State-dependent learning and drug discriminative control of behaviour: An overview
1986; Wiley; Volume: 74; Issue: S109 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1600-0404.1986.tb04863.x
ISSN1600-0404
Autores Tópico(s)Memory and Neural Mechanisms
ResumoActa Neurologica ScandinavicaVolume 74, Issue S109 p. 37-60 State-dependent learning and drug discriminative control of behaviour: An overview Torbjörn U C. Järbe, Corresponding Author Torbjörn U C. Järbe University of Uppsala, Department of Psychology, Uppsala, SwedenAddress: Torbjörn U C Järbe University of Uppsala Department of Psychology Box 227 S-751 04 Uppsala SwedenSearch for more papers by this author Torbjörn U C. Järbe, Corresponding Author Torbjörn U C. Järbe University of Uppsala, Department of Psychology, Uppsala, SwedenAddress: Torbjörn U C Järbe University of Uppsala Department of Psychology Box 227 S-751 04 Uppsala SwedenSearch for more papers by this author First published: October 1986 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1986.tb04863.xCitations: 27AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References 1 Overton DA. Contextual stimulus effects of drugs and internal states. In: PD Balsam, AM Tomie, eds. Context and learning. Hillsdale, NJ: L Erlbaum Ass, 1985: 357– 84. 2 Siegel S. Drug dissociation in the nineteenth century. In: FC Colpaert, JL Slangen, eds. Drug discrimination: applications in CNS pharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982: 257– 61. 3 Siegel S. Wilkie Collins: Victorian novelist as psychopharmacologist. J Hist Med Allied Sci 1983; 38: 161– 75. 4 Overton DA. State dependent learning and drug discrimination. In: LL Iversen, SD Iversen, SH Snyder, eds. Handbook of psychopharmacology. Vol 18. New York: Plenum Press, 1984: 59– 127. 5 FC Colpaert, JA Rosecrans, eds. Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978. 6 FC Colpaert, JL Slangen, eds. Drug discrimination: applications in CNS pharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982. 7 BT Ho, DW Richards, DL Chute, eds. Drug discrimination and state dependent learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978. 8 H. Lal, ed. Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. New York: Plenum Press, 1977. 9 Bliss DK. Theoretical explanations of drug-dissociated behaviors. Fed Proc 1974; 33: 1787– 96. 10 Henriksson BG, Järbe T. Effects of diazepam on conditioned avoidance learning in rats and its transfer to normal state conditions. Psychophar-macologia 1971; 20: 186– 90. 11 Henriksson BG, Järbe T. The effect of two tetrahydrocannabinols (delta-9-THC and delta-8-THC) on conditioned avoidance learning in rats and its transfer to normal state conditions. Psychopharmacologia 1971; 22: 23– 30. 12 Overton DA. State-dependent or "dissociated" learning produced with pentobarbital. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1964; 57: 3– 12. 13 Overton DA. Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning. Fed Proc 1974; 33: 1800– 13. 14 Girden E., Culler EA. Conditioned responses in curarized striate muscle in dogs. J Comp Psychol 1937; 23: 261– 74. 15 Case TJ, Funderbank WH. An effect of curare on the central nervous system. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 1947; 72: 195– 6. 16 Gardner LA. An experimental re-examination of the dissociative effects of curareform drugs. M A Thesis, Department of Psychology, Oberlin College, Oberlin Ohio, 1961. 17 Gardner LA, McCollough C. A reinvestigation of the dissociative effect of curareform drugs. Am Psychol 1962; 17: 398. 18 Holmgren B. Conditioned avoidance reflex under pentobarbital. Bol Inst Estud Med Biol (Mex) 1964; 22: 21– 38. 19 Overton DA. Major theories of state dependent learning. In: BT Ho, DW Richards, DL Chute, eds. Drug discrimination and state dependent learning. New York: Academic Pres, 1978: 283– 318. 20 Berger BD, Stein L. Asymmetrical dissociation of learning between scopolamine and Wy 4036, a new benzodiazepine tranquilizer. Psychophar-macologia 1969; 14: 351– 8. 