Editorial Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Adjuvant Tamoxifen Therapy: Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence and Mortality

2010; Future Medicine; Volume: 6; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2217/fon.10.65

ISSN

1744-8301

Autores

Deirdre Cronin‐Fenton, Timothy L. Lash, Henrik Toft Sørensen,

Tópico(s)

Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Resumo

Future OncologyVol. 6, No. 6 EditorialFree AccessSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adjuvant tamoxifen therapy: risk of breast cancer recurrence and mortalityDeirdre Cronin-Fenton, Timothy L Lash & Henrik T SørensenDeirdre Cronin-Fenton† Author for correspondence, Timothy L LashDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Alle 43–46, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark & Henrik T SørensenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Alle 43–46, 8200 Aarhus N, DenmarkPublished Online:8 Jun 2010https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.10.65AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Up to a quarter of women with breast cancer suffer clinical depression during the course of their treatment and recovery [1]. Regardless of whether a depression is premorbid, arises from the distress of the cancer diagnosis itself or occurs as a side effect of breast cancer treatment, managing symptoms of depression may improve compliance with treatment and thereby affect cancer outcome. The majority of breast cancer patients with depression or vasomotor symptoms are prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).In cancer treatment, tamoxifen has been used in routine clinical practice as the 'gold standard' for estrogen receptor-positive breast tumors for over 25 years [2,3]. It halves the risk of breast cancer recurrence and reduces the risk of death by 25%. Tamoxifen is also effective as a preventive agent in women at high risk of breast cancer [4]. Both SSRIs and tamoxifen are metabolized primarily by the same enzyme, cytochrome P450 variant 2D6 (CYP2D6) [5,6]. The net result can be competitive inhibition or direct inhibition, resulting in a reduced plasma concentration of one of the active metabolites of tamoxifen, 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyltamoxifen (sometimes known as endoxifen) [7,8]. Given the relatively frequent use of SSRIs by patients receiving tamoxifen treatment, the safety of concurrent use of the two medications is under scrutiny. The key question is whether SSRI-mediated CYP2D6 inhibition reduces or eliminates the survival advantage conferred by tamoxifen in breast cancer patients.Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors inhibit CYP2D6 to varying degrees. Paroxetine and fluoxetine are the strongest inhibitors, with paroxetine irreversibly inhibiting CYP2D6 activity. Compounds such as fluvoxamine and citalopram are weaker inhibitors [9]. Reduced plasma concentrations of 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyltamoxifen have been reported for women who used paroxetine concomitantly with tamoxifen, but not for those who used tamoxifen together with the selective serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine – a weak CYP2D6 inhibitor [7,8].Changes in plasma concentrations of 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyltamoxifen suggest that women taking a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor might benefit less, or not at all, from tamoxifen adjuvant therapy. However, findings from clinical epidemiology studies addressing this question have been inconsistent. Our population-based case–control study in Denmark documented that citalopram and its stereoisomer, escitalopram, were the most frequently used SSRIs among Danish breast cancer patients [10–12]. We saw no evidence of an association between concurrent use of citalopram/escitalopram and tamoxifen and risk of breast cancer recurrence, regardless of the duration of overlapping use of the two compounds. In the small subset of women taking more potent CYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline), there was also no association with breast cancer recurrence. By contrast, a Canadian study reported higher breast cancer mortality among women who used paroxetine concurrently with tamoxifen. The highest mortality occurred in women with the longest concurrent use of these two medications [13]. A US population-based study presented by Aubert and colleagues at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting in 2009 also found an increased risk of breast cancer recurrence among women concurrently using tamoxifen and the more potent CYP2D6 inhibitors (paroxetine, fluoxetine and sertraline), but not among women using the weaker inhibitors (citalopram, escitalopram and fluvoxamine) [14,15]. Only an abstract of this study is available at the time of writing. More detailed examination of their findings awaits publication of the full report. A recently published Dutch study, also presented at the 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting, found