Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Breast Density Legislation and Opportunities for Patient-centered Outcomes Research

2012; Radiological Society of North America; Volume: 264; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1148/radiol.12120184

1527-1315

Christoph I. Lee, Lawrence W. Bassett, Constance D. Lehman,

Breast Cancer Treatment Studies

HomeRadiologyVol. 264, No. 3 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryOpinionBreast Density Legislation and Opportunities for Patient-centered Outcomes ResearchChristoph I. Lee , Lawrence W. Bassett, Constance D. LehmanChristoph I. Lee , Lawrence W. Bassett, Constance D. LehmanAuthor AffiliationsFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (C.I.L., C.D.L.); Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023 (C.I.L., C.D.L.); and Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (L.W.B.).Address correspondence to C.I.L. (e-mail: [email protected]).Christoph I. Lee Lawrence W. BassettConstance D. LehmanPublished Online:Sep 1 2012https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120184MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In AbstractThe timely convergence of advocacy efforts, high political will, and health care reform provides an important opportunity for the breast cancer community to help institute positive change in screening practices.References1 Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002;359(9310):909–919. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(10):716–726, W-236. [Published correction appears in Ann Intern Med 2010;152(10):688 and Ann Intern Med 2010;152(3):199–200]. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 H.R. 1302. Breast Density and Mammography Reporting Act of 2011. U.S. Congress. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-3102. Published October 2011. Accessed November 15, 2011. Google Scholar4 McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(6):1159–1169. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al.. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87(21):1622–1629. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Boyd NF, Rommens JM, Vogt K, et al.. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2005;6(10):798–808. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL, et al.. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99(5):386–395. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Lurie G, Kolonel LN. A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15(4):732–739. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al.. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356(3):227–236. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, et al.. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87(9):670–675. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Vachon CM, van Gils CH, Sellers TA, et al.. Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res 2007;9(6):217. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al.. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012;307(13):1394–1404. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al.. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299(18):2151–2163. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M, et al.. Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med (Torino) 2006;111(3):440–448. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Tohno E, Ueno E, Watanabe H. Ultrasound screening of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2009;16(1):18–22. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16 Berg WA. Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42(5):845–851, vi. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17 Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42(5):793–806, v. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar18 Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al.. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(33):8469–8476. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Kuhl C, Weigel S, Schrading S, et al.. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(9):1450–1457. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar20 Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al.. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004;292(11):1317–1325. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Sardanelli F, Podo F, Santoro F, et al.. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk Italian 1 study): final results. Invest Radiol 2011;46(2):94–105. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22 Vacek PM, Geller BM. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13(5):715–722. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD, et al.. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 2007;244(2):381–388. Link, Google Scholar24 Sardanelli F, Podo F, D’Agnolo G, et al.. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 2007;242(3):698–715. Link, Google Scholar25 Lehman CD, Smith RA. The role of MRI in breast cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009;7(10):1109–1115. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al.. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(2):75–89. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar27 Elmore JG, Fletcher SW. Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: time to tackle an underappreciated harm. Ann Intern Med 2012;156(7):536–537. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001;221(3):641–649. Link, Google Scholar29 Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol 2010;20(3):734–742. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Lander MR, Tabár L. Automated 3-D breast ultrasound as a promising adjunctive screening tool for examining dense breast tissue. Semin Roentgenol 2011;46(4):302–308. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar31 Illinois Department of Insurance. Coverage for the Detection and Treatment of Breast Cancer. http://insurance.illinois.gov/healthinsurance/breastcancer.asp. Published July 2009. Accessed March 30, 2012. Google Scholar32 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Overview. http://www.pcori.org/. Accessed March 29, 2012. Google Scholar33 American College of Radiology. Ultrasound Accreditation Program. http://www.acr.org/accreditation/ultrasound.aspx. Accessed March 30, 2012. Google Scholar34 Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174(6):1769–1777. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar35 Gold LS, Klein G, Carr L, Kessler L, Sullivan SD. The emergence of diagnostic imaging technologies in breast cancer: discovery, regulatory approval, reimbursement, and adoption in clinical guidelines. Cancer Imaging 2012;12(1):13–24. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar36 Darabi H, Czene K, Zhao W, Liu J, Hall P, Humphreys K. Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14(1):R25. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar37 Katz SJ, Morrow M. The challenge of individualizing treatments for patients with breast cancer. JAMA 2012;307(13):1379–1380. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar38 Schousboe JT, Kerlikowske K, Loh A, Cummings SR. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155(1):10–20. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived January 22, 2012; revision requested March 17; revision received April 10; accepted April 24; final version accepted May 3.Published online: Sept 2012Published in print: Sept 2012 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByModern Methods of Imaging of Breast Neoplasms (Literature Review)A. E.Garanina, A. V.Kholin15 October 2023 | Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy, Vol. 6, No. 3Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging: A Special Focus on Advances in Digital Mammography & Digital Breast TomosynthesisDalyAvendaño, CarmeloSofia, PedroZapata, AntonioPortaluri, Alessia AngelaMaria Orlando, PabloAvalos, AlfredoBlandino, GiorgioAscenti, ServandoCardona-Huerta, Maria AdeleMarino2023Jul1 | Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews, Vol. 19, No. 8Community-based Participatory Research: A Practical Guide for RadiologistsArissa J. Milton, Efrén J. Flores, Eden F. Charles, Mai A. Elezaby, Earlise C. Ward, Christoph I. Lee, Ryan W. Woods, Maria D. Martin Rother, Roberta M. Strigel, Anand K. Narayan, 27 April 2023 | RadioGraphics, Vol. 43, No. 5Impact of a Deep Learning Model for Predicting Mammographic Breast Density in Routine Clinical PracticeBrian N.Dontchos, KatherineCavallo-Hom, Leslie R.Lamb, Sarah F.Mercaldo, MartinEklund, PragyaDang, Constance D.Lehman2022Sep1 