21 Nielsen HC, Dewitt JR, Gill JH. Some failures of the drug discrimination hypothesis of state-dependent learning. In: FC Colpaert, JA Rosecrans, eds. Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978: 423– 43. 22 Modrow HE, Bliss DK. Electrophysiological correlates of state-dependent learning. Physiol Psychol 1979; 7: 259– 62. 23 Overton DA. State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psy-chopharmacologia 1966; 10: 6– 31. 24 Miller NE. Objective techniques for studying motivational effects of drugs on animals. In: S. Garattini, V. Ghetti, eds. Psychotropic drugs. Proc Int Symposium on Psychotropic Drugs. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1957: 83– 103. 25 Swanson JM, Kinsbourne M. The 2times2 design reconsidered: limitations imposed by the statistical models. In: FC Colpaert, JA Rosecrans, eds. Stimulus properties: ten years of progress. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978: 467– 80. 26 Bignami G., Rosic N. Acquisition and performance effects of scopolamine and of treatment withdrawal in avoidance situations. Physiol Behav 1972; 8: 1127– 34. 27 Delini-Stula A. Suppression of conditioned avoidance behavior and the development of tolerance to delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol and dimethylpyran in rats. Pharmacopsychiatr Neuro-psychopharmacol 1973; 6: 189– 97. 28 Goldberg ME, Hefner MA, Robichaud RC, Dubinsky B. Effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and chlordiazepoxide (CDP) on state-dependent learning: evidence for asymmetrical dissociation. Psychopharmacologia 1973; 30: 173– 84. 29 Grunfeld Y., Edery H. Psychopharmacological activity of the active constituents of hashish and some related cannabinoids. Psychopharmacologia 1968; 14: 200– 10. 30 Järbe TUC, Henriksson BG. Effects of delta-8-THC and delta-9-THC on the acquisition of a discriminative positional habit in rats. The transitions between normal and tetrahydrocannabinol-induced states on reversal learning. Psychophar-macologia 1973; 31: 321– 32. 31 Johansson JO, Henriksson BG, Järbe TUC. Effects of delta-8-THC on dissociation of conditioned avoidance responding in tolerant and non-tolerant rats. Physiol Psychol 1974; 2: 431– 2. 32 Järbe TUC. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: tolerance after noncontingent exposure in rats. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1978; 231: 49– 56. 33 Webster CD, LeBlanc AE, Marshman JA, Beaton JM. Acquisition and loss of tolerance to 1-delta9-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol in rats on an avoidance schedule. Psychopharmacologia 1973; 30: 217– 26. 34 Altman JL, Albert J-M, Milstein SL, Greenberg I. Drugs as discriminable events in humans. In: H. Lal, ed. Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. New York: Plenum Press, 1977: 187– 206. 35 Chait LD, Uhlenhuth EH, Johanson CE. An experimental paradigm for studying the discriminative stimulus properties of drugs in humans. Psychopharmacology 1984; 82: 272– 4. 36 Kallman WM, Kallman MJ, Harry GJ, Woodson PP, Rosecrans JA. Nicotine as a discriminative stimulus in human subjects. In: FC Colpaert, JL Slangen, eds. Drug discrimination: applications in CNS pharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982: 211– 8. 37 Eich JE. The cue-dependent nature of state-dependent retrieval. Mem Cognit 1980; 8: 157– 73. 38 Eich JE, Birnbaum IM. Repetition, cuing, and state-dependent memory. Mem Cognit 1982; 10: 103– 14. 39 Downey DJ. State dependent learning with centrally and noncentrally active drugs. Bull Psychon Soc 1975; 5: 281– 4. 40 Overton DA. Discriminative control of behavior by drug states. In: T. Thompson, R. Pickens, eds. Stimulus properties of drugs. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1971: 87– 110. 41 Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJ, Janssen PA. Differential response control by isopropamide: a peripherally induced discriminative cue. Eur J Pharmacol 1975; 34: 381– 4. 42 Colpaert FC. Drug-produced cues and states: some theoretical and methodological inferences. In: H. Lai, ed. Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. New York: Plenum Press, 1977: 5– 21. 