Predictions: a universal principle in the operation of the human brain
2009; Royal Society; Volume: 364; Issue: 1521 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1098/rstb.2008.0321
ISSN1471-2970
Autores Tópico(s)Quantum Mechanics and Applications
ResumoYou have accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Bar Moshe 2009Predictions: a universal principle in the operation of the human brainPhil. Trans. R. Soc. B3641181–1182http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0321SectionYou have accessIntroductionPredictions: a universal principle in the operation of the human brain Moshe Bar Moshe Bar [email protected] Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Moshe Bar Moshe Bar [email protected] Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Published:12 May 2009https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0321Just as physicists can explain complex systems with a small set of elegant equations (e.g. Maxwell's), it might be possible for the multidisciplinary study of the brain to produce a list of well-defined universal principles that can explain the majority of its operation. Given exciting developments in theory, empirical findings and computational studies, it seems that the generation of predictions might be one strong candidate for such a universal principle. Predictions in the brain is the focus of the collection of papers in this special theme issue. The word 'focus' might be misleading, however, because these papers range from addressing cellular underpinnings to computational principles to cognition, emotion and happiness, and they cover predictions that range from the next turn for a rat navigating a maze to predictions required in social interactions.The questions that you might expect to learn and be stimulated about by reading this issue are accordingly diverse, for example:the links between future-related mental processes and memory, including their underlying cortical mechanisms. A related intriguing idea is that recollection relies on reconstruction, a mechanism that also provides a valuable tool for generating future-related thoughts, as well as for evaluations and future 'memories'. What are the neural mechanisms mediating such constructive processes?the connections between mental reconstruction, pattern completion, imagery, simulation, action plans, spatial navigation and more;the cellular mechanisms that balance the need to store stable memories and the need to be able to update them with novel experiences;counterfactual reasoning for past and future: 'what if' questions and mental scenarios in the context of preparation; 'what if' questions that seem to serve fantasizing; 'what if' questions that pertain to the past versus the future; and 'what if' questions that relate to self versus others. Are they all different? Perhaps not as much as it would seem, with all promoting simulations and imagery, possibly creating 'memories' that can be applied in future situations;is prediction-related processing primarily cortical or subcortical?what are the computational elements involved in the ability to predict?how do neural oscillations help in information organization for predictions?how do we learn what we need for subsequent generation of accurate predictions, and how does error in predictions promote such learning?what is the role of language in learning and sharing future-related information?does the ability for future simulations exist exclusively in humans, or are we simply unique in the magnitude and level of complexity of our foresight?in social settings, what is the relationship between simulations and our understanding of other people's thoughts and state of mind? andwhat is the role of predictions in emotion? How does the association of past experiences with affective values influence how we predict and perceive related information? Are we as good as we think in predicting emotional consequences? If there is a discrepancy between our ability to foresee affective states and rewards and our ability to predict non-affective outcome, what is the source of this discrepancy? How does the ability to plan and simulate futures affect our happiness, and what might be the implications to well-being and mental disorder?We learn, encode, recollect, attend, recognize, evaluate, feel and act. The papers presented in this issue put forth neural models describing the possible interactions between these rich processes and the predictions-related mechanisms that connect them.Some of the papers may appear almost synonymously describing similar ideas, which is an encouraging sign of potential validity. For example, the idea that predictions rely on memory. Indeed, it is hard to think of what other source if not