Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Results from additional nickel patch test readings in a sample of schoolgirls from the general population

2008; Wiley; Volume: 59; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01430.x

1600-0536

Jacob P. Thyssen, Christian Stab Jensen, Jeanne D. Johansen, Torkil Menné,

Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research

Contact DermatitisVolume 59, Issue 5 p. 317-318 Results from additional nickel patch test readings in a sample of schoolgirls from the general population Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen, Corresponding Author Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen Department of Dermatology, National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte 2820, DenmarkJacob Pontoppidan Thyssen, MDDepartment of DermatologyNational Allergy Research CentreGentofte University HospitalLedreborg Allé 401. 2820 GentofteDenmarkTel: +45 3977 7307Fax: +45 3977 7118e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorChristian Stab Jensen, Christian Stab Jensen National Center for Antimicrobials and Infection Control Division of Microbiology and Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen S, 2300 DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorJeanne Duus Johansen, Jeanne Duus Johansen Department of Dermatology, National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte 2820, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorTorkil Menné, Torkil Menné Department of Dermatology, National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte 2820, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen, Corresponding Author Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen Department of Dermatology, National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte 2820, DenmarkJacob Pontoppidan Thyssen, MDDepartment of DermatologyNational Allergy Research CentreGentofte University HospitalLedreborg Allé 401. 2820 GentofteDenmarkTel: +45 3977 7307Fax: +45 3977 7118e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorChristian Stab Jensen, Christian Stab Jensen National Center for Antimicrobials and Infection Control Division of Microbiology and Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen S, 2300 DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorJeanne Duus Johansen, Jeanne Duus Johansen Department of Dermatology, National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte 2820, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorTorkil Menné, Torkil Menné Department of Dermatology, National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte 2820, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author First published: 29 October 2008 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01430.xCitations: 15Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article. References 1 Dickel H, Taylor J S, Evey P, Merk H F. Delayed readings of a standard screening patch test tray: frequency of ‘lost,’‘found,’ and ‘persistent’ reactions. Am J Contact Dermat 2000: 11: 213– 217. 2 Geier J, Gefeller O, Wiechmann K, Fuchs T. Patch test reactions at D4, D5 and D6. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 40: 119– 126. 3 Rietschel R L, Adams R M, Maibach H I, Storrs F J, Rosenthal L E. The case for patch test readings beyond day 2. Notes from the lost and found department. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988: 18: 42– 45. 4 Shehade S A, Beck M H, Hillier V F. Epidemiological survey of standard series patch test results and observations on day 2 and day 4 readings. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 119– 122. 5 Uter W J, Geier J, Schnuch A. Good clinical practice in patch testing: readings beyond day 2 are necessary: a confirmatory analysis. Members of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology. Am J Contact Dermat 1996: 7: 231– 237. 6 Jonker M J, Bruynzeel D P. The outcome of an additional patch-test reading on days 6 or 7. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 330– 335. 7 Thyssen J P, Linneberg A, Menne T, Johansen J D. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population – prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 57: 287– 299. 8 Jensen C S, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O, Volund A, Menne T. Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation. Br J Dermatol 2002: 146: 636– 642. 9 Wilkinson D S, Fregert S, Magnusson B et al. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1970: 50: 287– 292. 10 Fernandez Vozmediano J M, Hita J C. Concordance and discordance between TRUE Test and Finn Chamber. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 182– 183. 11 Gollhausen R, Przybilla B, Ring J. Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber test results. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989: 21: 843– 846. Citing Literature Volume59, Issue5November 2008Pages 317-318 ReferencesRelatedInformation