The Puzzle of Nitrate Tolerance
2002; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 106; Issue: 18 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/01.cir.0000036742.52907.91
ISSN1524-4539
Autores Tópico(s)Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
ResumoHomeCirculationVol. 106, No. 18The Puzzle of Nitrate Tolerance Free AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBThe Puzzle of Nitrate TolerancePieces Smaller Than We Thought? Tommaso Gori, MD and John D. Parker, MD Tommaso GoriTommaso Gori From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai and University Health Network Hospitals, the University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. and John D. ParkerJohn D. Parker From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai and University Health Network Hospitals, the University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Originally published29 Oct 2002https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000036742.52907.91Circulation. 2002;106:2404–2408Nitroglycerin (GTN) and other organic nitrates are important drugs commonly used in cardiovascular medicine, and, more recently, in obstetrics as tocolytic agents.1 The development of tolerance, ie, the reduction in effect or the requirement for higher doses that appears after continuous use,2 is a major factor limiting the efficacy of these drugs. Despite their clinical importance in the therapy of ischemic heart disease and heart failure, many aspects of the pharmacology of organic nitrates, including the mechanism(s) of tolerance, remain unclear.In the past decade, studies have demonstrated that organic nitrate therapy leads to complex interactions between the vasculature, neurohormones, and free oxygen radicals. In particular, the concept that GTN treatment causes increased vascular superoxide anion (·O2−) production, the mechanisms leading to this production, and the consequences of this phenomenon on endothelial function, have all been investigated. In the first part of this 2-part review, these recent findings, as well as the potential role of neurohormonal and autonomic abnormalities, will be described. In the second part, which will appear in the next issue of Circulation, we will propose a new, integrated view on the pathophysiology of nitrate tolerance.The Vascular Free Radical Hypothesis of Nitrate ToleranceThere is evidence from both animal and human studies that nitrate tolerance, especially when induced in vivo,3 is associated with an increased bioavailability of ·O2−, and that this process is responsible for the development of tolerance.4 Superoxide anion is normally scavenged by multiple intra- and extracellular mechanisms, including the enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD). However, in higher concentrations, it can overcome these mechanisms and rapidly react with nitric oxide (NO), the active metabolite of GTN, to form peroxynitrite.5 This may reduce the bioavailability of GTN-derived NO, impairing its vasodilator activity (and that of other NO donors), and, possibly, directly counteract GTN-induced vasorelaxation,2 because even in small concentrations, peroxynitrite has a direct vasoconstrictor effect.6 Signs of increased ·O2− and peroxynitrite production during continuous nitrate therapy have been demonstrated in both animals and humans.4,7–9 Therefore, an ·O2−-mediated mechanism has been proposed as the cause of tolerance4,10 (Figure 1). Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. Diagram describing the oxidative pathway for the development of nitrate tolerance. Both endothelial and smooth muscle cells are involved in these processes. Increased free radical generation, increased production and responsiveness to angiotensin II, and l-arginine depletion may result in NOS uncoupling and further production of ·O2− and peroxynitrite. ET-1 indicates endothelin-1; BH4, tetrahydrobiopterin; AT II, angiotensin II; and ·O2−, superoxide anion.Experiments involving the concurrent administration of GTN and antioxidants appear to support this free radical hypothesis. In vitro, coincubation of vascular tissue with liposome-encapsulated SOD can partially restore GTN responses,4 and the inhibition of this enzyme mimics tolerance.3 In vivo, supplementation with the antioxidant vitamin C prevented tolerance both in animal and in human studies,10,11 despite being unable to reverse it.12In sum, there is now a body of evidence suggesting that some nitrates, particularly GTN, are associated with increased vascular oxygen free radical generation, and that these responses are involved in the genesis of tolerance. The sources of ·O2− that have been proposed include membrane NAD(P)H and xanthine oxidases, mitochondria, and the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS).13 The importance of NAD(P)H oxidases in the response to therapy with GTN has been demonstrated in a number of animal studies, and an important regulatory involvement of angiotensin II has been proposed.13,14 Interestingly, the importance of these enzymes has been demonstrated in studies in which hydralazine, by inhibiting NAD(P)H oxidases, modified the development of tolerance in both animals and humans.15,16 Although these membrane-bound oxidases are located in both smooth muscle and endothelial cells, the preponderance of evidence points to a crucial role of the endothelium in ·O2− production,4 suggesting that the culprit enzyme(s) are within this tissue.GTN and the EndotheliumClear evidence now exists that GTN therapy has negative effects on the function of the NOS, the