memory can mediate predictions, but those proposals are in agreement with many of the details, including the cortical structures involved (e.g. medial temporal lobe and medial prefrontal cortex), the complexity of the underlying memory structures, the way they are encoded and the reconstructive way by which they are recalled and used in predictions.On the other hand, some papers might seem to contradict each other. For example, the issue of whether foresight is exclusive to humans. There seems to be evidence either way, and the question is whether the fact that rats, for example, show future planning-like operations such as transitive inference and prediction of upcoming positions implies that they are able to predict in the same way as humans, or similarly but to a lower capacity, or not at all, and these demonstrations in non-humans can instead be interpreted as something different from foresight. Other interesting debates include whether the underlying computational principles are Bayesian in nature or not. Such orthogonal proposals are particularly interesting because they show how the same solutions can be reached via different mechanisms and pathways.As much as this collection answers important questions, it raises and emphasizes outstanding ones. How are experiences coded optimally to afford using them for predictions? What is the mechanism underlying reconstruction, and how do we construct a new simulation from separate memories? How specific in detail are future-related mental simulations, and when do they rely on imagery, concepts or language? What is the difference in mechanism and cortical underpinnings of predictions that stem from sequence memory (i.e. replaying existing memories) and predictions that stem from construction? What is the role of hierarchies in representations and predictions? It is hoped that the questions that emerge from this issue will inspire and steer future research on future-related mental processes.Let me conclude this introduction with an intriguing analogy. The fighter plane F-16 is the first aeroplane intentionally designed to have an aerodynamically unstable platform. This design was chosen to enhance the aircraft's manoeuvrability. Most aeroplanes are designed to be stable such that they strive to return to their original attitude following an interruption. While such stability is a desired property for a passenger aeroplane, for example, it opposes a pilot's effort to change headings rapidly and thus can degrade manoeuvring performance required for a fighter jet. This behaviour has led to a saying among pilots that 'you do not fly an F-16, it flies you' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-16_Fighting_Falcon). As is evident from the collection of articles presented in this issue, the brain might be similarly flexible and 'restless' by default. This restlessness does not reflect random activity that is there merely for the sake of remaining active, but, instead, it reflects the ongoing generation of predictions, which relies on memory and enhances our interaction with and adjustment to the demanding environment.AcknowledgmentsI am deeply grateful to Jasmine Boshyan for her relentless and remarkably meticulous assistance with preparing this entire issue for publication.FootnotesOne contribution of 18 to a Theme Issue 'Predictions in the brain: using our past to prepare for the future'.© 2009 The Royal Society Next Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited by Mermillod M, Perrier M, Lacroix A, Kauffmann L, Peyrin C, Méot A, Vermeulen N and Dutheil F (2022) High spatial frequencies disrupt conscious visual recognition: evidence from an attentional blink paradigm, Heliyon, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11964, 8:12, (e11964), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022. Gavard E and Ziegler J (2022) The Effects of Semantic and Syntactic Prediction on Reading Aloud, Experimental Psychology, 10.1027/1618-3169/a000568, 69:6, (308-319), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022. Jungilligens J, Paredes-Echeverri S, Popkirov S, Barrett L and Perez D (2022) A new science of emotion: implications for functional neurological disorder, Brain, 10.1093/brain/awac204, 145:8, (2648-2663), Online publication date: 27-Aug-2022. Steffen P, Hedges D and Matheson R (2022) The Brain Is Adaptive Not Triune: How the Brain Responds to Threat, Challenge, and Change, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.802606, 13 Sennesh E, Theriault J, Brooks D, van de Meent J, Barrett L and Quigley K (2022) Interoception as modeling, allostasis as control, Biological Psychology, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108242, 167, (108242), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022. Vlasceanu M, Morais M and Coman A (2021) The Effect of Prediction Error on Belief Update Across the Political Spectrum, Psychological Science, 10.1177/0956797621995208, 32:6, (916-933), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021. Lopukhina A, Lopukhin K, Laurinavichyute A and Mulatti C (2021) Morphosyntactic but not lexical corpus-based probabilities can substitute for cloze probabilities in reading experiments, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0246133, 16:1, (e0246133) Butz M, Achimova A, Bilkey D and Knott A (2020) Event‐Predictive Cognition: A Root for Conceptual Human Thought, Topics in Cognitive Science, 10.1111/tops.12522, 13:1, (10-24), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021. Johnson E, Kam J, Tzovara A and Knight R (2020) Insights into human cognition from intracranial EEG: A review of audition, memory, internal cognition, and causality, Journal of Neural Engineering, 10.1088/1741-2552/abb7a5, 17:5, (051001) Lavy S and Berkovich-Ohana A (2020) From Teachers' Mindfulness to Students' Thriving: the Mindful Self in School Relationships (MSSR) Model, Mindfulness, 10.1007/s12671-020-01418-2, 11:10, (2258-2273), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020. Cleeremans A, Achoui D, Beauny A, Keuninckx L, Martin J, Muñoz-Moldes S, Vuillaume L and de Heering A (2020) Learning to Be Conscious, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.011, 24:2, (112-123), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2020. Takac M, Knott A and Sagar M (2020) SOM-Based System for Sequence Chunking and Planning Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2020, 10.1007/978-3-030-61609-0_53, (672-684), . Quiroga-Martinez D, Hansen N, Højlund A, Pearce M, Brattico E and Vuust P (2019) Reduced prediction error responses in high-as compared to low-uncertainty musical contexts, Cortex, 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.06.010, 120, (181-200), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2019. Armeni K, Willems R, van den Bosch A and Schoffelen J (2019) Frequency-specific brain dynamics related to prediction during language comprehension, NeuroImage, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.083, 198, (283-295), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019. Butz M, Bilkey D, Humaidan D, Knott A and Otte S (2019) Learning, planning, and control in a monolithic neural event inference architecture, Neural Networks, 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.05.001, 117, (135-144), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019. Lohmann J, Belardinelli A and Butz M (2019) Hands Ahead in Mind and Motion: Active Inference in Peripersonal Hand Space, Vision, 10.3390/vision3020015, 3:2, (15) Carter B, Foster B, Muncy N and Luke S (2019) Linguistic networks associated with lexical, semantic and syntactic predictability in reading: A fixation-related fMRI study, NeuroImage, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.018, 189, (224-240), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019. Berkovich-Ohana A, Jennings P and Lavy S (2019) Contemplative neuroscience, self-awareness, and education Meditation, 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.10.015, (355-385), . Butz M, Menge T, Humaidan D and Otte S (2019) Inferring Event-Predictive Goal-Directed Object Manipulations in REPRISE Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2019: Theoretical Neural Computation, 10.1007/978-3-030-30487-4_49, (639-653), . Nourski K, Steinschneider M, Rhone A, Kawasaki H, Howard M and Banks M (2018) Processing of auditory novelty across the cortical hierarchy: An intracranial electrophysiology study, NeuroImage, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.027, 183, (412-424), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018. Euler M (2018) Intelligence and uncertainty: Implications of hierarchical predictive processing for the neuroscience of cognitive ability, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.013, 94, (93-112), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018. Benitez V and Saffran J (2018) Predictable Events Enhance Word Learning in Toddlers, Current Biology, 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.017, 28:17, (2787-2793.e4), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018. Atzil S, Gao W, Fradkin I and Barrett L (2018) Growing a social brain, Nature Human Behaviour, 10.1038/s41562-018-0384-6, 2:9, (624-636) Vuust P, Dietz M, Witek M and Kringelbach M (2018) Now you hear it: a predictive coding model for understanding rhythmic incongruity, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 10.1111/nyas.13622, 