Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

MR imaging in cervical cancer: seeing is believing

2005; Wiley; Volume: 78; Issue: special_issue_2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1259/bjr/66333608

1748-880X

Rodney H. Reznek, Anju Sahdev,

Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Full PaperMR imaging in cervical cancer: seeing is believingThe 2004 Mackenzie Davidson Memorial LectureR H Reznek and A SahdevR H Reznek1Cancer Imaging, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE and 2Department of Clinical Radiology, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, London E9 6SR, UK and A Sahdev1Cancer Imaging, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE and 2Department of Clinical Radiology, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, London E9 6SR, UKPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/66333608SectionsPDF/EPUBFull Text ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail About References 1 Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM. Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide, Version 1.0. International Agency for Research for Cancer World Health Organization: Globocan, 2000. Google Scholar2 National statistics online, www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/population_trends/healthcancer_pt90.pdf [Accessed 18 April 2005]. Google Scholar3 Shepherd JH. Revised FIGO staging of gynaecological cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:889–92. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar4 van Nagel JR Jr, Donaldson ES, Parker JC, van Dyke AH, Wood AG. The prognostic significance of cell type and lesion size in patients with cervical cancer treated by radical surgery. Gynecol Oncol 1977;5:142–51. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar5 La Polla JP, Schlaerth JB, Gaddis O, Morrow CP. The influence of surgical staging on the evaluation and treatment of patients with cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1986;24:194–206. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar6 Bipat S, Glas AS, van der Velden J, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:59–66. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar7 Postema S, Pattynama PM, van den Berg-Huysmans A, Peters LW, Kenter G, Trimbos JB. Effect of MRI on therapeutic decisions in invasive cervical carcinoma. Direct comparison with the pelvic examination as a preparative test. Gynecol Oncol 2000;79:485–9. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar8 Janus CL, Mendelson DS, Moore S, Gendal E, Dottiro P, Brodman M. Staging of cervical carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Clin Imaging 1989;13:114–6. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar9 Cobby M, Browing J, Jones A, Whipp E, Goddard P. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in staging of carcinoma of the cervix. Br J Radiol 1990;63:673–9. Link ISI, Google Scholar10 Subak LL, Hricak H, Powell CB, Azizi L, Stern JL. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:43–50. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar11 Kaji Y, Sugimura K, Kitao M, Ishida T. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:785–92. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar12 Sahdev A, Sohaib A, Jacobs I, Shepherd J, Jeyarajah A, Reznek RH. Imaging in staging early carcinoma of the cervix and identifying nodal infiltration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(Suppl.):26. Google Scholar13 Rockall AG, Alexander-Sefre F, Babar S, Yunif M, Naz S, Jacobs I, et al. Cervical carcinoma: value of MRI in assessment of bladder and rectal involvement and its cost implication. Eur Radiol 2004;14:248. Google Scholar14 Taylor MB, Carrington BM, Davidson SE, Swindell R, Lawrance JA. Staging of advanced cervical carcinoma using MRI-predictors of outcome after radical radiotherapy. Clin Radiol 2003;58:532–41. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar15 Aoki Y, Sasaki M, Watanabe M, Sato T, Tsuneki I, Aida H, et al. High-risk group in node-positive patients with stage IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and postoperative pelvic irradiation. Gynecol Oncol 2000;77:305–9. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar16 Odunsi KO, Lele S, Ghamande S, Seago P, Driscoll DL. The impact of pre-therapy extraperitoneal surgical staging on the evaluation and treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2001;22:325–30. Medline ISI, Google Scholar17 Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK, Subak L, Segal MR. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1997;278:1096–101. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar18 Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Braun C, Vogelgesang D, Ihling C, Hogerle S, Mix M, et al. Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology 2001;218:776–82. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar19 Rockall AG, Sohaib SA, Harisinghani MG, Babar SA, Singh N, Jeyarajah H, et al. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2813–21. Medline ISI, Google Scholar20 Shepherd JH, Crawford RA. Reconstructive procedures in benign and malignant gynecological surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1994;6:206–9. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar21 Popovich MJ, Hricak H, Sugimura K, Stern JL. The role of MR imaging in determining surgical eligibility for pelvic exenteration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:525–31. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar22 Babar S, Rockall AG, Goode A, Shepherd J, Reznek RH. MRI appearances of recurrent cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 2004;14:429. Google Scholar23 Yen TC, See LC, Chang TC, Huang KG, Ng KK, Tang SG, et al. Defining the priority of using 18F-FDG PET for recurrent cervical cancer. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1632–9. Medline ISI, Google Scholar24 Blomlie V, Rofstad EK, Trope C, Lien HH. Critical soft tissues of the female pelvis: serial MR imaging before, during, and after radiation therapy. Radiology 1997;203:391–7. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar25 Blomlie V, Rofstad EK, Tvera K, Lien HH. Noncritical soft tissues of the female pelvis: serial MR imaging before, during, and after radiation therapy. Radiology 1996;199:461–8. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar26 Healy JC, Phillips RR, Reznek RH, Crawford RA, Armstrong P, Shepherd JH. The MR appearance of vaginal fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1487–9. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar27 Shepherd JH, Crawford RA, Oram DH. Radical trachelectomy: a way to preserve fertility in the treatment of early cervical cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:912–6. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar28 Peppercorn PD, Jeyarajah AR, Woolas R, Shepherd JH, Oram DH, Jacobs IJ, et al. Role of MR imaging in the selection of patients with early cervical carcinoma for fertility-preserving surgery: initial experience. Radiology 1999;212:395–9. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar29 Narayan K, McKenzie AF, Hicks RJ, Fisher R, Bernshaw D, Bau S. Relation between FIGO stage, primary tumor volume, and presence of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients referred for radiotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003;13:657–63. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar30 Sahdev A, Jones J, Shepherd JH, Reznek RH. Post-surgical MR imaging appearances of the female pelvis following trachelectomy. Radiographics 2005 (In press). Google Scholar31 Toita T, Kakinohana Y, Shinzato S, Ogawa K, Yoshinaga M, Iraha S, et al. Tumor diameter/volume and pelvic node status assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for uterine cervical cancer treated with irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;43:777–82. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar32 Ahmed S, Nutting CM, Reznek RH, Powell MCB. The impact of MRI in radiotherapy planning for cervical cancer. Clin Oncol 2001;13:318–9. ISI, Google Scholar33 Zunino S, Rosato O, Lucino S, Jauregui E, Rossi L, Venencia D. Anatomic study of the pelvis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix as related to the box technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;44:53–9. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar34 Cancer Research UK, www.cancerresearchuk.org/ Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byManagement von Zervixdysplasien und Zervixkarzinom in der Schwangerschaft15 February 2022 | Frauenheilkunde up2date, Vol. 16, No. 01Cancer in PregnancyObstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, Vol. 45, No. 2Is there an added role for diffusion weighted imaging in the staging of cervical carcinoma?The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 48, No. 4Preoperative MR staging of cervical carcinoma: are oblique and contrast-enhanced sequences necessary?22 November 2016 | Acta Radiologica Open, Vol. 5, No. 11Management of cervical cancer during pregnancy14 October 2015 | Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 36, No. 3Uterine Cervix21 October 2014Positron Emission Tomography-Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oncologic Diseases of the Male and Female PelvisSeminars in Roentgenology, Vol. 49, No. 4Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial and Cervical CarcinomasRadiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 51, No. 6MRI-based pre-planning in patients with cervical cancer treated with three-dimensional brachytherapyM Dolezel, K Odrazka, J Vanasek, T Kohlova, T Kroulik, K Kudelka, D Spitzer, M Mrklovsky, M Tichy, J Zizka and L Jalcova13 February 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 84, No. 1005Parametrial Involvement in FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Carcinoma: Diagnostic Impact of Tumor Diameter in Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging1 January 2011 | International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, Vol. 21, No. 2Pre- and post-operative work-up in patients affected by early cervical cancer and eligible for fertility-sparing treatment: role of MRI with saline hydrocolpos21 March 2009 | Abdominal Imaging, Vol. 35, No. 3Cancer, fertility and pregnancy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-upAnnals of Oncology, Vol. 21Can We Diagnose Invasive Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy as Precise as in Nonpregnant Women?International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Vol. 19, No. 8Localized cervical cancer (stage <IIB): accuracy of MR imaging in planning less extensive surgery14 May 2009 | La radiologia medica, Vol. 114, No. 6Diagnostic ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging in Gynecological Oncology1 January 2009 | International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, Vol. 19, No. 2Cervical Cancer Screening in PregnancyObstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, Vol. 35, No. 4Neoadjuvant cisplatin and radical cesarean hysterectomy for cervical cancer in pregnancyNature Clinical Practice Oncology, Vol. 4, No. 6 Volume 78, Issue special_issue_2October 2005Pages: S63-S137 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF