The investigators reflect: what we have learned from the Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe (DUQuE) study
2014; Oxford University Press; Volume: 26; Issue: suppl 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/intqhc/mzu024
ISSN1464-3677
AutoresOliver Groene, Rosa Suñol, Niek Klazinga, Dionne Kringos, Kiki M. J. M. H. Lombarts, Thomas Plochg, María Andrée López Gómez, M. Secanell, Rosa Suñol, P. Vallejo, Paul Bartels, Søren Risom Kristensen, Philippe Michel, F. Saillour-Glénisson, F. Vlcek, Mate Car, S. Jones, E. Klaus, S. Bottaro, Pascal Garel, Mehmet Saluvan, Charles Bruneau, A. Depaigne-Loth, C. Shaw, Antje Hammer, Oliver Ommen, Holger Pfaff, Oliver Groene, D. Botje, Cordula Wagner, Halina Kutaj–Wąsikowska, B. Kutryba, Ana Escoval, A. Livio, Margarida Eiras, M. França, Isabel Cristina de Moura Leite, F. Almeman, H. Kus, K. Ozturk, Russell Mannion, Onyebuchi A. Arah, Maral DerSarkissian, Caroline A. Thompson, A. Wang, A. Thompson,
Tópico(s)Clinical practice guidelines implementation
ResumoIn 2009, we launched Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe (DUQuE), an ambitious study on the effectiveness of quality improvement systems of hospitals in eight European countries. We believe this to be the most comprehensive and detailed study of quality improvement systems to date in terms of the a priori development of a coherent theory to guide the measurement and analytical strategy, the diverse countries involved and the range of standardized data collected (including surveys, chart reviews, administrative data and organizational audit). The papers published in this supplement describe the key findings of the project so far [1]. Here we discuss the overarching lessons emerging from the study. Without the relentless efforts of healthcare professionals and patients to gather data, research on quality improvement would not be possible. Despite the demanding workload of the study, response rates and completion of data collection have been exceptional, reflecting the efforts of country and hospital coordinators. However, there were some lessons about feasibility as the field test was complex and challenging for two reasons. First, in some countries an increasing ‘quality burn-out’ (where professionals are overwhelmed by existing requirements to document and monitor aspects of quality and safety) made it difficult to motivate staff to take on yet another project. Secondly, restrictive research ethics criteria (appropriate for interventional studies, but questionable for observational research) led to substantial delays in advancing the study. These are serious issues of relevance for any …
Referência(s)