Explanation of Birth Rate Changes over Space and Time: A Study of Taiwan
1973; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 81; Issue: 2, Part 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/260164
ISSN1537-534X
Autores Tópico(s)Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessExplanation of Birth Rate Changes over Space and Time: A Study of TaiwanT. Paul SchultzT. Paul Schultz Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 81, Number 2, Part 2Mar. - Apr., 1973Part 2: New Economic Approaches to Fertility Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/260164 Views: 26Total views on this site Citations: 41Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1973 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Adeline Mbounka Nembot, Francis Menjo Baye Éducation et choix professionnels des femmes mariées : le cas du Cameroun, Revue d'économie du développement Vol. 29, no.33 (Aug 2022): 49–78.https://doi.org/10.3917/edd.353.0049Huoying Wu, Hwei-Lin Chuang An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Employment on the First Birth Decision for Married Women in Taiwan, (Aug 2018): 249–276.https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-465020180000006008Qurra-tul-ain Ali Sheikh, Mahpara Sadaqat, Muhammad Meraj Reckoning females’ education as a determinant of fertility control in Pakistan, International Journal of Social Economics 44, no.33 (Mar 2017): 414–444.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-01-2015-0007Pei-Syuan Lin, Chin-Oh Chang, Tien Foo Sing Do housing options affect child birth decisions? Evidence from Taiwan, Urban Studies 53, no.1616 (Jul 2016): 3527–3546.https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015615742Muhammad Qasim Attari, Zahid Pervaiz, Amatul R. Chaudhary Socioeconomic Determinants of Fertility: A Cross Districts Analysis of Punjab, Pakistan, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2835916Pei-Syuan Lin, Chin-Oh Chang, Tien Foo Sing Do Housing Options Affect Child Birth Decisions? Evidence from Taiwan, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2585216C. Y. Cyrus Chu, Seik Kim, Wen-Jen Tsay Coresidence With Husband’s Parents, Labor Supply, and Duration to First Birth, Demography 51, no.11 (Jan 2014): 185–204.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0244-yMartha J. Bailey Fifty Years of Family Planning: New Evidence on the Long-Run Effects of Increasing Access to Contraception, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2423451Martha J Bailey Reexamining the Impact of Family Planning Programs on US Fertility: Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4, no.22 (Apr 2012): 62–97.https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.2.62Shin-Yi Chou, Jin-Tan Liu, Michael Grossman, Ted Joyce Parental Education and Child Health: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Taiwan, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2, no.11 (Jan 2010): 33–61.https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.1.33T. Paul Schultz Chapter 52 Population Policies, Fertility, Women's Human Capital, and Child Quality, (Jan 2007): 3249–3303.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4471(07)04052-1Murray G. A. Wilson “Plus ça change…….” change and stasis in the age structure of Irish fertility, 1961–2002: A spatio‐temporal analysis, Irish Geography 40, no.11 (Jan 2007): 39–62.https://doi.org/10.1080/00750770709555886Anoshua Chaudhuri Direct and Indirect Effects of a Maternal and Child Health Program in Rural Bangladesh, Journal of Developing Societies 21, no.1-21-2 (Jun 2005): 143–173.https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X05053070Elissa Braunstein Shifting From the Home to the Market: Accounting for Women's Work in Taiwan, 1965-1995, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.333745Giota Panopoulou, Panos Tsakloglou Fertility and economic development: theoretical considerations and cross-country evidence, Applied Economics 31, no.1111 (Nov 1999): 1337–1351.https://doi.org/10.1080/000368499323229Gustavo Angeles, David K. Guilkey, Thomas A. Mroz Purposive Program Placement and the Estimation of Family Planning Program Effects in Tanzania, Journal of the American Statistical Association 93, no.443443 (Feb 2012): 884–899.https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1998.10473745John Strauss, Duncan Thomas Chapter 34 Human resources: Empirical modeling of household and family decisions, (Jan 1995): 1883–2023.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4471(05)80006-3Paul J. Gertler, John W. Molyneaux How Economic Development and Family Planning Programs Combined to Reduce Indonesian Fertility, Demography 31, no.11 (Feb 1994): 33.https://doi.org/10.2307/2061907Yannis Georgellis, Howard J. Wall The fertility effect of dependent tax exemptions: estimates for the United States, Applied Economics 24, no.1010 (Jul 2006): 1139–1145.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849200000007Jay D. Teachman, Paul T. Schollaert Economic conditions, marital status, and the timing of first births: Results for whites and blacks, Sociological Forum 4, no.11 (Mar 1989): 27–46.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112615Zafiris Tzannatos, James Symons An economic approach to fertility in Britain since 1860, Journal of Population Economics 2, no.22 (Jan 1989): 121–138.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00522405M. S. Kimenyi, W. F. Shughart, R. D. Tollison An interest-group theory of population growth, Journal of Population Economics 1, no.22 (Oct 1988): 131–139.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163886T.Paul Schultz Population programs: Measuring their impact on fertility and the personal distribution of their effects, Journal of Policy Modeling 10, no.11 (Apr 1988): 113–139.https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-8938(88)90037-3Nancy Birdsall Chapter 12 Economic approaches to population growth, (Jan 1988): 477–542.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4471(88)01015-0Andrew Isserman Forecasting Birth and Migration Rates: The Theoretical Foundation, (Jan 1986): 3–30.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4980-5_1A M Isserman Economic—Demographic Modeling with Endogenously Determined Birth and Migration Rates: Theory and Prospects, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 17, no.11 (Jan 1985): 25–45.https://doi.org/10.1068/a170025Kwok-Chan Lun Use of Contraceptives in three South-East Asian Countries, Asia-Oceania Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 9, no.22 (May 2010): 185–192.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.1983.tb00620.xANN SCHWARZ-MILLER Human Capital as a Fertility Determinant in an Economically Developed Homogeneous Population, Journal of Family Issues 3, no.22 (Jun 2016): 217–231.https://doi.org/10.1177/019251382003002006Emilio Casetti, Wen L. Li The Family Planning Program in Taiwan: Did It Make Any Difference?, Geographical Analysis 11, no.44 (Sep 2010): 395–403.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1979.tb00706.xDarius J. Conger, David C. Luan Dynamic properties of Taiwanese fertility, 1950–1972, Studies In Comparative International Development 14, no.22 (Jun 1979): 54–74.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686478Toni Richards Fertility decline in Germany: An econometric appraisal, Population Studies 31, no.33 (Nov 1977): 537–553.https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1977.10412765Marcel Fulop The Empirical Evidence from the Fertility Demand Functions: A Review of the Literature, The American Economist 21, no.22 (Jul 2016): 12–22.https://doi.org/10.1177/056943457702100202Marcel Fulop A Survey of the Literature on the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior, The American Economist 21, no.11 (Jul 2016): 5–13.https://doi.org/10.1177/056943457702100101R. Scott Moreland, M.V. Beuthe Une analyse économique de la natalité en Belgique, Recherches économiques de Louvain 43, no.11 (Aug 2016): 33–51.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0770451800079598RONALD DEMOS LEE Introduction, (Jan 1977): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-441850-9.50005-1Robert H. Cassen Population and development: A survey, World Development 4, no.10-1110-11 (Oct 1976): 785–830.https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(76)90073-5W. Whitney Hicks Reply, Demography 13, no.11 (Feb 1976): 153–155.https://doi.org/10.2307/2060428Albert I. Hermalin Empirical Research in Taiwan on Factors Underlying Differences in Fertility, (Jan 1976): 243–272.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02518-3_9N. F. R. Crafts, N. J. Ireland The role of simulation techniques in the theory and observation of family formation, Population Studies 29, no.11 (Mar 1975): 75–95.https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1975.10410186W. Whitney Hicks Economic Development and Fertility Change in Mexico, 1950–1970, Demography 11, no.33 (Aug 1974): 407–421.https://doi.org/10.2307/2060435Ghazi M. Farooq, Baran Tuncer Fertility and economic and social development in Turkey: a cross-sectional and time series study, Population Studies 28, no.22 (Jul 1974): 263–276.https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1974.10405179
Referência(s)