Field Evaluation of Interfacial and Partitioning Tracers for Characterization of Effective NAPL‐Water Contact Areas
1998; Wiley; Volume: 36; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02821.x
ISSN1745-6584
AutoresMichael D. Annable, James W. Jawitz, P. Suresh C. Rao, Daoxuan Dai, H. Kim, A. Lynn Wood,
Tópico(s)Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
ResumoAbstract The use of surface‐active tracers for measuring the interfacial area between no aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) and water was evaluated in a hydraulically isolated test cell installed in a surficial aquifer located at Hill Air Force Base (AFB), Utah. Interfacial tracers were developed at the University of Florida for quantifying immiscible fluid‐fluid interfaces (air‐water or NAPL‐water) in porous media. Sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) was used as the interfacial tracer to measure the effective NAPL‐water interfacial area (a Nw ), while 2,2‐dimethyl‐3‐pentanol (DMP) was used as the partitioning tracer to estimate the NAPL saturation (S N ). The observed retardation of SDBS and DMP when compared to a nonreactive tracer (bromide or methanol) at eight multilevel sampling locations and one extraction well, was used to quantify the a Nw and S N values averaged over the interval between the injection wells and each monitoring point. The NAPL morphology index, defined here as H N = a Nw /φS N (φ= porosity), varied significantly within the test cell. In locations where the magnitude of H N was large, the NAPL was assumed to be more or less uniformly spread, providing good contact with the mobile fluid. In contrast, regions with low H N values were assumed to have NAPL that was more heterogeneously distributed as isolated patches providing poor contact with the mobile fluid. The index H N , provided by the combined use of interfacial and partitioning tracers, has important implications for NAPL source region remediation employing in situ flushing technologies.
Referência(s)