Should We Target the Sympathetic Nervous System in the Treatment of Obesity-Associated Hypertension?
2007; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 51; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/hypertensionaha.107.090514
ISSN1524-4563
Autores Tópico(s)Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
ResumoHomeHypertensionVol. 51, No. 2Should We Target the Sympathetic Nervous System in the Treatment of Obesity-Associated Hypertension? Free AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBShould We Target the Sympathetic Nervous System in the Treatment of Obesity-Associated Hypertension? Italo Biaggioni Italo BiaggioniItalo Biaggioni From the Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, and the Autonomic Dysfunction Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn. Originally published17 Dec 2007https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.090514Hypertension. 2008;51:168–171Other version(s) of this articleYou are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions: December 17, 2007: Previous Version 1 An estimated 60% to 70% of hypertension may be attributed to obesity.1 As our population increases in weight and girth, obesity-associated hypertension will be an increasing medical problem, contributing to greater health care costs and reversing the gains that we have achieved in the treatment of hypertension. Considering that 30% of hypertensive subjects are undiagnosed, 40% remain untreated, and, of those being treated, 65% do not meet treatment goals,2 the opening of the spigot of obesity-associated hypertension will result in an ever-growing number of patients with uncontrolled hypertension, particularly because obesity is a predictor of poor blood pressure control.3 It is important, therefore, to understand the pathophysiology of obesity-associated hypertension. This commentary focuses on the role that the sympathetic nervous system plays in this condition and its relevance to treatment.Sympathetic Activity and Obesity-Associated HypertensionLandsberg4 postulated that obesity induces sympathetic activation as a compensatory mechanism to increase resting energy expenditure and restore energy balance; sympathetically mediated hypertension is the price to pay for this beneficial metabolic effect. A competing MONA LISA (Most Obesities kNown Are Low In Sympathetic Activity) hypothesis postulates that lower sympathetic activity is an initiating event leading to decreased energy expenditure and obesity.5 In white populations, in whom most of the studies have been done, the preponderance of evidence supports the concept that sympathetic activation accompanies obesity-associated hypertension. There is less agreement about the cause of sympathetic activation; potential culprits include the increase in insulin, leptin, and angiotensin II; the decrease of adiponectin; and the sleep apnea6,7 associated with obesity. Despite the disparity of these mechanisms, it is interesting that all of them act in the central nervous system to increase sympathetic outflow. This central sympathetic activation is not generalized; rather, it is selectively increased in organs relevant to blood pressure regulation, including the kidney, heart, and skeletal muscle vasculature.6,8To determine whether sympathetic activation indeed contributed to obesity-associated hypertension, Wofford et al9 used combined α- and β-blockade with doxazosin and atenolol and showed a greater decrease in blood pressure in obese compare with lean hypertensive subjects. We recently used a similar approach, inducing complete but transient autonomic withdrawal with the ganglionic blocker trimethaphan, and showed that most of the increase in blood pressure observed in obese subjects was mediated by the autonomic nervous system.10 As expected, resting energy expenditure was higher in obese subjects but, in contrast to blood pressure, it remained significantly elevated after autonomic blockade. We found that the increase in energy expenditure was likely because of the increase in muscle mass that usually companies obesity10; in our patients, a 30-kg increase in fat mass was accompanied by a 12-kg increase in lean (muscle) mass, and lean mass explained 83% of the variability in resting energy expenditure.Current evidence, therefore, supports the hypothesis that sympathetic activity is increased in obesity and contributes to hypertension but brings into doubt the concept that it provides a beneficial metabolic effect. An interesting parallel can be drawn with leptin; the levels of this hormone are increased in animal models of obesity and act in the hypothalamus to increase blood pressure through sympathetic activation but are no longer effective in reducing appetite or having a beneficial metabolic effect ("selective leptin resistance").11Treating Obesity-Associated Hypertension With Weight LossThe obvious solution to treat obesity-associated hypertension is to lose weight. Weight reduction reduces central sympathetic outflow,12 lowers blood pressure by 0.3 to 1.0 mm Hg for every kilogram lost,13 and decreases the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Unfortunately, success rate for long-term weight loss is in the 5% to 10% range. Furthermore, the reduction in blood pressure may be transient,14 even if weight loss is maintained. It is likely, therefore, that the vast majority of patients with obesity-associated hypertension will require medical treatment.Does It Matter What Antihypertensive Agents We Use as Long as We Lower Blood Pressure?Current guidelines for the treatment of hypertension do not recommend specific antihypertensive agents for obesity hypertension.2 Results from large multicenter studies would argue that it matters less what we use to treat hypertension as long as we achieve effective blood pressure reductions.15 In the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) chlorthalidone, despite its negative metabolic effects, was slightly more effective in reducing blood pressure and was as effective in improving all-cause mortality than amlodipine or lisinopril.15It is important to consider that most of the large clinical trials looking at cardiovascular outcomes as the main end point have enrolled older patients who are not uniformly obese (Figure). The association between body mass index (BMI) and high blood pressure is greater in younger subjects and is lost after age 60,16 in part because of the high prevalence of hypertension in the elderly. It is possible therefore, that results from these large outcome trials do not necessarily apply to young obese hypertensive populations. Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure. Examples of clinical trials in hypertension focusing in mortality and cardiovascular outcome end points (top 4) or on obesity-associated hypertension (bottom 5). N=number of subjects enrolled. Age and BMI are given as mean±SD. Vertical line at age 60 years indicates the age over which the relationship between BMI and blood pressure is commonly lost. Vertical lines in BMI indicate classification of obesity: overweight, 25 to 29; stage I obesity, 30 to 34; stage II obesity, 35 to 39; stage II obesity, >40.Smaller studies enrolling obese hypertensive subjects have focused on drugs targeting the renin-angiotensin system (Figure) and have, in general, showed beneficial effects. A comprehensive review of antihypertensive agents targeting the renin-angiotensin system is outside the scope of this commentary, and the reader is referred to recent reviews on the subject.17Are Adrenergic Blockers Effective in the Treatment of Hypertension?α-Adrenoreceptor antagonists are effective antihypertensive agents and improve insulin sensitivity,18 but there are concerns about their safety profile. In the ALLHAT Trial, the α-blocker doxazosin arm was stopped prematurely because of an increased risk of cardiovascular events, particularly heart failure.19Similarly, β-blockers are particularly effective in obesity-associated hypertension,16 but reduce energy expenditure, lipolysis, and insulin sensitivity. Their negative metabolic effect is associated with a small but significant weight gain (average: 1.2 kg)20 and an increased risk of new-onset diabetes.21 β-Blockers are not as effective in stroke prevention compared with other antihypertensive regimens.22 Newer vasodilating β-blockers with α-blocking activity appear to be devoid of this negative metabolic profile,23 but their effectiveness in improving cardiovascular outcomes in obesity-associated hypertension has not been determined.Central Sympatholytics in the Treatment of Obesity-Associated HypertensionCentral sympathetic outflow is increased in obesity,8 and its inhibition by carotid sinus simulation normalizes obesity-induced hypertension in dogs.24 Central sympatholytics, therefore, would seem like logical treatment candidates in obesity. Sedative adverse effects limit the use of traditional central sympatholytics, but this effect appears to be less prominent with newer imidazoline agonists.25–27 Moxonidine and rilmenidine are prototype drugs of this class of agents available in Europe. The antihypertensive effectiveness of moxonidine is comparable to hydrochlorothiazide, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and α- and β-blockers.28Although clonidine lowers resting energy expenditure29 in normal volunteers, moxonidine appears to have a positive metabolic effect, inducing a 1- to 2-kg weight loss30 (in uncontrolled studies) and improving insulin sensitivity.31,32 This effect, however, has not been reported with rilmenidine.33,34It is not known whether these positive metabolic effects of moxonidine will translate in improvement of cardiovascular outcomes. Its use in patients with heart failure has been associated with increased mortality because of worsening pump failure.35 In those trials, however, moxonidine was given at doses (3.0 mg/d; sustained-release preparation) several-fold greater those used in hypertension (0.4 to 1.2 mg/d; immediate release formulation). Furthermore, enrollment included heart failure patients without a substantial sympathetic activation at baseline, in whom no benefit from aggressive sympathoinhibition would be expected. Even if we argue that these concerns are not applicable to obese hypertensive subjects, the fact remains that studies to determine whether moxonidine improves long-term outcomes are lacking.Clinical outcome trials are needed before we can recommend the preferred use of sympatholytics in treating obesity-associated hypertension. Unfortunately, there are several reasons why these studies may not be forthcoming. The perception, whether valid or not, is that we already have effective medications to treat hypertension and that some of the cheapest ones (ie, thiazides) are as effective as newer ones. Hypertension, therefore, may not be seen as an unmet need that justifies the investment needed to fund these studies. Current sympatholytics are out of patent, and the incentive to develop novel leads, eg, the superoxide scavenger Tempol,36 may be lacking.Even if one could fund an outcome trial for central sympatholytics, it is not clear what the primary outcome or the ideal patient population should be. The golden standard outcome is a reduction in mortality or in morbidities such as myocardial infarction or stroke. By practical necessity, such studies have to enroll patients at risk to develop these events during the "life" of the trial, which explains the prevailing age of the patients enrolled in previous hypertension outcome trials37–40 (Figure). This may not be the ideal population in whom to test the beneficial effects of sympatholytics given that the relative importance of sympathetic activation to obesity-associated hypertension appears to be greater in younger patients. Finally, most patients require combination therapy to control their hypertension, so that studying a single agent may not be ethically justified. Despite these challenges, it will be important to determine whether targeting sympathetic activation provides an advantage over current therapies in obesity-associated hypertension.41–43ConclusionsObesity is arguably the most common factor predisposing to the development of hypertension and is a predictor of poor hypertension control. As the prevalence of obesity increases, obesity-associated hypertension will become a growing medical problem. Despite its importance, currently guidelines do not provide specific recommendations about pharmacotherapy of obesity-associated hypertension. This is attributable, in part, to the lack of evidence based on outcome trials in obese hypertensive patients. Large outcome hypertension trials have not focused on obesity and have enrolled older patients, in whom the relationship between BMI (and presumably sympathetic activation) and blood pressure is not as strong. Given this state of knowledge, it seems sensible to avoid drugs that worsen insulin resistance, increase the risk of diabetes, or induce weight gain in the treatment of obese hypertensive subjects. These include thiazides and β-blockers. Of available therapies in the United States, current evidence favors the use of drugs targeting the renin-angiotensin system. In large clinical trials that include, but do not target, obese patients, these drugs improve cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. They may also decrease the incidence of diabetes, but this is not entirely clear.It would seem intellectually appealing to guide therapy of obesity-associated hypertension based on our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. In this regard, there is growing evidence that increased sympathetic activity contributes to the development of obesity-associated hypertension, at least in white populations. The finding that central sympathetic outflow is increased in obesity-associated hypertension provides strong scientific rationale for the use of central sympatholytics in its treatment. Newer imidazoline agonists are available in Europe, and proof-of-concept clinical studies suggest that they induce weight loss, improve insulin sensitivity, and are effective in controlling hypertension. Outcome trials may be needed before they can be formally be recommended for the treatment of obesity-associated hypertension.Sources of FundingThis work was supported in part by grants HL56693 and NS055670 and the General Clinical Research Center grant MO1 RR00095.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to Italo Biaggioni, 556 RRB, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Jordan J, Engeli S, Redon J, Sharma AM, Luft FC, Narkiewicz K, Grassi G. European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Obesity: background, aims and perspectives. J Hypertens. 2007; 25: 897–900.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 1206–1252.LinkGoogle Scholar3 Lloyd-Jones DM, Evans JC, Larson MG, O'Donnell CJ, Roccella EJ, Levy D. Differential control of systolic and diastolic blood pressure: factors associated with lack of blood pressure control in the community. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 594–599.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Landsberg L. Diet, obesity and hypertension: an hypothesis involving insulin, the sympathetic nervous system, and adaptive thermogenesis. Q J Med. 1986; 61: 1081–1090.MedlineGoogle Scholar5 Bray GA. Obesity, a disorder of nutrient partitioning: the MONA LISA hypothesis. J Nutr. 1991; 121: 1146–1162.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Esler M, Straznicky N, Eikelis N, Masuo K, Lambert G, Lambert E. Mechanisms of sympathetic activation in obesity-related hypertension. Hypertension. 2006; 48: 787–796.LinkGoogle Scholar7 Mancia G, Bousquet P, Elghozi JL, Esler M, Grassi G, Julius S, Reid J, van Zwieten PA. The sympathetic nervous system and the metabolic syndrome. J Hypertens. 