Uncertainties in the Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
2011; Radiological Society of North America; Volume: 261; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1148/radiol.11111086
ISSN1527-1315
AutoresGustav Andreisek, Juerg Hodler, Johann Steurer,
Tópico(s)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
ResumoHomeRadiologyVol. 261, No. 3 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryEditorialsUncertainties in the Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal StenosisGustav Andreisek , Juerg Hodler, Johann SteurerGustav Andreisek , Juerg Hodler, Johann SteurerAuthor AffiliationsFrom the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland (G.A., J.H.); and Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland (J.S.).Address correspondence to G.A. (e-mail: [email protected]).Gustav Andreisek Juerg HodlerJohann SteurerPublished Online:Dec 1 2011https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11111086MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In AbstractDespite years of extensive research in lumbar spinal stenosis, many uncertainties remain and might be solved only through collaboration of experts in different specialties.References1 Arnoldi CC, Brodsky AE, Cauchoix J, et al.. Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes: definition and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976(115):4–5. Medline, Google Scholar2 Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice: lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008;358(8):818–825. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30(12):1441–1445; discussion 1446–1447. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 McCombe PF, Fairbank JC, Cockersole BC, Pynsent PB. 1989 Volvo Award in clinical sciences: reproducibility of physical signs in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14(9):908–918. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M, et al.. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32(1):1–8. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al.. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(14):1329–1338. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Niggemeyer O, Strauss JM, Schulitz KP. Comparison of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1975 to 1995. Eur Spine J 1997;6(6):423–429. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Allen RT, Rihn JA, Glassman SD, Currier B, Albert TJ, Phillips FM. An evidence-based approach to spine surgery. Am J Med Qual 2009;24(6 Suppl):15S–24S. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Genevay S, Atlas SJ, Katz JN. Variation in eligibility criteria from studies of radiculopathy due to a herniated disc and of neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis: a structured literature review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(7):803–811. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Fardon DF, Milette PC; Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26(5):E93–E113. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al.. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT)—a randomized trial. JAMA 2006;296(20):2441–2450. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Griffith JF, Wang YX, Antonio GE, et al.. Modified Pfirrmann grading system for lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32(24):E708–E712. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Pfirrmann CW, Dora C, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. MR image-based grading of lumbar nerve root compromise due to disk herniation: reliability study with surgical correlation. Radiology 2004;230(2):583–588. Link, Google Scholar14 Ross JS. Babel 2.0. Radiology 2010;254(3):640–641. Link, Google Scholar15 Arana E, Royuela A, Kovacs FM, et al.. Lumbar spine: agreement in the interpretation of 1.5-T MR images by using the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification form. Radiology 2010;254(3):809–817. Link, Google Scholar16 Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, et al.. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(21):1919–1924. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17 Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, et al.. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(4):1095–1098. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar18 Guen YL, Joon WL, Hee SC, Kyoung-Jin O, Heung SK. A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40(8):1033–1039. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Lee GY, Lee JW, Choi HS, Oh KJ, Kang HS. A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method [erratum]. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40(8):1127. Crossref, Google Scholar20 Malfair D, Beall DP. Imaging the degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007;15(2):221–238, vi. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Siebert E, Prüss H, Klingebiel R, Failli V, Einhäupl KM, Schwab JM. Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 2009;5(7):392–403. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22 Genevay S, Atlas SJ. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24(2):253–265. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Verbiest H. Pathomorphologic aspects of developmental lumbar stenosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1975;6(1):177–196. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar24 Knirsch W, Kurtz C, Häffner N, Langer M, Kececioglu D. Normal values of the sagittal diameter of the lumbar spine (vertebral body and dural sac) in children measured by MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35(4):419–424. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar25 Dora C, Wälchli B, Elfering A, Gal I, Weishaupt D, Boos N. The significance of spinal canal dimensions in discriminating symptomatic from asymptomatic disc herniations. Eur Spine J 2002;11(6):575–581. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Steurer J, Roner S, Gnannt R, Hodler J. Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12(1):175. [Epub ahead of print]. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar27 Brant-Zawadzki MN, Jensen MC, Obuchowski N, Ross JS, Modic MT. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in interpretation of lumbar disc abnormalities: a comparison of two nomenclatures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20(11):1257–1263; discussion 1264. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Raininko R, Manninen H, Battié MC, Gibbons LE, Gill K, Fisher LD. Observer variability in the assessment of disc degeneration on magnetic resonance images of the lumbar and thoracic spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20(9):1029–1035. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar29 Smith BM, Hurwitz EL, Solsberg D, et al.. Interobserver reliability of detecting lumbar intervertebral disc high-intensity zone on magnetic resonance imaging and association of high-intensity zone with pain and anular disruption. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23(19):2074–2080. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, et al.. Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(14):1605–1610. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar31 Jarvik JG, Deyo RA. Moderate versus mediocre: the reliability of spine MR data interpretations. Radiology 2009;250(1):15–17. Link, Google Scholar32 Kovacs FM, Royuela A, Jensen TS, et al.. Agreement in the interpretation of magnetic resonance images of the lumbar spine. Acta Radiol 2009;50(5):497–506. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar33 Lurie JD, Doman DM, Spratt KF, Tosteson AN, Weinstein JN. Magnetic resonance imaging interpretation in patients with symptomatic lumbar spine disc herniations: comparison of clinician and radiologist readings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(7):701–705. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34 Carrino JA, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, et al.. Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings. Radiology 2009;250(1):161–170. Link, Google Scholar35 Speciale AC, Pietrobon R, Urban CW, et al.. Observer variability in assessing lumbar spinal stenosis severity on magnetic resonance imaging and its relation to cross-sectional spinal canal area. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27(10):1082–1086. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar36 Drew R, Bhandari M, Kulkarni AV, Louw D, Reddy K, Dunlop B. Reliability in grading the severity of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 2000;13(3):253–258. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar37 Attias N, Hayman A, Hipp JA, Noble P, Esses SI. Assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar spine foraminal stenosis: a surgeon’s perspective. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19(4):249–256. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar38 Cihangiroglu M, Yildirim H, Bozgeyik Z, et al.. Observer variability based on the strength of MR scanners in the assessment of lumbar degenerative disc disease. Eur J Radiol 2004;51(3):202–208. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar39 Lohman CM, Tallroth K, Kettunen JA, Lindgren KA. Comparison of radiologic signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31(16):1834–1840. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar40 Jarvik JG, Deyo RA. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging. Ann Intern Med 2002;137(7):586–597. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar41 Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, et al.. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J 2009;9(7):545–550. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar42 Sigmundsson FG, Kang XP, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B. Correlation between disability and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study of 109 patients operated on by decompression. Acta Orthop 2011;82(2):204–210. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived May 26, 2011; revision requested July 11; revision received July 18; final version accepted July 27.Published online: Dec 2011Published in print: Dec 2011 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByNormative Measurements of L1–S1 Segmental Angulation, Disk Space Height, and Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed TomographyJacobRazzouk, TrevorCase, ZacharyBrandt, MaryMarciniak, GrantSajdak, KaiNguyen, EastonSmall, GarrettPetersen, WhitneyKagabo, OmarRamos, Christopher I.Shaffrey, WayneCheng, OlumideDanisa30 November 2023 | Neurosurgery, Vol. 19Applications of Interpedicular Distance and Anteroposterior Diameter in the Approximation of the Spinal Canal AreaZacharyBrandt, JacobRazzouk, KaiNguyen, MarkOliinik, PatriciaCarlson, Andrew JCabrera, AlexBouterse, EmilyNovak, AsaelIsaac, JulietteScolieri, MeiCarter, OlumideDanisa, WayneCheng2023Nov13 | Cureus, Vol. 328Symptom-imaging correlation in lumbar spine painReneBalza, William E.Palmer2 March 2023 | Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 52, No. 10Diagnostic value of a new axial loading MRI device in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosisXingyuFang, JialinLi, LiweiWang, LinLiu, WeiLv, ZhiquanTang, DaifengGao23 February 2023 | European Radiology, Vol. 33, No. 5Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading Systems for Central Canal and Neural Foraminal Stenoses of the Lumbar and Cervical Spines With a Focus on the Lee Grading SystemJiwoonSeo, Joon WooLee2023Jan1 | Korean Journal of Radiology, Vol. 24, No. 3Improved Productivity Using Deep Learning–assisted Reporting for Lumbar Spine MRIDesmond Shi Wei Lim, Andrew Makmur, Lei Zhu, Wenqiao Zhang, Amanda J. L. Cheng, David Soon Yiew Sia, Sterling Ellis Eide, Han Yang Ong, Pooja Jagmohan, Wei Chuan Tan, Vanessa Meihui Khoo, Ying Mei Wong, Yee Liang Thian, Sangeetha Baskar, Ee Chin Teo, Diyaa Abdul Rauf Algazwi, Qai Ven Yap, Yiong Huak Chan, Jiong Hao Tan, Naresh Kumar, Beng Chin Ooi, Hiroshi Yoshioka, Swee Tian Quek, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, 14 June 2022 | Radiology, Vol. 305, No. 1Evaluation of 2 Novel Ratio-Based Metrics for Lumbar Spinal StenosisU.U.Bharadwaj, A.R.Ben-Natan, J.Huang, V.Pedoia, D.Chou, S.Majumdar, T.M.Link, C.T.Chin15 September 2022 | American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 43, No. 10Congenitally Short Pedicles; as an Underlying Cause of Lumbar Spinal StenosisHakanÖnder, BerrinErok, TanjuKisbet, EyüpKaya29 September 2022 | European Archives of Medical Research, Vol. 38, No. 3Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: Imaging and BiomechanicsMaximeLacroix, ChristelleNguyen, RobertBurns, AmandineLaporte, FrançoisRannou, AntoineFeydy14 September 2022 | Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, Vol. 26, No. 04Clinical and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: baseline data from the NORDSTEN studyJørnAaen, Ivar MagneAustevoll, ChristianHellum, KjerstiStorheim, Tor ÅgeMyklebust, HasanBanitalebi, MasoudAnvar, Jens IvarBrox, ClemensWeber, ToreSolberg, OliverGrundnes, HelenaBrisby, KariIndrekvam, ErlandHermansen19 November 2021 | European Spine Journal, Vol. 31, No. 6A systematic review of validated classification systems for cervical and lumbar spinal foraminal stenosis based on magnetic resonance imagingJohnHutchins, HannaHebelka, KerstinLagerstrand, HelenaBrisby28 March 2022 | European Spine Journal, Vol. 31, No. 6Severity and location of lumbar spine stenosis affects the outcome of total knee arthroplastyWilliam L.Sheppard, Kevin M.McKay, AlexanderUpfill-Brown, GideonBlumstein, Howard Y.Park, AkashShah, Adam A.Sassoon, Don Y.Park20 December 2021 | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, Vol. 16, No. 1Deep Learning Model for Automated Detection and Classification of Central Canal, Lateral Recess, and Neural Foraminal Stenosis at Lumbar Spine MRIJames Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Lei Zhu, Kaiyuan Yang, Andrew Makmur, Diyaa Abdul Rauf Algazwi, Yee Liang Thian, Samuel Lau, Yun Song Choo, Sterling Ellis Eide, Qai Ven Yap, Yiong Huak Chan, Jiong Hao Tan, Naresh Kumar, Beng Chin Ooi, Hiroshi Yoshioka, Swee Tian Quek, 11 May 2021 | Radiology, Vol. 300, No. 1Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Treatment of Lumbar Disk Degeneration and StenosisStefanoMarcia, ChiaraZini, MatteoBellini, OlivierClerk-Lamalice19 October 2021Differentiating epidural fibrosis from disc herniation on contrast-enhanced and unenhanced MRI in the postoperative lumbar spineZitaPassavanti, SebastianLeschka, SimonWildermuth, ThomasForster, Tobias JohannesDietrich10 June 2020 | Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 49, No. 11Clinical validity of two different grading systems for lumbar central canal stenosis: Schizas and Lee classification systemsYeon-jeeKo, EugeneLee, Joon WooLee, Chi YoungPark, JungheumCho, YusuhnKang, Joong MoAhn, Michael G.Fehlings27 May 2020 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 15, No. 5Interobserver Reliability When Classifying MR Imaging of the Lumbar Spine: Written Instructions Alone Do Not SufficeUlf KristerHofmann, Ramona LuiseKeller, MarcoGesicki, ChristianWalter, FalkMittag2020Jan1 | Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 3Lumbar bölge canalis vertebalis sagittal çaplarının manyetik rezonans görüntüleme yöntemiyle incelenmesiNazireKILIÇ ŞAFAK, SibelTEPECİK, Ahmet HilmiYÜCEL30 August 2019 | Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Vol. 12, No. 2Qualitative versus quantitative lumbar spinal stenosis grading by machine learning supported texture analysis—Experience from the LSOS study cohortFlorian A.Huber, ShanonStutz, IlariaVittoria de Martini, ManojMannil, Anton S.Becker, SebastianWinklhofer, Jakob M.Burgstaller, RomanGuggenberger2019May1 | European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 114The MIST Guidelines: The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Consensus Group Guidelines for Minimally Invasive Spine TreatmentTimothy R.Deer, Jay S.Grider, Jason E.Pope, StevenFalowski, Tim J.Lamer, AaronCalodney, David A.Provenzano, DawoodSayed, EricLee, Sayed E.Wahezi, ChongKim, CoreyHunter, MayankGupta, RasminBenyamin, BohdanChopko, DidierDemesmin, SudhirDiwan, ChristopherGharibo, LeoKapural, DavidKloth, Brian D.Klagges, MichaelHarned, TomSimopoulos, ToryMcJunkin, Jonathan D.Carlson, Richard W.Rosenquist, Timothy R.Lubenow, NagyMekhail2 December 2018 | Pain Practice, Vol. 19, No. 3Lumbar spinal stenosis: symptoms, diagnosis and treatment (meta-analysis of literature data)Ia. V.Fishchenko, L. D.Kravchuk, O. A.Perepechay7 March 2018 | Pain medicine, Vol. 3, No. 1Characteristics and determinants of clinical symptoms in radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis in a tertiary health care centre in sub-Saharan AfricaMarieDoualla-Bija, Mbeng AshuTakang, EmmanuellaMankaa, JudeMoutchia, PierreOngolo-Zogo, HenryLuma-Namme28 November 2017 | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 18, No. 1The nerve root sedimentation sign for differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective, consecutive cohort studyLiangmingZhang, RuiqiangChen, BinLiu, WeiZhang, YeqingZhu, LiminRong13 February 2016 | European Spine Journal, Vol. 26, No. 10Dural sac cross-sectional area and morphological grade show significant associations with patient-rated outcome of surgery for lumbar central spinal stenosisA. F.Mannion, T. F.Fekete, D.Pacifico, D.O’Riordan, S.Nauer, M.von Büren, C.Schizas30 August 2017 | European Spine Journal, Vol. 26, No. 10Degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: intra- and inter-reader agreement for magnetic resonance imaging parametersSebastianWinklhofer, UlrikeHeld, Jakob M.Burgstaller, TimFinkenstaedt, NicolaeBolog, NilsUlrich, JohannSteurer, GustavAndreisek, FilippoDel Grande22 June 2016 | European