Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

It's a Small World, but I Wouldn't Want to Paint it: Learning from Denmark's Experience with Electronic Monitoring

2014; Wiley; Volume: 13; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/1745-9133.12090

1745-9133

Brian K. Payne,

Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance

Criminology & Public PolicyVolume 13, Issue 3 p. 381-391 POLICY ESSAY It's a Small World, but I Wouldn't Want to Paint it: Learning from Denmark's Experience with Electronic Monitoring Brian K. Payne, Corresponding Author Brian K. Payne Old Dominion UniversityDirect correspondence to Brian K. Payne, Ph.D., Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, Old Dominion University, 2020C Koch Hall, Norfolk, VA 23529 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author Brian K. Payne, Corresponding Author Brian K. Payne Old Dominion UniversityDirect correspondence to Brian K. Payne, Ph.D., Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, Old Dominion University, 2020C Koch Hall, Norfolk, VA 23529 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author First published: 13 September 2014 https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12090Citations: 7Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Andersen, Lars, Signe Andersen. 2014. Effect of electronic monitoring on social welfare dependence. Criminology & Public Policy, 13: 349–379. Bales, William, Karen Mann, Thomas Blomberg, Gerry Gaes, Kelley Barrick, Karla Dhungana, et al. 2010. A Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Electronic Monitoring. Office of Justice Program Report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Beato, Greg. 2012. The lighter side of electronic monitoring. Reason.com. Retrieved August 7, 2014 from reason.com/archives/2012/05/24/the-lighter-side-of-electronic-monitorin. Beccaria, Cesare. 1819. An essay on Crimes and Punishments, E. D. Ingraham, trans. Philadelphia: H. Nicklin. Blackwell, Brenda, Brian K. Payne, and John Prevost. 2011. Measuring electronic monitoring tools: The influence of vendor type and vendor data. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 29: 17–28. Bohm, Robert. 2006. McJustice: On the McDonaldization of criminal justice. Justice Quarterly, 23: 127–146. Button, Deeanna, Matthew DeMichele, and Brian K. Payne. 2009. Using electronic monitoring to supervise sex offenders: Legislative patterns and implications for supervising sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20: 414–436. Clark, Ronald V. and Derek B. Cornish. 1985. Modeling offenders' decision making: A framework for research and policy. In ( Michael H. Tonry and Norval Morris, eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Volume 6. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Cohen, Lawrence E. and Marcus Felson. 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44: 588–608. DeMichele, Matthew and Brian K. Payne. 2009. Offender Supervision with Electronic Technology: Community Corrections Resource. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance. DeMichele, Matthew and Brian K. Payne. 2010. Electronic supervision and the importance of evidence-based practices. Federal Probation, 74: 4–11. Gainey, Randy R. and Brian K. Payne. 2000. Understanding the experience of house arrest with electronic monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44: 84–96. Gies, Stephen V., Randy R. Gainey, Marcia I. Cohen, Eoin Healy, Dan Duplantier, Martha Yeide, et al. 2012. Monitoring High Risk Sex Offenders with GPS Technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Martin, Jamie S., Kate Hanrahan, and James J. Bowers. 2009. Offenders' perceptions of house arrest and electronic monitoring. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48: 547–570. Padgett, Kathy G., William D. Bales, and Thomas G. Blomberg. 2006. Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology & Public Policy, 5: 61–91. Payne, Brian K. and Matthew DeMichele. 2011. Probation philosophies and workload considerations. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36: 29–43. Payne, Brian K., Matthew DeMichele, and Nonsa Okafo. 2009. Attitudes about electronic monitoring: Minority and majority racial group differences. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37: 155–162. Payne, Brian K. and Randy R. Gainey. 1998. A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42: 149–163. Payne, Brian K. and Randy R. Gainey. 2000. Is good-time appropriate for offenders on electronic monitoring? Attitudes of electronic monitoring directors. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28: 497–506. Payne, Brian K. and Randy R. Gainey. 2004. The electronic monitoring of offenders released from jail or prison: Safety, control, and comparisons to the incarceration experience. The Prison Journal, 84: 413–435. Renzema, Marc and Evan Mayo-Wilson. 2005. Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1: 215–237. Rose, Dina and Todd Clear. 1998. Incarceration, social capital, and crime: Implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology, 36: 441–479. Sykes, Gresham M. 1958. The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. U.S. Department of Justice. 2011. In Short Toward Criminal Justice Solutions: Electronic Monitoring Reduces Recidivism. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Citing Literature Volume13, Issue3August 2014Pages 381-391 ReferencesRelatedInformation