Revisão Revisado por pares

Distributed collaboration for engineering design: A review and reappraisal

2001; Wiley; Volume: 11; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/1520-6564(200124)11

ISSN

2157-4650

Autores

Janeen Hammond, Richard J. Koubek, Craig Harvey,

Tópico(s)

Software Engineering Techniques and Practices

Resumo

Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service IndustriesVolume 11, Issue 1 p. 35-52 Distributed collaboration for engineering design: A review and reappraisal Janeen Hammond, Janeen Hammond Department of Industrial Engineering, 1287 Grissom Hall, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907Search for more papers by this authorRichard J. Koubek, Richard J. Koubek Department of Biomedical, Industrial, and Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435Search for more papers by this authorCraig M. Harvey, Craig M. Harvey Department of Biomedical, Industrial, and Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435Search for more papers by this author Janeen Hammond, Janeen Hammond Department of Industrial Engineering, 1287 Grissom Hall, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907Search for more papers by this authorRichard J. Koubek, Richard J. Koubek Department of Biomedical, Industrial, and Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435Search for more papers by this authorCraig M. Harvey, Craig M. Harvey Department of Biomedical, Industrial, and Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435Search for more papers by this author First published: 09 January 2001 https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6564(200124)11:1 3.0.CO;2-ECitations: 18AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract Collaborative manufacturing is aimed to increase the flexibility of design and production processes through multiple organizations pooling strengths on a product-by-product basis to create distributed collaborative corporations. These collaborations involve multidisciplinary, geographically dispersed teams of engineers who often communicate only through voice, video, or computer-mediated interfaces. Utilizing sociotechnical theory as a framework, this article reviews multiple sources of literature on collaboration and interprets them in light of the collaborative engineering design process. A conceptual model of distributed engineering collaboration based on a sociotechnical theory framework is proposed to understand how technology changes both the social interaction and the technical design process. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. REFERENCES Ballay, J.M. ( 1987). An experimental view of the design process. In W.B. Rouse & K.R. Boff. (Eds.), System design: Behavioral perspectives on designers, tools, and organizations (pp. 65– 82). New York: North-Holland. Bennison, D. ( 1988). Transport/telecommunication interactions: Empirical evidence from a videoconferencing field trial in the United Kingdom. Transportation Research, 22A. (4), 291– 300. Brown, D., & Chandrasekaran, B. ( 1989). Design problem solving: Knowledge structures and control strategies. (pp. 19– 35). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Bul, T.X., & Slvasankaran, T.R. ( 1990). Relation between GDSS use and group task complexity. In J.F. Nunamaker, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. (pp. 69–78). IEEE Computer Society Press. Burleson, B.R., Levine, B.J., & Samter, W. ( 1984). Decision-making procedure and decision quality. Human Communication Research, 10. (4), 557– 574. Carey, J.M., & Kacmar, C.J. ( 1997). The impact of communication mode and task complexity on small groups performance and member satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 13. (1), 23– 49. Carmel, E. ( 1991). Supporting joint application development with electronic meeting systems: A field study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tuscon. Choi, S. ( 1996). Analysis of communication behaviors in isdn-tv model conference using synchronous and asynchronous speech transmission. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E79-D. (6), 728– 736. Dawson, P. ( 1996). Advanced technology design, people and organization: Experience of Australian industrial collaboration. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 7. (5), 5– 11. Dennis, A.R., Tyran, C.K., Vogel, D.R., & Nunamaker, J.F., Jr. ( 1990). An evaluation of information technology to support strategic management. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 35– 52. Forsythe, C., & Ashby, M.R. ( 1996). Human factors in agile manufacturing. Ergonomics in Design, 4. (1), 15– 21. Gallupe, R., DeSanctis, G., & Disckson, G. ( 1988). Computer-based support for group problem-finding: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 277– 295. George, J.F., Easton, G.K., Nunamaker, J.F., Jr., & Northcroft, G.B. ( 1990). A study of collaborative group work with and without computer based support. Information Systems Research, 1, 394– 415. Goldman, S., & Preiss, K. ( 1992). 21st century manufacturing enterprise strategy: Vol. 2. Infrastructure. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University. Gouran, D.S., & Hirokawa, R.Y. ( 1986). Counteractive functions of communication in effective group decision-making. In R.Y. Hirokawa & M.S. Poole. (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 81– 90). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Greiner, R., & Metes, G. ( 1995). Going virtual. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Greis, H.A. ( 1993). American industrial dominance will depend on agility to manage change. Focus, 1. Hacker, M., & Kleiner, B. ( 1996). Identifying critical factors impacting virtual work group performance. IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 1996. (pp. 201– 205). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. Hartman, F., & Ashrafi, R. ( 1996). Virtual organizations—an opportunity for learning. IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 1996. (pp. 196– 200). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. Harvey, C.M. ( 1997). Toward a model of distributed engineering collaboration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Hill, G.W. ( 1982). Groups versus individual performance: Are n+1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91. (3), 517– 539. Hiltz, S.R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. ( 1987). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13. (2), 225– 252. Hirokawa, R.Y., & Scheerhorn, D.R. ( 1986). Communication in faulty group decision-making. In R.Y. Hirokawa & M.S. Poole. (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 63– 80). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Hubka, V., & Eder, W.E. ( 1988). Theory of technical systems. New York: Springer-Verlag. King, N., & Majchrzak, A. ( 1996). Concurrent engineering tools: Are the human issues being ignored? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43. (2), 189– 201. Kovac, F.J. ( 1993). Goodyear agility focuses on collaboration, technology and employee empowerment. Focus, 2. Kuokka, D., & Harada, L. ( 1995). Communication infrastructure for concurrent engineering. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, 9. (4), 283– 297. Lewis, F. ( 1982). Facilitator: A microcomputer decision support system for small groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. Lim, I.H., Raman, K.S., & Wei, K.K. ( 1990). Does GDSS promote more democratic decision making? The Singapore Experiment, 23, 59– 68. Meister, D. ( 1989). A cognitive theory of design and requirements for a behavioral design aid. In W.B. Rouse & K.R. Boff. (Eds.), System design: Behavioral perspectives on designers, tools, and organizations (pp. 229– 244). North-Holland, New York: Elsevier Science. Meredith, J. ( 1997). Emperical investigation of sociotechnical issues in engineering design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. Michaelsen, L.K., Watson, W.E., & Black, R.H. ( 1989). A realistic test of individuals versus group consensus decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74. (5), 834– 839. Olaniran, B.A. ( 1996). A model of group satisfaction in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face meetings. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15. (1), 24– 36. Olson, G.M., Olson, J.S., Carter, M.R., & Storrøsten, M. ( 1992). Small groups design meetings: An analysis of collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 347– 374. Poole, M.S., & Doelger, J.A. ( 1986). Developmental processes in group decision-making. In R.Y. Hirokawa & M.S. Poole. (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 35– 61). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Poole, M.S., & Hirokawa, R.Y. ( 1986). Communication and group decision-making: A critical assessment. In R.Y. Hirokawa & M.S. Poole. (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 15– 31). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Sarkis, J., Presley, A., & Liles, D. ( 1995). The management of technology within an enterprise engineering framework. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 28. (3), 497– 511. Seibold, D.R., & Meyers, R.A. ( 1986). Communication and influence in group decision-making. In R.Y. Hirokawa & M.S. Poole. (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 133– 155). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Shaw, M. ( 1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. ( 3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Sriram, D., Stephanopoulos, G., Logcher, R., Gossard, D., Groleau, N., Serrano, D., & Navinchandra, D. ( 1989). Knowledge-based system applications in engineering design: Research at MIT. AI Magazine, 79– 95. Vora, P., & Helander, M. ( 1992). A review of design models and a proposal for a taxonomy of design. In M. Helander & M. Nagamachi. (Eds.), Design for manufacturability: A systems approach to concurrent engineering and ergonomics (pp. 78– 90). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis. Watson, R., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. ( 1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 463– 477. Weeks, G.D., & Chapanis, A. ( 1976). Cooperative versus conflictive problem solving in three telecommunication modes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 879– 917. Williams, E. ( 1977). Experimental comparison of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84. (5), 963– 976. Zaleska, M. ( 1978). Individual and group choices among solutions of a problem when solution verifiability is moderate or low. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 37– 53. Citing Literature Volume11, Issue1Winter 2001Pages 35-52 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)