2007; 25: 909–920.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Lambert E, Straznicky N, Schlaich M, Esler M, Dawood T, Hotchkin E, Lambert G. Differing pattern of sympathoexcitation in normal-weight and obesity-related hypertension. Hypertension. 2007; 50: 862–868.LinkGoogle Scholar9 Wofford MR, Anderson DC Jr, Brown CA, Jones DW, Miller ME, Hall JE. Antihypertensive effect of alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade in obese and lean hypertensive subjects. Am J Hypertens. 2001; 14: 694–698.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Shibao C, Gamboa A, Diedrich A, Ertl AC, Chen KY, Byrne DW, Farley G, Paranjape SY, Davis SN, Biaggioni I. Autonomic contribution to blood pressure and metabolism in obesity. Hypertension. 2007; 49: 27–33.LinkGoogle Scholar11 Rahmouni K, Correia ML, Haynes WG, Mark AL. Obesity-associated hypertension: new insights into mechanisms. Hypertension. 2005; 45: 9–14.LinkGoogle Scholar12 Grassi G, Seravalle G, Colombo M, Bolla G, Cattaneo BM, Cavagnini F, Mancia G. Body weight reduction, sympathetic nerve traffic, and arterial baroreflex in obese normotensive humans. Circulation. 1998; 97: 2037–2042.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Stevens VJ, Obarzanek E, Cook NR, Lee IM, Appel LJ, Smith WD, Milas NC, Mattfeldt-Beman M, Belden L, Bragg C, Millstone M, Raczynski J, Brewer A, Singh B, Cohen J. Long-term weight loss and changes in blood pressure: results of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention, phase II. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134: 1–11.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 Aucott L, Poobalan A, Smith WC, Avenell A, Jung R, Broom J. Effects of weight loss in overweight/obese individuals and long-term hypertension outcomes: a systematic review. Hypertension. 2005; 45: 1035–1041.LinkGoogle Scholar15 The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002; 288: 2981–2997.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16 Bramlage P, Pittrow D, Wittchen HU, Kirch W, Boehler S, Lehnert H, Hoefler M, Unger T, Sharma AM. Hypertension in overweight and obese primary care patients is highly prevalent and poorly controlled. Am J Hypertens. 2004; 17: 904–910.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17 Sharma AM. Is there a rationale for angiotensin blockade in the management of obesity hypertension? Hypertension. 2004; 44: 12–19.LinkGoogle Scholar18 Sharma AM, Pischon T, Engeli S, Scholze J. Choice of drug treatment for obesity-related hypertension: where is the evidence? J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 667–674.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19 ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2000; 283: 1967–1975.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20 Sharma AM, Pischon T, Hardt S, Kunz I, Luft FC. Hypothesis: beta-adrenergic receptor blockers and weight gain: a systematic analysis. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 250–254.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21 Dahlof B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT, Mehlsen J, Nieminen M, O'Brien E, Ostergren J. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 366: 895–906.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar22 Williams B. The obese hypertensive: the weight of evidence against beta-blockers. Circulation. 2007; 115: 1973–1974.LinkGoogle Scholar23 Jacob S, Rett K, Henriksen EJ. Antihypertensive therapy and insulin sensitivity: do we have to redefine the role of beta-blocking agents? Am J Hypertens. 1998; 11: 1258–1265.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar24 Lohmeier TE, Dwyer TM, Irwin ED, Rossing MA, Kieval RS. Prolonged activation of the baroreflex abolishes obesity-induced hypertension. Hypertension. 2007; 49: 1307–1314.LinkGoogle Scholar25 Prichard BN, Graham BR, Owens CW. Moxonidine: a new antiadrenergic antihypertensive agent. J Hypertens. 1999; 17 (suppl): S41–S54.Google Scholar26 Regunathan S, Reis DJ. Imidazoline receptors and their endogenous ligands. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1996; 36: 511–544.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar27 Bousquet P, Greney H, Bruban V, Schann S, Ehrhardt JD, Monassier L, Feldman J. I(1) imidazoline receptors involved in cardiovascular regulation: where are we and where are we going? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003; 1009: 228–233.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar28 Fenton C, Keating GM, Lyseng-Williamson KA. Moxonidine: a review of its use in essential hypertension. Drugs. 2006; 66: 477–496.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar29 Takahashi H, Nishikawa T, Mizutani T, Handa F. Oral clonidine premedication decreases energy expenditure in human volunteers. Can J Anaesth. 1997; 44: 268–272.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar30 Sharma AM, Wagner T, Marsalek P. Moxonidine in the treatment of overweight and obese patients with the metabolic syndrome: a postmarketing surveillance study. J Hum Hypertens. 2004; 18: 669–675.