What Causes Myocardial Infarction in Women Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease?
2011; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 124; Issue: 13 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/circulationaha.111.055855
ISSN1524-4539
AutoresDomenico G. Della Rocca, Carl J. Pepine,
Tópico(s)Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
ResumoHomeCirculationVol. 124, No. 13What Causes Myocardial Infarction in Women Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease? Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBWhat Causes Myocardial Infarction in Women Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease? Domenico G. Della Rocca, MD and Carl J. Pepine, MD Domenico G. Della RoccaDomenico G. Della Rocca From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville. and Carl J. PepineCarl J. Pepine From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville. Originally published27 Sep 2011https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.055855Circulation. 2011;124:1404–1406Women experience higher mortality rates and more adverse outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than men, despite less obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and plaque burden with similar plaque responses to intensive risk factor modification.1 Furthermore, nonobstructive CAD by angiography appears to be emerging as a predictor of mortality in women, but not among men.2 These puzzling findings illustrate our incomplete understanding of sex-specific differences in pathophysiological mechanisms of AMI and ischemic heart disease in general. A better understanding of the mechanisms would lead the way for improvement in attempts to optimize ischemic heart disease management among women.Article see p1414In the current issue, Reynolds and colleagues3 provide new data to help advance our understanding in this area by using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to investigate women with AMI in the absence of obstructive CAD. They provide the first evidence for plaque disruption and myocardial tissue characteristics among women with confirmed AMI and normal or only minimally abnormal coronary angiograms. To help interpret their novel findings, it seems appropriate to briefly review what we know in this area.Although sex-related results were lacking, autopsy studies from past decades securely linked severe atherosclerotic CAD and intracoronary thrombosis with AMI leading to death. More recent and detailed studies of women and men dying with AMI added disrupted plaque as the culprit for the acute thrombotic event. Overall, the majority had plaque rupture; a third had erosion; and a few percent had calcified nodules contributing to the thrombi.4 Interestingly, plaque erosion was identified as the cause of death in about one third of women, whereas in men, erosion was only about half as frequent as the cause of death. More important, erosion was observed as the cause of acute coronary thrombi in the majority of women 50 years of age and in men regardless of age, whereas erosion is the predominant mechanism in younger women.4Because autopsy studies are limited in their ability to identify precursor substrates for these acute events, attention turned to the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Many older and very well-conducted prospective angiographic studies (eg, from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study [CASS] Registry,5) securely linked increasing stenosis and extent of CAD with progressively increasing risk for AMI and death. However, no helpful sex-specific information was provided, in part because 85% to 90% of the cases studied were men. Nevertheless, these reports confirmed and extended the autopsy conclusions from fatal cases to nonfatal cases: The substrate for AMI is severe coronary atherosclerosis. This conclusion appeared to be challenged by retrospective reports suggesting that minimal lesions on angiography may be precursor lesions for plaque disruption leading to acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Indeed, our overview of angiographic results from many ACS studies found that 20% to 30% of women presenting with biomarker-positive ACS had no obstructive CAD.6 Such angiographic findings were only half as frequent among men. On first look, these findings may seem at variance with the conclusions from autopsy and older prospective angiographic studies of severe CAD among fatal and nonfatal ACS. However, there would likely be many more minimal lesions than severe lesions, so even if risk for plaque disruption were similar between these lesions, the likelihood for a patient to have a minimal lesion associated with the AMI would always be greater.Then IVUS studies documented that culprit lesions associated with ACS tend to have severe coronary atherosclerosis (eg, larger plaque burdens [≈60% to 80%], remodeling indexes, and thrombus volumes).7 Additionally, severe atherosclerosis usually underlies angiographic minimal lesions, and this severe disease is often obscured by remodeling. So, the process of compensatory enlargement of the vessel to maintain coronary artery lumen size was rediscovered.8 These IVUS studies also suggested that plaque rupture per se did not necessarily result in symptoms or death, but that the presence of rupture, with a smaller lumen size, and/or thrombus usually provides the substrate for the clinical expression of ACS.7In addition, questions were raised about whether ACS, among patients with no obstructive disease by angiography, could be related to plaque disruption or perhaps acute coronary occlusion by other mechanisms (eg, spasm, enhanced coagulation, impaired fibrinolysis, microvascular disease, etc.). Some reports have linked female-unique disorders (polycystic ovarian syndrome, hypothalamic hypoestrogenemia, etc) and other conditions highly prevalent among women (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, giant-cell arteritis, etc). Several recent reports have identified provoked coronary artery spasm in 50% to 70% of ACS patients without obstructive CAD.9 Interestingly, despite prior reports among more clinically stable patients showing higher frequencies of coronary spasm in women versus men, these new reports in ACS patients did not link coronary artery spasm with sex.Within this background, the report by Reynolds and colleagues3 advances our understanding of AMI in women. Several points from their report require emphasis, along with discussion of some limitations. First, and perhaps most important, they have confirmed that evidence for plaque disruption by IVUS was present in almost 40% of women with ACS and nonobstructive CAD. Considering the sampling limitations of IVUS, this likely underestimates the true frequency of plaque disruption among such women. Unfortunately, they did not provide information to indicate whether spasm testing was performed. From the mechanistic standpoint, this is an important piece of the puzzle, because increased smooth muscle reactivity is highly prevalent in women and men with ACS and nonobstructive CAD, as noted above. It is puzzling that evidence for plaque disruptions by IVUS did not seem to correlate with an ischemic pattern on CMR (only 1 of 14 such women). This was in contrast to the finding that half of the women (11 of 22) without IVUS evidence of plaque disruption showed an ischemic pattern on CMR. Their suggestions about relief of spasm and/or endogenous fibrinolysis are also important areas for future investigations that merge CMR and IVUS details with testing coronary smooth muscle reactivity and coagulability. Spasm could have accounted for an ischemic pattern on CMR, particularly in the absence of plaque rupture. Nevertheless, their observations provide direction for future investigation into the prospective identification of which coronary artery sites, and/or which women, are likely candidates for disruption and which are likely to be linked with acute events. Finding such patients was recently noted as a priority by our National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group on Identifying Patients at High Risk of a Cardiovascular Event in the Near Future.10Second, although the authors state that they did not observe evidence for plaque rupture among the women with completely normal coronary angiography, they did not provide information about whether this subsample (15 women) had plaque by IVUS. This is important mechanistically and for providing direction for prevention management. Given our Women's Ischemic Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) IVUS substudy documenting plaque among ≈80% of clinically stable women with ischemic heart disease,11 in addition to other IVUS reports12 among patients with normal coronary angiography, it seems that the overwhelming majority of women (and men) presenting with clinically stable and unstable ischemic syndromes have coronary plaque when they have atherosclerosis risk factors. Thus, it would not be appropriate to simply assume that such patients with so-called normal coronary angiograms have no coronary atherosclerosis, because such an assumption has the potential to result in a lost opportunity for appropriate prevention therapies. In addition, the possibility of microvascular abnormalities should be considered among those women with late gadolinium enhancement on CMR. This deserves additional consideration, because coronary microvascular dysfunction has been linked with adverse outcomes among women with stable ischemic heart disease and nonobstructive CAD.13 Microvascular vascular dysfunction would have the potential to amplify the consequences of an upstream spastic or thrombotic event.Third, Reynolds et al did not present data on vessel remodeling, which is important because positive remodeling leads to underestimation of atherosclerosis severity/burden, as noted above. Furthermore, because wall stress is directly proportional to vessel diameter, positive remodeling would be expected to increase the likelihood of plaque disruption (rupture/erosion). Although the plaque disruptions observed appeared at sites of minimal or no stenosis, IVUS measures of plaque burden, stenosis area, and remodeling indexes could have provided valuable insights.Fourth, the authors provide interesting new evidence for plaque disruption by IVUS among 2 of the 4 women thought to have stress-related cardiomyopathy. This provides a possible mechanistic explanation of the findings associated with this intriguing disorder. Again, information on the presence of plaque and plaque burden from the sties with and without plaque disruption would have been helpful.From the clinical standpoint, it would be highly desirable to be able to identify disruption-prone lesions at risk for thrombosis in the near term.10 We know that the clinical expression (ranging from asymptomatic plaque to progression with angina to ACS or even to sudden death) likely is also determined by underlying plaque burden, endogenous coagulation and fibrinolytic systems, vascular smooth muscle tone, and numerous other factors, including sex and sex hormone status. Several novel methods have evolved to identify these disruption-prone plaques. Although intravascular catheters are limited by their range of sampling, the close proximity to the coronary artery luminal surface makes these techniques attractive, particularly if the patient is already undergoing invasive coronary angiography. From this perspective, radiofrequency IVUS, optical coherence tomography, and near-infrared spectroscopy combined with IVUS appear very promising. All of these techniques are under investigation relative to their usefulness to predict future plaque-related events, and our hope is that these studies will have adequate statistical power to provide meaningful sex-specific data. As illustrated here, IVUS and CMR are also very valuable diagnostic techniques to detect coronary abnormalities potentially responsible for the ischemic event and to evaluate myocardial injury. The finding of AMI with no angiographic evidence of obstructive CAD likely subtends a variety of pathophysiological mechanisms that require further investigation among both women and men.Sources of FundingDr Pepine is funded in part through NIH grants 5U01 HL08736, 5R01 HL91005, 5R01 HL09095, 3U01 AG022376, 2U01 GM074492, and 5K23 HL086558. This work was supported in part by the NIH/NCRR Clinical and Translational Science Award to the University of FloridaUL1 RR029890.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Correspondence to Carl J. Pepine, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Box 100277, Gainesville, FL 32610-0277. E-mail carl.[email protected]ufl.eduReferences1. Nicholls SJ, Wolski K, Sipahi I, Schoenhagen P, Crowe T, Kapadia SR, Hazen SL, Tuzcu EM, Nissen SE. Rate of progression of coronary atherosclerotic plaque in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49:1546–1551.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Shaw LJ, Min JK, Narula J, Lin F, Noel Bairey-Merz CN, Callister TQ, Berman DS. Sex differences in mortality associated with computed tomographic angiographic measurements of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary artery disease: an exploratory analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3:473–481.LinkGoogle Scholar3. Reynolds HR, Srichai MB, Iqbal SN, Slater JN, Mancini GBJ, Feit F, Pena-Sing I, Axel L, Attubato MJ, Yatskar L, Kalhorn RT, Wood DA, Lobach IV, Hochman JS. Mechanisms of myocardial infarction in women without angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation.2011; 124:1414–1425.LinkGoogle Scholar4. Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Concept of vulnerable/ unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010; 30:1282–1292.LinkGoogle Scholar5. Ellis S, Alderman E, Cain K, Fisher L, W Sanders W, Bourassa M. Risk of anterior myocardial infarction by lesion severity and measurement method of stenoses in the left anterior descending coronary distribution: a CASS Registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988; 11:908–916.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Anderson RD, Pepine CJ. How to manage angina with normal coronary arteries (update). In: , Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J eds. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 2010. http://www.accessmedicine.com/updatesContent.aspx?aid=1001522.Google Scholar7. Fujii K, Kobayashi Y, Mintz GS, Takebayashi H, Dangas G, Moussa I, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Kreps E, Collins M, Colombo A, Stone GW, Leon MB, Moses JW. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of ulcerated ruptured plaques. Circulation. 2003; 108:2473–2478.LinkGoogle Scholar8. Mann GV, Spoerry A, Gray M, Jabashow D. Atherosclerosis in the Masai. Am J Epidemiol.1972; 95:26–37.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Pepine CJ. Provoked coronary spasm and acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52:528–530.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Eagle KA, Ginsburg GS, Musunuru K, Aird WC, Balaban RS, Bennett SK, Blumenthal RS, Coughlin SR, Davidson KW, Frohlich ED, Greenland P, Jarvik GP, Libby P, Pepine CJ, Ruskin JN, Stillman AE, Van Eyk JE, Tolunay HE. Identifying patients at high risk of a cardiovascular event in the near future: current status and future directions: report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group. Circulation. 