no association between CYP2D6 inhibitor use (most frequently paroxetine and fluoxetine) in patients treated with tamoxifen and breast cancer recurrence [16]. However, this finding was based on only 18 breast cancer events among SSRI users.Two additional studies, both US-based, reported no association between antidepressants and rates of breast cancer recurrence or mortality, even among users of the most potent CYP2D6 inhibitors [17,18]. However, these studies had low power. No studies have examined the impact of concurrent use of the weaker CYP2D6 inhibitor, fluvoxamine on breast cancer outcome. In a letter to the editor of the British Medical Journal, Jenkinson [19] emphasized that two of the published studies [11,13] reported lowest mortality among users of fluoxetine, despite it being a relatively potent CYP2D6 inhibitor. Thus, findings from the limited observational studies available do not appear to support the biological rationale for a negative impact of CYP2D6 inhibitor use on breast cancer recurrence and mortality in women using tamoxifen. Perhaps the reduction in plasma concentrations of tamoxifen's active metabolites from concurrent SSRI treatment is insufficient to actually eliminate tamoxifen's anti-tumor effects [20,21].Over 90 polymorphic variants of CYP2D6 have been identified, some of which reduce or eliminate CYP2D6 activity [101]. Depending on their CYP2D6 genotype, patients can be classified as poor (two nonfunctional alleles), intermediate (one nonfunctional and one reduced-activity allele), extensive (at least one normal allele) or ultra-rapid metabolizers (two functional alleles) [22–24]. Research has demonstrated reduced plasma concentrations of 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyltamoxifen among patients heterozygous or homozygous for the CYP2D6 variant allele [7,8]. Thus, in theory, a patient's CYP2D6 genotype profile can determine the effectiveness of drugs such as tamoxifen. Nonetheless, the published research, extensively reviewed elsewhere [21], has demonstrated little overall variation in tamoxifen effectiveness, in terms of breast cancer recurrence and mortality, among individuals with functionally variant CYP2D6 alleles, compared with those without variant alleles.To date, two published studies have examined the combined effect of genetic variants and pharmacologic CYP2D6 inhibitors (including antidepressants) on the effectiveness of tamoxifen in reducing breast cancer recurrence and mortality. Using data from a registry of BRCA1/2 carriers, Newman et al. found higher recurrence and mortality among postmenopausal women who were CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (those with CYP2D6 variant alleles or those who took CYP2D6-inhibiting medications), especially among women with the BRCA2 mutation, based on the low numbers of patients with this mutation [25]. A larger study of postmenopausal women by Goetz et al. found that patients with decreased CYP2D6 activity (defined as the presence of one or two CYP2D6*4 alleles or the co-administration of a moderate or potent CYP2D6 inhibitor) had higher breast cancer recurrence rates and poorer survival [26]. In both studies, however, information on CYP2D6-inhibitor drugs was collected from medical records after breast cancer recurrence, and abstractors may not have been blinded to the study outcomes.Several factors may explain the conflicting findings of the few published studies. First, national differences in physicians' preferences for prescribing specific antidepressants (e.g., citalopram is a frequent choice in Denmark), together with variation in the population distribution of CYP2D6 genetic variants, are likely to introduce variation in study results. Second, sources of medication data differ across studies, ranging from medical record review [18,25,27], to prescription claims databases [10–13,15,16,28]. Third, much previous research has had low statistical power owing to limited sample size regarding various drug exposures, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions [11,18,25,28]. Fourth, published studies provide limited detail on tamoxifen compliance, although prescription claims data are likely to be a good proxy for actual use, especially when multiple prescriptions are filled and patients are reimbursed for a portion of the cost. Finally, very limited data is available on the combined effect of CYP2D6 genetic variants and CYP2D6-inhibiting medications with regard to breast cancer recurrence and mortality. Well-designed studies with prospectively collected data are warranted to investigate these intricate and clinically important gene–drug interactions.Despite its merits in terms of breast cancer prevention and reductions in recurrence and mortality, the antiestrogenic and estrogenic effects of tamoxifen produce mild-to-severe side effects, including hot flashes and vasomotor symptoms, induction or exacerbation of depression, venous thromboembolism and endometrial cancer [3]. Women who experience tamoxifen-induced side effects are more likely to discontinue treatment [29]. Thus, the importance of effective clinical control of such side effects cannot be overstated, both in terms of health-related quality of life and breast cancer outcomes. While the findings of observational studies on the impact of concurrent use of antidepressants and tamoxifen remain inconclusive, mounting evidence suggests that, unless otherwise contraindicated, women on tamoxifen who experience depression and/or vasomotor symptoms can be prescribed weaker CYP2D6 inhibitors (citalopram, escitalopram, venlafaxine) without a negative impact on breast cancer prognosis [102].Financial & competing interests disclosureThis research was supported by grants from the US National Cancer Institute (R01CA118708), the Danish Cancer Society (DP06117) and the Karen Elise Jensen Foundation. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.Bibliography1 Fann JR, Thomas-Rich AM, Katon WJ et al.: Major depression after breast cancer: a review of epidemiology and treatment. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry30(2),112–126 (2008).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Jordan VC: Tamoxifen: catalyst for the change to targeted therapy. Eur. J. Cancer44(1),30–38 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar3 Osborne CK: Tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.339(22),1609–1618 (1998).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar4 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group: Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet365(9472),1687–1717 (2005).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Crewe HK, Ellis SW, Lennard MS, Tucker GT: Variable contribution of cytochromes P450 2D6, 2C9 and 3A4 to the 4-hydroxylation of tamoxifen by human liver microsomes. Biochem. Pharmacol.53(2),171–178 (1997).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar6 Crewe HK, Lennard MS, Tucker GT, Woods FR, Haddock RE: The effect of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors on cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) activity in human liver microsomes. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.34(3),262–265 (1992).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar7 Jin Y, Desta Z, Stearns V et al.: CYP2D6 genotype, antidepressant use, and tamoxifen metabolism during adjuvant breast cancer treatment. J. Natl Cancer Inst.97(1),30–39 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar8 Stearns V, Johnson MD, Rae JM et al.: Active tamoxifen metabolite plasma concentrations after coadministration of tamoxifen and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine. J. Natl Cancer Inst.95(23),1758–1764 (2003).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar9 Jeppesen U, Gram LF, Vistisen K, Loft S, Poulsen HE, Brosen K: Dose-dependent inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 by citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and paroxetine. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.51(1),73–78 (1996).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar10 Lash TL, Cronin-Fenton D, Ahern TP et al.: Breast cancer recurrence risk related to concurrent use of SSRI antidepressants and tamoxifen. Acta Oncol.49(3),305–312 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar11 Ahern TP, Pedersen L, Cronin-Fenton DP, Sorensen HT, Lash TL: No increase in breast cancer recurrence with concurrent use of tamoxifen and some CYP2D6-inhibiting medications. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.18(9),2562–2564 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar12 Lash TL, Pedersen L, Cronin-Fenton D et al.: Tamoxifen's protection against breast cancer recurrence is not reduced by concurrent use of the SSRI citalopram. Br. J. Cancer99(4),616–621 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar13 Kelly CM, Juurlink DN, Gomes T et al.: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and breast cancer mortality in women receiving tamoxifen: a population based cohort study. BMJ340,C693 (2010).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Holzman D: Tamoxifen, antidepressants, and CYP2D6: the conundrum continues. J. Natl Cancer Inst.101(20),1370–1371 (2009).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Aubert RE, Stanek EJ, Yao J et al.: Risk of breast cancer recurrence in women initiating tamoxifen with CYP2D6 inhibitors. J. Clin. Oncol.27(Suppl. 18) (2009) (Abstract CRA508).Crossref, Google Scholar16 Dezentje VO, van Blijderveen NJ, Gelderblom H et al.: Effect of concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitor use and tamoxifen adherence on breast cancer recurrence in early-stage breast cancer: a pharmacoepidemiologic study. J. Clin. Oncol.27(Suppl. 18) (2009) (Abstract CRA509).Crossref, Google Scholar17 Chubak J, Buist DS, Boudreau DM, Rossing MA, Lumley T, Weiss NS: Breast cancer recurrence risk in relation to antidepressant use after diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.112(1),123–132 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar18 Lehmann D, Nelsen J, Ramanath V, Newman N, Duggan D, Smith A: Lack of attenuation in the antitumor effect of tamoxifen by chronic CYP isoform inhibition. J. Clin. Pharmacol.44(8),861–865 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar19 Jenkinson ML: SSRIs and tamoxifen. Why condemn fluoxetine? BMJ340,C1319 (2010).