Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Are all runoff processes the same?

2013; Wiley; Volume: 27; Issue: 26 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/hyp.10076

1099-1085

Jeffrey J. McDonnell,

Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

Hydrological ProcessesVolume 27, Issue 26 p. 4103-4111 Invited Commentary Are all runoff processes the same? Jeffrey J. McDonnell, Corresponding Author Jeffrey J. McDonnell Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK Dept of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA Correspondence to:Jeffrey J. McDonnell, Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon Canada. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Jeffrey J. McDonnell, Corresponding Author Jeffrey J. McDonnell Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK Dept of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA Correspondence to:Jeffrey J. McDonnell, Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon Canada. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 02 October 2013 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10076Citations: 78Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Appels WM. 2013. Water redistribution at the soil surface: ponding and surface runoff in flat areas. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 151 pp. ISBN: 978-94-6173-506-5. Bachmair S, Weiler M. 2011. New dimensions of hillslope hydrology. In Forest Hydrology and Biogeochemistry: Synthesis of Past Research and Future Directions, Ecological Studies, DF Levia, et al. (eds). Springer Netherlands, 216. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1363-5_23 Berman E, Gupta M, Gabrielli C, Garland T, McDonnell JJ. 2009. High-frequency field deployable isotope analyzer for hydrological applications. Water Resources Research 45: 10. DOI: 10.1029/2009WR008265 Betson R. 1964. What is watershed runoff. Journal of Geophysical Research 69(8): 1541–1552. DOI: 10.1029/JZ069i008p01541 Beven KJ. 2001. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer vol. 15. Wiley: Chichester; 360. Beven K. 2006. Searching for the holy grail of scientific hydrology: Qt = (S,R,Δt)A as closure. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 10(5): 609–618. Bishop K, Seibert J, Köhler S, Laudon H. 2004. Resolving the double paradox of rapidly mobilized old water with highly variable responses in runoff chemistry. Hydrological Processes 18: 185–189. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5209 Bonell M. 1993. Progress in the understanding of runoff generation dynamics in forests. Journal of Hydrology 150(2–4): 217–275. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(93)90112-M Bonell M. 1998. Selected challenges in runoff generation research in forests from the hillslope to headwater drainage basin scale. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(4): 765–785. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb01514.x Branfireun B, Roulet N. 1998. The baseflow and stormflow hydrology of a Precambrian shield peatland. Hydrological Processes 12: 57–72. Buttle JM, McDonald DJ. 2002. Coupled vertical and lateral preferential flow on a forested slope. Water Resources Research 38. DOI: 10.1029/2001WR000773 Dunne T. 1983. Relation of field studies and modeling in the prediction of storm runoff. Journal of Hydrology 65(1-3): 25–48. Dunne T, Black RD. 1970. Partial area contributions to storm runoff in a small New-England watershed. Water Resources Research 6(5): 1296–1311. DOI: 10.1029/WR006i005p01296 Fenicia F, Kavetski D, Savenije HHG. 2011. Elements of a flexible approach for conceptual hydrological modeling: 1. Motivation and theoretical development. Water Resources Research 47( 11) DOI: 10.1029/2010WR010174 Freer J, McDonnell JJ, Beven KJ, Peters NE, Burns DA, Hooper RP, Aulenbach B, Kendall C. 2002. The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow. Water Resources Research 38(12): 5-1–5-16. Frei S, Lischeid G, Fleckenstein en JH. 2010. Effects of micro-topography on surface-subsurface exchange and runoff generation in a virtual riparian wetland – A modeling study. Advances in Water Resources 33 (11): 1388–1401. DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.07.006 Gabrielli C, McDonnell JJ, Jarvis T. 2012. The role of bedrock groundwater in rainfall-runoff response at hillslope and catchment scales. Journal of Hydrology 450-451: 117–133. Graham C, McDonnell JJ, Woods R. 2010. Hillslope threshold response to storm rainfall: (1) A field based forensic approach. Journal of Hydrology DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.015 Hjerdt K, McDonnell JJ, Seibert J, Rodhe A. 2004. A new topographic index to estimate downslope controls on local drainage. Water Resources Research 40: W05602. DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003130 Hopp L, McDonnell JJ. 2009. Connectivity at the hillslope scale: Identifying interactions between storm size, bedrock permeability, slope angle and soil depth. Journal of Hydrology 376: 378–391. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.047 Horton RE. 1933. The role of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 14: 446–460. Hursh CR, Brater E. 1941. Separating storm hydrographs from small drainage areas into surface- and subsurface-flow. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 22: 863–871. Kendall K, Shanley J, McDonnell JJ. 1999. A hydrometric and geochemical approach to testing the transmissivity feedback hypothesis during snowmelt. Journal of Hydrology 219: 188–205. McDonnell JJ. 2003. Where does water go when it rains? Moving beyond the variable source area concept of rainfall-runoff response. Hydrological Processes 17: 1869–1875. McDonnell JJ. 2009. Classics in physical geography revisited: Hewlett JD, Hibbert AR. 1967. Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas. Progress in Physical Geography 33(2): 1–6. Mirus B, Loague K. 2013. How runoff begins (and ends): characterizing hydrologic response at the catchment scale. Water Resources Research 49(5): 2987–3006. DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20218 Muñoz-Villers LE, McDonnell JJ. 2012. Runoff generation in a steep, tropical montane cloud forest catchment on permeable volcanic substrate. Water Resources Research 48(9). DOI: 10.1029/2011WR011316 Pearce AJ, Stewart MK, Sklash MG. 1986. Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments: 1. Where does the water come from? Water Resources Research 22(8): 1263–1272. DOI: 10.1029/WR022i008p01263 Peters DL, Buttle JM, Taylor CH, LaZerte BD. 1995. Runoff production in a forested, shallow soil Canadian Shield basin. Water Resources Research 31: 1291–1304. Rodhe A. 1981. Spring flood: meltwater or groundwater? Nordic Hydrology 12(1): 21–30. Sayama T, McDonnell JJ, Dhakal A, Sullivan K. 2011. How much water can a watershed store? Hydrological Processes DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8288 Seibert J, Bishop K, Rodhe A, McDonnell J. 2003. Groundwater dynamics along a hillslope: a test of the steady-state hypothesis. Water Resources Research 39(1): 2-1–2-9. Shaw DA, Vanderkamp G, Conly FM, Pietroniro A, Martz L. 2012. The fill–spill hydrology of prairie wetland complexes during drought and deluge. Hydrological Processes 26: 3147–3156. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8390 Sivapalan M. 2009. The secret to 'Doing Better Hydrological Science': change the question! Hydrological Processes 23(9): 1391–1396. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7242 Spence C. 2010. A paradigm shift in hydrology: storage thresholds across scales influence catchment runoff generation. Geography Compass 4(7): 819–833. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00341.x Spence C, Woo M-K. 2003. Hydrology of subarctic Canadian shield: soil-filled valleys. Journal of Hydrology 279(1-4): 151–166. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00175-6 Spence C, Woo M-K. 2006. Hydrology of subarctic Canadian shield: heterogeneous headwater basins. Journal of Hydrology 317(1): 138–154. Torres R, Dietrich WE, Montgomery DR, Anderson SP, Loague K. 1998. Unsaturated zone processes and the hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled catchment. Water Resources Research 34(8): 1865–1879. DOI: 10.1029/98WR01140 Troch PA, Carrillo GA, Heidbüchel I, Rajagopal S, Switanek M, Volkmann THM, Yaeger M. 2009. Dealing with landscape heterogeneity in watershed hydrology: A review of recent progress toward new hydrological theory. Geography Compass 3(1): 375–392. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00186.x Tromp-van Meerveld I, McDonnell JJ. 2006a. Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow 1: a 147 storm analysis of the Panola hillslope trench. Water Resources Research DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003778 Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, McDonnell JJ. 2006b. Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow 2: the fill and spill hypothesis: an explanation for observed threshold behavior in subsurface stormflow. Water Resources Research DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003800 Uchida T, Kosugi K, Mizuyama T. 2001. Effects of pipeflow on hydrological process and its relation to landslide: a review of pipeflow studies in forested headwater catchments. Hydrological Processes 15: 2151–2174. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.281 Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch P, Woods R. 2007. Catchment classification and hydrologic similarity. Geography Compass 1(4): 901–931. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00039.x Weyman D. 1973. Measurements of the downslope flow of water in soil. Journal of Hydrology 20(3): 267–288. Citing Literature Volume27, Issue2630 December 2013Pages 4103-4111 This article also appears in:HPToday: Invited Commentaries ReferencesRelatedInformation