Voltar
Editorial Revisado por pares
BIBTEX RIS

Dental education as a social science: some implications for research

2010; Wiley; Volume: 14; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00626.x

ISSN

1600-0579

Autores

Alison Bullock,

Tópico(s)

Cultural Competency in Health Care

Resumo

European Journal of Dental EducationVolume 14, Issue 2 p. 65-68 Dental education as a social science: some implications for research Alison Bullock, Alison Bullock Professor of Medical and Dental Education at the Cardiff Unit for Research and Evaluation of Medical and Dental Education (CUREMeDE), Cardiff University School of Social Sciences, Cardiff, UKSearch for more papers by this author Alison Bullock, Alison Bullock Professor of Medical and Dental Education at the Cardiff Unit for Research and Evaluation of Medical and Dental Education (CUREMeDE), Cardiff University School of Social Sciences, Cardiff, UKSearch for more papers by this author First published: 13 April 2010 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00626.xCitations: 12Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1 Bligh J, Brice J. What is the value of good medical education research? Med Educ 2008: 42: 652–653. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03036.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2 Monrouxe LV, Rees CE. Picking up the gauntlet: constructing medical education as a social science. Med Educ 2009: 43: 196–198. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03272.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 Gill D, Griffin AE. Reframing medical education research: let’s make the publishable meaningful and the meaningful publishable. Med Educ 2009: 43: 933–935. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03451.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4 Tan TPY, Stokes T, Shaw EJ. Use of qualitative research as evidence in the clinical guideline program of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2009: 7: 169–172. 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2009.00135.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5 Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. London: RoutledgeFalmer, 2000. 10.4324/9780203224342 Google Scholar 6 Henwood KL, Pidgeon NF. Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. Br J Psychol 1992: 83: 97–111. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7 Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999. 10.4159/9780674039681 Google Scholar 8 Shifferdecker KE, Reed VA. Using mixed methods research in medical education: basic guidelines for researchers. Med Educ 2009: 43: 637–644. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03386.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9 Albert M. Understanding the debate on medical education research: a sociological perspective. Acad Med 2004: 79: 10 948–953 10.1097/00001888-200410000-00009 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Hammersley M. Some questions about evidence-based practice in education. In: G Thomas, R Pring, eds. Evidence-based practice in education. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2004: 133–149. Google Scholar 11 Hutchinson L. Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions. BMJ 1999: 318: 1267–1269. 10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1267 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 12 Ten Cate O. Why the ethics of medical education research differs from that of medical research. Med Educ 2009: 43: 608–610. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03385.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 13 Shea JA, Arnold L, Mann KV. A RIME perspective on the quality and relevance of current and future medical education research. Acad Med 2004: 79: 931–938. 10.1097/00001888-200410000-00006 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14 Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine, 1967. Google Scholar 15 Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000: 320: 114–116. 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 16 McMillan W. Finding a method to analyze qualitative data: using a study of conceptual learning. J Dent Educ 2009: 73: 53–64. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.1.tb04639.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 17 Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995: 311: 109–112. 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 18 Guba E, Lincoln Y. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: NK Denzin, YS Lincoln, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage, 1994: 105–117. Google Scholar 19 Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1985. 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 Google Scholar 20 Mays N, Pope C. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000: 320: 50–52. 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21 Ambert AM, Adler PA, Adler P, Detzner DF. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. J Marriage Fam 1995: 57: 879–893. 10.2307/353409 Web of Science®Google Scholar 22 Cohen DJ, Crabtree BJ. Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Ann Fam Med 2008: 6: 331–339. 10.1370/afm.818 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 23 Stige B, Malterud K, Midtgarden T. Towards an agenda for evaluation of qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2009: 19: 1504–1516. 10.1177/1049732309348501 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 24 Cassell C, Buehring A, Symon G, Johnson P, Bishop V. Qualitative management research: a thematic analysis of interviews with stakeholders in the field. Final Research Report, 2005. http://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/e-space/handle/2173/5015 (accessed 2 February 2010). Google Scholar 25 Albert M, Laberge S, Hodges BD, Regehr G, Lingard L. Biomedical scientists’ perception of the social sciences in health research. Soc Sci Med 2008: 66: 2520–2531. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.052 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume14, Issue2May 2010Pages 65-68 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)