Artigo Revisado por pares

Clint Eastwood and Male Weepies

2009; Oxford University Press; Volume: 22; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1093/alh/ajp051

ISSN

1468-4365

Autores

Tania Modleski,

Tópico(s)

Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism

Resumo

I think it was Playboy's posting of the 10 worst chick flicks that clinched it for me—the decision to do a project on male weepies. According to the Playboy editors, the research necessary for them to complete their task was the most excruciating torture mankind has had to endure, making, they say with great cultural sensitivity, Abu Ghraib look like Club Med. Never mind that many of Abu Ghraib's victims could very well have been forced to look at images from videos and magazines like Playboy as part of their torture or that the photos taken by the soldiers forced inmates to assume stock porn images ripped from the pages of today's men's magazines. Watching those obscene women's films brought human suffering to a whole new level for our heroic Playboy editors. I could just weep for them. And that is the point. It is my contention that in many male weepies (or male melodramas), real men do not cry, or at best they shed only a few hard-wrung tears; others do the crying for them—usually women and people of color. I am therefore not so much interested in those films like Field of Dreams (1989) which are frankly melodramatic and, for instance, in the case of Field of Dreams, position the spectator as a little boy; rather I want to examine those movies featuring a strong, stoic type whose sorrow lurks under the surface but who is wept over by other characters and by the audience. Who better to turn to in considering the melodramatic potential of such a character type than the iconic figure of Clint Eastwood? In what follows, I will be analyzing certain aspects of Eastwood's relatively recent films. One of my main interests lies in the reaction of melancholy spectators/critics/reviewers who project their “cinematic grief” onto the heroes of the films, and most of all, onto the figure of Eastwood himself. (Indeed, we shall see that reviewers and critics of Eastwood films continually slide between talking about Eastwood characters and Eastwood the man.) Above all, I am hoping to revive an interest in the writing of those feminist scholars—and one in particular—whose path-breaking work on melancholia, one of the most popular subjects in contemporary theory, was lost before it was given its due.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX