Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Comparison of newborn hearing screening by transient otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response using ALGO-2®

1998; Elsevier BV; Volume: 43; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/s0165-5876(98)00007-x

1872-8464

Karen Jo Doyle, Sharon Fujikawa, Paula Rogers, Erin Newman,

Noise Effects and Management

The aim of this study is to compare pass rates for two different hearing screening methods in well newborns as a function of age. A previous study by this group compared click evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (ABR) using the ALGO-1® infant hearing screener (Natus Medical, Foster City, CA). Since that study, a new generation automated ABR screener, the ALGO-2®, has been developed. In this study, 232 ears in 116 healthy newborn infants aged 5–48 h were tested using the ALGO-2 screener and EOAE. Overall, 92% of ears passed the ABR, while 57% passed the EOAE screen. The ABR pass rate was higher than in the previous study, where 88.5% of ears passed the ABR screen using ALGO-1. The EOAE pass rate in the present study was lower than in the previous study, in which 79% passed the EOAE screen. Pass rates for both EOAE and ABR improved significantly with increasing infant age. There was no significant difference in the test time required for ALGO-2 (5.7 min) compared with EOAE (5.2 min). The results are compared with earlier studies and implications for universal hearing screening are discussed.