Evolution of Alarm Signals: Role of Benefits of Retaining Group Members or Territorial Neighbors
1986; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 128; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/284591
ISSN1537-5323
Autores Tópico(s)Marine animal studies overview
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsEvolution of Alarm Signals: Role of Benefits of Retaining Group Members or Territorial NeighborsR. J. F. SmithR. J. F. Smith Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 128, Number 4Oct., 1986 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/284591 Views: 35Total views on this site Citations: 84Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1986 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Nicole E. Butler, Simon J. Watson, Richard A. Peters Life history characteristics and alarm calling in Australian arid-zone birds, Emu - Austral Ornithology 11 (Jul 2022): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1080/01584197.2022.2104735Ève Courtois, Dany Garant, Fanie Pelletier, Marc Bélisle Nonideal nest box selection by tree swallows breeding in farmlands: Evidence for an ecological trap?, Ecology and Evolution 11, no.2222 (Nov 2021): 16296–16313.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8323Tainara V. Sobroza, Marcelo Gordo, Adrian P.A. Barnett, Jean P. Boubli, Wilson R. Spironello Parapatric pied and red-handed tamarin responses to congeneric and conspecific calls, Acta Oecologica 110 (May 2021): 103688.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2020.103688Luciana Mafalda Elias de Assis, Raul Abreu de Assis, Moiseis Cecconello, Ezio Venturino Models for alarm call behaviour, Theoretical Ecology 11, no.11 (Aug 2017): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-017-0345-0Alexai E. Faulkner, Ingrid E. Holstrom, Samantha A. Molitor, Mikaela E. Hanson, Whitney R. Shegrud, Joshua C. Gillen, Samuel J. Willard, Brian D. Wisenden , Chemoecology 27, no.66 ( 2017): 233.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-017-0247-zILKA VOSTEEN, WOLFGANG W WEISSER, GRIT KUNERT Is there any evidence that aphid alarm pheromones work as prey and host finding kairomones for natural enemies?, Ecological Entomology 41, no.11 (Oct 2015): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12271Kevin W. Barnes, Kamal Islam, Sasha A. Auer Integrating LIDAR-derived canopy structure into cerulean warbler habitat models, The Journal of Wildlife Management 80, no.11 (Sep 2015): 101–116.https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.995Saskia Hesse, Jaime M. Anaya-Rojas, Joachim G. Frommen, Timo Thünken Kinship reinforces cooperative predator inspection in a cichlid fish, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 28, no.1111 (Sep 2015): 2088–2096.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12736Ghazi Mahjoub, Mark K. Hinders, John P. Swaddle Using a “sonic net” to deter pest bird species: Excluding European starlings from food sources by disrupting their acoustic communication, Wildlife Society Bulletin 39, no.22 (Apr 2015): 326–333.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.529 , Crustaceana 88, no.55 ( 2015): 523.https://doi.org/10.1163/15685403-00003430Jakub Szymkowiak Facing Uncertainty: How Small Songbirds Acquire and Use Social Information in Habitat Selection Process?, Springer Science Reviews 1, no.1-21-2 (Aug 2013): 115–131.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40362-013-0012-9C. Elisa Schaum, Robert Batty, Kim S. Last, Roberto Pronzato Smelling Danger – Alarm Cue Responses in the Polychaete Nereis (Hediste) diversicolor (Müller, 1776) to Potential Fish Predation, PLoS ONE 8, no.1010 (Oct 2013): e77431.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077431Luis Alexandre Piteira Gomes, Pedro Miguel Pedreirinho Salgado, Eduardo Nuno Barata, António Paulo Pereira Mira Alarm scent-marking during predatory attempts in the Cabrera vole (Microtus cabrerae Thomas, 1906), Ecological Research 28, no.22 (Jan 2013): 335–343.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-1023-8Denis Meuthen, Sebastian A Baldauf, Timo Thünken Evolution of alarm cues: a role for kin selection?, F1000Research 1 (Oct 2012): 27.https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.1-27.v1Denis Meuthen, Sebastian A Baldauf, Timo Thünken Evolution of alarm cues: a test of the kin selection hypothesis, F1000Research 1 (May 2014): 27.https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.1-27.v2G Buscaino, F Filiciotto, M Gristina, A Bellante, G Buffa, V Di Stefano, V Maccarrone, G Tranchida, C Buscaino, S Mazzola Acoustic behaviour of the European spiny lobster Palinurus elephas, Marine Ecology Progress Series 441 (Nov 2011): 177–184.https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09404G Buscaino, F Filiciotto, M Gristina, G Buffa, A Bellante, V Maccarrone, B Patti, S Mazzola Defensive strategies of European spiny lobster Palinurus elephas during predator attack, Marine Ecology Progress Series 423 (Feb 2011): 143–154.https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08957François J. Verheggen, Eric Haubruge, Mark C. Mescher Alarm Pheromones—Chemical Signaling in Response to Danger, (Jan 2010): 215–239.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0083-6729(10)83009-2Perri Eason Alarm signaling in a facultatively social mammal, the southern Amazon red squirrel Sciurus spadiceus, mammalia 74, no.33 (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2010.038Sarah R. Partan, Christian P. Larco, Max J. Owens Wild tree squirrels respond with multisensory enhancement to conspecific robot alarm behaviour, Animal Behaviour 77, no.55 (May 2009): 1127–1135.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.029Brandon C. Wheeler Selfish or altruistic? An analysis of alarm call function in wild capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella nigritus, Animal Behaviour 76, no.55 (Nov 2008): 1465–1475.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.06.023Jennifer L. Kelley, Anne E. Magurran Learned Defences and Counterdefences in Predator-Prey Interactions, (Nov 2007): 28–48.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996058.ch3John L. Quinn, Mark J. Whittingham, Simon J. Butler, Will Cresswell Noise, predation risk compensation and vigilance in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs, Journal of Avian Biology 37, no.66 (Oct 2006): 601–608.