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar31 Derosa G, Cicero AF, D'Angelo A, Fogari E, Salvadeo S, Gravina A, Ferrari I, Fassi R, Fogari R. Metabolic and antihypertensive effects of moxonidine and moxonidine plus irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild hypertension: a sequential, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clin Ther. 2007; 29: 602–610.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar32 Chazova I, Almazov VA, Shlyakhto E. Moxonidine improves glycaemic control in mildly hypertensive, overweight patients: a comparison with metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006; 8: 456–465.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar33 Nowak L, Adamczak M, Wiecek A. Blockade of sympathetic nervous system activity by rilmenidine increases plasma adiponectin concentration in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2005; 18: 1470–1475.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar34 Widimsky J, Sirotiakova J. Efficacy and tolerability of rilmenidine compared with isradipine in hypertensive patients with features of metabolic syndrome. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006; 22: 1287–1294.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar35 Cohn JN, Pfeffer MA, Rouleau J, Sharpe N, Swedberg K, Straub M, Wiltse C, Wright TJ. Adverse mortality effect of central sympathetic inhibition with sustained-release moxonidine in patients with heart failure (MOXCON). Eur J Heart Fail. 2003; 5: 659–667.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar36 Lu N, Helwig BG, Fels RJ, Parimi S, Kenney MJ. Central Tempol alters basal sympathetic nerve discharge and attenuates sympathetic excitation to central ANG II. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 287: H2626–H2633.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar37 de Simone G, Wachtell K, Palmieri V, Hille DA, Beevers G, Dahlof B, de Faire U, Fyhrquist F, Ibsen H, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Lederballe-Pedersen O, Lindholm LH, Nieminen MS, Omvik P, Oparil S, Devereux RB. Body build and risk of cardiovascular events in hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE (Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension) study. Circulation. 2005; 111: 1924–1931.LinkGoogle Scholar38 Reisin E, Weir MR, Falkner B, Hutchinson HG, Anzalone DA, Tuck ML. Lisinopril versus hydrochlorothiazide in obese hypertensive patients: a multicenter placebo-controlled trial. Treatment in Obese Patients With Hypertension (TROPHY) Study Group. Hypertension. 1997; 30: 140–145.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar39 Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Marks RG, Kowey P, Messerli FH, Mancia G, Cangiano JL, Garcia-Barreto D, Keltai M, Erdine S, Bristol HA, Kolb HR, Bakris GL, Cohen JD, Parmley WW. A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003; 290: 2805–2816.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar40 Grassi G, Seravalle G, Dell'Oro R, Trevano FQ, Bombelli M, Scopelliti F, Facchini A, Mancia G. Comparative effects of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and sympathetic drive in obese hypertensive individuals: results of the CROSS study. J Hypertens. 2003; 21: 1761–1769.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar41 Jordan J, Engeli S, Boschmann M, Weidinger G, Luft FC, Sharma AM, Kreuzberg U. Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to valsartan and atenolol in obese hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2005; 23: 2313–2318.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar42 Scholze J, Grimm E, Herrmann D, Unger T, Kintscher U. Optimal treatment of obesity-related hypertension: the Hypertension-Obesity-Sibutramine (HOS) study. Circulation. 2007; 115: 1991–1998.LinkGoogle Scholar43 Jordan J, Engeli S, Boye SW, Le Breton S, Keefe DL. Direct renin inhibition with aliskiren in obese patients with arterial hypertension. Hypertension. 2007; 49: 1047–1055.LinkGoogle Scholar eLetters(0)eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.Sign In to Submit a Response to This Article Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Shen Y, Chen X, Yang C, Liu B and Li P (2018) Alamandine injected into the paraventricular nucleus increases blood pressure and sympathetic activation in spontaneously hypertensive rats, Peptides, 10.1016/j.peptides.2018.03.014, 103, (98-102), Online publication date: 1-May-2018. Sabbag A, Goldenberg I, Moss A, McNitt S, Glikson M, Biton Y, Jackson L, Polonsky B, Zareba W and Kutyifa V (2016) Predictors and Risk of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias or Death in Black and White Cardiac Patients, JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.03.003, 2:4, (448-455), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016. Zhou H, Sun H, Chang J, Ding L, Gao Q, Tang C, Zhu G and Zhou Y (2014) Cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex response to intermedin microinjection into paraventricular nucleus is mediated by nitric oxide and γ-amino butyric acid in hypertensive rats, Experimental Biology and Medicine, 10.1177/1535370214533882, 239:10, (1352-1359), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014. Gamboa A, Okamoto L, Arnold A, Figueroa R, Diedrich A, Raj S, Paranjape S, Farley G, Abumrad N and Biaggioni I (2014) Autonomic Blockade Improves Insulin Sensitivity in Obese Subjects, Hypertension, 64:4, (867-874), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014. Pausova Z (2014) Visceral Fat and Hypertension: Sex Differences Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Abdominal Obesity, 10.1016/B978-0-12-407869-7.00009-X, (99-111), . (2013) Individualized treatment with multiple antihypertensive agents is often necessary when treating hypertension in obese patients, Drugs & Therapy Perspectives, 10.1007/s40267-013-0077-1, 30:1, (21-25), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014. Melka M, Abrahamowicz M, Leonard G, Perron M, Richer L, Veillette S, Gaudet D, Paus T, Pausova Z and Pajewski N (2013) Clustering of the Metabolic Syndrome Components in Adolescence: Role of Visceral Fat, PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0082368, 8:12, (e82368) Kidambi S and Kotchen T (2013) Treatment of Hypertension in Obese Patients, American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 10.1007/s40256-013-0008-5, 13:3, (163-175), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2013. Han Y, Sun H, Li P, Gao Q, Zhou Y, Zhang F, Gao X, Zhu G and Quintas L (2012) Angiotensin-(1–7) in Paraventricular Nucleus Modulates Sympathetic Activity and Cardiac Sympathetic Afferent Reflex in Renovascular Hypertensive Rats, PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0048966, 7:11, (e48966) Wang X, Bosonea A and Fernandez-Patron C (2012) Metalloproteinases: key and common mediators of multiple GPCRs and candidate therapeutic targets in models of hypertensive cardiac disease, Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models, 10.1016/j.ddmod.2012.04.003, 9:3, (e103-e108), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2012. Dorresteijn J, Visseren F and Spiering W (2011) Mechanisms linking obesity to hypertension, Obesity Reviews, 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00914.x, 13:1, (17-26), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012. Xu Y, Gao Q, Gan X, Chen L, Zhang L, Zhu G and Gao X (2011) Endogenous hydrogen peroxide in paraventricular nucleus mediates sympathetic activation and enhanced cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex in renovascular hypertensive rats, Experimental Physiology, 10.1113/expphysiol.2011.059733, 96:12, (1282-1292), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2011. Han Y, Fan Z, Yuan N, Xie G, Gao J, De W, Gao X and Zhu G (2011) Superoxide anions in the paraventricular nucleus mediate the enhanced cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex and sympathetic activity in renovascular hypertensive rats, Journal of Applied Physiology, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00908.2010, 110:3, (646-652), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011. Chen A, Zhang S, Yuan N, Xu Y, De W, Gao X and Zhu G (2011) Angiotensin AT 1 receptors in paraventricular nucleus contribute to sympathetic activation and enhanced cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex in renovascular hypertensive rats , Experimental Physiology, 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.054353, 96:2, (94-103), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2011. Jansen P, Danser J, Spiering W and van den Meiracker A (2010) Drug Mechanisms to Help in Managing Resistant Hypertension in Obesity, Current Hypertension Reports, 10.1007/s11906-010-0123-5, 12:4, (220-225), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2010. Esler M (2010) The 2009 Carl Ludwig Lecture: pathophysiology of the human sympathetic nervous system in cardiovascular diseases: the transition from mechanisms to medical management, Journal of Applied Physiology, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00832.2009, 108:2, (227-237), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010. DiBona G and Esler M (2010) Translational medicine: the antihypertensive effect of renal denervation, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 10.1152/ajpregu.00647.2009, 298:2, (R245-R253), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010. Zhu G, Xu Y, Zhou L, Li Y, Fan L, Wang W, Gao X and Chen Q (2009) Enhanced cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex involved in sympathetic overactivity in renovascular hypertensive rats, Experimental Physiology, 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.046565, 94:7, (785-794), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2009. da Silva A, do Carmo J, Dubinion J and Hall J (2009) The role of the sympathetic nervous system in obesity-related hypertension, Current Hypertension Reports, 10.1007/s11906-009-0036-3, 11:3, (206-211), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009. Victor R and Shafiq M (2008) Sympathetic neural mechanisms in human hypertension, Current Hypertension Reports, 10.1007/s11906-008-0045-7, 10:3, (241-247), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2008. February 2008Vol 51, Issue 2 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.090514PMID: 18086947 Manuscript receivedOctober 8, 2007Manuscript acceptedNovember 19, 2007Originally publishedDecember 17, 2007Manuscript revisedOctober 23, 2007 PDF download Advertisement SubjectsAutonomic Nervous SystemClinical StudiesObesity
Referência(s)