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 19, No. 9Breast density notification: evidence on whether benefit outweighs harm is required to inform future screening practiceBrookeNickel, RachelFarber, MeaganBrennan, JolynHersch, KirstenMcCaffery, NehmatHoussami14 July 2020 | BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 6Diagnostic Performance of Adjunctive Imaging Modalities Compared to Mammography Alone in Women with Non-Dense and Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisIbrahimHadadi, WilliamRae, JillianClarke, MarkMcEntee, ErnestEkpo2021Aug1 | Clinical Breast Cancer, Vol. 21, No. 4Breast Cancer Screening in Older WomenLauraBozzuto9 June 2021Self-co-attention neural network for anatomy segmentation in whole breast ultrasoundBaiyingLei, ShanHuang, HangLi, RanLi, ChengBian, Yi-HongChou, JingQin, PengZhou, XuehaoGong, Jie-ZhiCheng2020Aug1 | Medical Image Analysis, Vol. 64Impact of Breast Density Awareness on Knowledge about Breast Cancer Risk Factors and the Self-Perceived Risk of Breast CancerKristinaBojanic, SonjaVukadin, FilipSarcevic, LukaMalenica, KajaGrgic, RobertSmolic, KristinaKralik, InesBilic Curcic, GordanaIvanac, George Y.Wu, MartinaSmolic20 July 2020 | Diagnostics, Vol. 10, No. 7The Impact of Breast Density Notification Laws on Supplemental Breast Imaging and Breast BiopsyLorenSaulsberry, Lydia E.Pace, Nancy L.Keating29 May 2019 | Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 8Efficacy of Ultrasonography in Breast Cancer ScreeningHyun JoYoun, Ha RimAhn, Sang YullKang, Sung HooJung2019May31 | Journal of Surgical Ultrasound, Vol. 6, No. 1AttentionNet: Learning Where to Focus via Attention Mechanism for Anatomical Segmentation of Whole Breast Ultrasound ImagesHangLi, Jie-ZhiCheng, Yi-HongChou, JingQin, ShanHuang, BaiyingLei2019Apr1The Impact of Breast Density Reporting Laws on Women’s Awareness of Density-Associated Risks and Conversations Regarding Supplemental Screening With ProvidersNancy M.Cappello, DorindaRichetelli, Christoph I.Lee2019Feb1 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 16, No. 2Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ScreeningEun YoungChae, Hak HeeKim2019Jan1 | Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, Vol. 80, No. 1The impact of legislation mandating breast density notification – Review of the evidenceNehmatHoussami, Christoph ILee2018Dec1 | The Breast, Vol. 42Segmentation of breast anatomy for automated whole breast ultrasound images with boundary regularized convolutional encoder–decoder networkBaiyingLei, ShanHuang, RanLi, ChengBian, HangLi, Yi-HongChou, Jie-ZhiCheng2018Dec1 | Neurocomputing, Vol. 321Breast Density and the Importance of Supplemental ScreeningBrianWeber, JodyHayes, W.Phil Evans20 April 2018 | Current Breast Cancer Reports, Vol. 10, No. 2Addressing Potential Health Disparities in the Adoption of Advanced Breast Imaging TechnologiesRandy C.Miles, TracyOnega, Christoph I.Lee2018May1 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 25, No. 5Deciphering the Breast Density Inform Law Movement: Implications for PracticeSean D.Raj, ValerieFein-Zachary, Priscilla J.Slanetz2018Feb1 | Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI, Vol. 39, No. 1Breast Imaging: Tomosynthesis, Elastography, Breast MRI and Emerging TechniquesNancy A.Resteghini, Michael D. C.Fishman, Priscilla J.Slanetz13 September 2017Translating New Imaging Technologies to Clinical PracticeChristoph I.Lee, SupriyaGupta, Steven J.Sherry, AllanChiunda, EmiliaOlson, Falgun H.Chokshi, LoriMankowski-Gettle, MishalMendiratta-Lala, Yueh Z.Lee, Franklin G.Moser, RichardDuszak2018Jan1 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 25, No. 1Assessing Multi-Modality Breast Cancer Screening Strategies for BRCA 1/2 Gene Mutation Carriers and Other High-Risk Populationsaalaraalayan, TurgayAyer, Donatus U.Ekwueme2018Jan1 | SSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. 