Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Artigo Produção Nacional Revisado por pares

BIBTEX RIS

Wear Potential of Dental Ceramics and its Relationship with Microhardness and Coefficient of Friction

2015; Wiley; Volume: 25; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/jopr.12330

1532-849X

Rafael Augusto Freddo, Myriam Pereira Kapczinski, Éder Júlio Kinast, Oswaldo Baptista Souza, Elken Gomes Rivaldo, Luís Carlos da Fontoura Frasca,

Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

Abstract Purpose To evaluate, by means of pin‐on‐disk testing, the wear potential of different dental ceramic systems as it relates to friction parameters, surface finish, and microhardness. Materials and methods Three groups of different ceramic systems (Noritake EX3, Eris, Empress II) with 20 disks each (10 glazed, 10 polished) were used. Vickers microhardness (Hv) was determined with a 200‐g load for 30 seconds. Friction coefficients (μ) were determined by pin‐on‐disk testing (5 N load, 600 seconds, and 120 rpm). Wear patterns were assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results were analyzed using one‐way ANOVA and Tukey's test, with the significance level set at α = 0.05. Results The coefficients of friction were as follows: Noritake EX3 0.28 ± 0.12 (polished), 0.33 ± 0.08 (glazed); Empress II 0.38 ± 0.08 (polished), 0.45 ± 0.05 (glazed); Eris 0.49 ± 0.05 (polished), 0.49 ± 0.06 (glazed). Microhardness measurements were as follows: Noritake EX3 530.7 ± 8.7 (polished), 525.9 ± 6.2 (glazed); Empress II 534.1 ± 8 (polished), 534.7 ± 4.5 (glazed); Eris, 511.7 ± 6.5 (polished), 519.5 ± 4.1 (glazed). The polished and glazed Noritake EX3 and polished and glazed Eris specimens showed statistically different friction coefficients. SEM image analysis revealed more surface changes, such as small cracks and grains peeling off, in glazed ceramics. Conclusions Wear potential may be related to the coefficient of friction in Noritake ceramics, which had a lower coefficient than Eris ceramics. Within‐group analysis showed no differences in polished or glazed specimens. The differences observed were not associated with microhardness.