Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Guidelines on the management of massive blood loss

2006; Wiley; Volume: 135; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06355.x

1365-2141

D. Stainsby, Sheila MacLennan, Dafydd G. Thomas, John Isaac, P. J. Hamilton,

Blood donation and transfusion practices

The guideline group was selected to be representative of UK-based medical experts and included the authors of previous recommendations. Preparation of the guidelines included a review of key literature, including Cochrane Database and MEDLINE and consultation with representatives of relevant specialties. Recommendations are based on appraisal of the relevant literature and expert consensus. The writing group produced the draft guideline, which was subsequently revised by consensus by members of the Transfusion Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. The guideline was then reviewed by a sounding board of approximately 100 UK haematologists, the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH) and the British Society for Haematology Committee and comments incorporated where appropriate. Criteria used to quote levels and grades of evidence are as outlined in appendix 3 of the Procedure for Guidelines Commissioned by the BCSH (http://www.bcshguidelines.com/process1.asp#App3). The objective of this guideline is to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the management of massive blood loss. They do not address the specific problems associated with major obstetric haemorrhage; these are being addressed by the Royal College of Obstetricians. In all cases individual patient circumstances may dictate an alternative approach. These guidelines summarise current opinions regarding the management of massive blood loss and update previous recommendations (Stainsby et al, 2000). These are presented as a template that can be modified to suit local circumstances, and then displayed in clinical areas. The left-hand column outlines the key steps or goals, the centre column adds procedural detail and the right-hand column provides additional advice and information (Table I). Major blood loss jeopardises the survival of patients in many clinical settings and is a challenge for haematological and blood transfusion services. Tensions may arise between those attempting to treat bleeding, those supplying blood and those providing laboratory services. Discord can waste scarce resources, or, worse, result in a bad outcome for the patient. Massive blood loss is arbitrarily defined as the loss of one blood volume within a 24 h period (Mollison et al, 1997), the normal adult blood volume being approximately 7% of ideal body weight in adults and 8–9% in children. Alternative definitions that may be more helpful in the acute situation include a 50% blood volume loss within 3 h or a rate of loss of 150 ml/min (Fakhry & Sheldon, 1994). It is imperative to recognise major blood loss early and institute effective action promptly if shock and its consequences are to be prevented. These are; Maintenance of tissue perfusion and oxygenation by restoration of blood volume and haemoglobin Arrest of bleeding by treating any traumatic, surgical or obstetric source judicious use of blood component therapy to correct coagulopathy A successful outcome requires prompt action and good communication between clinical specialties, diagnostic laboratories, hospital transfusion laboratory staff and the Blood Service. Blood component support takes time to organise and the supplying blood centre may be several hours away from the hospital. Special transfusion requirements for specific indications, e.g. components suitable for neonates, irradiated components for patients at risk of transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease, (British Committee for Standards in Haematology Blood Transfusion Taskforce, 1996, 2004), should be taken into account if time permits, but it may be necessary to make a pragmatic decision regarding the relative risks of delaying transfusion or giving components that are not of the appropriate specification. Early consultation with senior surgical, anaesthetic and haematology colleagues is essential and the importance of good communication and co-operation in this situation cannot be over-emphasised. Appropriate surgical expertise for the area of bleeding is vital; involvement of vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic surgeons or others with specific interests is crucial to success. Consideration should be given to early referral and if necessary transfer to such expertise. In the more difficult cases, confidence to pack visceral cavities, cross clamp and tie off major vessels may be required. Radiological embolisation or stenting has an established role. An intensive care bed is likely to be required and early warning of this is advisable. A member of the clinical team should be nominated to act as co-ordinator responsible for overall organisation, liaison, communication and documentation. This is a critical role for a designated member of the permanent clinical staff. Accurate documentation of blood components given and the reason for transfusion is necessary in order to enable audit of outcome and satisfy the legal requirement for full traceability (Blood Safety and Quality Regulations, 2005). The hospital transfusion laboratory must be informed of a massive transfusion situation at the earliest possible opportunity. This will provide an opportunity to check stock, reschedule non-urgent work and call in additional staff if required out of hours. Clear local protocols for management of massive blood loss should be accessible in all relevant clinical and laboratory areas and understood by all involved staff. Regular 'drills' can improve awareness and confidence and ensure that the blood transfusion chain works efficiently. It is good practice to review such cases after the event, to assess what went well and what did not, and to update protocols accordingly. The Hospital Transfusion Committee (HTC) has a central role in ensuring the optimum and safe use of blood components. The development of protocols for management of massive transfusion is an important part of its remit. The HTC also provides a forum in which a rapid communication cascade can be agreed and massive transfusion episodes critically reviewed. As part of contingency planning for national blood shortage situations, every hospital should have an Emergency Blood Management Plan in place that provides guidance on clinical priorities for the use of large volumes of blood components. In exceptional circumstances it may be necessary to make a decision to cease energetic transfusion support when the chances of the patient's survival are low, determined on a case-by-case basis. The HTC should establish a mechanism for making such difficult decisions on an individual basis, taking into account such factors as co-morbidity, potential for control of bleeding, reversal of the underlying cause and competing demands for available blood components. The over-riding first requirement is maintenance of tissue perfusion and oxygenation, which is critical in preventing the development of hypovolaemic shock and consequent high mortality from multi-organ failure. Restoration of circulating volume is initially achieved by rapid infusion of crystalloid or colloid through large bore (up to 14 gauge) peripheral cannulae (Donaldson et al, 1992). Alternatively, larger bore central access devices can be used dependent on local skills and availability The use of albumin and non-albumin colloids versus crystalloids for volume replacement has been the subject of debate following controversial meta-analyses (Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers, 1998; Schierhout & Roberts, 1998). A controlled trial of normal saline versus 4% human albumin for fluid resuscitation involving over 7000 patients in 16 intensive Care Units in Australia and New Zealand (Finfer et al, 2004) found no difference in outcome at 28 d and concluded that they were clinically equivalent (Grade A recommendation, Level 1b evidence). Hypothermia increases the risk of end organ failure and coagulopathy (Iserson & Huestis, 1991; American College of Surgeons, 1997) and may be prevented by pre-warming of resuscitation fluids, patient warming devices such as warm air blankets and the use of temperature controlled blood warmers (Grade C recommendation, Level IV evidence). Blood samples should be sent to the laboratory at the earliest possible opportunity for blood grouping, antibody screening and compatibility testing, as well as for baseline haematology, coagulation screen (including fibrinogen estimation and thrombin time) and biochemistry investigations. Accurate patient identification is of paramount importance in all aspects of healthcare, and particularly in emergency situations. Every patient must wear an identification wristband, and there must be a robust and tested system in place for identification of unknown unconscious patients, including subsequent merging of clinical and laboratory records. When dealing with an evolving process it is important to check parameters frequently, (and after each therapeutic intervention) to monitor the need for and the efficacy of component therapy. Appropriate use of near-patient testing devices, which can include thromboelastography (TEG), can offer rapid data to guide component therapy (Samama & Ozier, 2003) but requires expert interpretation. Advice should be sought from a consultant with transfusion expertise regarding appropriate investigations, their interpretation and optimum corrective therapy. Allogeneic blood from volunteer donors is a limited and valuable resource that must be used carefully, appropriately and safely. There is a lack of good evidence from randomised controlled trials to support recommendations for the use of blood components in massive transfusions, although the design of such trials in the emergency setting is problematic. The target platelet count and the efficacy of fresh frozen plasma are key areas where further research is needed. All blood components supplied by the UK transfusion services are now leucodepleted as a precaution against transfusion transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD), in addition to mandatory testing for viral markers (human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis B virus [HBV], hepatitis C virus [HCV] and Human T lymphotropic virus type 1 [HTLV 1]). Benefits of leucodepletion also include reduced non-haemolytic febrile transfusion reactions, reduced transmission of leucocyte-associated viruses, such as cytomegalovirus, reduced immunosuppressive effects of transfusion (Blajchman et al, 2001) and reduced cytokine-mediated organ damage. (Erber, 2002) Transfusion giving sets, which should be changed at least 12-hourly during red cell infusion and prior to platelet infusion, include a screen filter. Any additional filter is unnecessary and may impede blood flow. (McClelland, 2001) The function of red cells is oxygen delivery to tissues; they should not be used as a volume expander. In the UK, the blood services will routinely provide leucodepleted red cells in optimal additive solution, which has low viscosity (Hogman et al, 1983) and contains minimal plasma. Red cells also contribute to haemostasis by their effect on platelet margination and function. The optimal haematocrit to prevent coagulopathy is unknown, but experimental evidence suggests that a relatively high haematocrit, possibly 0·35 l/l, may be required to sustain haemostasis in patients with massive blood loss (Reiss, 2000; Hardy et al, 2004). Red cell transfusion is likely to be required when 30–40% blood volume is lost; over 40% blood volume loss is immediately life-threatening (American College of Surgeons, 1997). Blood loss may be underestimated particularly if concealed and in young fit people, such as in the obstetric setting. Blood replacement should be guided by clinical estimation of blood loss in conjunction with the patient's response to volume replacement. Haemoglobin and haematocrit levels should be measured frequently, but in the knowledge that the haemoglobin level is a poor indicator of blood loss in the acute situation. Red cells are rarely indicated when the haemoglobin concentration is >10 g/dl but almost always indicated when it is <6 g/dl. (British Committee for Standards in Haematology Blood Transfusion Task Force, 2001) (Grade C recommendation, Level IV evidence). Decisions on red cell transfusion at intermediate haemoglobin concentrations should be based on the patient's risk factors for complications of inadequate oxygenation, such as rate of blood loss, cardiorespiratory reserve, oxygen consumption and atherosclerotic disease. Measured physiological variables, such as heart rate, arterial pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and cardiac output may assist the decision-making process, but it should be emphasised that silent tissue or organ ischaemia may occur in the presence of stable vital signs. The clinician who communicates with the transfusion laboratory should indicate the timescale within which blood is needed at the bedside, (i.e. immediately, within 20 min, within an hour) in order that the laboratory scientist knows how much time is available for ABO and D grouping and pre-transfusion testing. In an extreme situation where blood is required immediately and the patient's blood group is unknown, it may be necessary to issue Group O un-crossmatched red cells. Females of reproductive age (i.e. under 50 years) whose blood group is unknown must be given group O Rh D negative red cells in order to avoid sensitisation and the risk of haemolytic disease of the newborn in subsequent pregnancy. It is acceptable to give O Rh D positive cells to males and older females of unknown blood group (Schwab et al, 1986), as group O Rh D negative blood is a scarce resource. ABO group-specific red cells should be given at the earliest possible opportunity. Blood group determination takes less than 10 min and so it should not be necessary to give large volumes of group O blood. In a patient with known red cell antibodies, the risk of a haemolytic transfusion reaction will need to be assessed against the risk of withholding transfusion until compatible blood can be provided. Red cells undergo changes during 4°C storage (the 'storage lesion') including increase of extracellular potassium, decrease in ATP and 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3 DPG) content and lowering of pH. Although 2,3 DPG is undetectable after 14–21 d storage, regeneration has been demonstrated within 24 h of transfusion (Heaton et al, 1989) and studies have not shown any clinically significant impact on oxygen diffusion when older components are transfused (Ho et al, 2003). Intraoperative blood salvage may be of great value in reducing requirements for allogeneic blood and can be rapidly deployed in hospitals where it is in routine use. (Hughes et al, 2001). Synthetic oxygen-carrying solutions (artificial blood) are theoretically an attractive alternative to allogeneic blood but there is no product currently available in the UK (Prowse, 1999; Hess, 2004). Expert consensus advises that the platelet count should not be allowed to fall below the critical level of 50 × 109/l in the acutely bleeding patient (Contreras, 1998) (Grade C recommendation, level IV evidence), and this is endorsed by the BCSH guidelines for the use of platelet transfusions. (British Committee for Standards in Haematology Blood Transfusion Task Force, 2003) A platelet count of 50 × 109/l may be anticipated when approximately two blood volumes have been replaced by fluid or red cell components (Hiippala et al, 1995) but there is marked individual variation. A platelet transfusion trigger of 75 × 109/l in a patient with ongoing bleeding is therefore recommended here, so as to provide a margin of safety to ensure that the level does not fall below that critical for haemostasis. A higher target level of 100 × 10 9 platelets/l has been recommended for those with multiple high-velocity trauma or central nervous system injury. (Development Task Force of the College of American Pathologists, 1994; Horsey, 1997) (Grade C recommendation, level IV evidence). Empirical platelet transfusion may be required when platelet function is abnormal, as occurs after cardio-pulmonary by-pass, in patients with renal dysfunction or secondary to anti-platelet therapy. In assessing the requirement for platelets, frequent measurements are necessary, and it may be necessary to request platelets from the blood centre at levels above the desired target in order to ensure their availability when needed. Platelets can be given via an unused blood giving set, although a platelet giving set reduces wastage because it has less dead space. Transfusion of platelets through a giving set previously used for red cells is not recommended. Coagulation factor deficiency is the primary cause of coagulopathy in massive transfusion because of dilution of coagulation factors following volume replacement with crystalloid or colloid and transfusion of red cell components. The level of fibrinogen falls first; the critical level of 1·0 g/l is likely to be reached after 150% blood volume loss, followed by the fall of other labile coagulation factors to 25% activity after 200% blood loss. (Hiippala, 1998; Reiss, 2000). Prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT) to 1·5 times the mean normal value is correlated with an increased risk of clinical coagulopathy (Ciavarella et al, 1987). It is essential that laboratory tests of coagulation are monitored frequently; these may need interpretation by a haematologist. Fibrinogen should be estimated using the Clauss method, and not derived from the prothrombin time, as this is unreliable. Laboratories should have standard operating procedures in place to ensure that clinical staff are contacted appropriately. Experienced laboratory scientists should be empowered to issue blood components in the first instance using a locally agreed algorithm. It may be necessary to request components before results are available, depending on the rate of bleeding and the laboratory turnaround time. Although 'formula replacement' with fresh plasma is not recommended, it may be required in situations where rapid turnaround of coagulation tests cannot be guaranteed. Infusion of FFP should be considered after one blood volume is lost (Hiippala, 1998). The dose should be large enough to maintain coagulation factors well above the critical level, bearing in mind that the efficacy may be reduced because of rapid consumption (Development Task Force of the College of American Pathologists, 1994; Hiippala, 1998) (Grade C recommendation, level IV evidence). It should be borne in mind that, although FFP is recommended (British Committee for Standards in Haematology Blood Transfusion Taskforce, 2004) and widely used in situations of massive blood loss, there is little evidence of its clinical efficacy from randomised trials. (Stanworth et al, 2004) Fresh frozen plasma alone, if given in sufficient quantity, will correct fibrinogen and most coagulation factor deficiencies, but large volumes may be required. If fibrinogen levels remain critically low ( 300 ml/h, with no evidence of heparin or warfarin effect, where surgical control of bleeding is not possible and there has been adequate replacement of coagulation factors with FFP, cryoprecipitate and platelets and correction of acidosis. There should be a local protocol in place and the decision should be made at consultant level. Disseminated intravascular coagulation is a feared complication in the acutely bleeding patient but is fortunately rare outside obstetric practice. The cardinal clinical sign of DIC is microvascular oozing, whilst microthrombi in small vessels can result in end-organ damage. A DIC-like syndrome can result from the activation of the coagulation cascade secondary to tissue trauma, resulting in excessive consumption of platelets and coagulation factors. Patients at particular risk are those with tissue damage due to prolonged hypoxia, hypovolaemia or hypothermia, and those with massive head injury or extensive muscle damage (Hardy et al, 2004). This syndrome carries a high mortality, and is difficult to reverse. Prolongation of the PT and APTT in excess of that expected by dilution, together with significant thrombocytopenia and fibrinogen of 6 mmol/l it should be treated with glucose insulin regimens together with bicarbonate to correct acidosis. Early haemofiltration is likely to be required after the arrest of bleeding in the most severe cases. Successful treatment of massive haemorrhage depends on prompt action, good communication and involvement of senior clinicians with the necessary expertise. Survival has improved due to better understanding of the associated physiological changes. This has resulted in more aggressive resuscitation, with effective blood component therapy guided by laboratory/near-patient testing, and effective warming techniques (Cinat et al, 1999). Patient age and co-morbidity, duration and degree of shock, and development of DIC influence the outcome. (Erber, 2002) Suggested topics for audit Initial resuscitation with crystalloids should be preceded by blood sampling for full blood count, coagulation screen, biochemistry, blood gases and blood grouping. Documentation (using a designated checklist sheet and identified member of the resuscitation team) should consist of a minimum dataset that must record: type of blood component or replacement fluid, time given, amount (dosage), indication for replacement, effectiveness of the transfusion. Full traceability of blood components given. Local protocols and algorithms must be available and displayed in high-risk units e.g. Accident and emergency, Intensive care units, Theatre and blood banks. Regular practices of emergency management of massive transfusion should be held and learning points documented to inform protocol development. Regular retrospective audit of management of massive transfusions – review by Transfusion Team and Hospital Transfusion Committee against the guidelines with learning points documented to inform protocol review. While the advice and information in these guidelines is believed to be true and accurate at the time of going to press, neither the authors, the British Society for Haematology nor the publishers accept any legal responsibility for the content of these guidelines. None of the authors has declared a conflict of interest. Task force membership at time of writing this guideline was; Dr Frank Boulton (Chair), Dr Dorothy Stainsby (Secretary), Ms Andrea Blest, Dr Hari Boralessa, Dr Hannah Cohen, Mr Chris Elliott, Dr Brian McClelland, Dr Hafiz Qureshi, Dr Megan Rowley, Dr Gillian Turner, Dr Keith Wilson.