Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Do modular products lead to modular organizations?

2006; Wiley; Volume: 27; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/smj.528

ISSN

1097-0266

Autores

Glenn Hoetker,

Tópico(s)

Business Strategy and Innovation

Resumo

Strategic Management JournalVolume 27, Issue 6 p. 501-518 Research Article Do modular products lead to modular organizations? Glenn Hoetker, Corresponding Author Glenn Hoetker [email protected] College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A.College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 350 Wohlers Hall, 1206 South Sixth Street, Champaign, IL 61820-6980, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author Glenn Hoetker, Corresponding Author Glenn Hoetker [email protected] College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A.College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 350 Wohlers Hall, 1206 South Sixth Street, Champaign, IL 61820-6980, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author First published: 18 April 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.528Citations: 209AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract The tacit assumption that increased product modularity is associated with advantageous increases in organizational modularity underlies much of the literature on modularity. Previous empirical investigations of this assumption, few in number, have faced numerous confounding factors and generated conflicting results. I build a causal model for the relationship between product and organizational modularity, which I test using a distinctive empirical setting that controls for confounding factors present in previous studies. I find support for only part of the assumed relationship, showing that modularity is a more multifaceted concept than previously recognized. In particular, increased product modularity enhances reconfigurability of organizations more quickly than it allows firms to move activities out of hierarchy. The paper contributes to the emerging stream of research that focuses on the previously underappreciated costs of designing and maintaining a modular organization. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. REFERENCES Afuah A. 2001. Dynamic boundaries of the firm: are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 1211–1228. Ahuja G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(3): 425–445. Aiken LS, West SG. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage: Thousand Islands, CA. Allison PD. 1999. Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups. SMR/Sociological Methods and Research 28(2): 186–208. Arrow KJ. 1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Markham: Chicago, IL. Arrow KJ. 1974. The Limits of Organizations. Norton: New York. Baldwin CY, Clark KB. 1997. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review 75(5): 84–94. Baldwin CY, Clark KB. 2000. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. Bird A, Mitsuhashi H. 2003. Entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial processes: historical and theoretical perspectives on entrepreneurship in the Japanese contexts. Asian Perspective 27(3): 125–175. Boskin MJ. 1974. A conditional logit model of occupational choice. Journal of Political Economy 82: 389–398. Bradach JL, Eccles RG. 1989. Markets versus hierarchies: from ideal types to plural forms. In Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 15, WR Scott (ed). Annual Reviews: Palo Alto, CA; 97–118. Brusoni S, Prencipe A. 2001. Unpacking the black box of modularity: technologies, products and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change 10(1): 179–205. Buckley P, Casson M. 1976. The Future of Multinational Enterprise. Macmillan: London. Chesbrough HW, Teece DJ. 1996. When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation. Harvard Business Review 74(1): 65–71. Crocker KJ, Reynolds KJ. 1993. The efficiency of incomplete contracts: an empirical analysis of Air Force engine procurement. Rand Journal of Economics 24(1): 126–146. Darnell AC. 1994. A Dictionary of Econometrics. Edward Elgar: Brookfield, VT. Dyer J. 1997. Effective interfirm collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 535–556. Dyer J. 1998. Interorganizational learning, barriers to intra-firm knowledge transfers, and competitive advantage. Wharton School working paper, University of Pennsylvania. Fine CH. 1998. Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. Perseus: Reading, MA. Garud R, Kumaraswamy A. 1995. Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 16: 93–109. Grant RM. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 109–122. Gujarati D. 1988. Basic Econometrics ( 2nd edn). McGraw-Hill: New York. Gulati R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust: the implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38(1): 85–112. Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. 2000. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look, W7441. National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA. Hannan MT, Freeman J. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. Hansen MT. 1999. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(1): 82–111. Hausman JA, McFadden D. 1984. Specification tests for the multinomial logic model. Econometrica 52: 1219–1240. Heide JB, Miner AS. 1992. The shadow of the future: effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer–seller cooperation. Academy of Management Journal 35(2): 265–292. Henderson R, Cockburn I. 1994. Measuring competence: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15: 63–84. Hoetker G. 2004. Confounded coefficients: extending recent advances in the accurate comparison of logit and probit coefficients across groups. University of Illinois, College of Business Working Paper 03–0100. http://ssrn.com/abstract=609104. Hoetker G. 2005. How much you know versus how well I know you: selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component. Strategic Management Journal 26(1): 75–96. Hoetker G, Swaminathan A, Mitchell W. 2002. (In)significant others: the impact of buyer–supplier relationships on the survival of modular and architectural component suppliers. Mimeo, University of Illinois. Hsuan J. 1999. Impacts of supplier–buyer relationships on modularization in new product development. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 5: 197–209. Kamien MI, Schwartz NL. 1982. Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature. Cambridge University Press: New York. Klein B. 1980. Transaction costs determinants of 'unfair' contractual arrangements. American Economic Review 70(2): 56–62. Kogut B, Zander U. 1996. What do firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science 7(5): 502–518. Krackhardt D. 1988. Predicting with networks: nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks 10: 359–381. Langlois RN, Robertson PL. 1992. Networks and innovation in a modular system: lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Research Policy 21(4): 297–313. Langlois RN, Robertson PL. 1995. Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions. Routledge: New York. Lincoln JR, Ahmadjian CL, Mason E. 1998. Organizational learning and purchase–supply relations in Japan: Hitachi, Matsushita, and Toyota compared. California Management Review 40(3): 241–264. Long JS. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA. Maddala GS. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press: New York. Malmgren HB. 1961. Information, expectations and the theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 399–421. Masten SE. 1984. The organization of production: evidence from the aerospace industry. Journal of Law and Economics 27(2): 403–417. Masten SE. 1988. A legal basis for the firm. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 4: 181–198. McFadden D. 1973. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers of Econometrics, P Zarembka (ed). Academic Press: New York; 105–142. Murtha TP, Lenway SA, Hart JA. 2001. Managing New Industry Creation: Global Knowledge Formation and Entrepreneurship in High Technology. Stanford Business Books. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA. Nelson RR, Winter SG. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. Orton JD, Weick KE. 1990. Loosely coupled systems: a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review 15: 202–223. O'Sullivan A. 2001. Achieving modularity: generating design rules in an aerospace design-build network. Working paper, University of Ottawa. Parkhe A. 1993. Strategic alliance structuring: a game theoretic and transaction costs examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal 36: 794–829. Parnas DL. 1972. On the criteria for decomposing systems into modules. Communications of the ACM 15(12): 1053–1058. Peters S. 2000. On the use of the RESET test in micro-econometric models. Applied Economics Letters 7(6): 361–365. Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL. 1991. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts ( 3rd edn). McGraw-Hill: New York. Pisano G. 1989. Using equity participation to support exchange: evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 5(1): 109–126. Pisano G, Teece DJ. 1989. Collaborative arrangements and global technology strategy: some evidence from the telecommunications equipment industry. In Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, Vol. 4, RS Rosenbloom, RA Burgelman (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 227–256. Polanyi M. 1962. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. Harper & Row: New York. Putterman L. 1995. Markets, hierarchies, and information: on a paradox in the economics of organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 26(3): 373–390. Ramsey JB. 1969. Tests for specification errors in classical linear least squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 31: 350–371. Ring PS, Van de Ven AH. 1992. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal 13(7): 483–498. Rogers WM. 1993. Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin 13: 19–23. Sanchez R. 1995. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal Summer Special Issue 16: 135–59. Sanchez R, Mahoney JT. 1996. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 63–76. Schilling MA. 2000. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review 25(2): 312–324. Schilling MA, Steensma HK. 2001. The use of modular organizational forms: an industry-level analysis. Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 1149–1168. Shapiro DL, Sheppard BH, Cherasking L. 1992. In theory: business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal 8: 365–377. Spencer JW. 1997. Firms' strategies in the global innovation system: knowledge sharing in the flat panel display industry. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota. Stinchcomb AL. 1965. Social structure and organizations. In Handbook of organizations, JG March (eds). Rand-McNally: Chicago, IL; 153–193. Swait J, Louviere J. 1993. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit-models. Journal of Marketing Research 30(3): 305–314. Szulanski G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 27–43. Takeishi A. 2002. Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: the case of automotive product development. Organization Science 13(3): 321–338. Teece D. 1977. Technology transfer by multinational firms: the resource cost of transferring technological know-how. Economic Journal, June: 242–261. Teece D. 1981. The market for know-how and the efficient international transfer of technology. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 458: 81–96. Teece DJ, Rumelt R, Dosi G, Winter S. 1994. Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23(1): 1–30. Train KE. 2004. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. Ulrich KT. 1995. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy 24: 419–440. Uzzi B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1): 35–67. Williamson OE. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics 22(2): 233–261. Williamson OE. 1983. Credible commitments: using hostages to support exchange. American Economic Review 73(4): 519–540. Williamson OE. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press: New York. Williamson OE. 1991. Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(2): 269–296. Zucker LG. 1986. Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8, BM Staw, LL Cummings (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 53–111. Citing Literature Volume27, Issue6June 2006Pages 501-518 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX