Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Cardiopulmonary bypass for adult patients: A survey of equipment and techniques

1995; Elsevier BV; Volume: 9; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/s1053-0770(05)80097-7

1532-8422

George Silvay, Tameshwar Ammar, David L. Reich, Frances Vela-Cantos, Denise Joffe, Arisan Ergin,

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Objectives: The techniques and equipment used for cardiopulmonary bypass for adult cardiac surgery vary among institutions and may change over time. This study sought to document the changing patterns of practice. Design: Voluntary survey of meeting participants. Setting: 13th Annual San Diego Cardiothoracic Surgery Symposium (February 1993). Participants: There were 331 responses from perfusionists (79.5%), cardiac surgeons (11.2%), and anesthesiologists (6.3%). The majority of these participants were from institutions where more than 1,000 cardiac operations were performed annually. Measurements and Main Results: It was found that 91.5% of the respondents used membrane oxygenators currently, compared with 5% in 1982 (as reported in a previous survey). Over 80% of the institutions surveyed used some type of perioperative cell-salvaging technique. Arterial line filters were used by 92% of the respondents compared with 64% in 1982. Also, 80% of the respondents were aware of the availability of leukocyte-depleting filters. Conclusions: The probable reasons for the increased utilization of membrane oxygenators and arterial line filters include less damage to the formed elements of blood, fewer gaseous microemboli, and better control of carbon dioxide elimination and oxygenation. The authors anticipate that future surveys will document increased use of leukocyte-depleting filters because of the literature implicating neutrophils as mediators of tissue destruction in various disease processes, including myocardial reperfusion injury. The techniques and equipment used for cardiopulmonary bypass for adult cardiac surgery vary among institutions and may change over time. This study sought to document the changing patterns of practice. Voluntary survey of meeting participants. 13th Annual San Diego Cardiothoracic Surgery Symposium (February 1993). There were 331 responses from perfusionists (79.5%), cardiac surgeons (11.2%), and anesthesiologists (6.3%). The majority of these participants were from institutions where more than 1,000 cardiac operations were performed annually. It was found that 91.5% of the respondents used membrane oxygenators currently, compared with 5% in 1982 (as reported in a previous survey). Over 80% of the institutions surveyed used some type of perioperative cell-salvaging technique. Arterial line filters were used by 92% of the respondents compared with 64% in 1982. Also, 80% of the respondents were aware of the availability of leukocyte-depleting filters. The probable reasons for the increased utilization of membrane oxygenators and arterial line filters include less damage to the formed elements of blood, fewer gaseous microemboli, and better control of carbon dioxide elimination and oxygenation. The authors anticipate that future surveys will document increased use of leukocyte-depleting filters because of the literature implicating neutrophils as mediators of tissue destruction in various disease processes, including myocardial reperfusion injury.