Delayed Detection of Psychosis: Causes, Consequences, and Effect on Public Health
2000; American Psychiatric Association; Volume: 157; Issue: 11 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1727
ISSN1535-7228
AutoresJeffrey A. Lieberman, Wayne S. Fenton,
Tópico(s)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
ResumoBack to table of contents Previous article Next article EditorialFull AccessDelayed Detection of Psychosis: Causes, Consequences, and Effect on Public HealthJeffrey A. Lieberman, M.D., , and Wayne S. Fenton, M.D., Jeffrey A. LiebermanSearch for more papers by this author, M.D., Chapel Hill, N.C., and Wayne S. FentonSearch for more papers by this author, M.D., Bethesda, Md.Published Online:1 Nov 2000https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1727AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Although the pathophysiology and cause of schizophrenia remain unknown, the natural history of this vexing illness has been well described (1). The onset of schizophrenia typically occurs in late adolescence or early adulthood. Manifestations of the disorder in the form of positive, negative, cognitive, and mood symptoms develop gradually over a period of weeks, months, or even years. In the majority of cases, the symptoms and behaviors on which a clinical diagnosis is based are preceded by less specific and severe “prodromal symptoms.” Prodromal symptoms and behaviors may include attenuated positive symptoms (e.g., illusions, ideas of reference, and magical thinking), mood symptoms (e.g., anxiety, dysphoria, mood lability, and irritability), cognitive symptoms (e.g., distractibility and difficulty concentrating), social withdrawal, and obsessive behaviors—to name a few (2). Because many of these prodromal phenomena extensively overlap with the mental experiences and behaviors of persons in the age group at risk for schizophrenia who do not subsequently develop schizophrenia, they cannot be considered diagnostic. Thus, it is only after the formal symptoms of the disorder reach a threshold of severity and are sustained that a person is said to be experiencing a first psychotic episode or break.Recent research has demonstrated that the first episode of schizophrenia is a critical therapeutic opportunity. If patients are treated promptly and effectively, good outcomes can be achieved. However, these same studies have revealed that throughout the world, individuals suffering a first episode of psychosis experience an alarming delay between the onset of psychotic symptoms and the initiation of treatment. More than 10 studies conducted on several continents have described typical durations of untreated psychosis that average 1–2 years (3).This disturbing finding raises several questions. What are the consequences of a diagnostic delay regarding psychosis? Can the course of schizophrenia be modified by earlier detection and treatment? A controversial hypothesis suggests that untreated psychosis may result in neurotoxicity, which induces irreversible brain damage that is clinically detectable as deterioration and treatment resistance (4, 5). If this hypothesis is correct, a long duration of untreated psychosis can have serious consequences, including enduring and perhaps lifelong deficits and disability.Associations between the duration of untreated psychosis and time to treatment response (6) and relapse (7) have been interpreted as consistent with a neurotoxic effect of psychosis. In this issue of the Journal, two reports bring new evidence to bear on the “toxic psychosis” hypothesis by direct measurement of biological indices. Hoff et al. evaluated the relationship among the duration of untreated psychosis, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetric measurements, and neuropsychological test scores in 50 consecutively admitted patients in the Suffolk County (New York) Longitudinal Study. The patients had an average duration of untreated psychosis of about 1 year and an average duration of behavioral change of 3 years (both retrospectively determined). Among the patients recovering from a first episode of psychosis, no relationships among duration of prior illness, severity of cognitive deficits, or structural brain anomalies were observed.In a second carefully conducted MRI study, Fannon et al. examined 37 never or minimally treated patients with a first episode of psychosis (schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder) and 25 matched normal comparison subjects. Patients had a relatively short (31-week) average duration of psychosis (retrospectively determined). Confirming the results of previous reports, the authors found that the patients with psychosis revealed significantly smaller whole brain volumes and smaller cortical and temporal gray matter volumes and significantly larger lateral and third ventricle volumes than comparison subjects. However, no relationship between the duration of prior psychosis and any regional brain volumes was detected.Other Journal reports published this year also found no association between the duration of prior or untreated psychosis and clinical outcome at 6 (8) and 24 months (9) after the onset of psychosis. When we group the newer data with these findings, the cognitive and morphologic data of Hoff et al. and Fannon et al. offer important new information that militates against the hypothesis that measurable neurotoxicity and lifelong disability are frequent or inevitable consequences of untreated psychosis. Although they offer some reassurance, the results of these studies should be interpreted in the context of the research methods used and their inherent limitations. A decisive test of the neurotoxicity hypothesis will require a prospective longitudinal study that integrates repeated measures with state-of-the-art neuroimaging, neuropsychological evaluation, and clinical outcome assessment in patients in the early stages of schizophrenia and, ideally, before the onset of psychosis. Such important studies will take time to complete.In the meantime, however, and apart from the frightening prospect of permanent brain damage, there are other compelling reasons for making the early detection and treatment of psychosis a public health priority—first and foremost the fact that untreated psychosis damages lives.Undiagnosed and untreated psychosis imposes a significant burden of terror, suffering, and bewilderment on patients and their families. Impairments in functioning that accompany untreated psychosis wreak havoc on the normative processes of young adult development. The maturational tasks of establishing and maintaining a peer group, achieving independence from family, cultivating romantic interests, acquiring independent living skills, and preparing for productive work may all be disrupted at a most critical stage of development. These disruptions too often alter the trajectory of a young person’s life in a way that is not easily repaired. In addition, an untreated person with psychosis is at risk for episodes of behavioral dyscontrol, including violence, with the potential for long-lasting consequences for himself or herself and others.A serious and surprising question is why is the duration of untreated psychosis so long throughout the world? The duration of untreated psychosis can be measured—albeit imperfectly, as it is usually performed retrospectively—but its causes are remarkably understudied and poorly understood. How much of untreated psychosis is accounted for by patient delay (time between onset of symptoms and actually initiating contact with a health professional) and how much by diagnostic delay (time between first contact with the health care system and the time when definitive diagnosis and treatment is achieved)? How often are the symptoms of psychosis recognized by the patient as an indication of illness? Or is a family member, friend, or teacher usually the first to notice that something is wrong? To whom do these individuals characteristically turn for help? To guidance counselors, clergy, or primary health care professionals? How ready is their access to mental health care? What knowledge, skills, attitudes, beliefs, and barriers operate as determinants for help-seeking individuals experiencing symptoms themselves or for persons who notice symptoms in family members, friends, or acquaintances? How can these determinants be modified?An effective public health response as well as a reasoned scientific approach to the unacceptably long duration of untreated psychosis worldwide must be informed by a clear understanding of the at-risk states that precede psychosis. This includes the phenomenology, neurobiology, and course of the early stages of psychotic illness and the individual, interpersonal, and social processes that contribute to a delay in treatment. Indeed, the protracted average delays until diagnosis and treatment seem to be present throughout the world, with the only consistent exception thus far reported being the military (10).When these phenomena and processes are identified and understood, potent and modifiable risk factors for a delay in treatment can be isolated and the optimal time and method of therapeutic intervention can be determined.The prospect of early intervention favorably altering the course and outcome of schizophrenia has exerted a powerful influence on psychiatric research and treatment strategies and captured the attention of the clinical and lay communities (see articles in the Wall Street Journal and New York Times; e.g., references 11, 12, and 13). If we can enable recovery and improve outcome with earlier treatment, is it logical—in fact, imperative—to intervene before the onset of illness? Thus, the prodromal stage of the illness has become a prime target for research and the development of therapeutic strategies. Although, on the whole this represents a substantial advance in our attitude and approach to the clinical care of patients with schizophrenia, this movement has stimulated many questions and controversies. Among these is the feasibility and safety of intervention, particularly with pharmacologic agents, in the putative prepsychotic and prediagnostic stages of psychotic disorders. The effectiveness of such potentially powerful preventive strategies is dependent on the soundness of the methods, the certainty with which we can identify persons truly at risk for imminent illness, and our understanding of the potential risks and benefits of careful watching versus preemptive treatment. The decision to participate in preventive trials ultimately rests with the informed and competent prospective participant, who must weigh the risks and benefits. Although research has laid much of the scientific foundation for the implementation of such strategies, it is uncertain whether the evidence is sufficient to assure all the stakeholders in this illness of the readiness of this new model of care. Strategies such as the integration of early detection teams into youth services in Australia (14) and sustained anti-stigma-oriented social marketing in Norway (3) are important pilot tests of innovative models to meet this challenge.In the meantime, developing approaches to early detection to reduce the duration of untreated psychosis in those who are already ill is an immediate public health challenge and opportunity. Delay in diagnosis and treatment is a concern across many medical conditions, and progress is possible: a recent report (15) described a median prehospital delay of 2 hours among patients hospitalized for the evaluation of heart attack symptoms; after self-discovery of breast cancer symptoms, about two-thirds of woman seek evaluation within 3 months (16). A delay in the treatment of psychosis is unacceptably long; it must be understood and remedied. We have the means to do so.Address reprint requests to Dr. Lieberman, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7160, 7025 Neurosciences Hospital, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7160; [email protected] (e-mail).References1. McGlashan TH: A selective review of recent North American follow-up studies of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1988; 14:515–542Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2. Yung AR, McGorry PD: The prodromal phase of first-episode schizophrenia: past and current conceptualizations. Schizophr Bull 1996; 22:353–370Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3. McGlashan TH: Duration of untreated psychosis in first episode schizophrenia: marker or determinant of course. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 46:899–907Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4. Wyatt RJ: Neuroleptics and the natural course of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1991; 17:325–351Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5. Lieberman JA: Is schizophrenia a neurodegenerative disorder? a clinical and neurobiological perspective. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 46:729–739Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6. Loebel AD, Lieberman JA, Alvir JMJ, Mayerhoff DI, Geisler SH, Szymanski SR: Duration of psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1992; 149:1183–1188Google Scholar7. Crow TJ, MacMillan JF, Johnson AL, Johnstone EC: A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic neuroleptic treatment. Br J Psychiatry 1986; 148:120–127Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8. Ho B-C, Andreasen NC, Flaum M, Nopoulos P, Miller D: Untreated initial psychosis: its relation to quality of life and symptom remission in first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:808–815Link, Google Scholar9. Craig TJ, Bromet EJ, Fennig S, Tanenberg-Karant M, Lavelle J, Galambos N: Is there an association between duration of untreated psychosis and 24-month clinical outcome in a first-admission series? Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:60–66Google Scholar10. Davidson M, Reichenberg A, Rabinowitz J, Weiser M, Kaplan Z, Mark M: Behavioral and intellectual markers for schizophrenia in apparently healthy male adolescents. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156:1328–1335Google Scholar11. Tanouye E: New weapons in the war on schizophrenia—clues to a sudden attack on the mind—a intriguing theory: “spring cleaning” of adolescents’ brains. Wall Street Journal, Aug 25, 1999, p B1Google Scholar12. Tanouye E: New weapons in the war on schizophrenia—to avoid his brother’s illness, a young man tries a risky experiment. Wall Street Journal, Aug 25, 1999, p B1Google Scholar13. Tanouye E: New weapons in the war on schizophrenia—for drug makers, high-stakes race inside the brain. Wall Street Journal, Aug 25, 1999, p B1Google Scholar14. McGorry PD, Edwards J, Mihalopoulos C, Harrigan SM, Jackson HJ: EPPIC: an evolving system of early detection and optimal management. Schizophr Bull 1996; 22:305–326Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15. Goff DC Jr, Feldman HA, McGovern PG, Goldberg RJ, Simons-Morton DG, Cornwell CE, Osganian SK, Cooper LS, Hedges JR (Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment [REACT] Study Group): Prehospital delay in patients hospitalized with heart attack symptoms in the United States: the REACT trial. Am Heart J 1999; 138(6, part 1):1046–1057Google Scholar16. Facione NC, Dodd MJ, Holzemer W, Meleis AI: Help seeking for self-discovered breast symptoms. Cancer Pract 1997; 5:220–227Medline, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited byTobacco Use, Nicotine Dependence, and Cessation Methods in US Adults With Psychosis28 March 2023 | JAMA Network Open, Vol. 6, No. 3Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of severe mental disorders in ChinaAsian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 79Development of a novel COMPAssion focused online psyChoTherapy for bereaved informal caregivers: the COMPACT feasibility trial protocol22 December 2022 | BMJ Open, Vol. 12, No. 12Rates of homicide and homicide associated with severe mental illness in NSW between 1993 and 201618 August 2021 | Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 56, No. 7Cross-Platform Detection Of Psychiatric Hospitalization Via Social Media Data: A Comparison Study (Preprint)31 May 2022 | JMIR Mental HealthDevelopment and Calibration of the PREMIUM Item Bank for Measuring Respect and Dignity for Patients with Severe Mental Illness16 March 2022 | Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 6Falling in a gap in mental health services in the UK: a perspective paper14 March 2022 | International Journal of Spa and Wellness, Vol. 5, No. 1Compliance and insight as factors of recovery in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disordersZhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova, Vol. 122, No. 1Multimodal Assessment of Schizophrenia and Depression Utilizing Video, Acoustic, Locomotor, Electroencephalographic, and Heart Rate Technology: Protocol for an Observational Study13 July 2022 | JMIR Research Protocols, Vol. 11, No. 7Esordi psicotici in adolescenza e giovane età adulta: prospettive teoriche e di trattamentoRIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA, Vol. 146, No. 3Factors Associated with Delayed Diagnosis of Severe Mental Disorders in ChinaSSRN Electronic JournalDuration of Untreated Psychosis in First-Episode Psychosis is not Associated With Common Genetic Variants for Major Psychiatric Conditions: Results From the Multi-Center EU-GEI Study8 May 2021 | Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 47, No. 6Psychosocial interventions for people with a first episode psychosis: between tradition and innovation16 July 2021 | Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Vol. 34, No. 5Utilizing Instagram Data to Identify Usage Patterns Associated With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders16 August 2021 | Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol. 12Help-seeking duration in adolescents with suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injuryJournal of Psychiatric Research, Vol. 140Diagnostik und Intervention bei ersten psychotischen Episoden26 March 2021 | InFo Neurologie + Psychiatrie, Vol. 23, No. 3A conceptual framework to develop a patient-reported experience measure of the quality of mental health care: a qualitative study of the PREMIUM project in France23 February 2021 | Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, Vol. 9, No. 1Diagnostic conversion from unipolar depression to bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder: A nationwide prospective 15‐year register study on 43 495 inpatients22 May 2020 | Bipolar Disorders, Vol. 22, No. 6Delays to diagnosis among people with severe mental illness in rural Vietnam, a population-based cross-sectional survey4 December 2019 | BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 19, No. 1DURATION OF UNTREATED PSYCHOSIS (DUP) AND PRE-MORBID FUNCTIONING, MAY PREDICT CLINICAL PRESENTATION IN FIRST EPISODE OF PSYCHOSIS (FEP): NORTH-EAST INDIAN STUDY26 April 2019 | Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, Vol. 6, No. 17Caractérisation des premiers épisodes de schizophrénie à partir de bases de données administratives de santé jumelées10 April 2019 | Santé mentale au Québec, Vol. 43, No. 2Fitness to stand trial evaluation challenges in the United States: Some comparisons with South Africa13 October 2016 | South African Journal of Psychology, Vol. 47, No. 2CNS Spectrums, Vol. 21, No. 3Middle East Current Psychiatry, Vol. 23, No. 1Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry, Vol. 8, No. 22173Challenges for group leaders working with families dealing with early psychosis: a qualitative study2 July 2015 | BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 15, No. 1Family Intervention in First-Episode Psychosis16 November 2015 | SAGE Open, Vol. 5, No. 4Journal of Psychiatric Research, Vol. 61Prävention psychotischer Störungen und Behandlung Ersterkrankter9 September 2014 | NeuroTransmitter, Vol. 25, No. 9European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 264, No. S1Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, Vol. 27, No. 4Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 33, No. 3PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, No. 1International Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 42, No. 1Early psychosis treatment in an integrated model within an adult mental health service15 April 2020 | European Psychiatry, Vol. 27, No. 7Care Seeking and Beliefs About the Cause of Mental Illness Among Nigerian Psychiatric Patients and Their FamiliesChikaodiri Nkereuwem Aghukwa, M.B., B.Ch., F.M.C.Psych.1 June 2012 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 63, No. 6Neuropharmacology, Vol. 62, No. 3Neuropsychopharmacology, Vol. 37, No. 10References6 April 2011Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 2Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 37, No. 6Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, Vol. 15, No. 36Neuropsychiatry, Vol. 1, No. 6Psychiatric Quarterly, Vol. 81, No. 4Psychological Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 3CNS Drugs, Vol. 24, No. 3Transcultural aspects of schizophrenia and old-age schizophrenia28 July 2010Pathways to care andreducing treatment delay in early psychosisBiological Psychiatry, Vol. 66, No. 11CNS Drugs, Vol. 23, No. 10Biological treatments for psychotic disordersSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Vol. 43, No. 3Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 17, No. 1Early Intervention in Psychiatry, Vol. 2, No. 2The Evaluation and Management of Patients with First-Episode Schizophrenia: A Selective, Clinical Review of Diagnosis, Treatment, and PrognosisHarvard Review of Psychiatry, Vol. 15, No. 5Early Intervention in Psychiatry, Vol. 1, No. 3Early Intervention in Psychiatry, Vol. 1, No. 4Clinical Drug Investigation, Vol. 27, No. 1Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses, Vol. 1, No. 2Psychosocial Acute Treatment in Early-Episode Schizophrenia Disorders18 August 2016 | Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 16, No. 3American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, Vol. 140A, No. 11Schizophrenia Research, Vol. 84, No. 1Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 2Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Vol. 114, No. 5Psychosocial Treatment for First-Episode Psychosis: A Research UpdateDavid L. Penn, Ph.D., Evan J. Waldheter, M.A., Diana O. Perkins, M.D., Kim T. Mueser, Ph.D., and Jeffrey A. Lieberman, M.D.1 December 2005 | American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 162, No. 12Relationship Between Duration of Untreated Psychosis and Outcome in First-Episode Schizophrenia: A Critical Review and Meta-AnalysisDiana O. Perkins, M.D., M.P.H., Hongbin Gu, Ph.D., Kalina Boteva, M.D., and Jeffrey A. Lieberman, M.D.1 October 2005 | American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 162, No. 10Hippocampus Volume and Treatment Delays in First-Episode SchizophreniaBeng-Choon Ho, M.R.C.Psych., Daniel Alicata, M.D., Carmencita Mola, M.D., and Nancy C. Andreasen, M.D., Ph.D.1 August 2005 | American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 162, No. 8Determinants of Duration of Untreated Psychosis and the Pathway to Care in Singapore27 July 2016 | International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Vol. 51, No. 1Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Vol. 40, No. 8Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, Vol. 12, No. 1Disease Management & Health Outcomes, Vol. 13, No. 1Molecular Medicine and the Prospects for Prevention and Early Intervention in SchizophreniaSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Vol. 39, No. 9Journal of Psychiatric Practice, Vol. 10, No. 5British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 185, No. 6Management of Early Psychosis in a Generic Adult Mental Health Service17 November 2016 | Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 37, No. 4Treating schizophrenia earlier in life and the potential for preventionCurrent Psychosis & Therapeutics Reports, Vol. 1, No. 1Summary Australian and New Zealand Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Schizophrenia 200316 November 2016 | Australasian Psychiatry, Vol. 11, No. 2Untreated Initial Psychosis: Relation to Cognitive Deficits and Brain Morphology in First-Episode SchizophreniaBeng-Choon Ho, M.R.C.Psych., Daniel Alicata, M.D., Julianna Ward, Ph.D., David J. Moser, Ph.D., Daniel S. O’Leary, Ph.D., Stephan Arndt, Ph.D., and Nancy C. Andreasen, M.D., Ph.D.1 January 2003 | American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 160, No. 1Schizophrenia Research, Vol. 61, No. 1Clinical Neuroscience Research, Vol. 3, No. 4-5Drugs, Vol. 63, No. 21Early psychosis reform: too fast or too slow?11 September 2002 | Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Vol. 106, No. 4Levetiracetam for Acute ManiaJOSEPH F. GOLDBERG, M.D., and KATHERINE E. BURDICK, M.A., 1 January 2002 | American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 159, No. 1MECP2 Mutation in a Boy With Language Disorder and SchizophreniaDAVID COHEN, M.D., GABRIELA LAZAR, M.D., PHILIPPE COUVERT, M.D., VINCENT DESPORTES, M.D., DIDIER LIPPE, M.D., PHILIPPE MAZET, M.D., and DELPHINE HÉRON, M.D., 1 January 2002 | American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 159, No. 1Treatment of Psychosis at OnsetTANDY J. MILLER, PH.D., SCOTT W. WOODS, M.D., JOANNA LIFSHEY ROSEN, PSY.D., and THOMAS H. MCGLASHAN, M.D., 1 January 2002 | American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 159, No. 1Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Vol. 15, No. 1Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 50, No. 11The Lancet, Vol. 357, No. 9260Schizophrenia Research, Vol. 51, No. 1Schizophrenia Research, Vol. 51, No. 1 Volume 157Issue 11 November 2000Pages 1727-1730 Metrics PDF download History Published online 1 November 2000 Published in print 1 November 2000
Referência(s)