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.03781.xMark Abrahams The Physiology of Antipredator Behaviour: What You Do With What You've Got, (Jan 2005): 79–108.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1546-5098(05)24003-7Daniel J. Mennill, Scott M. Ramsay, Peter T. Boag, Laurene M. Ratcliffe Patterns of extrapair mating in relation to male dominance status and female nest placement in black-capped chickadees, Behavioral Ecology 15, no.55 (Sep 2004): 757–765.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh076Shi‐Ryong Park, Seokwan Cheong, Hoon Chung Behavioral function of the anomalous song in the bush warbler, Cettia diphone, Korean Journal of Biological Sciences 8, no.22 (Jan 2004): 89–95.https://doi.org/10.1080/12265071.2004.9647739Karen Burke da Silva, Carolyn Mahan, Jack da Silva THE TRILL OF THE CHASE: EASTERN CHIPMUNKS CALL TO WARN KIN, Journal of Mammalogy 83, no.22 (May 2002): 546–552.https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0546:TTOTCE>2.0.CO;2C.J. PROCTOR, M. BROOM, G.D. RUXTON Modelling antipredator vigilance and flight response in group foragers when warning signals are ambiguous, Journal of Theoretical Biology 211, no.44 (Aug 2001): 409–417.https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2353Grant E. Brown, Scott Brennan, R. E. Gatten, Jr. Chemical Alarm Signals in Juvenile Green Sunfish ( Lepomis cyanellus , Centrarchidae), Copeia 2000, no.44 (Dec 2000): 1079–1082.https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2000)000[1079:CASIJG]2.0.CO;2Douglas P. Chivers, Alicia Mathis, Grant E. Brown, Reehan S. Mirza, Brian D. Wisenden Scratching the Skin of Predator—prey Interactions in Fishes: A Tribute to R. Jan F. Smith (1940–1998), Environmental Biology of Fishes 56, no.44 (Dec 1999): 343–350.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007585207192Grant E Brown, Jean-Guy J Godin Chemical alarm signals in wild Trinidadian guppies ( Poecilia reticulata ), Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, no.44 (Sep 1999): 562–570.https://doi.org/10.1139/z99-035TROY A BAIRD, DUSTI K TIMANUS Social inhibition of territorial behaviour in yearling male collared lizards,Crotaphytus collaris, Animal Behaviour 56, no.44 (Oct 1998): 989–994.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0865Grant E. Brown, Douglas P. Chivers, R. Jan F. Smith Differential learning rates of chemical versus visual cues of a northern pike by fathead minnows in a natural habitat, Environmental Biology of Fishes 49, no.11 (May 1997): 89–96.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007302614292B. D. Wisenden, R. J. F. Smith The effect of physical condition and shoalmate familiarity on proliferation of alarm substance cells in the epidermis of fathead minnows, Journal of Fish Biology 50, no.44 (Apr 1997): 799–808.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01973.xR. J. F. Smith Does one result trump all others? A response to Magurran, Irving and Henderson, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 264, no.13801380 (Mar 1997): 445–450.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0063DANIEL T. BLUMSTEIN, JEFF STEINMETZ, KENNETH B. ARMITAGE, JANICE C. DANIEL Alarm calling in yellow-bellied marmots: II. The importance of direct fitness, Animal Behaviour 53, no.11 (Jan 1997): 173–184.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0286Brian D. Wisenden, Douglas P. Chivers, R. Jan F. Smith Early warning in the predation sequence: A disturbance pheromone in Iowa darters (Etheostoma exile), Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, no.1010 (Oct 1995): 1469–1480.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02035146RICHARD C. CONNOR The Benefits of Mutualism: A Conceptual Framework, Biological Reviews 70, no.33 (Aug 1995): 427–457.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1995.tb01196.xD. P. Chivers, R. J. F. Smith Free-living fathead minnows rapidly learn to recognize pike as predators, Journal of Fish Biology 46, no.66 (Jun 1995): 949–954.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1995.tb01399.xDouglas P. Chivers, Grant E. Brown, R. Jan F. Smith Acquired Recognition of Chemical Stimuli from Pike, Esox lucius, by Brook Sticklebacks, Culaea inconstans (Osteichthyes, Gasterosteidae), Ethology 99, no.33 (Apr 2010): 234–242.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1995.tb00897.xDavid Sloan Wilson, Elliott Sober Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 585–608.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036104John Alroy, Alexander Levine Driving both ways: Wilson & Sober's conflicting criteria for the identification of groups as vehicles of selection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 608–610.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036116C. Daniel Batson Seeing the light: What does biology tell us about human social behavior?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 610–611.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036128C. Loring Brace The consequences of group selection in a domain without genetic input: Culture, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 611–612.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0003613XMichael Bradie Metaphors and mechanisms in vehicle-based selection theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 612–612.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036141Gordon M. Burghardt Group selection and the group mind in science, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 613–613.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036153Donald T. Campbell, John B. Gatewood Ambivalently held group-optimizing predispositions, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 614–614.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036165F. T. Cloak Unnecessary competition requirement makes group selection harder to demonstrate, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 614–615.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036177Lee Cronk Group selection's new clothes, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 615–616.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036189James F. Crow In praise of replicators, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 616–616.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036190Richard Dawkins Burying the vehicle, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 616–617.