4Sonographic breast density pattern among Nigerian women in ZariaSAOlarinoye-Akorede, AAdamu, MSBalogun2018Jan1 | Nigerian Journal of Basic and Clinical Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 2Maximizing Value Through Innovations in Radiologist-Driven Communications in Breast ImagingChristoph I.Lee, Janie M.Lee2017Nov1 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 209, No. 5Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast TomosynthesisMariaCastillo-García, MargaritaChevalier, JuliaGarayoa, AlejandroRodriguez-Ruiz, DiegoGarcía-Pinto, JulioValverde2017Jul1 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 24, No. 7Risk-based Breast Cancer ScreeningChristoph I.Lee, Linda E.Chen, Joann G.Elmore2017Jul1 | Medical Clinics of North America, Vol. 101, No. 4Comparison Between Digital and Synthetic 2D Mammograms in Breast Density InterpretationTaghreed I.Alshafeiy, AntoineWadih, Brandi T.Nicholson, Carrie M.Rochman, Heather R.Peppard, James T.Patrie, Jennifer A.Harvey2017Jul1 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 209, No. 1Breast Density Legislation and Clinical EvidenceRegina J.Hooley2017May1 | Radiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 55, No. 3Implementation of Whole-Breast Screening UltrasonographyMelissa A.Durand, Regina J.Hooley2017May1 | Radiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 55, No. 3Breast Density Reporting Laws and Supplemental Screening—A Survey of Referring Providers’ Experiences and UnderstandingSantoMaimone, Michelle D.McDonough, Stephanie L.Hines2017Mar1 | Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, Vol. 46, No. 2Dense Breast Notification and Supplemental Screening: A Survey of Current Strategies and SentimentsSantoMaimone, MichelleMcDonough31 October 2016 | The Breast Journal, Vol. 23, No. 2Use Case III: Imaging Biomarkers in Breast Tumours. Development and Clinical IntegrationM. A.Marino, K.Pinker, P.Baltzer, T. H.Helbich3 November 2016What Do Women Know About Breast Density? Results From a Population Survey of Virginia WomenThomas M.Guterbock, Wendy F.Cohn, Deborah L.Rexrode, Casey M.Eggleston, MelissaDean-McKinney, Wendy M.Novicoff, Martin J.Yaffe, William A.Knaus, Jennifer A.Harvey2017Jan1 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 14, No. 1Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and the Challenges of Implementing an Emerging Breast Cancer Screening Technology Into Clinical PracticeChristoph I.Lee, Constance D.Lehman2016Nov1 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 13, No. 11Impact of Breast Density Notification Legislation on Radiologists’ Practices of Reporting Breast Density: A Multi-State StudyManisha Bahl, Jay A. Baker, Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield, Eugenia K. Brandt, Sujata V. Ghate, 28 March 2016 | Radiology, Vol. 280, No. 3Impact of Breast Density Legislation on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Supplemental Screening: A Survey of 110 Radiology FacilitiesLinaNayak, Kanae K.Miyake, Jessica W. T.Leung, Elissa R.Price, Yueyi I.Liu, Bonnie N.Joe, Edward A.Sickles, William R.Thomas, Jafi A.Lipson, Bruce L.Daniel, JonathanHargreaves, R. JamesBrenner, Lawrence W.Bassett, HaydeeOjeda-Fournier, Karen K.Lindfors, Stephen A.Feig, Debra M.Ikeda14 June 2016 | The Breast Journal, Vol. 22, No. 5Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS AtlasErnest U.Ekpo, Ujong PeterUjong, ClaudiaMello-Thoms, Mark F.McEntee2016May1 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 206, No. 5Mammographic Breast Density: Comparison Across Women with Conclusive and Inconclusive Mammography ReportsErnest U.Ekpo, Nneoyi OnenEgbe, Akwa E.Egom, Mark F.McEntee2016Mar1 | Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Vol. 47, No. 1Availability of Advanced Breast Imaging at Screening Facilities Serving Vulnerable PopulationsChristoph ILee, AndyBogart, Jessica CGermino, L ElizabethGoldman, Rebecca AHubbard, Jennifer SHaas, Deirdre AHill, Anna NATosteson, Jennifer AAlford-Teaster, Wendy BDeMartini, Constance DLehman, Tracy LOnega15 June 2015 | Journal of Medical Screening, Vol. 23, No. 1Advanced Breast Imaging Availability by Screening Facility CharacteristicsChristoph I.Lee, AndyBogart, Rebecca A.Hubbard, Eniola T.Obadina, Deirdre A.Hill, Jennifer S.Haas, Anna N.A.Tosteson, Jennifer A.Alford-Teaster, Brian L.Sprague, Wendy B.DeMartini, Constance D.Lehman, Tracy L.Onega2015Jul1 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 22, No. 7Breast Cancer ScreeningMackenzie S.Fuller, Christoph I.Lee, Joann G.Elmore2015May1 | Medical Clinics of North America, Vol. 99, No. 3Awareness of Breast Density and Its Impact on Breast Cancer Detection and RiskDeborah J.Rhodes, CarmenRadecki Breitkopf, Jeanette Y.Ziegenfuss, Sarah M.Jenkins, Celine