The Weight of Evidence Does Not Support the Suggestion that Exposure to Low Doses of X Rays Increases Longevity
2003; Radiological Society of North America; Volume: 229; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1148/radiol.2291030990
ISSN1527-1315
AutoresEric J. Hall, David J. Brenner,
Tópico(s)Radiology practices and education
ResumoHomeRadiologyVol. 229, No. 1 PreviousNext OpinionThe Weight of Evidence Does Not Support the Suggestion that Exposure to Low Doses of X Rays Increases LongevityEric J. Hall, David J. BrennerEric J. Hall, David J. BrennerAuthor Affiliations1From the Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10024. Received June 20, 2003; accepted June 21. Address correspondence to E.J.H. (e-mail: [email protected]).Eric J. HallDavid J. BrennerPublished Online:Oct 1 2003https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2291030990MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In References 1 Cameron JR. Longevity is the most appropriate measure of health effects of radiation. Radiology 2003; 229:13-14. Google Scholar2 Macklis RM. Radithor and the era of mild radium therapy. JAMA 1990; 264:614-618. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Berrington A, Darby SC, Weiss HA, Doll R. 100 years of observation on British radiologists: mortality from cancer and other causes 1897-1997. Br J Radiol 2001; 74:507-519. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Matanoski GM, Sternberg A, Elliott EA. Does radiation exposure produce a protective effect among radiologists? Health Phys 1987; 52:637-643. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Carpenter LM, Swerdlow AJ, Fear NT. Mortality of doctors in different specialties: findings from a cohort of 20000 NHS hospital consultants. Occup Environ Med 1997; 54:388-395. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Mortality patterns in British and US radiologists: what can we really conclude? Br J Radiol 2003; 76:1-2. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Cologne JB, Preston DL. Longevity of atomic-bomb survivors. Lancet 2000; 356:303-307. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: Oct 2003 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByHormesis, aging and longevityÉricLe Bourg2009Oct1 | Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, Vol. 1790, No. 10Strahlendosis in der ComputertomographieM.Prokop6 March 2008 | Der Radiologe, Vol. 48, No. 3Should positive phase III clinical trial data be required before proton beam therapy is more widely adopted? NoHermanSuit, HanneKooy, AlexeiTrofimov, JonathanFarr, JohnMunzenrider, ThomasDeLaney, JayLoeffler, BenjaminClasie, SairosSafai, HaraldPaganetti2008Feb1 | Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 86, No. 2What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation?B FWall, G MKendall, A AEdwards, SBouffler, C RMuirhead, J RMeara2006Apr1 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 79, No. 940Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and MethodsDouglas L.Weed13 December 2005 | Risk Analysis, Vol. 25, No. 6Whole-Body CT Screening: Spectrum of Findings and Recommendations in 1192 Patients1Claudia D. Furtado, , Diego A. Aguirre, , Claude B. Sirlin, , David Dang, , Stephan K. Stamato, , Patrick Lee, , Farhad Sani, , Michelle A. Brown, , David L. Levin, , and Giovanna Casola, 1 November 2005 | Radiology, Vol. 237, No. 2Further Thoughts on Low-Level Radiation: An Evolutionary Biologist’s Perspective [letter]James S. Welsh, , 1 June 2004 | Radiology, Vol. 231, No. 3Recommended Articles RSNA Education Exhibits RSNA Case Collection Vol. 229, No. 1 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download
Referência(s)