Debate: Agonism and Deliberation— Recognizing the Difference*
2009; Wiley; Volume: 17; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00341.x
ISSN1467-9760
Autores Tópico(s)Political Philosophy and Ethics
ResumoJournal of Political PhilosophyVolume 17, Issue 3 p. 356-368 Debate: Agonism and Deliberation— Recognizing the Difference* Fuat Gürsözlü, Fuat Gürsözlü Philosophy, Binghamton UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Fuat Gürsözlü, Fuat Gürsözlü Philosophy, Binghamton UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: 05 July 2009 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00341.xCitations: 11 * I am indebted to Bat-Ami Bar-On and Selin Gürsözlü for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper. I am also grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for The Journal of Political Philosophy for their very helpful comments that guided me in the revisions. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. Towards a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. Pp. 67–95 in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference. NJ: Princeton University Press. Brady, John. 2004. No contest? Assessing critiques of Jürgen Habermas's theory of the public sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 30, 331–54. Connolly, William. 1991a. Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Connolly, William. 1991b. Beyond good and evil: the ethical sensibility of Michel Foucault. Political Theory, 21, 365–389. Dryzek, John. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms, trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. Three normative models of democracy. Pp. 239–53 in C. Cronin and P. DeGrieff (eds), The Inclusion of the Other. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Honig, Bonnie. 1993a. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Honig, Bonnie. 1993b. The politics of agonism. Political Theory, 21, 528–33. Honig, Bonnie. 1996. Difference, dilemmas, and the politics of home. Pp. 257–279 in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Honig, Bonnie. 2007. Between decision and deliberation: political paradox in democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 101, 1–17. Knops, Andrew. 2007. Agonism as deliberation—on Mouffe's theory of democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 15, 115–26. Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso. Markell, Patchen. 1997. Contesting consensus: rereading Habermas on the public sphere. Constellations, 3, 377–99. Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso. Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso. Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. London: Verso. Villa, Dana. 1992. Beyond good and evil: Arendt, Nietzsche and the aestheticization of political action. Political Theory, 20, 274–308. Villa, Dana. 1999. Politics, Philosophy, Terror: Essays on the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Citing Literature Volume17, Issue3September 2009Pages 356-368 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)