M.Vachon2015Apr1 | Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 33, No. 10Mammographic Breast Density: Impact on Breast Cancer Risk and Implications for ScreeningPhoebe E. Freer, 12 March 2015 | RadioGraphics, Vol. 35, No. 2Breast Density: Clinical Implications and Assessment MethodsNicole S. Winkler, Sughra Raza, Meaghan Mackesy, Robyn L. Birdwell, 12 March 2015 | RadioGraphics, Vol. 35, No. 2Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Supplemental Ultrasonography Screening for Women With Dense BreastsBrian L.Sprague, Natasha K.Stout, ClydeSchechter, Nicolien T.van Ravesteyn, MucahitCevik, OguzhanAlagoz, Christoph I.Lee, Jeroen J.van den Broek, Diana L.Miglioretti, Jeanne S.Mandelblatt, Harry J.de Koning, KarlaKerlikowske, Constance D.Lehman, Anna N.A.Tosteson2015Feb3 | Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 162, No. 3Alternative Screening for Dense Breasts: MRIElizabeth A. M.O'Flynn, Araminta E. W.Ledger, Nandita M.deSouza2015Feb1 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 204, No. 2Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breastsJohn R.Scheel, Janie M.Lee, Brian L.Sprague, Christoph I.Lee, Constance D.Lehman2015Jan1 | American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 212, No. 1Prevalence of Mammographically Dense Breasts in the United StatesBrian L.Sprague, Ronald E.Gangnon, VeronicaBurt, AmyTrentham-Dietz, John M.Hampton, Robert D.Wellman, KarlaKerlikowske, Diana L.Miglioretti12 September 2014 | JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 106, No. 10Geographic Access to Breast Imaging for US WomenTracyOnega, RebeccaHubbard, DeirdreHill, Christoph I.Lee, Jennifer S.Haas, Heather A.Carlos, JenniferAlford-Teaster, AndyBogart, Wendy B.DeMartini, KarlaKerlikowske, Beth A.Virnig, Diana S.M.Buist, LouiseHenderson, Anna N.A.Tosteson2014Sep1 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 9La densidad mamaria. Una aproximaciónMelciorSentís i Crivellé2014Jul1 | Revista de Senología y Patología Mamaria, Vol. 27, No. 3Mammographic Breast Density as a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: Awareness in a Recently Screened Clinical SampleSuzanne C.O’Neill, Kara GraceLeventhal, MarieScarles, Chalanda N.Evans, EriniMakariou, EdwardPien, ShawnaWilley2014May1 | Women's Health Issues, Vol. 24, No. 3Breast Density Notification Legislation: Pros and Cons of a New ParadigmElissa R.Price2014Jan1 | Breast Diseases: A Year Book Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3Mammographic Density Estimation with Automated Volumetric Breast Density MeasurementSu YeonKo, Eun-KyungKim, Min JungKim, Hee JungMoon2014Jan1 | Korean Journal of Radiology, Vol. 15, No. 3Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and the Challenges of Implementing an Emerging Breast Cancer Screening Technology Into Clinical PracticeChristoph I.Lee, Constance D.Lehman2013Dec1 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 10, No. 12Investigation of AM-FM methods for mammographic breast density classificationStylianiPetroudi, IoannisConstantinou, ChrysaTziakouri, MariosPattichis, ConstantinosPattichis2013Nov1Breast Density LegislationFerris M. Hall, , 1 March 2013 | Radiology, Vol. 266, No. 3Recommended Articles Invited Commentary: Update on Mammographic Breast Density and Supplemental Screening for Breast CancerRadioGraphics2023Volume: 43Issue: 10Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisRadiology2023Volume: 306Issue: 3Reducing False-Positive Screening MRI Rates in Women with Extremely Dense BreastsRadiology2021Volume: 301Issue: 2pp. 293-294Performance Benchmarks for Screening Breast MR Imaging in Community PracticeRadiology2017Volume: 285Issue: 1pp. 44-52Beyond Breast Density: Risk Measures for Breast Cancer in Multiple Imaging ModalitiesRadiology2023Volume: 306Issue: 3See More RSNA Education Exhibits Dense Breast: Is It Really Looking for a Needle in the Haystack? Digital Posters2020High Risk Breast Cancer Screening  Digital Posters20202022 New Trends in Breast Density - What Should We Know?Digital Posters2022 RSNA Case Collection Hyperplastic Residual Breast TissueRSNA Case Collection2022Lactating BreastRSNA Case Collection2022Multifocal breast cancerRSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 264, No. 3 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download