Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Co-Managing Human–Wildlife Conflicts: A Review

2006; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 11; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1080/10871200600984265

1533-158X

Adrian Treves, Robert B. Wallace, Lisa Naughton‐Treves, Andrea Morales,

Primate Behavior and Ecology

Conservationists recognize the need to work beyond protected areas if they are to sustain viable populations of wildlife. But ambitious plans to extend wildlife corridors beyond protected areas must consider the economic and political implications when wildlife forage on crops, attack livestock, or otherwise threaten human security. Traditionally, humans respond by killing "problem" wildlife and transforming wild habitats to prevent further losses. This traditional response, however, is now illegal or socially unacceptable in many areas, changing a simple competitive relationship between people and wildlife into a political conflict. Here we draw from experience in Bolivia, Uganda, and Wisconsin to outline a strategy for mitigating human–wildlife conflict based on participatory methods and co-management with twin objectives of wildlife conservation and safeguarding human security. Incorporating local stakeholders as partners in planning and implementation can help to win space for wildlife beyond protected area boundaries. We also show why systematic study of local people's perceptions of risk and participant planning of interventions are irreplaceable components of such projects.