Re‐examining the Role of Executive Functions in Routine Action Productiona
1995; Wiley; Volume: 769; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38148.x
ISSN1749-6632
Autores Tópico(s)Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
ResumoAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesVolume 769, Issue 1 p. 321-336 Re-examining the Role of Executive Functions in Routine Action Productiona MYRNA F. SCHWARTZ, MYRNA F. SCHWARTZ Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute 1200 West Tabor Road Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141 e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author MYRNA F. SCHWARTZ, MYRNA F. SCHWARTZ Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute 1200 West Tabor Road Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141 e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author First published: December 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38148.xCitations: 23 a This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant No. 1R01 NS31824-02. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL NOTES AND REFERENCES A. I am indebted to Prof. J. Reason for allowing me to review the original diaries. The intended/did format used in Table 1 represents my own reconstruction of the diary entries. The classification of the errors is also mine. B. A complete enumeration of the constituents, or units, of action plans would have to include representations of the direction of movement, the effectors, and the number of times the movement is repeated, in addition to the nature of the action, the objects of the action, and their respective locations. See ref. 20 for relevant evidence. C. J. K.'s attentional functions were evaluated as part of a large study of attentional deficits in traumatic brain injury conducted at the Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute by Dr. John Whyte. Luria, A. R. 1966. Higher Cortical Functions in Man. Basic Books. New York . Norman, D. A. & T. Shallice. 1980. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior (CHIP No. 99). University of California, San Diego . Stuss, D. T. & D. F. Benson. 1986. The Frontal Lobes. Raven Press. New York . Fuster, J. M. 1989. The Prefrontal Cortex (2nd edit.). Raven Press. New York . Canavan, A. G. M., I. Janota & P. H. Schurr. 1985. Luria's frontal lobe syndrome: Psychological and anatomical considerations. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 48: 1049– 1053. Baars, B. J. 1992a. Experimental Slips and Human Error: Exploring the Architecture of Volition. Plenum. New York . Reason, J. T. 1984. Lapses of attention in everyday life. In Varieties of Attention. R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies, Eds.: 515– 549. Academic Press. Orlando , FL . Reason, J. T. 1990. Human Error. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge , UK . MacKay, D. G. 1985. A theory of the representation, organization and timing of action with implications for sequencing disorders. In Neuropsychological Studies of Apraxia and Related Disorders. E. A. Roy, Ed.: 267– 308. North-Holland. Amsterdam . Norman, D. A. 1981. Categorization of action slips. Psychol. Rev. 88: 1– 15. Sellen, A. J. & D. A. Norman. 1992. The psychology of slips. In Experimental Slips and Human Error. Exploring the Architecture of Volition. B. J. Baars, Ed. Plenum. New York . Norman, D. A. & T. Shallice. 1986. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In Consciousness and Self-Regulation, Vol. 4. R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro, Eds. Plenum. New York . Shallice, T. 1982. Specific impairments of planning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B29: 199– 209. Shallice, T. 1988. From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge , UK . Baars, B. J. 1992b. The many uses of error: Twelve steps to a unified framework. In Experimental Slips and Human Error. Exploring the Architecture of Volition. B. J. Baars, Ed. Plenum. New York . Reason, J. T. 1979. Actions not as planned: The price of automatization. In Aspects of Consciousness. Vol. 1. Psychological Issues. G. Underwood & R. Stevens, Eds.: 67– 89. Academic Press. London . Reason, J. T. & K. Mycielska. 1982. Absent Minded? The Psychology of Mental Lapses and Everyday Errors. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs , NJ . Baars, B. J. & M. T. Motley. 1976. Spoonerisms as sequencer conflicts: Evidence from artificially elicited errors. Am. J. Psychol. 89: 467– 484. Baars, B. J., M. T. Motley & D. G. Mackay. 1975. Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 14: 382– 391. Mattson, M. E. & B. J. Baars. 1992. Laboratory induction of nonspeech action errors. In Experimental Slips and Human Error. B. J. Baars, Ed. Plenum. New York . Reason, J. T. 1992. Cognitive underspecification: Its variety and consequences. In Experimental Slips and Human Error. Exploring the Architecture of Volition. B. J. Baars, Ed. Plenum. New York . Schwartz, M. F., E. S. Reed, M. W. Montgomery, C. Palmer & M. H. Mayer. 1991. The quantitative description of action disorganization after brain damage: A case study. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 8: 381– 414. Gibson, E. & N. Rader. 1979. The perceiver as performer. In Attention and Cognitive Development. G. A. Hale & M. Lewis, Eds. Plenum. New York . Allport, A. 1987. Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In Perspectives on Perception and Action. H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders, Eds.: 395– 420. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale , NJ . Allport, A. 1990. Visual attention. In Foundations of Cognitive Science. M. I. Posner, Ed.: 631– 682. MIT Press. Cambridge , MA . Duncan, J. 1993. Selection of input and goal in the control of behaviour. In Attention: Selection, awareness and control. A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz, Eds. Clarendon Press. Oxford , UK . Duncan, J. 1986. Disorganization of behaviour after frontal lobe damage. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 3: 271– 290. Heilman, K. M. & E. Valenstein. 1972. Frontal lobe neglect in man. Neurology 22: 660– 664. Mesulam, M-M. 1981. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann. Neurol. 10: 309– 325. Posner, M. I. & M. E. Raichle. 1994. Images of Mind. Sci. Am. Library. New York . Kimberg, D. Y. & M. J. Farah. 1993. A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: The role of working memory in complex, organized behavior. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 122: 411– 428. Goldman-Rakic, P. S. 1987. Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory. In Handbook of Physiology: The Nervous System, Vol. 5. F. Plum, Ed.: 373– 417. American Physiological Society. Bethesda , MD . Holyoak, K. J. 1995. Forms of reasoning. Insight into prefrontal functions. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. This volume. Mayer, N. H., D. Keating & D. Rapp. 1986. Skills, routines, and activity patterns of daily living: A functional nested approach. In Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention. B. P. Uzzell & Y. Gross, Eds.: 205– 222. Martinus Nijhoff. Boston , MA . Mayer, N. H., E. S. Reed, M. F. Schwartz, M. W. Montgomery & C. Palmer. 1990. Buttering a cup of hot coffee: An approach to the study of errors of action after brain damage. In The Neuropsychology of Everyday Life: Assessment and Basic Competencies. K. Cicerone & D. Tupper, Ed.: 259– 283. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Boston , MA . Schwartz, M. F., M. W. Montgomery, E. J. Fitzpatrick-DeSalme, C. Ochipa, H. B. Coslett & N. H. Mayer. Analysis of a disorder of everyday action. Cogn. Neuropsychol. In press. Buxbaum, L. J., M. F. Schwartz, H. B. Coslett & T. G. Carew. 1995. Everyday action and praxis in callosal apraxia. Neurocase 1: 3– 17. Schwartz, M. F., E. J. Fitzpatrick-DeSalme & T. G. Carew. 1995. The multiple objects test for ideational apraxia: Etiology and task effects on error profiles (Abstract). J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 1: 149. Shallice, T., P. W. Burgess, F. Schon & D. M. Baxter. 1989. The origins of utilisation behaviour. Brain 112: 1587– 1598. Schwartz, M. F., N. H. Mayer, E. J. Fitzpatrick & M. W. Montgomery. 1993. Cognitive theory and the study of everyday action disorders after brain damage. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 8: 59– 72. Stuss, D. T., T. Shallice & M. Alexander. 1995. A multidisciplinary approach to anterior attentional functions. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. This volume. Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working Memory. Clarendon Press. Oxford , UK . Baddeley, A. D. 1993. Working memory or working attention? In Attention: Selection, Awareness and Control. A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz, Eds. Clarendon Press. Oxford , UK . Roy, E. A. 1983. Neuropsychological perspectives on apraxia and related disorders. In Memory and Control of Action. R. A. Magill, Ed.: 293– 320. North-Holland. Amsterdam . Poeck, K. & G. Lehmkuhl. 1980. Ideatory apraxia in a left-handed patient with rightsided brain lesion. Cortex 16: 273– 284. DeRenzi, E. & F. Lucchelli. 1988. Ideational apraxia. Brain 111: 1173– 1185. Schwartz, M. F. & L. J. Buxbaum. Pragmatic action. In Apraxia. L. J. G. Rothi & K. M. Heilman, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale , NJ. In press . De Renzi, E., A. Pieczuro & L. A. Vignolo. 1968. Ideational apraxia: A quantitative study. Neuropsychologia 6: 41– 52. Liepmann, H. 1905. The left hemisphere and action. Translations from Liepmann's Essays on Apraxia, D. Kimura (Trans.), 1980. University of Western Ontario. London , Ontario . Poeck, K. 1985. Clues to the nature of disruptions to limb praxis. In Neuropsychological Studies of Apraxia and Related Disorders. E. A. Roy, Ed: 99– 110. North-Holland. Amsterdam . Marsden, C. D. 1982. The mysterious motor function of the basal ganglia: The Robert Wartenberg Lecture. Neurology 32: 514– 539. Citing Literature Volume769, Issue1Structure and Functions of the Human Prefrontal CortexDecember 1995Pages 321-336 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)