1423:1, (19-29), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018. Xenakis I (2017) Reducing uncertainty in sustainable interpersonal service relationships: the role of aesthetics, Cognitive Processing, 10.1007/s10339-017-0819-4, 19:2, (215-229), Online publication date: 1-May-2018. Gendron M and Barrett L (2018) Emotion Perception as Conceptual Synchrony, Emotion Review, 10.1177/1754073917705717, 10:2, (101-110), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018. Wang L, Hagoort P and Jensen O (2018) Language Prediction Is Reflected by Coupling between Frontal Gamma and Posterior Alpha Oscillations, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10.1162/jocn_a_01190, 30:3, (432-447), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018. Meijs E, Slagter H, de Lange F and van Gaal S (2018) Dynamic Interactions between Top–Down Expectations and Conscious Awareness, The Journal of Neuroscience, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1952-17.2017, 38:9, (2318-2327), Online publication date: 28-Feb-2018. Monahan P (2018) Phonological Knowledge and Speech Comprehension, Annual Review of Linguistics, 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045537, 4:1, (21-47), Online publication date: 14-Jan-2018. Vuust P (2018) Groove on the Brain Music Technology with Swing, 10.1007/978-3-030-01692-0_7, (101-110), . Euler M, McKinney T, Schryver H and Okabe H (2017) ERP correlates of the decision time-IQ relationship: The role of complexity in task- and brain-IQ effects, Intelligence, 10.1016/j.intell.2017.08.003, 65, (1-10), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017. Koban L, Jepma M, Geuter S and Wager T (2017) What's in a word? How instructions, suggestions, and social information change pain and emotion, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.014, 81, (29-42), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017. Schrodt F, Kneissler J, Ehrenfeld S and Butz M (2017) Mario Becomes Cognitive, Topics in Cognitive Science, 10.1111/tops.12252, 9:2, (343-373), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017. Divjak D (2016) The Role of Lexical Frequency in the Acceptability of Syntactic Variants: Evidence From that- Clauses in Polish , Cognitive Science, 10.1111/cogs.12335, 41:2, (354-382), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017. Taves A and Asprem E (2016) Experience as event: event cognition and the study of (religious) experiences, Religion, Brain & Behavior, 10.1080/2153599X.2016.1150327, 7:1, (43-62), Online publication date: 2-Jan-2017. Muraskin J, Sherwin J, Lieberman G, Garcia J, Verstynen T, Vettel J and Sajda P Fusing Multiple Neuroimaging Modalities to Assess Group Differences in Perception–Action Coupling, Proceedings of the IEEE, 10.1109/JPROC.2016.2574702, 105:1, (83-100) Maess B, Mamashli F, Obleser J, Helle L and Friederici A (2016) Prediction Signatures in the Brain: Semantic Pre-Activation during Language Comprehension, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00591, 10 Willems R, Frank S, Nijhof A, Hagoort P and van den Bosch A (2015) Prediction During Natural Language Comprehension, Cerebral Cortex, 10.1093/cercor/bhv075, 26:6, (2506-2516), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016. Marzen S and Crutchfield J (2016) Predictive Rate-Distortion for Infinite-Order Markov Processes, Journal of Statistical Physics, 10.1007/s10955-016-1520-1, 163:6, (1312-1338), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016. Henderson J, Choi W, Lowder M and Ferreira F (2016) Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading, NeuroImage, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.050, 132, (293-300), Online publication date: 1-May-2016. Malekshahi R, Seth A, Papanikolaou A, Mathews Z, Birbaumer N, Verschure P and Caria A (2016) Differential neural mechanisms for early and late prediction error detection, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/srep24350, 6:1 Ramachandran S, Meyer T and Olson C (2016) Prediction suppression in monkey inferotemporal cortex depends on the conditional probability between images, Journal of Neurophysiology, 10.1152/jn.00091.2015, 115:1, (355-362), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016. Ferreira F and Lowder M (2016) Prediction, Information Structure, and Good-Enough Language Processing , 10.1016/bs.plm.2016.04.002, (217-247), . Roy S (2016) Predictability of Brain and Decision Making Decision Making and Modelling in Cognitive Science, 10.1007/978-81-322-3622-1_3, (51-73), . Muraskin J, Sherwin J and Sajda P (2015) Knowing when not to swing: EEG evidence that enhanced perception–action coupling underlies baseball batter expertise, NeuroImage, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.028, 123, (1-10), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015. Colder B (2015) The basal ganglia select the expected sensory input used for predictive coding, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 10.3389/fncom.2015.00119, 9 Ondobaka S, de Lange F, Wittmann M, Frith C and Bekkering H (2014) Interplay Between Conceptual Expectations and Movement Predictions Underlies Action Understanding, Cerebral Cortex, 10.1093/cercor/bhu056, 25:9, (2566-2573), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015. Berkovich‐Ohana A, Wilf M, Kahana R, Arieli A and Malach R (2015) Repetitive speech elicits widespread deactivation in the human cortex: the " M antra" effect? , Brain and Behavior, 10.1002/brb3.346, 5:7, Online publication date: 1-Jul-2015. Gebauer L, Kringelbach M and Vuust P (2015) Predictive coding links perception, action, and learning to emotions in music, Physics of Life Reviews, 10.1016/j.plrev.2015.04.023, 13, (50-52), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2015. Chetverikov A and Kristjansson Á (2014) History effects in visual search for monsters: Search times, choice biases, and liking, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 10.3758/s13414-014-0782-4, 77:2, (402-412), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015. Koppe G, Gruppe H, Sammer G, Gallhofer B, Kirsch P and Lis S (2014) Temporal unpredictability of a stimulus sequence affects brain activation differently depending on cognitive task demands, NeuroImage, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.008, 101, (236-244), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2014. Xenakis I and Arnellos A (2014) Aesthetic perception and its minimal content: a naturalistic perspective, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01038, 5 Andersen M, Schjoedt U, Nielbo K and Sørensen J Mystical Experience in the Lab, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 10.1163/15700682-12341323, 26:3, (217-245) Cleeremans A (2014) Connecting Conscious and Unconscious Processing, Cognitive Science, 10.1111/cogs.12149, 38:6, (1286-1315), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2014. Cornelis H and Coop A (2014) Afference copy as a quantitative neurophysiological model for consciousness, Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 10.1142/S0219635214400020, 13:02, (363-402), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014. Caplette L, West G, Gomot M, Gosselin F and Wicker B (2014) Affective and contextual values modulate spatial frequency use in object recognition, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00512, 5 Geertz A (2013) Who or what is doing the flowing? On the apparent metaphysics of N.F. Barrett's ecological approach, Religion, Brain & Behavior, 10.1080/2153599X.2013.816348, 4:2, (149-152), Online publication date: 4-May-2014. Rosenbaum R, Gilboa A and Moscovitch M (2014) Case studies continue to illuminate the cognitive neuroscience of memory, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 10.1111/nyas.12467, 1316:1, (105-133), Online publication date: 1-May-2014. Berkovich-Ohana A and Glicksohn J (2014) The consciousness state space (CSS)—a unifying model for consciousness and self, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00341, 5 Porubanova M, Shaw D, McKay R, Xygalatas D and Mesoudi A (2014) Memory for Expectation-Violating Concepts: The Effects of Agents and Cultural Familiarity, PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0090684, 9:4, (e90684) Neroni M, Gamboz N and Brandimonte M (2014) Does episodic future thinking improve prospective remembering?, Consciousness and Cognition, 10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.001, 23, (53-62), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014. Butz M (2013) Separating goals from behavioral control: Implications from learning predictive modularizations, New Ideas in Psychology, 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.04.001, 31:3, (302-312), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2013. Galtier M and Wainrib G (2013) A Biological Gradient Descent for Prediction Through a Combination of STDP and Homeostatic Plasticity, Neural Computation, 10.1162/NECO_a_00512, 25:11, (2815-2832), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2013. Schaat S, Wendt A and Bruckner D (2013) A multi-criteria exemplar model for holistic categorization in autonomous agents IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 10.1109/IECON.2013.6700231, 978-1-4799-0224-8, (6642-6647) Dudai Y and Morris R (2013) Memorable Trends, Neuron, 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.039, 80:3, (742-750), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013. Smith