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar20 Ratliff B, Dietze EC, Bean GR, Moore C, Wanko S, Seewaldt VL: Re: active tamoxifen metabolite plasma concentrations after coadministration of tamoxifen and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine. J. Natl Cancer Inst.96(11),883; author reply 884–885 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar21 Lash TL, Lien EA, Sorensen HT, Hamilton-Dutoit S: Genotype-guided tamoxifen therapy: time to pause for reflection? Lancet Oncol.10(8),825–833 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar22 Sistonen J, Sajantila A, Lao O, Corander J, Barbujani G, Fuselli S: CYP2D6 worldwide genetic variation shows high frequency of altered activity variants and no continental structure. Pharmacogenet. Genomics17(2),93–101 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar23 Johansson I, Lundqvist E, Bertilsson L, Dahl ML, Sjoqvist F, Ingelman-Sundberg M: Inherited amplification of an active gene in the cytochrome P450 CYP2D locus as a cause of ultrarapid metabolism of debrisoquine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA90(24),11825–11829 (1993).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar24 Rodriguez-Antona C, Ingelman-Sundberg M: Cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetics and cancer. Oncogene25(11),1679–1691 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar25 Newman WG, Hadfield KD, Latif A et al.: Impaired tamoxifen metabolism reduces survival in familial breast cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res.14(18),5913–5918 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar26 Goetz MP, Knox SK, Suman VJ et al.: The impact of cytochrome P450 2D6 metabolism in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.101(1),113–121 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar27 Goetz MP, Rae JM, Suman VJ et al.: Pharmacogenetics of tamoxifen biotransformation is associated with clinical outcomes of efficacy and hot flashes. J. Clin. Oncol.23(36),9312–9318 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar28 Chubak J, Bowles EJ, Terry MB, Trentham-Dietz A, Buist DS: Antidepressant medications and change in mammographic density in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.18(2),676–679 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar29 Lash TL, Fox MP, Westrup JL, Fink AK, Silliman RA: Adherence to tamoxifen over the five-year course. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.99(2),215–220 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar101 CYP2D6 allele nomenclature www.cypalleles.ki.se/cyp2d6.htmGoogle Scholar102 National Comprehensive Cancer Network www.nccn.orgGoogle ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByThe menopause after cancer study (MACS) - A multimodal technology assisted intervention for the management of menopausal symptoms after cancer – Trial protocol of a phase II studyContemporary Clinical Trials Communications, Vol. 24The Underrated Risks of Tamoxifen Drug Interactions10 April 2018 | European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Vol. 43, No. 5Tamoxifen and CYP2D6: A Controversy in PharmacogeneticsThe Role of Pharmacogenomics in Individualized Medicine17 January 2015Fluoxetine modulates breast cancer metastasis to the brain in a murine model16 August 2014 | BMC Cancer, Vol. 14, No. 1Metabolism and transport of tamoxifen in relation to its effectiveness: new perspectives on an ongoing controversyDeirdre P Cronin-Fenton, Per Damkier & Timothy L Lash11 December 2013 | Future Oncology, Vol. 10, No. 1Antidepressants and tamoxifen: interaction concerns1 October 2013 | Australasian Psychiatry, Vol. 21, No. 5Tamoxifen and Depression: Drug Interactions in Breast Cancer5 September 2013 | The Consultant Pharmacist, Vol. 28, No. 9The importance of nonpharmacogenetic factors in endocrine therapyColin McCowan & Alastair M Thompson19 April 2012 | Pharmacogenomics, Vol. 13, No. 6Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Targeted Anticancer Therapy. Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators: A Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory Perspective7 June 2012Clinical epidemiology and pharmacology of CYP2D6 inhibition related to breast cancer outcomes10 January 2014 | Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 4, No. 3 Vol. 6, No. 6 STAY CONNECTED Metrics History Published online 8 June 2010 Published in print June 2010 Information© Future Medicine LtdFinancial & competing interests disclosureThis research was supported by grants from the US National Cancer Institute (R01CA118708), the Danish Cancer Society (DP06117) and the Karen Elise Jensen Foundation. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.PDF download

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX