Curriculum in interventional cardiology: Coronary pressure and flow measurements in the cardiac catheterization laboratory
2001; Wiley; Volume: 54; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/ccd.1303
ISSN1522-726X
Autores Tópico(s)Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
ResumoCatheterization and Cardiovascular InterventionsVolume 54, Issue 3 p. 378-400 Board Review Curriculum in interventional cardiology: Coronary pressure and flow measurements in the cardiac catheterization laboratory Morton J. Kern MD, Corresponding Author Morton J. Kern MD [email protected] J. Gerard Mudd Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, St. Louis, MissouriJ. Gerard Mudd Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, 3635 Vista Avenue at Grand Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63110Search for more papers by this author Morton J. Kern MD, Corresponding Author Morton J. Kern MD [email protected] J. Gerard Mudd Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, St. Louis, MissouriJ. Gerard Mudd Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, 3635 Vista Avenue at Grand Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63110Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 October 2001 https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1303Citations: 15AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES 1 Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology: the dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1995; 92: 2333–2342. 2 Toshihiko N, Amanullah AM, Luo H, Berglund H, Kim CJ, Nagai T, Hakamata N, Katsushika S, Uehata A, Takase B, Isojima K, Berman DS, Siegel R. Clinical validation of intravascular ultrasound for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1870–1878. 3 White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, Hiratza LF, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, Marcus ML. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 819–824. 4 Harrison DG, White CW, Hiratzka LF, Doty DB, Barnes DH, Eastham CL, Marcus ML. The value of lesion cross-sectional area determined by quantitative coronary angiography in assessing the physiologic significance of proximal left anterior descending coronary arterial stenoses. Circulation 1984; 69: 1111–1119. 5 Gould KL, Kirkeeide RL, Buchi M. Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 459–474. 6 Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 1974; 33: 87–94. 7 Doucette JW, Corl PD, Payne HM, Flynn AE, Goto M, Nassi M, Segal J. Validation of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular measurement of coronary artery flow velocity. Circulation 1992; 85: 1899–1911. 8 Labovitz AJ, Anthonis DM, Cravens TL, Kern MJ. Validation of volumetric flow measurements by means of a Doppler-tipped coronary angioplasty guide wire. Am Heart J 1993; 126: 1456–1461. 9 Baumgart D, Haude M, Liu F, Ge J, Goerge G, Erbel R. Current concepts of coronary flow reserve for clinical decision making during cardiac catheterization. Am Heart J 1998; 136: 136–149. 10 Kern MJ, Bach RG, Mechem C, Caracciolo EA, Aguirre FV, Miller LW, Donohue TJ. Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1154–1160. 11 McGinn AL, White CW, Wilson RF. Interstudy variability of coronary flow reserve: influence of heart rate, arterial pressure, and ventricular preload. Circulation 1990; 81: 1319–1330. 12 Marcus ML, Mueller TM, Gascho JA, Kerber RE. Effects of cardiac hypertrophy secondary to hypertension on the coronary circulation. Am J Cardiol 1979; 44: 1023–1031. 13 Chauhan A, Millins PA, Petch MC, Schonfield PM. Is coronary flow velocity response really normal in syndrome X? Circulation 1994; 89: 1998–2004. 14 Marcus ML, Doty DB, Hiratzka LF, Wright CB, Eastham CL. Decreased coronary flow reserve: a mechanism for angina pectoris in patients with aortic stenosis and normal coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 1362–1367. 15 Cobb F, McHale P, Remert J. Effects of acute cellular injury on coronary vascular reactivity in awake dogs. Circulation 1978; 57: 962–968. 16 Gould KL. Dynamic coronary stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1980; 45: 286–292. 17 Czernin J, Muller P, Chan S, Bruken RC, Porenta G, Krivokapich J, Chen K, Chan A, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Influence of age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and reserve. Circulation 1993; 88: 62–69. 18 Wolford TL, Donohue TJ, Bach RG, Drury JH, Caracciolo EA, Kern MJ, Miller LW. Heterogeneity of coronary flow reserve in the examination of multiple individual allograft coronary arteries. Circulation 1999; 99: 626–632. 19 Wieneke H, Haude M, Ge J, Altmann C, Kaiser S, Baaumgart D, von Birgelen C, Welge D, Erbel R. Corrected coronary flow velocity reserve: a new concept for assessing coronary perfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1713–1720. 20 Akasaka T, Yoshida K, Hozumi T, Takagi T, Kaji S, Kawamoto T, Morioka S, Yoshikawa J. Retinopathy identifies marked restriction of coronary flow reserve in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 935–941. 21 Baumgart D, Haude M, Goerge G, Ge J, Vetter S, Dagres N, Heusch G, Erbel R. Improved assessment of coronary stenosis severity using the relative flow velocity reserve. Circulation 1998; 98: 40–46. 22 Kern MJ, Puri S, Bach RG, Donohue TJ, Dupouy P, Caracciolo EA, Craig WR, Aguirre F, Aptecar E, Wolford TL, Mecham CJ, Dubois-Rande JL. Abnormal coronary flow velocity reserve after coronary artery stenting in patients: role of relative coronary reserve to assess potential mechanisms. Circulation 1999; 100: 2491–2498. 23 Van Liebergen RAM, Piek JJ, Koch KT, Peters RJG, de Winter RJ, Schotborgh CE, Lie KI. Hyperemic coronary flow after optimized intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1899–1906. 24 Donohue TJ, Kern MJ, Aguirre FV, Bach RG, Wolford T, Bell CA, Segal J. Assessing the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenoses: analysis of translesional pressure-flow velocity relationships in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 449–458. 25 Ofili EO, Kern MJ, Labovitz AJ, St. Vrain JA, Segal J, Aguirre FV, Castello R. Analysis of coronary blood flow velocity dynamics in angiographically normal and stenosed arteries before and after endoluminal enlargement by angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 308–316. 26 Segal J, Kern MJ, Scott NA, King SB III, Doucette JW, Heuser RR, Ofili E, Siegel R. Alterations of phasic coronary artery flow velocity in man during percutaneous coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 276–286. 27 MJ Kern, editor. Interventional physiology rounds: case studies in coronary pressure and flow for clinical practice. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1998. 28 Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, el Gamal MI. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995; 92: 3183–3193. 29 Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek J, Koolen JJ. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1703–1708. 30 De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Pijls NH, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1996; 94: 1842–1849. 31 Kern MJ, Aguirre FV, Bach RG, Caracciolo EA, Donohue TJ, Labovitz AJ. Interventional physiology rounds: Fundamentals of translesional pressure-flow velocity measurements. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994; 31: 137–143. 32 Pijls NHJ, Kern MJ, Yock PG, De Bruyne B. Practice and potential pitfalls of coronary pressure measurement. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 49: 1–16. 33 Qian J, Ge J, Baumgart D, Oldenburg O, Haude M, Sack S, Erbel R. Safety of intracoronary Doppler flow measurement. Am Heart J 2000; 140: 502–510. 34 Wilson RF, Laughlin DE, Ackell PH, Chilian WM, Holida MD, Hartley CJ, Armstrong ML, Marcus ML, White CW. Transluminal subselective measurement of coronary artery blood flow velocity and vasodilator reserve in man. Circulation 1985; 72: 82–92. 35 Wilson RF, White C. Serious ventricular dysrhythmias after intracoronary papaverine. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 1301–1302. 36 Wilson RF, Wyche K, Christensen BV, Zimmer S, Laxson DD. Effects of adenosine on human arterial circulation. Circulation 1990; 82: 1595–1606. 37 Kern MJ, Deligonul U, Tatineni S, Serota H, Aguirre F, Hilton TC. Intravenous adenosine: continuous infusion and low dose bolus administration for determination of coronary vasodilatory reserve in patients with and without coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 718–729. 38 Caracciolo EA, Wolford TL, Underwood RD, Donohue TJ, Bach RG, Miller LW, Kern MJ. Influence of intimal thickness on coronary blood flow responses in orthotopic heart transplant recipients: a combined intravascular Doppler and ultrasound imaging study. Circulation 1995; 92: II182–II190. 39 Jeremias A, Whitbourn RJ, Filardo SD, Fitzgerald PJ, Cohen DJ, Tuzcu EM, Anderson WD, Abizaid AA, Mintz GS, Yeung AC, Kern MJ, Yock PG. Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements. Am Heart J 2000; 140: 651–657. 40 Sonoda S, Takeuchi M, Nakashima Y, Kuroiwa A. Safety and optimal dose of intracoronary adenosine 5′-triphosphate for the measurement of coronary flow reserve. Am Heart J 1998; 135: 621–627. 41 Bartunek J, Winjs W, Heyndrickx GR, de Bruyne B. Effects of dobutamine on coronary stenosis: physiology and morphology comparison with intracoronary adenosine. Circulation 1999; 100: 243–249. 42 Abizaid A, Kornowski R, Mintz GS, Hong MK, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Bramwell O, Leon MB. Influence of guiding catheter selection on the measurement of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 703–704. 43 Kern MJ. Coronary physiology revisited: practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circulation 2000; 101: 1344–1351. 44 Miller DD, Donohue TJ, Younis LT, Bach RG, Aguirre FV, Wittry MD, Goodgold HM, Chaitman BR, Kern MJ. Correlation of pharmacologic 99mtc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging with poststenotic coronary flow reserve in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenoses. Circulation 1994; 89: 2150–2160. 45 Joye JD, Schulman DS, Lasorda D, Farah T, Donohue BC, Reichek N. Intracoronary Doppler guide wire versus stress single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 940–947. 46 Deychak YA, Segal J, Reiner JS, Rohrbeck SC, Thompson MA, Lundergan CF, Ross AM, Wasserman AG. Doppler guide wire flow-velocity indexes measured distal to coronary stenoses associated with reversible thallium perfusion defects. Am Heart J 1995; 129: 219–227. 47 Heller LI, Popma J, Cates C, Deckelbaum L, Grinstead S, Kipperman R, Cleman H; Setaro C, Villegas B, Dahlberg L, Balcom SJ, Leppo J. Functional assessment of stenosis severity in the cath lab: a comparison of Doppler and Tl-201 imaging. J Intervent Cardiol 1995; 7: 23A. 48 de Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Hendrickx GR. Relation between myocardial fractional flow reserve calculated from coronary pressure measurements and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1995; 92: 39–46. 49 Zilstra F, Fioretti P, Reiber J, Serruys PW. Which cineangiographically assessed anatomic variable correlates best with functional measurements of stenosis severity? a comparison of quantitative analysis of the coronary cineangiogram with measure coronary flow reserve and exercise/redistribution thallium-201 scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 686–691. 50 Danzi GB, Pirelli S, Mauri L, Testa R, Ciliberto GR, Massa D, Lotto AA, Campolo L, Parodi O. Which variable of stenosis severity best describes the significance of an isolated left anterior descending coronary artery lesion? correlation between quantitative coronary angiography, intracoronary Doppler measurements and high dose dipyridamole echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 526–533. 51 Bartunek J, Van Schuerbeeck E, De Bruyne B. Comparison of exercise electrocardiography and dobutamine echocardiography with invasively assessed myocardial fractional flow reserve in evaluation of severity of coronary arterial narrowing. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 478–481. 52 Schulman DS, Lasorda D, Farah T, Soukas P, Reichek N, Joye JD. Correlations between coronary flow reserve measured with a Doppler guide wire and treadmill exercise testing. Am Heart J 1997; 134: 99–104. 53 Donohue TJ, Miller DD, Bach RG, Tron C, Wolford T, Caracciolo EA, Aguirre FA, Younis LT, Chaitman BR, Kern MJ. Correlation of poststenotic hyperemic coronary flow velocity and pressure with abnormal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 948–954. 54 Duffy SJ, Gelman JS, Peverill RE, Greentree MA, Harper RW, Meredith IT. Agreement between coronary flow velocity reserve and stress echocardiography in intermediate-severity coronary stenoses. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001; 53: 29–38. 55 Chamuleau SAJ, Meuwissen M, van Eck-Smit BLF, Koch KT, de Jong A, de Winter RJ, Schotborgh CE, Bax M, Verberne HJ, Tijssen JGP, Piek JJ. Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1316–1322. 56 Caymaz O, Fak AS, Tezcan H, Inanir S, Toprak A, Tokay S, Turoglu T, Oktay A. Correlation of myocardial fraction flow reserve with thallium-201 SPECT imaging in intermediate-severity coronary artery lesions. J Invas Cardiol 2000; 12: 345–350. 57 Fearon WF, Takagi A, Jeremias A, Yeung AC, Joye JD, Cohen DJ, Chou TM, Kern MJ, Yock PG. Use of fractional myocardial flow reserve to assess the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 1013–1014. 58 El-Shafei A, Chiravuri R, Stikovac MM, El-Badry MA, Donohue TJ, Bach RG, Aguirre FV, Caracciolo EA, Bitar S, Wolford TL, Miller DD, Kern MJ. Comparison of relative coronary Doppler flow velocity reserve to stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001; 53: 193–201. 59 Anderson HV, Stokes MJ, Leon M, Abu-Halawa SA, Stuart Y, Kirkeeide RL. Coronary artery flow velocity is related to lumen area and regional left ventricular mass. Circulation 2000; 102: 48–54. 60 Kern MJ. Focus for the new millennium: diffuse coronary artery disease and physiologic measurements of severity. Am Coll Cardiol Curr J Rev 2000: 13–19. 61 Meuwissen J, Chamuleau AJ, Siebes M, Schotborgh CE, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Bax M, de Jong A, Spaan JAE, Piek JJ. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesion. Circulation 2001; 103: 184–187. 62 Kern MJ, Donohue TJ, Aguirre FV, Bach RG, Caracciolo EA, Wolford T, Mechem CJ, Flynn MS, Chaitman B. Clinical outcome of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal translesional pressure-flow velocity measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 178–187. 63 Ferrari M, Schnell B, Werner GS, Figulla HR. Safety of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal coronary flow velocity reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 83–87. 64 Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Bonnier HJRM, Bartunek J, Wijns W, Peels K, Heyndrickx GR, Koolen JJ, Pijls NHJ. Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 841–847. 65 Lesser JL, Wilson RF, White CW. Physiologic assessment of coronary stenoses of intermediate severity: can facilitate patient selection for coronary angioplasty? J Coron Art Dis 1990; 1: 697–705. 66 Bech GJW, Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Peels KH, Michels R, Bonnier HJRM, Koolen JJ. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve to predict clinical outcome after balloon angioplasty. Circulation 1999; 99: 883–888. 67 Gruberg L, Kapeliovich M, Roguin A, Grenadier E, Markiewicz W, Beyar R. Deferring angioplasty in intermediate coronary lesions based on coronary flow criteria is safe: comparison of a deferred group to an intervention group. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 1999; 2: 35–40. 68 Wilson RF, Johnson MR, Marcus ML, Aylward PEG, Skorton DJ, Collins S, White CW. The effect of coronary angioplasty on coronary flow reserve. Circulation 1988; 77: 873–885. 69 Kern MJ, Deligonul U, Vandormael M, Labovitz A, Gudipati R, Gabliani G, Bodet J, Shah Y, Kennedy HL. Impaired coronary vasodilatory reserve in the immediate post-coronary angioplasty period: analysis of coronary arterial velocity flow indices and regional cardiac venous efflux. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 860–872. 70 Kern MJ, Dupouy P, Drury JH, Aguirre FV, Aptecar E, Bach RG, Caracciolo EA, Donohue TJ, Dubois-Rande J, Geschwind HJ, Mechem CJ, Kane G, Teiger E, Wolford TL. Role of coronary artery lumen enlargement in improving coronary blood flow after balloon angioplasty and stenting: a combined intravascular ultrasound Doppler flow and imaging study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1520–1527. 71 Abizaid A, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Walsh CL, Popma JJ, Leon MB. Clinical, intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 423–428. 72 Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, Suzuki K, Kawana M, Kasanuki H. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1999; 100: 250–255. 73 Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, Gimelli G, Nishida T, Adamian M, Corvaja N, Di Mario C, Colombo A. Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 136–141. 74 Hanekamp CEE, Koolen JJ, Pijls NHJ, Michels HR, Bonnier HJRM. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation 1999; 99: 1015–1021. 75 Van Liebergen RAM, Piek JJ, Koch KT, Peters RJG, de Winter RJ, Schotborgh CE, Lie KI. Hyperemic coronary flow after optimized intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1899–906. 76 Haude M, Baumgart D, Verna E, Piek JJ, Vrints C, Probst P, Erbel R. Intracoronary Doppler– and quantitative coronary angiography–derived predictors of major adverse cardiac events after stent implantation. Circulation 2001; 103: 1212–1217. 77 Serruys PW, Di Mario C, Piek J, Schroeder E, Vrints C, Probst P, De Bruyne B, Hanet C, Fleck E, Haude M, Verna E, Voudris V, Geschwind H, Emanuelsson H, Muhlberger V, Danzi G, Peels HO, Ford AJ, Boersma E, for the DEBATE Study Group. Prognostic value of intracoronary flow velocity and diameter stenosis in assessing the short- and long-term outcomes of coronary balloon angioplasty: the DEBATE study (Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe). Circulation 1997; 96: 3369–3377. 78 Lafont A, Dubois-Rande JL, Steg PG, Dupouy P, Carrie D, Coste P, Furber A, Beygui F, Feldman LJ, Rahal S, Tron C, Hamon M, Grollier G, Commeau P, Richard P, Colin P, Bauters C, Karrillon G, Ledru F, Citron B, Marie FN, Kern M, for the FROST Study Group. The French randomized optimal stenting trial: a prospective evaluation of provisional stenting guided by coronary velocity reserve and quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 404–409. 79 DiMario C, Moses JW, Anderson TJ, Bonan R, Muramatsu T, Jain AC, de Lezo JS, Cho SY, Kern M, Meredith IT, Cohen D, Moussa I, Colombo A, on behalf of the DESTINI Study Group (Doppler Endpoint Stenting International Investigation). Randomized comparison of elective stent implantation and coronary balloon angioplasty guided by online quantitative angiography and intracoronary Doppler. Circulation 2000; 102: 2938–2944. 80 Serruys PW, de Bruyne B, Carlier S, Sousa JE, Piek J, Muramatsu T, Vrints C, Probst P, Seabra-Gomes R, Simpson I, Voudris V, Gurne O, Pijls N, Belardi J, Van Es GA, Boersma E, Morel MA, Van Hout B, on behalf of the Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe (DEBATE) II Study Group. Randomized comparison of primary stenting and provisional balloon angioplasty guided by flow velocity measurement. Circulation 2000; 102: 2930–2937. 81 Dupouy P, Pelle G, Garot P, Kern MJ, Kane G, Woscoboinick J, Aptecar E, Belarbi A, Pernes JM, Rande JLD, Teiger E. Physiologically guided angioplasty in support to a provisional stenting strategy: immediate and six-month outcome. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 49: 369–375. 82 Anderson HV, Carabello BA. Provisional versus routine stenting: routine stenting is here to stay. Circulation 2000; 102: 2910–2914. 