So how much of your error is epistemic? Lessons from Japan and Italy
2012; Wiley; Volume: 27; Issue: 11 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/hyp.9648
ISSN1099-1085
Autores Tópico(s)Flood Risk Assessment and Management
ResumoHydrological ProcessesVolume 27, Issue 11 p. 1677-1680 Invited Commentary So how much of your error is epistemic? Lessons from Japan and Italy Keith Beven, Corresponding Author Keith Beven Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK Department of Earth Sciences, GeoCentrum, Uppsala University, Sweden Laboratoire d'Ecohydrologie (ECHO), ENAC, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland Centre for Analysis of Time Series, London School of Economics, London, UK Correspondence to: Keith Beven, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Keith Beven, Corresponding Author Keith Beven Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK Department of Earth Sciences, GeoCentrum, Uppsala University, Sweden Laboratoire d'Ecohydrologie (ECHO), ENAC, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland Centre for Analysis of Time Series, London School of Economics, London, UK Correspondence to: Keith Beven, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 19 November 2012 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9648Citations: 32Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Beven KJ. 2011. I believe in climate change but how precautionary do we need to be in planning for the future? Hydrological Processes 25: 1517–1520. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7939 10.1002/hyp.7939 Web of Science®Google Scholar Beven KJ. 2012. Causal models as multiple working hypotheses about environmental processes. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, Académie de Sciences, Paris. doi: 10.1016/j.crte.2012.01.005 10.1016/j.crte.2012.01.005 Web of Science®Google Scholar Beven KJ, Westerberg I. 2011. On red herrings and real herrings: disinformation and information in hydrological inference. Hydrological Processes 25: 1676–1680. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7963 10.1002/hyp.7963 Web of Science®Google Scholar Beven K, Smith PJ, Wood A. 2011. On the colour and spin of epistemic error (and what we might do about it). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 3123–3133. doi: 10.5194/hess-15-3123-2011 10.5194/hess‐15‐3123‐2011 Web of Science®Google Scholar Beven KJ, Smith PJ, Westerberg I, Freer JE. 2012. Comment on Clark et al., Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling, W09301, 2011. Water Resources Research 48. doi: 10.1029/2012WR012282 10.1029/2012WR012282 Google Scholar Clark M, Kavetski D, Fenicia F. 2011. Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling. Water Resour. Res 47: W09301. 10.1029/2010WR009827 Web of Science®Google Scholar Clark M, Kavetski D, Fenicia F. 2012. Reply to comments by Beven et al. on Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling. Water Resources Research 48. doi: 10.1029/2012WR012547 10.1029/2012WR012547 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar Der Kiureghiana A, Ditlevsen O. 2009. Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety 31: 105–112. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020 Web of Science®Google Scholar Golding B, Clark P, May B. 2005. The Boscastle flood: Meteorological analysis of the conditions leading to flooding on 16 August 2004. Weather 60: 230–235. 10.1256/wea.71.05 Google Scholar Helton JC, Burmaster DE. 1996. Guest editorial: treatment of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in performance assessments for complex systems. Reliabilty Engineering and Systems Safety 54: 91–94. 10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00066-X Web of Science®Google Scholar Hoffman FO, Hammonds JS. 1994. Propagation of unccrtainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty duc to variability. Risk Analysis 14: 707–712. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00281.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kaplan S, Garrick BJ. 1981. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1: 11–27. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Knight FH. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton-Mifflin Co. (reprinted University of Chicago Press, 1971): Boston, MA. Google Scholar Koutsoyiannis D. 2010. HESS Opinions "A random walk on water". Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 14: 585–601. 10.5194/hess-14-585-2010 Web of Science®Google Scholar Koutsoyiannis D. 2011. Hurst-Kolmogorov Dynamics and Uncertainty. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47: 481–495. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00543.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Montanari A, Koutsoyiannis D. 2012. A blueprint for process-based modeling of uncertain hydrological systems. Water Resources Research 48: W09555. doi: 10.1029/2011WR011412 10.1029/2011WR011412 Web of Science®Google Scholar Morgan MG, Henrion M. 1992. Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Google Scholar Rougier J, Beven KJ. 2012. Epistemic uncertainty. In Risk and uncertainty assessment for natural hazards, J Rougier, S Sparks, L Hill (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, in press. Google Scholar Silbergeld EK. 1987. Five types of ambiguity: scientific uncertainty in risk assessment. Hazardous Waste & Hazardous Materials 4: 139–150. 10.1089/hwm.1987.4.139 Web of Science®Google Scholar Taleb NN. 2007. Fooled by Randomness. Penguin: London. Google Scholar Taleb NN. 2010. The Black Swan, 2nd edn. Penguin: London. Google Scholar Wakker P. 2010. Prospect Theory for Risk and Ambiguity. CUP: Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9780511779329 Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume27, Issue1130 May 2013Pages 1677-1680 This article also appears in:HPToday: Invited Commentaries ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)