What’s in a song? Female bushcrickets discriminate against the song of older males
1995; Royal Society; Volume: 262; Issue: 1363 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1098/rspb.1995.0171
ISSN1471-2954
AutoresMichael G. Ritchie, Iain D. Couzin, Wayne A. Snedden,
Tópico(s)Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
ResumoRestricted accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Ritchie Michael G. , Couzin Iain and Snedden W. Andrew 1995What's in a song? Female bushcrickets discriminate against the song of older malesProc. R. Soc. Lond. B.26221–27http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0171SectionRestricted accessArticleWhat's in a song? Female bushcrickets discriminate against the song of older males Michael G. Ritchie Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Iain Couzin Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and W. Andrew Snedden Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Michael G. Ritchie Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed , Iain Couzin Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed and W. Andrew Snedden Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Published:23 October 1995https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0171AbstractThe striking songs of insects such as bushcrickets have traditionally been interpreted as species recognition signals. If this is so, their information content should be relatively simple. Females should discriminate against atypical songs, but not between common differences between males. Alternatively, female preference may have evolved by sexual selection with variation between males providing reliable cues on which females discriminate among potential mates, or sensory biases may predispose females towards a particular form of song. We examined how the calling song of the bushcricket Ephippiger ephippiger varies in natural populations. Song structure changes over the course of a season, reflecting wear of the stridulatory apparatus. Males vary substantially in the rate at which they show ageing effects. Superimposed on this are consistent differences between males and temperature effects. This sexual signal therefore contains potentially reliable cues which females could use during mate choice. When presented with artificial songs that reproduce some of the song variants associated with older males, females show extremely strong preferences for unmanipulated song, typical of young males. These aspects of female preference will exert sexual selection on males, whether they originate for adaptive or arbitrary reasons.FootnotesThis text was harvested from a scanned image of the original document using optical character recognition (OCR) software. As such, it may contain errors. Please contact the Royal Society if you find an error you would like to see corrected. Mathematical notations produced through Infty OCR. Previous ArticleNext Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited by Rebrina F, Anichini M, Reinhold K and Lehmann G (2020) Allometric scaling in two bushcricket species (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) suggests sexual selection on song-generating structures, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10.1093/biolinnean/blaa122, 131:3, (521-535), Online publication date: 6-Nov-2020. Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Hopwood P, Fisher D, Skicko I, Tucker R, Woodcock K, Slate J, Walling C and Tregenza T (2019) Older males attract more females but get fewer matings in a wild field cricket, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.04.011, 153, (1-14), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019. Anichini M, Kuchenreuther S and Lehmann G (2016) Allometry of male sound-producing structures indicates sexual selection on wing size and stridulatory teeth density in a bushcricket, Journal of Zoology, 10.1111/jzo.12419, 301:4, (271-279), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017. Cusano D, Matthews L, Grapstein E and Parks S (2016) Effects of Increasing Temperature on Acoustic Advertisement in the Tettigoniidae, Journal of Orthoptera Research, 10.1665/034.025.0101, 25:1, (39-47), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016. Archer C and Hunt J (2015) Understanding the link between sexual selection, sexual conflict and aging using crickets as a model, Experimental Gerontology, 10.1016/j.exger.2015.06.017, 71, (4-13), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2015. Hartbauer M, Siegert M and Römer H (2015) Male age and female mate choice in a synchronizing katydid, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 10.1007/s00359-015-1012-9, 201:8, (763-772), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015. Pitchers W, Klingenberg C, Tregenza T, Hunt J and Dworkin I (2014) The potential influence of morphology on the evolutionary divergence of an acoustic signal, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/jeb.12471, 27:10, (2163-2176), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014. Zhu D, Cui S, Fan Y and Liu Z (2012) Adaptive strategies of overwintering adults: Reproductive diapause and mating behavior in a grasshopper, Stenocatantops splendens (Orthoptera: Catantopidae) , Insect Science, 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2011.01493.x, 20:2, (235-244), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013. Amin M, Bussière L and Goulson D (2011) Effects of Male age and Size on Mating Success in the Bumblebee Bombus terrestris, Journal of Insect Behavior, 10.1007/s10905-011-9306-4, 25:4, (362-374), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012. Deb R, Bhattacharya M and Balakrishnan R (2012) Females of a tree cricket prefer larger males but not the lower frequency male calls that indicate large body size, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.020, 84:1, (137-149), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012. Arias A, Márquez R, Llusia D, Beltrán J, Slimani T, Radi M, Fattah A and El Mouden E (2012) Effects of temperature on the song parameters of the Moroccan bushcricket Eugaster spinulosa (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) , Bioacoustics, 10.1080/09524622.2012.686185, 21:3, (225-238), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2012. Liu X, Xu J, He H, Kuang X and Xue F (2010) Male Age Affects Female Mate Preference and Reproductive Performance in the Cabbage Beetle, Colaphellus bowringi, Journal of Insect Behavior, 10.1007/s10905-010-9237-5, 24:2, (83-93), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011. Verburgt L, Ferreira M and Ferguson J (2011) Male field cricket song reflects age, allowing females to prefer young males, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.010, 81:1, (19-29), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011. Kuriwada T and Kasuya E (2010) Age-dependent changes in calling effort in the bell cricket Meloimorpha japonica, Journal of Ethology, 10.1007/s10164-010-0231-3, 29:1, (99-105), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011. De Luca P and Cocroft R (2011) The Influence of Age on Male Mate-Searching Behaviour in Thornbug Treehoppers, Ethology, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01893.x, 117:5, (440-450), Online publication date: 1-May-2011. Shelly T, Edu J and Pahio E (2010) Female Medflies Mate Selectively with Young Males but Gain No Apparent Fitness Benefits, Journal of Insect Behavior, 10.1007/s10905-010-9236-6, 24:1, (55-66), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011. Judge K (2011) Do male field crickets, Gryllus pennsylvanicus, signal their age?, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.032, 81:1, (185-194), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011. Jang S, An H and Jang Y (2010) Calling song and phonotactic selectivity in the field cricket Teleogryllus emma (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), Journal of Ecology and Environment, 10.5141/JEFB.2010.33.4.307, 33:4, (307-315), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010. Milonas P and Andow D (2010) Virgin male age and mating success in Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.005, 79:2, (509-514), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010. COLE J (2010) Clinal variation explains taxonomic discrepancy in the calling songs of shield-back katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigoniinae: Aglaothorax), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01532.x, 101:4, (910-921), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010. GASPARINI C, MARINO I, BOSCHETTO C and PILASTRO A (2010) Effect of male age on sperm traits and sperm competition success in the guppy ( Poecilia reticulata ) , Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01889.x, 23:1, (124-135), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010. De Luca P and Cocroft R (2009) Age-related changes in an insect mating signal have no effect on female choice, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-009-0803-9, 63:12, (1787-1798), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009. Nityananda V and Balakrishnan R (2008) Leaders and followers in katydid choruses in the field: call intensity, spacing and consistency, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.04.015, 76:3, (723-735), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2008. Avent T, Price T and Wedell N (2008) Age-based female preference in the fruit fly Drosophila pseudoobscura, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.015, 75:4, (1413-1421), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2008. Jacot A, Scheuber H and Brinkhof M (2007) The Effect of Age on a Sexually Selected Acoustic Display, Ethology, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01360.x, 113:6, (615-620), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2007. Kindle T, Johnson K, Ivy T, Weddle C and Sakaluk S (2006) Female mating frequency increases with temperature in two cricket species, Gryllodes sigillatus and Acheta domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), Canadian Journal of Zoology, 10.1139/z06-127, 84:9, (1345-1350), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2006. Reproduction Entomology, 10.1007/1-4020-3183-1_19, (561-596) Orci K, Nagy B, Szövényi G, Rácz I and Varga Z (2005) A comparative