Propertius on the Parilia (4.4.73–8)
2000; Cambridge University Press; Volume: 50; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/cq/50.2.472
ISSN1471-6844
Autores Tópico(s)Augustinian Studies and Theology
ResumoThe necessity of emending immundas… dapes in 78 to immundos… pedes has long been recognized, but I argue here that the text is unsatisfactory in three further respects: (1) the difficulties of style, sense, and punctuation in 73–75; (2) diuitiis in 76, wrongly retained by most editors and, when emended, wrongly emended to deliciis ; and (3) raros in 77, of which no satisfactory explanation has been offered.
Referência(s)