83 Fujita H, Inoue N, Matsuo Y, Tokura T, Tanaka T, Ohta B, Matsumuro A, Kuriyama T, Kitamura M, Miyao K. Fractional myocardial flow reserve (FFRmyo) after coronary intervention as a predictor of chronic restenosis. J Invas Cardiol 1999; 11: 527–532. 84 Mazur W, Bitar JN, Lechin M, Grinstead C, Khalil AA, Khan MM, Sekili S, Zoghbi WA, Raizner AE, Kleiman NS. Coronary flow reserve may predict myocardial recovery after myocardial infarction in patients with TIMI grade 3 flow. Am Heart J 1998; 136: 335–344. 85 Claeys MJ, Vrints CJ, Bosmans J, Krug B, Blockx PP, Snoeck JP. Coronary flow reserve during coronary angioplasty in patients with recent myocardial infarction: relation to stenosis and myocardial viability. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1712–1719. 86 Kawamoto T, Yoshida K, Akasaka T, Hozumi T, Takagi T, Kaji S, Ueda Y. Can coronary blood flow velocity pattern after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography predict recovery of regional left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction? Circulation 1999; 100: 339–345. 87 Tsunoda T, Nakamura M, Wakatsuki T, Nishida T, Asahara T, Anzai H, Touma H, Mitsuo K, Soumitsi Y, Sakatani H, Nakamura S, Degawa T, Yamaguchi T. The pattern of alteration in flow velocity in the recanalized artery is related to left ventricular recovery in patients with acute infarction and successful direct balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 338–344. 88 Neumann FJ, Blasini R, Schmitt C, Alt E, Dirschinger J, Gawaz M, Kastrati A, Schomig A. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade on recovery of coronary flow and left ventricular function after the placement of coronary-artery stents in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 98: 2695–2701. 89 Reis SE, Holubkov R, Lee JS, Sharaf B, Reichek N, Rogers WJ, Walsh EG, Fuisz AR, Kerensky R, Detre KM, Sopko G, Pepine CJ, for the WISE Investigators. Coronary flow velocity response to adenosine characterizes coronary microvascular function in women with chest pain and obstructive coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1469–1475. 90 Hasdai D, Holmes DR, Higano ST, Burnett JC, Lerman A. Prevalence of coronary blood flow reserve abnormalities among patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease and chest pain. Mayo Clin Proc 1998; 73: 1133–1140. 91 Skalidis EI, Kochiadakis GE, Koukouraki SI, Parthenakis FI, Karkavitsas NS, Vardas PE. Phasic coronary flow pattern and flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block and normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1338–1346. 92 Seiler C, Fleisch M, Billinger M, Meier B. Simultaneous intracoronary velocity- and pressure-derived assessment of adenosine-induced collateral hemodynamics in patients with one- to two-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1985–1994. 93 Pijls NHJ, Bech GJW, el Gamal MIH, Bonnier HJ, De Bruyne B, Van Gelder B, Michels HR, Koolen JJ. Quantification of recruitable coronary collateral blood flow in conscious humans and its potential to predict future ischemic events. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 1522–1528. 94 Piek JJ, van Liebergen RAM, Koch KT, Peters RJG, David GK. Clinical, angiographic and hemodynamic predictors of recruitable collateral flow assessed during balloon angioplasty coronary occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 275–282. 95 Gruberg L, Mintz GS, Fuchs S, Shalman E, Barak C, Dgany E, Ahmed J, Pichard A, Leon M. Simultaneous assessment of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve with a novel pressure-based method. J Intervent Cardiol 2000; 13: 323–330. 96 Joye JD, Cates CU, Farah T, et al. Cost analysis of intracoronary Doppler determination of lesion significance: Preliminary results of the PEACH study. J Invas Cardiol 1995; 1: 27. Citing Literature Volume54, Issue3November 2001Pages 378-400 SCAI Member Sign in ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)