2010; 121:1447–1454.LinkGoogle Scholar11. Khuddus MA, Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Bairey Merz CN, Sopko G, Bavry AA, Denardo SJ, McGorray SP, Smith KM, Sharaf BL, Nicholls SJ, Nissen SE, Anderson RD. An intravascular ultrasound analysis in women experiencing chest pain in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease: a substudy from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute–Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). J Interv Cardiol. 2010; 3:511–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar12. Ge J, Erble R, Gerber T, Gorge G, Koch L, Haude M, Meyer J. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of angiographically normal coronary arteries: a prospective study in vivo. Br Heart J. 1994; 71:572–578.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Pepine CJ, Anderson RD, Sharaf BL, Reis SE, Smith KM, Handberg EM, Johnson BD, Sopko G, Bairey Merz CN. Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol.2010; 55:2825–2832.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Mullasari A (2022) Acute Coronary Syndromes in Women, Indian Journal of Cardiovascular Disease in Women - WINCARS, 10.1055/s-0042-1742759, 06:04, (248-249), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2021. Blakeman J (2020) Words Matter, Advances in Nursing Science, 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000295, 43:3, (214-227), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020. Dreyer R, Tavella R, Curtis J, Wang Y, Pauspathy S, Messenger J, Rumsfeld J, Maddox T, Krumholz H, Spertus J and Beltrame J (2019) Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries as compared with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary disease: outcomes in a Medicare population, European Heart Journal, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz403, 41:7, (870-878), Online publication date: 14-Feb-2020. Vasile V and Jaffe A (2017) High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin for the Diagnosis of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes, Current Cardiology Reports, 10.1007/s11886-017-0904-4, 19:10, Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017. Schulman-Marcus J, ó Hartaigh B, Gransar H, Lin F, Valenti V, Cho I, Berman D, Callister T, DeLago A, Hadamitzky M, Hausleiter J, Al-Mallah M, Budoff M, Kaufmann P, Achenbach S, Raff G, Chinnaiyan K, Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Villines T, Kim Y, Leipsic J, Feuchtner G, Rubinshtein R, Pontone G, Andreini D, Marques H, Shaw L and Min J (2016) Sex-Specific Associations Between Coronary Artery Plaque Extent and Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.010, 9:4, (364-372), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016. Chandrasekhar J and Mehran R (2016) Sex-Based Differences in Acute Coronary Syndromes, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.004, 9:4, (451-464), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016. Spatz E, Curry L, Masoudi F, Zhou S, Strait K, Gross C, Curtis J, Lansky A, Soares Barreto-Filho J, Lampropulos J, Bueno H, Chaudhry S, D'Onofrio G, Safdar B, Dreyer R, Murugiah K, Spertus J and Krumholz H (2015) The Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients (VIRGO) Classification System, Circulation, 132:18, (1710-1718), Online publication date: 3-Nov-2015. Iqbal S, Feit F, Mancini G, Wood D, Patel R, Pena-Sing I, Attubato M, Yatskar L, Slater J, Hochman J and Reynolds H (2014) Characteristics of plaque disruption by intravascular ultrasound in women presenting with myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease, American Heart Journal, 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.01.011, 167:5, (715-722), Online publication date: 1-May-2014. Rossini R, Capodanno D, Lettieri C, Musumeci G, Limbruno U, Molfese M, Spatari V, Calabria P, Romano M, Tarantini G, Gavazzi A and Angiolillo D (2013) Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease, The American Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.006, 112:2, (150-155), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013. Byrne C, Kühl J, Zacho M, Nordestgaard B, Fuchs A, Frestad D, Køber L and Kofoed K (2013) Sex- and age-related differences of myocardial perfusion at rest assessed with multidetector computed tomography, Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.01.010, 7:2, (94-101), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2013. Sharkey S, Maron B and Lesser J (2013) Authors' Reply, The American Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.004, 111:4, (628), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2013. September 27, 2011Vol 124, Issue 13 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.055855PMID: 21947933 Originally publishedSeptember 27, 2011 Keywordssexcoronary artery diseasemyocardial infarctionwomenEditorialsPDF download Advertisement SubjectsMyocardial InfarctionPathophysiology
Referência(s)