43 Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJ, Janssen PA. Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning. Psychopharmacologia 1976; 46: 169– 77. 44 Koek W., Slangen JL. Drug stimulus generalization in the absence of discrimination training. In: FC Colpaert, JL Slangen, eds. Drug discrimination: applications in CNS pharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982: 263– 8. 45 Barry III H., Krimmer EC. Pharmacology of discriminative drug stimuli. In: BT Ho, HIDW Richards, DL Chute, eds. Drug discrimination and state dependent learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978: 3– 32. 46 Overton DA. Comparison of the degree of discriminability of various drugs using the T-maze drug discrimination paradigm. Psychopharmacology 1982; 76: 385– 95. 47 Järbe TUC. Drug discrimination learning: cue properties of drugs. In: A. Greenshaw, CT Dourish, eds. Experimental psychopharmacology. Clifton: Humana Press (in press). 48 Järbe TUC, Kroon-Järbe ER. Discriminability and procedure: effects of cocaine and amphetamine. Psychol Rep 1983; 52: 611– 6. 49 Waser PG, Martin A., Heer-Carcano L. The effect of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and LSD on the acquisition of an active avoidance response in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 1976; 46: 249– 54. 50 Järbe TUC, Holmgren B. Discriminative properties of pentobarbital after repeated, noncontingent exposure in gerbils. Psychopharmacology 1977; 53: 39– 44. 51 Kilbey MM, Harris RT, Aigner TG. Establishment of equivalent external and internal stimulus control of an operant behavior and its reversal. Proc Am Psychol Ass 1971; 6: 767– 8. 52 Demellweek C., Goudie AJ. Behavioural tolerance to amphetamine and other psychostimulants: the case for considering behavioural mechanisms. Psychopharmacology 1983; 80: 287– 307. 53 Bueno OF, Carlini EA. Dissociation of learning in marihuana tolerant rats. Psychopharmacologia 1972; 25: 49– 56. 54 Järbe TUC, Henriksson BG. Open-field behavior and acquisition of discriminative response control in delta-9-THC tolerant rats. Experientia 1973; 29: 1251– 3. 55 Overton DA, Ercole MA, Dutta P. Discriminability of the postictal state produced by electroconvulsive shock in rats. Physiol Psychol 1976; 4: 207– 12. 56 Haug T., Götestam KG. Two opposite effects of diazepam on fear by differential training in the CER-paradigm. Psychopharmacology 1981; 75: 110– 3. 57 Overton DA. Differential conditioning can reverse the fear-reducing effects of phenobarbetal. Bull Psychol Sci 1984; 22: 73– 6. 58 Cameron OG, Appel JB. Conditioned suppression of bar-pressing behavior by stimuli associated with drugs. J Exp Anal Behav 1972; 17: 127– 37. 59 Cameron OG, Appel JB. Generalization of LSD-induced conditioned suppression. Psychon Sci 1972; 27: 302– 4. 60 Turner EG, Altshuler HL. Conditioned suppression of an operant response using d-amphetamine as the conditioned stimulus. Psychopharmacology 1976; 50: 139– 43. 61 Holloway FA. State dependent retrieval based on time of day. In: BT Ho, DW Richards, DL Chute, eds. Drug discrimination and state dependent learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978: 319– 43. 62 Wansley RA, Holloway FA. Multiple retention deficits following one-trial appetitive training. Behav Biol 1975; 14: 135– 49. 63 Schechter MD. Rapid acquisition of a two-drug discrimination: time of day effect upon saline state. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1981; 14: 269– 71. 64 Weingartner H., Murphy DL, Stillman RC. Mood state dependent learning. In: PC Colpaert, JA Rosecrans, eds. Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978: 445– 53. 65 Conger JJ. Effects of alcohol on conflict behavior in albino rat. Quart J Stud Alcohol 1951; 12: 1– 29. 66 Frey LG, Winter JC. Current trends in the study of drugs as discriminative stimuli. In: BT Ho, DW Richards, DL Chute, eds. Drug discrimination and state dependent learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978: 35– 45. 67 Stolerman IP, Shine PJ. Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1982-1983. Psychopharmacology 1985; 86: 1– 11. 68 Kalish HI. Stimulus generalization. In: MH Marx, ed. Learning: processes. London: MacMillan Co, 1969: 207– 57. 69 Mackintosh NJ. The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press, 1974. 70 Catania AC. Discriminative stimulus functions of drugs: interpretations. In: T. Thompson, R. Pickens, eds. Stimulus properties of drugs. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971: 149– 55. 71 Barry H. Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats. Fed Proc 1974; 33: 1814– 24. 72 Järbe TUC, McMillan DE. Delta-9-THC as a discriminative stimulus in rats and pigeons: generalization to THC-metabolites and SP-111. Psycho-pharmacology 1980; 71: 281– 9. 73 Heinemann EG, Chase S. Stimulus generalisation. In: WK Estes, ed. Conditioning and behavior theory. Hillsdale: LEA, 1975: 305– 49. 74 Honig WK, Urcuioli PJ. The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956); 25 years of research on stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav 1981; 36: 405– 45. 75 Järbe TUC, Swedberg MDB. A conceptualization of drug discrimination learning. In: FC Colpaert, JL Slangen, eds. Drug discrimination: application in CNS pharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982: 327– 41. 76 Colpaert FC, Janssen PA. Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of progressively decreasing training dose in cocaine-saline discrimination. Neuropharmacology 1982; 21: 1187– 94. 77 Colpaert FC, Janssen PA. Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: the effects of dose ratio and absolute dose level in the case of fentanyl dose-dose discrimination. Arch Int Pharmacodynam Ther 1982; 258: 283– 99. 78 Herling S., Shannon HE. Ro 15–1788 antagonizes the discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam in rats but not similar effects of pentobarbital. Life Sci 1982; 31: 2105– 12. 79 Young R., Glennon RA, Dewey WL. Stereoselective stimulus effects of 3-methylflunitrazepam and pentobarbital. Life Sci 1984; 34: 1977– 83. 80 Järbe TUC, Swedberg MDB. Differences in the stimulus effects of CNS depressant substances as evidenced by drug vs drug discrimination techniques. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 1981; 49 (suppl IV, abstract 45). 81 Krimmer EC, Barry III H. Pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide differentiated from each other and from nondrug. Commun Psychopharmacol 1979; 3: 93– 9. 82 Overton DA. Comparison of ethanol, pentobarbital and phenobarbital using drug vs drug discrimination training. Psychopharmacology 1977; 53: 195– 9. 83 Colpaert FC. The pharmacological specificity of opiate drug discrimination. In: Colpaert FC, Slangen JL, eds. Drug discrimination: applications in CNS pharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982: 3– 16. 84 Haug T., Götestam KG. Onset and offset of the diazepam stimulus complex. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1982; 17: 1171– 4. 85 Hilrunen AJ, Járbe TUC. Interactions between deita-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol as evaluated by drug discrimination procedures in rats and pigeons. Neuropharmacology (in press). 86 Järbe TUC, Swedberg MDB, Mechoulam R. A repeated tests procedure to assess onset and duration of the cue properties of (-)-delta-9-THC, (-)-delta-8-THC-DMH and (+)-delta8-THC. Psychopharmacology 1981; 75: 152– 7. 87 Woods JH, Herling S., Young AM. Comparison of discriminative and reinforcing stimulus characteristics of morphine-like opioids and two met-enkephalin analogues. Neuropeptides 1981; 1: 409– 19. 88 Stolerman IP, D'Mello GD. Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats. Psychopharmacology 1981; 73: 295– 303. 89 Nielsen EB, Jepsen SA. Antagonism of the amphetamine cue by both classical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. Eur J Pharmacol 1985; 111: 167– 76. 90 Colpaert FC, Janssen PA. Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: the effect of frustrative non-reward in fentanyl-saline discrimination. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1981; 254: 241– 51. 