The Uses of Metaphor and Analogy: Toward a Renewal of Political Language
1974; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 36; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2307/2129472
ISSN1468-2508
AutoresElliot Zashin, Phillip C. Chapman,
Tópico(s)Public Policy and Administration Research
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessArticlesThe Uses of Metaphor and Analogy: Toward a Renewal of Political LanguageElliot Zashin, and Phillip C. ChapmanElliot Zashin Search for more articles by this author , and Phillip C. Chapman Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 36, Number 2May, 1974 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2129472 Views: 41Total views on this site Citations: 39Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1974 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jason Barabas, Benjamin Carter, Kevin Shan Analogical Framing: How Policy Comparisons Alter Political Support for Health Care Reform, American Politics Research 48, no.55 (Jun 2020): 596–611.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X20926125Richard Swedberg Using Metaphors in Sociology: Pitfalls and Potentials, The American Sociologist 51, no.22 (May 2020): 240–257.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09443-3 채유정 Metaphor, Metonymy, and Machine Translation, The Journal of Foreign Studies null, no.4646 (Dec 2018): 373–406.https://doi.org/10.15755/jfs.2018..46.373Andreas König, Jan Mammen, Johannes Thomas Luger, Angela Fehn, Albrecht Enders SILVER BULLET OR RICOCHET? CEOS’ USE OF METAPHORICAL COMMUNICATION AND INFOMEDIARIES’ EVALUATIONS, Academy of Management Journal (Sep 2017).https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0626Michael P. Marks The Significance of Metaphors in International Relations Theory, (Jan 2018): 1–30.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71201-7_1Nicole Dewandre, Political Agents as Relational Selves, Philosophy Today 62, no.22 (Jan 2018): 493–519.https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2018612222Nathan P. Kalmoe, Joshua R. Gubler, David A. Wood Toward Conflict or Compromise? How Violent Metaphors Polarize Partisan Issue Attitudes, Political Communication 28 (Sep 2017): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1341965Shu-Yun Ma Taking Evolution Seriously, or Metaphorically? A Review of Interactions between Historical Institutionalism and Darwinian Evolutionary Theory, Political Studies Review 14, no.22 (Dec 2015): 223–234.https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12059Joshua R. Gubler, Nathan P. Kalmoe Violent Rhetoric in Protracted Group Conflicts, Political Research Quarterly 68, no.44 (Dec 2015): 651–664.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915608947Caterina Carta Use of metaphors and international discourse: The EU as an Idiot power, a deceptive Pangloss and a Don Juan in his infancy, Cooperation and Conflict 49, no.33 (Sep 2014): 334–353.https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713494998Nathan P. Kalmoe, Joshua R. Gubler, David A. Wood Polarizing Partisans and the Prejudiced with Violent Metaphors, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2439278Hans-Joachim König La función de las imágenes en el proceso de construcción de las naciones latinoamericanas, (Jan 2014): 1–28.https://doi.org/10.7476/9789587385243.0002Alexander Spencer The social construction of terrorism: media, metaphors and policy implications, Journal of International Relations and Development 15, no.33 (Feb 2012): 393–419.https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2012.4Alexander Spencer Sic[k] of the ‘new terrorism’ debate? A response to our critics, Critical Studies on Terrorism 4, no.33 (Dec 2011): 459–467.https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2011.623428Victor C. Ottati, Randall A. Renstrom Metaphor and Persuasive Communication: A Multifunctional Approach, Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4, no.99 (Sep 2010): 783–794.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00292.xCOLLEEN L. BARRY, VICTORIA L. BRESCOLL, KELLY D. BROWNELL, MARK SCHLESINGER Obesity Metaphors: How Beliefs about the Causes of Obesity Affect Support for Public Policy, Milbank Quarterly 87, no.11 (Mar 2009): 7–47.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00546.xSarah Covington The Wounded Body Politic, (Jan 2009): 19–53.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101098_2Darren C. Brunk Curing the Somalia Syndrome: Analogy, Foreign Policy Decision Making, and the Rwandan Genocide, Foreign Policy Analysis 4, no.33 (Jul 2008): 301–320.