study on the song and morphology of Isophya stysi and Isophya modestior (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae), Zoologischer Anzeiger - A Journal of Comparative Zoology, 10.1016/j.jcz.2004.11.002, 244:1, (31-42), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2005. JACOT A, SCHEUBER H, KURTZ J and BRINKHOF M (2005) Juvenile immune status affects the expression of a sexually selected trait in field crickets, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00899.x, 18:4, (1060-1068), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2005. Jones T and Elgar M (2004) The role of male age, sperm age and mating history on fecundity and fertilization success in the hide beetle, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271:1545, (1311-1318), Online publication date: 22-Jun-2004. Wedell N and Ritchie M (2004) Male age, mating status and nuptial gift quality in a bushcricket, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.007, 67:6, (1059-1065), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2004. Orci K and Heller K (2004) A description of the song of Isophya modesta modesta (Frivaldszky 1867) with notes on its relationship to I. modesta rossica Bey-Bienko, 1954, Journal of Orthoptera Research, 10.1665/1082-6467(2004)013[0211:ADOTSO]2.0.CO;2, 13:2, (211-219), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004. LeBas N, Hockham L and Ritchie M (2004) SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE GIFT-GIVING DANCE FLY, RHAMPHOMYIA SULCATA, FAVORS SMALL MALES CARRYING SMALL GIFTS, Evolution, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00459.x, 58:8, (1763-1772), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2004. LeBas N, Hockham L and Ritchie M (2004) SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE GIFT-GIVING DANCE FLY, RHAMPHOMYIA SULCATA, FAVORS SMALL MALES CARRYING SMALL GIFTS, Evolution, 10.1554/03-659, 58:8, (1763), . Sattman D and Cocroft R (2003) Phenotypic Plasticity and Repeatability in the Mating Signals of Enchenopa Treehoppers, with Implications for Reduced Gene Flow among Host-Shifted Populations , Ethology, 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00940.x, 109:12, (981-994), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003. Orci K, Ragge D and Reynolds W (2002) A re-examination of the taxonomy of Euchorthippus pulvinatus and related species on the basis of morphology and song (Orthoptera: Acrididae), Journal of Natural History, 10.1080/00222930010022908, 36:5, (585-600), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2002. Ritchie M (2000) The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267:1441, (327-332), Online publication date: 22-Feb-2000.Shaw K and Herlihy D (2000) Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267:1443, (577-584), Online publication date: 22-Mar-2000.Jones T, Balmford A and Quinnell R (2000) Adaptive female choice for middle–aged mates in a lekking sandfly, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267:1444, (681-686), Online publication date: 7-Apr-2000. Allen G (2000) Call Structure Variability and Field Survival among Bushcrickets Exposed to Phonotactic Parasitoids, Ethology, 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00550.x, 106:5, (409-423), Online publication date: 1-May-2000. Martin S, Gray D and Cade W (2000) Fine-scale temperature effects on cricket calling song, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 10.1139/z99-262, 78:5, (706-712), Online publication date: 1-May-2000. SNEDDEN W and GREENFIELD M (1998) Females prefer leading males: relative call timing and sexual selection in katydid choruses, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.1998.0871, 56:5, (1091-1098), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1998. Allen G (2010) Diel Calling Activity and Field Survival of the Bushcricket, Sciarasaga quadrata (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): A Role for Sound-locating Parasitic Flies?, Ethology, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00099.x, 104:8, (645-660) Greenfield M (1997) Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Advertisement Signals Communication, 10.1007/978-1-4899-1745-4_6, (145-177), . Simmons L and Ritchie M (1997) Symmetry in the songs of crickets, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 263:1375, (1305-1311), Online publication date: 22-Oct-1996. Ritchie M (1996) The shape of female mating preferences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14628, 93:25, (14628-14631), Online publication date: 10-Dec-1996. Jang Y and Perc M (2011) Male Responses to Conspecific Advertisement Signals in the Field Cricket Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0016063, 6:1, (e16063) This Issue23 October 1995Volume 262Issue 1363 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0171Published by:Royal SocietyPrint ISSN:0962-8452Online ISSN:1471-2954History: Manuscript received26/05/1995Manuscript accepted28/06/1995Published online01/01/1997Published in print23/10/1995 License:Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society Citations and impact Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad
Referência(s)