Artigo Revisado por pares

Clinical comparison between two different splint designs for temporomandibular disorder therapy

2005; Informa; Volume: 63; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1080/00016350510019982

ISSN

1502-3850

Autores

Asbjørn Jokstad, Arild Mo, Berit Schie Krogstad,

Tópico(s)

Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments

Resumo

Objective. To compare splint therapy in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients using two splint designs. Material and methods. In a double-blind randomized parallel trial, 40 consenting patients were selected from the dental faculty pool of TMD patients. Two splint designs were produced: an ordinary stabilization (Michigan type) and a NTI (Nociceptiv trigeminal inhibition). The differences in splint design were not described to the patients. All patients were treated by one operator. A separate, blinded, examiner assessed joint and muscle tenderness by palpation and jaw opening prior to splint therapy, and after 2 and 6 weeks' and 3 months' splint use during night-time. The patients reported headache and TMD-related pain on a visual analog scale before and after splint use, and were asked to describe the comfort of the splint and invited to comment. Results. Thirty-eight patients with mainly myogenic problems were observed over 3 months. A reduction of muscle tenderness upon palpation and self-reported TMD-related pain and headache and an improved jaw opening was seen in both splint groups (p 0.05; Mann-Whitney U-test). Conclusion. No differences in treatment efficacy were noted between the Michigan and the NTI splint types when compared over 3 months.

Referência(s)