Spine Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2Is multidetector computed tomography comparable to magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lumbar foraminal stenosis?Woo YoungKang, Joong MoAhn, Joon WooLee, EugeneLee, Yun JungBae, JiwoonSeo, JunghoonKim, Heung SikKang20 July 2016 | Acta Radiologica, Vol. 58, No. 2Diagnosis of Nerve Root Compromise of the Lumbar Spine: Evaluation of the Performance of Three-dimensional Isotropic T2-weighted Turbo Spin-Echo SPACE Sequence at 3TJinkyeongSung, Won-HeeJee, Joon-YongJung, JinheeJang, Jin-SungKim, Young-HoonKim, Kee-YongHa2017Jan1 | Korean Journal of Radiology, Vol. 18, No. 1Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging AnalysisAntonioPierro, SavinoCilla, GiuseppinaMaselli, EleonoraCucci, MatteoCiuffreda, GiuseppinaSallustio31 August 2017 | Journal of Clinical Imaging Science, Vol. 7Correlation of lumbar lateral recess stenosis in magnetic resonance imaging and clinical symptomsAnninaSplettstößer, M FawadKhan, BerndZimmermann, Thomas JVogl, HannsAckermann, MarcusMiddendorp, AdelMaataoui2017Jan1 | World Journal of Radiology, Vol. 9, No. 5Arthritis of the SpineRunshengWang, Michael M.Ward18 December 2014Axonal, bladder and bowel impairment: evidence based clinical review of gaps in guidelines for spinal stenosisMarioGiraldo-Prieto1 January 2015 | Revista Colombiana de Médicina Física y Rehabilitación, Vol. 25, No. 1Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis - an initiative for structured reporting, GustavAndreisek, Richard A.Deyo, Jeffrey G.Jarvik, FrancoisPorchet, Sebastian F. X.Winklhofer, JohannSteurer31 July 2014 | European Radiology, Vol. 24, No. 12Determinants of outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis surgeryFreyr GautiSigmundsson10 December 2014 | Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 85, No. sup357Intracranial Imaging of Uncommon Diseases Is More Frequently Reported in Clinical Publications Than in Radiology PublicationsV.T.Lehman, D.A.Doolittle, C.H.Hunt, L.J.Eckel, D.F.Black, K.M.Schwartz, F.E.Diehn4 July 2013 | American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 35, No. 1A Systematic Review of Semiquantitative and Qualitative Radiologic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal StenosisGustavAndreisek, MarioImhof, MariaWertli, SebastianWinklhofer, Christian W. A.Pfirrmann, JuergHodler, JohannSteurer, 2013Nov1 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 201, No. 5Impact of Pain on Function and Health Related Quality of Life in Lumbar Spinal StenosisFreyr GautiSigmundsson, BoJönsson, BjörnStrömqvist2013Jul1 | Spine, Vol. 38, No. 15Decompressive lumbar laminectomy: Indications and discussionCalvinWhaley2013Apr1 | Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management, Vol. 17, No. 2Agreeing (or Not) on How to Describe Spinal Stenosis: Expanding a Narrow MindsetJanna L. Friedly, , and Jeffrey G. Jarvik, 1 July 2012 | Radiology, Vol. 264, No. 1Uncertainties in the Measurement of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis at MR Imaging: Are They Clinically Relevant?Francisco M. Kovacs, , Carmen Martínez, , Estanislao Arana, , Ana Royuela, , Ana Estremera, , Guillermo Amengual, , Beatriz Asenjo, , Helena Sarasíbar, , Isabel Galarraga, , Ana Alonso, , Carlos Casillas, , Alfonso Muriel, , and Víctor Abraira, 1 April 2012 | Radiology, Vol. 263, No. 1Recommended Articles Deep Learning Model for Automated Detection and Classification of Central Canal, Lateral Recess, and Neural Foraminal Stenosis at Lumbar Spine MRIRadiology2021Volume: 300Issue: 1pp. 130-138CT Myelography: Clinical Indications and Imaging FindingsRadioGraphics2020Volume: 40Issue: 2pp. 470-484Feasibility of Iterative Model Reconstruction for Unenhanced Lumbar CTRadiology2017Volume: 284Issue: 1pp. 153-160Deep Learning for Lumbar Spine MRI Reporting: A Welcome Tool for RadiologistsRadiology2021Volume: 300Issue: 1pp. 139-140Improved Productivity Using Deep Learning–assisted Reporting for Lumbar Spine MRIRadiology2022Volume: 305Issue: 1pp. 160-166See More RSNA Education Exhibits CT Myelography: From Technical Aspects to Imaging EvaluationDigital Posters2022Myelograms Revisited: Striking the Right CordDigital Posters2020The Many Facets Of Pain ReliefDigital Posters2021 RSNA Case Collection Intracranial HypotensionRSNA Case Collection2021Discal cystRSNA Case Collection2022Intracranial hypotension syndromeRSNA Case Collection2021 Vol. 261, No. 3 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download
Referência(s)