N and Levy R (2013) The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic, Cognition, 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013, 128:3, (302-319), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013. Stapleton M (2013) Steps to a "Properly Embodied" cognitive science, Cognitive Systems Research, 10.1016/j.cogsys.2012.05.001, 22-23, (1-11), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2013. Limongi R, Sutherland S, Zhu J, Young M and Habib R (2013) Temporal prediction errors modulate cingulate–insular coupling, NeuroImage, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.078, 71, (147-157), Online publication date: 1-May-2013. Schjoedt U, Sørensen J, Nielbo K, Xygalatas D, Mitkidis P and Bulbulia J (2013) Cognitive resource depletion in religious interactions, Religion, Brain & Behavior, 10.1080/2153599X.2012.736714, 3:1, (39-55), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2013. Sedeño L, Moya Á, Baker P and Ibáñez A (2014) Cognición social contexto-dependiente y redes frontotemporo-insulares, Revista de Psicología Social, 10.1174/021347413807719085, 28:3, (299-315), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013. Davis J (2013) Persistent Inequality: A Neurosociological Perspective Handbook of Neurosociology, 10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8_21, (333-348), . Perlovsky L and Ilin R (2012) Brain. Conscious and Unconscious Mechanisms of Cognition, Emotions, and Language, Brain Sciences, 10.3390/brainsci2040790, 2:4, (790-834) Saygin A and Stadler W (2012) The role of appearance and motion in action prediction, Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-012-0426-z, 76:4, (388-394), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012. Stapleton M (2012) Feeling the strain: Predicting the third dimension of core affect, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10.1017/S0140525X11001610, 35:3, (166-167), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012. Kwan D, Craver C, Green L, Myerson J, Boyer P and Rosenbaum R (2011) Future decision-making without episodic mental time travel, Hippocampus, 10.1002/hipo.20981, 22:6, (1215-1219), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012. Saygin A, Chaminade T, Ishiguro H, Driver J and Frith C (2011) The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10.1093/scan/nsr025, 7:4, (413-422), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2012. Eldaief M, Deckersbach T, Carlson L, Beucke J and Dougherty D (2011) Emotional and cognitive stimuli differentially engage the default network during inductive reasoning, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10.1093/scan/nsr003, 7:4, (380-392), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2012. Frey S and Povinelli D (2012) Comparative investigations of manual action representations: evidence that chimpanzees represent the costs of potential future actions involving tools, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367:1585, (48-58), Online publication date: 12-Jan-2012. Perlovsky L and Ilin R (2012) Mathematical Model of Embodied Symbols: Cognition and Perceptual Symbol System, Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 10.4236/jbbs.2012.22024, 02:02, (195-220), . Yardley H, Perlovsky L and Bar M (2012) Predictions and Incongruency in Object Recognition: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective Detection and Identification of Rare Audiovisual Cues, 10.1007/978-3-642-24034-8_12, (139-153), . Perlovsky L, Deming R and Ilin R (2011) Epilogue Future Research Directions Emotional Cognitive Neural Algorithms with Engineering Applications, 10.1007/978-3-642-22830-8_5, (175-198), . Roepstorff A, Niewöhner J and Beck S (2010) Enculturing brains through patterned practices, Neural Networks, 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.002, 23:8-9, (1051-1059), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010. Perlovsky L and Ilin R (2010) Grounded symbols in the brain 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 10.1109/IJCNN.2010.5596923, 978-1-4244-6916-1, (1-10) Bar M (2009) A cognitive neuroscience hypothesis of mood and depression, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.009, 13:11, (456-463), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2009. This Issue12 May 2009Volume 364Issue 1521Theme Issue 'Predictions in the brain: using our past to prepare for the future' compiled by Moshe Bar Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0321PubMed:19527998Published by:Royal SocietyPrint ISSN:0962-8436Online ISSN:1471-2970History: Published online12/05/2009Published in print12/05/2009 License:© 2009 The Royal Society Citations and impact Subjectsneuroscience
Referência(s)