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2008.00071.xELISABETH GIDENGIL, JOANNA EVERITT Talking Tough: Gender and Reported Speech in Campaign News Coverage, Political Communication 20, no.33 (Jul 2003): 209–232.https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390218869ALISON BRYSK, CRAIG PARSONS, WAYNE SANDHOLTZ After Empire: National Identity and Post-colonial Families of Nations, European Journal of International Relations 8, no.22 (Jul 2016): 267–305.https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008002004Mark Schlesinger, Richard R. Lau The Meaning and Measure of Policy Metaphors, American Political Science Review 94, no.33 (Aug 2014): 611–626.https://doi.org/10.2307/2585834Bryan B. Whaley, Lisa Smith Wagner Rebuttal Analogy in Persuasive Messages, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 19, no.11 (Jul 2016): 66–84.https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X00019001004Elisabeth Gidengil, Joanna Everitt Metaphors and Misrepresentation, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 4, no.11 (Sep 2016): 48–65.https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X99004001005Jeffery Scott Mio Metaphor and Politics, Metaphor and Symbol 12, no.22 (Jun 1997): 113–133.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1202_2Bryan B. Whaley Perceptions of Rebuttal Analogy: Politeness and Implications for Persuasion, Argumentation and Advocacy 33, no.44 (Jan 2018): 161–169.https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1997.11978015William N. Elwood Declaring War on the Home Front: Metaphor, Presidents, and the War on Drugs, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10, no.22 (Jun 1995): 93–114.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1002_2James Voss, Joel Kennet, Jennifer Wiley, Tonya Schooler Experts at Debate: The Use of Metaphor in the U.S. Senate Debate on the Gulf Crisis, Metaphor and Symbol 7, no.33 (Sep 1992): 197–214.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0703&4_6Stephen J. Read, Ian L. Cesa, David K. Jones, Nancy L. Collins When Is the Federal Budget Like a Baby? Metaphor in Political Rhetoric, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 5, no.33 (Sep 1990): 125–149.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0503_1 Bernard Grofman Richard Nixon as Pinocchio, Richard II, and Santa Claus: The Use of Allusion in Political Satire, The Journal of Politics 51, no.11 (Oct 2015): 165–173.https://doi.org/10.2307/2131614Nicholas Howe Metaphor in Contemporary American Political Discourse, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 3, no.22 (Jun 1988): 87–104.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0302_2M. Neil Browne The metaphorical constraints to pay equity: Why so many economists are outraged by comparable worth, Population Research and Policy Review 6, no.11 (Jan 1987): 29–46.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124801J. Rayner Between Meaning and Event: An Historical Approach to Political Metaphors, Political Studies 32, no.44 (Dec 1984): 537–550.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1984.tb01544.xMary Lowenthal Felstiner Family Metaphors: The Language of an Independence Revolution, Comparative Studies in Society and History 25, no.11 (Jun 2009): 154–180.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500010343Rozann Rothman Political Symbolism, (Jan 1981): 285–340.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9191-7_5Eugene F. Miller Metaphor and Political Knowledge, American Political Science Review 73, no.11 (Aug 2014): 155–170.https://doi.org/10.2307/1954738David Luck A psycholinguistic approach to leader personality, Soviet Studies 30, no.44 (Nov 2007): 491–515.https://doi.org/10.1080/09668137808411207 John S. Nelson Toltechs, Aztechs, & the Art of the Possible: Parenthetic Comments on the Political through Language and Aesthetics, Polity 8, no.11 (Nov 2016): 80–116.https://doi.org/10.2307/3234348Herbert G. Reid, Ernest J. Yanarella Political Science and the Post-Modern Critique of Scientism and Domination, The Review of Politics 37, no.33 (Aug 2009): 286–316.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500024438B. Wynne The rhetoric of consensus politics: a critical review of technology assessment, Research Policy 4, no.22 (May 1975): 108–158.https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(75)90028-1
Referência(s)