Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Paradox of Public Discourse: A Framework for the Analysis of Political Accounts

1980; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 42; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2307/2130553

1468-2508

W. Lance Bennett,

Electoral Systems and Political Participation

Previous articleNext article No AccessArticlesThe Paradox of Public Discourse: A Framework for the Analysis of Political AccountsW. Lance BennettW. Lance Bennett Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 42, Number 3Aug., 1980 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2130553 Views: 51Total views on this site Citations: 28Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1980 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Nyron N. Crawford “It’s a Racist Plot”: An Experimental Test of the Racial Defense, Urban Affairs Review 58, no.55 (Jun 2021): 1277–1304.https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211016937Konstantin Vössing Shaping Public Opinion about Regional Integration: The Rhetoric of Justification and Party Cues, Political Studies 69, no.33 (May 2020): 492–513.https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720905130Kevin L. Blankenship, Kelly A. Kane, Carly R. Hewitt The Self-Validating Role of Political Ideology on Political Attitudes, Social Cognition 39, no.44 (Aug 2021): 437–456.https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2021.39.4.437Jeremy Pitt, Stephen Cranefield A Conceptual Model and Metaplatform for Public Interest Technology Design, IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 2, no.22 (Jun 2021): 71–82.https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2021.3075189Konstantin Vössing How Politicians Ought to Talk About Europe: Lessons Learned from Experimental Evidence, (Apr 2020): 101–116.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44117-3_6Rolf Brühl, Max Kury Rhetorical Tactics to Influence Responsibility Judgments: Account Giving in Banks Presidents’ Letters During the Financial Market Crisis, International Journal of Business Communication 56, no.33 (Jan 2016): 299–325.https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415627356David J. Gilchrist, Roger Simnett Research horizons for public and private not‐for‐profit sector reporting: moving the bar in the right direction, Accounting & Finance 59, no.11 (Jan 2019): 59–85.https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12439Ariel Zellman Framing consensus, Journal of Peace Research 11 (Jun 2015): 002234331556471.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343315564713Ariel Zellman Framing consensus, Journal of Peace Research 52, no.44 (Jul 2015): 492–507.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314564713Konstantin Vössing Transforming public opinion about European integration: Elite influence and its limits, European Union Politics 16, no.22 (Jun 2015): 157–175.https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515572167Ben D Mor The structure of rhetorical defense in public diplomacy: Israel’s social account of the 2010 Turkish flotilla incident, Media, War & Conflict 7, no.22 (Jun 2014): 250–265.https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635214538621BEN D. MOR Credibility talk in public diplomacy, Review of International Studies 38, no.22 (Sep 2011): 393–422.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000489Tereza Capelos, Johannes Wurzer United Front: Blame Management and Scandal Response Tactics of the United Nations, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 17, no.22 (Jun 2009): 75–94.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2009.00567.xCHIARA VALENTINI Political communication in international settings, Journal of International Communication 14, no.22 (Jan 2008): 102–116.https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2008.9674735R. R. Krebs, P. T. Jackson Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric, European Journal of International Relations 13, no.11 (Mar 2007): 35–66.https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074284Byron D'Andra Orey, L. Marvin Overby, Barbara J. Walkosz, Kimberly R. Walker Accounting for “Racism”: Responses to Political Predicaments in Two States, State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7, no.33 (Jan 2021): 235–255.https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000700700301Stephen C. Craig, Michael D. Martinez, Jason Gainous, James G. Kane Winners, Losers, and Election Context: Voter Responses to the 2000 Presidential Election, Political Research Quarterly 59, no.44 (Dec 2006): 579–592.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900407James R. McLeod The Sociodrama of Presidential Politics: Rhetoric, Ritual, and Power in the Era of Teledemocracy, American Anthropologist 101, no.22 (Jun 1999): 359–373.https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1999.101.2.359KATHLEEN M. McGRAW Manipulating Public Opinion with Moral Justification, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 560, no.11 (Sep 2016): 129–142.https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716298560001010Walter Aerts On the use of accounting logic as an explanatory category in narrative accounting disclosures, Accounting, Organizations and Society 19, no.4-54-5 (May 1994): 337–353.https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90001-9Marc W. Steinberg The Dialogue of Struggle: The Contest over Ideological Boundaries in the Case of London Silk Weavers in the Early Nineteenth Century, Social Science History 18, no.44 (Jan 2016): 505–542.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0145553200017144Kathleen M. McGraw, Richard Timpone, Gabor Bruck Justifying controversial political decisions:Home style in the laboratory, Political Behavior 15, no.33 (Sep 1993): 289–308.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993439Gray Cavender, Nancy C. Jurik, Albert K. Cohen The Baffling Case of the Smoking Gun: The Social Ecology of Political Accounts in the Iran-Contra Affair, Social Problems 40, no.22 (May 1993): 152–166.https://doi.org/10.2307/3096919Kathleen M. McGraw Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts, The American Political Science Review 85, no.44 (Dec 1991): 1133.https://doi.org/10.2307/1963939Yehudit Auerbach Legitimation for turning-point decisions in foreign policy: Israel vis-à-vis Germany 1952 and Egypt 1977, Review of International Studies 15, no.44 (Oct 2009): 329–340.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112744Andrew Szasz The Process and Significance of Political Scandals: A Comparison of Watergate and the "Sewergate" Episode at the Environmental Protection Agency, Social Problems 33, no.33 (Feb 1986): 202–217.https://doi.org/10.2307/800705Darrell M. West Cheers and Jeers, American Politics Quarterly 12, no.11 (Nov 2016): 23–50.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8401200102W. Lance Bennett Perception and Cognition, (Jan 1981): 69–193.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1074-7_2