91 McMillan DE, Wenger GR. Bias of phencyclidine discrimination by the schedule of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 1984; 42: 51– 66. 92 Koek W., Slangen JL. Effects of reinforcement differences between drug and saline sessions on discriminative stimulus properties of fentanyl. In: FC Colpaert, JL Slangen, eds. Drug discrimination: applications in CNS pharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982: 343– 54. 93 Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJ, Janssen PA. Drugcue conditioning to external stimulus conditions. Eur J Pharmacol 1978; 49: 185– 8. 94 Järbe TUC, Johansson B. Interaction between drug discriminative stimuli and exteroceptive sensory signals. Behav Neurosci 1984; 98: 686– 94. 95 Järbe TUC, Sterner U., Hjerpe C. Conditioning of an interoceptive drug stimulus to different exteroceptive contexts. Psychopharmacology 1981; 73: 23– 6. 96 Järbe TUC, Laaksonen T., Svensson R. Influence of exteroceptive contextual conditions upon internal drug stimulus control. Psychopharmacology 1983; 80: 31– 4. 97 Järbe TUC, Svensson R., Laaksonen T. Conditioning of a discriminative drug stimulus: overshadowing and blocking like procedures. Scand J Psychol 1983; 24: 325– 30. 98 Krimmer EC, Benson BJ, McGuire M., Barry III H. Conditional sensory stimuli during morphine discrimination. In: FC Colpaert, JL Slangen, eds. Drug discrimination: applications in CNS pharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982: 135– 45. 99 Schechter MD. Drug sensitivity of individual rats determines degree of drug discrimination. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1983; 19: 1– 4. 100 Lal H., Yaden S. Discriminative stimuli produced by clonidine in spontaneously hypertensive rats: generalization to antihypertensive drugs with different mechanisms of action. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1985; 232: 33– 9. 101 Weissman A. The discriminability of aspirin in arthritic and nonarthritic rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1976; 5: 583– 6. 102 Gellert VF, Holtzman SG. Discriminative stimulus effects of naltrexone in the morphine-dependent rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1979; 211: 596– 605. 103 Valentino RJ, Herling S., Woods JH. Discriminative stimulus effects of naltrexone in narcoticnaive and morphine-treated pigeons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1983; 224: 307– 13. 104 Holtzman SG. Discriminative stimulus effects of morphine withdrawal in the dependent rat: suppression by opiate and nonopiate drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1985; 233: 80– 6. 105 Swedberg MDB, Järbe TUC. Morphine cue saliency: limits of discriminability and third-state perception by pigeons. In: FC Colpaert, JL Slangen, eds. Drug discrimination: application in CNS pharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982: 147– 64. 106 Barrett RJ, Blackshear MA, Sanders-Bush E. Discriminative stimulus properties of L-5-hydroxytryptophan: behavioral evidence for multiple serotonin receptors. Psychopharmacology 1982; 76: 29– 35. 107 Colpaert FC, Kuyps JJ, Niemegeers CJ, Janssen PA. Discriminative stimulus properties of fentanyl and morphine: tolerance and dependence. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1976; 5: 401– 8. 108 Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJ, Janssen PA. Studies on the regulation of sensitivity to the narcotic cue. Neuropharmacology 1978; 17: 705– 13. 109 Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJ, Janssen PA. Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity. A long-term study on the cocaine cue. In: FC Colpaert, JA Rosecrans, eds. Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978: 281– 99. 110 McKenna M., Ho BT. Induced tolerance to the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1977; 7: 273– 6. 111 Miksic S., Lal H. Tolerance to morphine-produced discriminative stimuli and analgesia. Psychopharmacology 1977; 54: 217– 21. 112 Shannon HE, Holtzman SG. Evaluation of the discriminative effects of morphine in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1976; 198: 54– 65. 113 Hutchings GC, Gonzalez LP, Altshuler HL. Changes in cocaine discrimination in rats during chronic cocaine exposure. Fed Proc 1978; 37: 274. 114 Witkin JM, Dykstra LA, Carter RB. Acute tolerance to the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1982; 17: 223– 8. 115 Wood DM, Lal H., Emmett-Oglesby M. Acquisition and recovery of tolerance to the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. Neuropharmacology 1984; 23: 1419– 23. 116 Kallman MJ, Rosecrans JA. Drug discrimination paradigms: problems of tolerance and behavioral disruption. In: FC Colpaert, JA Rosecrans, eds. Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978: 253– 63. 117 Rosecrans JA. Stimulus properties of drugs: some observations on its current status and directions for the future. In: FC Colpaert, JA Rosecrans, eds. Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978: 553– 7. 118 Overton DA, Merkle DA, Hayes M. Are "no drug" cues discriminated during drug-discrimination training? Anim Learn Behav 1983; 11: 295– 301. 119 Swedberg MDB. A model of discrimination learning with interoceptive stimuli. Doctoral dissertation from the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Uppsala, 1985. 120 Schuster CR, Balster RL. The discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. In: T. Thompson, PB Dews, eds. Advances in behavioral pharmacology. Vol 1. New York: Academic Press, 1977: 85– 138. 121 Järbe TUC, Rollenhagen C. Morphine as a discriminative cue in gerbils: drug generalization and antagonism. Psychopharmacology 1978; 58: 271– 5. 122 Järbe TUC. Characteristics of pentobarbital discrimination in the gerbil: transfer and antagonism. Psychopharmacology 1976; 49: 33– 40. 123 Järbe TUC, Johansson JO. Drug discrimination in rats: effects of mixtures of ditran and cholines-terase inhibitors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1976; 4: 151– 7. 124 Järbe TUC, Loman P., Swedberg MDB. Evidence supporting lack of discriminative stimulus properties of a combination of naltrexone and morphine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1979; 10: 493– 7. 125 Johansson JO, Järbe TUC. Antagonism of pentobarbital induced discrimination in the gerbil. Psychopharmacologia 1975; 41: 225– 8. 126 Johansson JO, Järbe TUC. Diazepam as a discriminative cue: its antagonism by bemegride. Eur J Pharmacol 1975; 30: 372– 5. 127 Swedberg MDB, Loman P., Järbe TUC. Effects of chlormethiazole (Heminevrin) on drug discrimination and open-field behavior in gerbils. Psychopharmacology 1978; 59: 165– 70. 128 Winter JC. Drug-induced stimulus control. In: DE Blackman, DJ Sanger, eds. Contemporary research in behavioral pharmacology. New York: Plenum Press, 1978: 209– 37. 129 Swedberg MDB, Järbe TUC. Drug discrimination procedures: roles of relative stimulus control in two-drug cases. Psychopharmacology 1985; 86: 444– 51. 130 Järbe TUC. Cocaine cue in pigeons: time course studies and generalization to structurally related compounds (norcocaine, WIN 35, 428 and 35,065–2) and (+)-amphetamine. Br J Pharmacol 1981; 73: 843– 52. 131 Järbe TUC. Discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. Effects of apomorphine, haloperidol, procaine and other drugs. Neuropharmacology 1984; 23: 899– 907. 132 White JM, Holtzman SG. Three-choice drug discrimination in the rat: morphine, cyclazocine and saline. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1981; 217: 254– 62. 133 White JM, Holtzman SG. Further characterization of the three-choice morphine, cyclazocine and saline discrimination paradigm: opioids with agonist and antagonist properties. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1983; 224: 95– 9. 134 White JM, Holtzman SG. Three-choice drug discrimination: phencyclidine-like stimulus effects of opioids. Psychopharmacology 1983; 80: 1– 9. 135 Järbe TUC, Swedberg MDB. Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs: a brief history and a selective review. Scand J Psychol 1982; (suppl 1): 72– 8. Citing Literature Volume74, IssueS109October 1986Pages 37-60 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)