Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the Austrian and the American Constitution
1942; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 4; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2307/2125770
ISSN1468-2508
Autores Tópico(s)Judicial and Constitutional Studies
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessJudicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the Austrian and the American ConstitutionHans KelsenHans KelsenPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 4, Number 2May, 1942 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2125770 Views: 166Total views on this site Citations: 58Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Diego Werneck Arguelhes Ellwanger e as transformações do Supremo Tribunal Federal: um novo começo?, Revista Direito e Práxis 13, no.33 (Jul 2022): 1530–1584.https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2021/54758Karl Kössler, Yonatan T. Fessha Federalism and the Courts, (Mar 2022): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_211-1Willem Mingelen, Jerfi Uzman Courts as Consiglieri: Advisory Opinions in a Comparative Constitutional Perspective, (Jun 2022): 245–276.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-535-5_11Benjamin G. Engst Judicial Power in Germany and the European Union, (Apr 2021): 79–116.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7_3Andras Gal Beyond "unwinding": Constitutional review strategies in consociations, Nations and Nationalism 26, no.33 (Feb 2020): 594–610.https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12599Lydia Brashear Tiede Mixed Judicial Selection and Constitutional Review, Comparative Political Studies 53, no.77 (Oct 2019): 1092–1123.https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019879961Rosa M. Navarrete, Pablo Castillo-Ortiz Constitutional courts and citizens' perceptions of judicial systems in Europe, Comparative European Politics 18, no.22 (Jan 2019): 128–150.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00154-9Evelyne Maes The Independence of the Belgian Constitutional Court, (Dec 2019): 13–40.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-359-7_2Francesco Biagi European Constitutional Courts and Transitions to Democracy, 100 (Dec 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108776783Pablo Castillo-Ortiz The Illiberal Abuse of Constitutional Courts in Europe, European Constitutional Law Review 15, no.11 (May 2019): 48–72.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000026Isaac Owusu-Mensah, Joanna Rice The judiciary and democracy in Ghana's Fourth Republic, Journal of African Elections (Oct 2018): 44–65.https://doi.org/10.20940/JAE/2018/v17i2a3Anine Kierulf Judicial Review in Norway, 76 (Sep 2018).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108617727Ivan S. Grigoriev Law clerks as an instrument of court–government accommodation under autocracy: the case of the Russian Constitutional Court, Post-Soviet Affairs 34, no.11 (Dec 2017): 17–34.https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1408927João Andrade Neto A Constitutional Court Looking for Justification, (Nov 2018): 233–281.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02263-1_6Sascha Kneip Constitutional Courts in Democracy: Inducing or Preventing Crisis?, (Mar 2018): 325–348.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72559-8_14Paolo Carrozza Kelsen and Contemporary Constitutionalism: The Continued Presence of Kelsenian Themes, (May 2017): 75–98.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51817-6_5Ming-Sung Kuo In the Shadow of Judicial Supremacy: Putting the Idea of Judicial Dialogue in Its Place, Ratio Juris 29, no.11 (Sep 2015): 83–104.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12093David Ingram A Morally Enlightened Positivism? Kelsen and Habermas on the Democratic Roots of Validity in Municipal and International Law, (Aug 2016): 175–213.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33130-0_10Nikolai G. Wenzel Descartes, Rousseau, de Gaulle: France's Constitutional Waltz of Plebiscitarian Caesarism, Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines 22, no.22 (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.1515/jeeh-2015-0008Pan Mohamad Faiz Dimensi Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Dimensions of Judicial Activism in the Constitutional Court Decisions), SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847500Sascha Kneip Verfassungsgerichte in der Demokratie, (Nov 2014): 407–438.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05945-3_14Carolina Arlota, Nuno M. Garoupa Do Specialized Courts Make a Difference? Evidence from Brazilian State Supreme Courts, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2591141Fan Jizeng Constitutional Transplant in the People's Republic of China: The Influence of the Soviet Model and Challenges in the Globalization Era, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2657404Nikolai G. Wenzel Lessons from Constitutional Culture and the History of Constitutional Transfer: A Hope for Constitutionally Limited Government?, International Advances in Economic Research 20, no.22 (Mar 2014): 213–226.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-014-9462-3Wang Zhenmin, Tu Kai Chinese constitutional dynamics, (Apr 2014): 118–140.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338333.007David Ingram Reconciling positivism and realism, Philosophy & Social Criticism 40, no.33 (Mar 2014): 237–267.https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453713520164Jean-Louis Halpérin Modern Constitutionalism: A Chain of Revolutions Always in Progress, (Jul 2014): 73–110.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05888-7_3Dimitrios A. Kourtis The Notion of Hierarchy Under the Light of the Founding Fathers' Magna Opera: The Ideological Structure of the Early Jus Gentium and its Implications on the Current Debate About the Order of Values and Normative Hierarchy, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2546174Guillaume Tusseau A Plea for a Hint of Empiricism in Constitutional Theory: A Comment on Cesare Pinelli's Constitutional Reasoning and Political Deliberation, German Law Journal 14, no.88 (Mar 2019): 1183–1194.https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200002224Nikolai G. Wenzel Judicial Review and Constitutional Maintenance: John Marshall, Hans Kelsen, and the Popular Will, PS: Political Science & Politics 46, no.0303 (Jun 2013): 591–598.https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651300053XAnthony J. Evans, Nikolai G. Wenzel A framework for the study of firms as constitutional orders, Constitutional Political Economy 24, no.11 (Nov 2012): 2–18.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-012-9129-0Albert H. Y. Chen The Global Expansion of Constitutional Judicial Review: Some Historical and Comparative Perspectives, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2210340Courtney Jung, Ran Hirschl, Evan Rosevear Economic and Social Rights in National Constitutions, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2349680Tomasz Stawecki Autonomous Constitutional Interpretation, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 25, no.44 (Oct 2011): 505–535.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-011-9243-8Elaine Mak Judicial Review of Regulatory Instruments: The Least Imperfect Alternative?, Legisprudence 6, no.33 (Sep 2015): 301–319.https://doi.org/10.5235/17521467.6.3.301 The quest to intellectualize statute law, (Nov 2012): 57–91.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139135009.007Fabio Padovano, Nadia Fiorino Strategic delegation and "judicial couples" in the Italian Constitutional Court, International Review of Law and Economics 32, no.22 (Jun 2012): 215–223.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2012.01.002Stefan Voigt On the optimal number of courts, International Review of Law and Economics 32, no.11 (Mar 2012): 49–62.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2011.12.008Alicia Hinarejos Social Legitimacy and the Court of Justice of the EU: Some Reflections on the Role of the Advocate General, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 14 (Oct 2017): 615–633.https://doi.org/10.5235/152888712805580525Nuno Garoupa, Tom Ginsburg Hybrid Judicial Career Structures, Journal of Legal Analysis 3, no.22 (Oct 2011): 411–448.https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lar004Jerg Gutmann, Bernd Hayo, Stefan Voigt Determinants of Constitutionally Safeguarded Judicial Review – Insights Based on a New Indicator, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1947244Nikolai G. Wenzel Constitutional Culture in Japan and the Philippines: Success and Failure in Post-War Constitutional Choice, Pacific Focus 25, no.33 (Nov 2010): 396–416.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1976-5118.2010.01051.xNikolai Wenzel From contract to mental model: Constitutional culture as a fact of the social sciences, The Review of Austrian Economics 23, no.11 (Apr 2009): 55–78.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-009-0086-4Klaus von Beyme Modell für neue Demokratien? Die Vorbildrolle des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, (Jan 2010): 165–179.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92337-6_11Stefan Voigt On the Optimal Number of Courts, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1689003Sofia Amaral-Garcia, Nuno Garoupa, Veronica Grembi Judicial Independence and Party Politics in the Kelsenian Constitutional Courts: The Case of Portugal, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6, no.22 (Jun 2009): 381–404.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01147.xCristina E. Parau Beyond Judicial Independence: What Kind of Judiciary is Emerging in Post-Communist Eastern Europe?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1523285KRISTIAN SKAGEN EKELI Green Constitutionalism: The Constitutional Protection of Future Generations, Ratio Juris 20, no.33 (Sep 2007): 378–401.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00366.xKristian Skagen Ekeli Hvem skal vokte vokterne? Modeller for håndheving av konstitusjonelle lover, Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 117, no.4-054-05 (Apr 2005): 548–579.https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3096-2004-04-05-03John A. Ferejohn, Frances McCall Rosenbluth, Charles R. Shipan Comparative Judicial Politics, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2004).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1154123Larry Cata Backer Restraining Power from Below: The European's Constitution Text and the Effectiveness of Protection of Member State Power within the EU Framework, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2004).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.581341Martin Borowski The Beginnings of Germany's Federal Constitutional Court, Ratio Juris 16, no.22 (Jun 2003): 155–186.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00230Theo Ohlinger The Genesis of the Austrian Model of Constitutional Review of Legislation, Ratio Juris 16, no.22 (Jun 2003): 206–222.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00233Stanley L. Paulson Constitutional Review in the United States and Austria: Notes on the Beginnings, Ratio Juris 16, no.22 (Jun 2003): 223–239.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00234Georg Schmitz The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Austria 1918-1920, Ratio Juris 16, no.22 (Jun 2003): 240–265.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00235Michael Mandel A Brief History of the New Constitutionalism, or "How We Changed Everything So That Everything Would Remain the Same", Israel Law Review 32, no.22 (Jul 2014): 250–300.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700015661F. Rubio Llorente Constitutional Jurisdiction as Law-Making, (Jan 1988): 156–185.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73052-8_5David Deener Judicial Review in Modern Constitutional Systems, American Political Science Review 46, no.44 (Sep 2013): 1079–1099.https://doi.org/10.2307/1952114
Referência(s)