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036207Daniel C. Dennett E pluribus unum?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 617–618.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036219Lee Alan Dugatkin Subtle ways of shifting the balance in favor of between-group selection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 618–619.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036220John Dupré Some philosophical implications of the rehabilitation of group selection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 619–620.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036232Robert H. Frank Group selection and “genuine” altruism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 620–621.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036244Margaret Gilbert Me, you, and us: Distinguishing “egoism,” “altruism,” and “groupism”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 621–622.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036256Charles J. Goodnight Contextual analysis and group selection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 622–622.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036268Todd A. Grantham Putting the cart back behind the horse: Group selection does not require that groups be “organisms”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 622–623.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0003627XP. E. Griffiths, R. D. Gray Replicators and vehicles? Or developmental systems?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 623–624.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036281Adolf Heschl Reconstructing the real unit of selection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 624–625.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036293Harmon R. Holcomb Empirically equivalent theories, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 625–626.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0003630XKent E. Holsinger Groups as vehicles and replicators: The problem of group-level adaptation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 626–627.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036311David L. Hull Taking vechicles seriously, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 627–628.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036323Michael E. Hyland Different vehicles for group selection in humans, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 628–628.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036335Elisabeth A. Lloyd Rx: Distinguish group selection from group adaptation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 628–629.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036347Kevin MacDonald Group evolutionary strategies: Dimensions and mechanisms, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 629–630.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036359Geoffrey F. Miller Beyond shared fate: Group-selected mechanisms for cooperation and competition in fuzzy, fluid vehicles, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 630–631.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036360Jim Moore Hominids, coalitions, and weapons: Not vehicles, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 632–632.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036372Randolph M. Nesse Why is group selection such a problem?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 633–634.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036384Anatol Rapoport Nongenetic and non-Darwinian evolution, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 634–634.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036396Jeffry A. Simpson Adaptation and natural selection: A new look at some old ideas, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 634–636.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036402Eric Alden Smith Semantics, theory, and methodological individualism in the group-selection controversy, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 636–637.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036414Nicholas S. Thompson Vehicles all the way down?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 638–638.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036426Christopher Wills The maintenance of behavioral diversity in human societies, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 638–639.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00036438David Sloan Wilson, Elliott Sober Group selection: The theory replaces the bogey man, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no.44 (Feb 2010): 639–654.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0003644XJudy Stamps Territorial Behavior: Testing the Assumptions, (Jan 1994): 173–232.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60354-XR. Jan F. Smith Alarm signals in fishes, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 2, no.11 (Mar 1992): 33–63.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042916Don M. Hugie, Pamela L. Thuringer, R. Jan F. Smith The Response of the Tidepool Sculpin, Oligocottus maculosus, to Chemical Stimuli from Injured Conspecifics, Alarm Signalling in the Cottidae (Pisces), Ethology 89, no.44 (Apr 2010): 322–334.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1991.tb00377.xR. J. F. Smith Social behaviour, homing and migration, (Jan 1991): 509–529.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3092-9_18Rauno V. Alatalo, Pekka Helle Alarm calling by individual willow tits, Parus montanus, Animal Behaviour 40, no.33 (Sep 1990): 437–442.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80523-8Robert J. Taylor, David F. Balph, Martha H. Balph The evolution of alarm calling: a cost-benefit analysis, Animal Behaviour 39, no.55 (May 1990): 860–868.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80950-9R. J. F. Smith, M. J. Smith Predator-recognition Behaviour in Two Species of Gobiid Fishes, Asterropteryx semipunctatus and Gnatholepis anjerensis, Ethology 83, no.11 (Apr 2010): 19–30.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1989.tb00516.x J. A. Stamps Conspecific Attraction and Aggregation in Territorial Species, The American Naturalist 131, no.33 (Oct 2015): 329–347.https://doi.org/10.1086/284793R. Jan, F. Smith The Evolution of Chemical Alarm Signals in Fishes, (Jan 1986): 99–115.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2235-1_9
Referência(s)