enzyme responsible for the endothelial control of vascular tone. Evidence of this effect has now been developed in multiple animal and human models, including the coronary circulation of patients with ischemic heart disease.17–21 In particular, in vitro experiments have reported increased expression but decreased activity of NOS during continuous GTN, associated with increased ·O2− generation.22 GTN therapy appears to induce a dysfunctional state of NOS, in which the reductive activation of molecular oxygen to form ·O2− is not followed by oxidation of l-arginine and NO synthesis, resulting in the net generation of ·O2−—a situation termed "NOS uncoupling." Uncoupling can be triggered by reduced bioavailability of tetrahydrobiopterin and/or l-arginine, respectively a cofactor and the substrate for NOS (Figure 2).23,24Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 2. NOS dysfunction induced by GTN therapy. Physiologically, NOS catalyzes a two-step oxidation of l-arginine to l-citrulline and NO. Generation of free ·O2− is minimal. The equilibrium between this form of the NOS and its uncoupled state (ie, in which l-arginine is not oxidized, resulting in ·O2− generation), appears to depend on l-arginine supply and oxidative status of BH4. During nitrate tolerance, this equilibrium might be shifted toward the uncoupled form of the enzyme. In turn, ·O2− and peroxynitrite can oxidize BH4, resulting in further uncoupling. Folic acid (possibly though a BH4-mediated mechanism) and l-arginine supplementation can reverse this process. NOS III indicates endothelial nitric oxide synthase; BH4, tetrahydrobiopterin; and BH2, dihydrobiopterin.Animal studies demonstrated that peroxynitrite is able to oxidize tetrahydrobiopterin to the ineffective form dihydrobiopterin,25 thus providing a potential mechanism in GTN tolerance. In this positive feedback mechanism, a peroxynitrite-dependent oxidation of tetrahydrobiopterin would cause NOS to produce even greater quantities of ·O2−. Evidence for this proposed mechanism can be found in a report by Gruhn et al26 in which the administration of tetrahydrobiopterin was found to restore the activity of NOS. Despite this effect, in this animal model, supplemental tetrahydrobiopterin did not reverse tolerance.A number of studies have suggested that folic acid supplementation can improve endothelium-dependent vascular function in the presence of multiple risk factors for cardiovascular diseases.27 Our laboratory recently tested, in a group of healthy volunteers, the hypothesis that this vitamin would have a favorable impact on the abnormalities induced by nitrate therapy at the level of the endothelium. We documented that supplemental folic acid is able to prevent the development of both NOS dysfunction and nitrate tolerance as assessed by forearm plethysmographic measures of arterial blood flow.28 The mechanism of this effect remains unknown, but a number of possibilities can be proposed, including: (1) a folate-mediated increase in tetrahydrobiopterin regeneration with subsequent NOS recoupling29,30; (2) inhibition of the other sources of ·O2−, such as xanthine and/or NADPH membrane oxidases29,30; (3) depletion of NAD(P)H reserves31; (4) direct antioxidant effect32; and, finally (5) direct substitution of tetrahydrobiopterin as a cofactor for NOS.33 Whatever the mechanism, it appears that, during GTN treatment, NOS uncoupling might be both cause and effect (via tetrahydrobiopterin oxidation) of the described increase in vascular ·O2− generation.Another hypothesis was recently developed with regard to the mechanism of GTN-induced NOS uncoupling with subsequent increases in ·O2− bioavailability. This hypothesis states that GTN therapy leads to intracellular l-arginine depletion. Although the exact mechanism remains controversial, it has been demonstrated that NO donors, including GTN, activate NOS.34 The subsequent increase in l-arginine demand and the negative effect of sustained administration of NO donors on l-arginine uptake35,36 may lead to l-arginine depletion, resulting in the uncoupling of NOS and increased ·O2− generation. It is now recognized that the arginine transporter and NOS are colocalized within caveolae of the endothelial cell, and that changes in arginine concentration may not be uniform throughout the endothelial cell.37 These observations have led to the arginine depletion hypothesis of nitrate tolerance. In this case, therapy with nitrates leads to intracellular l-arginine depletion with resultant uncoupling of NOS and increased ·O2− production. Of note, there is experimental evidence to suggest that l-arginine has antioxidant effects as a scavenger for ·O2−,38 a characteristic that may also play a role in modifying responses to GTN therapy. In vitro studies have demonstrated that l-arginine supplementation prevents the uncoupling of NOS during nitrate exposure and modifies the development of tolerance.34 Finally, a recent study39 in patients with angina documented that supplemental l-arginine prevents the development of tolerance during sustained treatment with continuous transdermal GTN.Neurohormonal Activation and the Control of ·O2− ProductionThe neurohormonal activation hypothesis of nitrate tolerance was developed from the evidence that GTN stimulates counterregulatory responses mediated by sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis.40–43 Although the vasoconstriction induced by these responses has been implicated in the rebound ischemia after GTN withdrawal,44–47 a direct role in the development of tolerance has never been substantiated.41,48Interestingly, recent evidence suggests that neurohormonal responses may play a role in free radical generation.49,50 Angiotensin II production appears to play a permissive or causal role in nitrate-induced increased ·O2−51 via angiotensin II–stimulated membrane NAD(P)H oxidases.52,53 In humans, angiotensin II showed a direct negative effect on vascular responsiveness to GTN.54 In animal studies, the administration of ACE inhibitors or an angiotensin II receptor blocker, reduced ·O2− production and prevented GTN tolerance, thus reinforcing the idea of a pro-oxidant effect of this mediator.51,55,56There is also evidence for a role of endothelin in the development of tolerance. The production of endothelin is stimulated by both angiotensin II and oxidative stress in endothelial and smooth muscle cells.57–59 An increased endothelin-1–like and big endothelin-1–like immunoreactivity in the tunica media of tolerant vessels has been demonstrated during nitrate treatment in two different animal models.60,61 In one report, exposure of normal vessels to low concentrations of endothelin-1 caused a hypersensitivity to vasoconstricting agents similar to that observed in nitrate tolerant vessels.61 In rabbits, an endothelin-1 receptor inhibitor reduced ·O2− production and the development of GTN tolerance, although angiotensin II receptor inhibitors appeared more effective.62 The effects of endothelin-1 include direct vasoconstriction, a positive feedback increase of angiotensin II production, and the activation of protein kinase C (PKC).61 In turn, PKC stimulates a NAD(P)H oxidase-mediated ·O2− production63 and might be autocatalytically activated by ·O2−.64 In addition, PKC-mediated phosphorylation causes inhibition of NOS,65 and a recent report demonstrated that angiotensin II, via an ·O2−- and PKC-mediated mechanism, can trigger NOS uncoupling.14 Inhibition of PKC prevented tolerance in a rat model,66 but the effect of endothelin-1 receptor or PKC inhibition in the response to nitrates in humans has not yet been tested.One of the major controversies about the traditional neurohormonal hypothesis is that tolerance can be induced in isolated vessels, thus excluding the importance of circulating plasma levels of any mediator. The recognition that neurohormonal mediators may be produced by vascular cells and may induce tolerance by increasing local ·O2− generation, ie, via paracrine or autocrine pathways, suggests that this hypothesis is not inconsistent with such observations. Local coronary and/or systemic abnormalities in the endothelial neurohormonal milieu could play a role in tolerance, may lead to abnormalities in NOS function and, finally, could also be involved in the rebound phenomena that follow abrupt cessation of GTN therapy.67Autonomic Nervous System Responses to Nitrate TherapyObserved increases in (nor)epinephrine, endothelin-1, and angiotensin II levels after nitrate treatment might be mediated in part by the sympathetic nervous system. The role of autonomic responses in the development of tolerance has been the subject of a number of studies and considerable controversy. Experimental evidence suggests that GTN does interact with the autonomic nervous system and that this interaction is complex and occurs at peripheral and central sites.68,69 In particular, NO synthesis in the brain stem appears to have chronic inhibitory effects on medullary areas modulating sympathetic outflow. This effect seems to be lost in nitrate tolerance, possibly as a result of NOS dysfunction in the central nervous system.70 Increases in central nervous system ·O2− and angiotensin II production are felt to play a role in mediating these heightened sympathetic responses during sustained nitrate therapy.69 This tolerance-dependent loss of a sympathoinhibitory mechanism, termed "sympathetic tolerance," might blunt the vasodilatory responses to NO donors in resistance vessels, thus contributing to GTN tolerance. Therefore, nitrates may influence the autonomic nervous system at several locations. Although the net effect of these responses represents a complex function that is also dependent on whether the nitrate exposure is acute or chronic, sustained therapy with organic nitrates appears to lead to a relative increase in sympathetic outflow associated with a parallel decrease in parasympathetic tone.70,71In conclusion, recent evidence suggests that abnormalities in autonomic nervous system regulation, renin release, and redox state are strongly integrated and form a complex mechanistic puzzle, the fundamental pieces of which appear to be small and elusive oxygen-free radicals. The findings described above are important not only because of their potential role in the mechanism of tolerance, but also because neurohormonal and autonomic activation, ·O2− generation, and NOS dysfunction might have prognostic relevance in heart failure and coronary artery disease. In the next issue of Circulation, we will propose the existence of mechanistic links between these phenomena and other abnormalities that are present during tolerance and provide our perspective view on research and clinical issues related to the use of organic nitrates.This is the first part of a 2-part article. The second part will appear in the November 5, 2002, issue of the journal (Circulation. 2002;106:2510–2513).Dr Gori is the recipient of a research fellowship from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Canada. Dr Parker is a Career Investigator of the same Institution.FootnotesCorrespondence to John D. Parker, MD, FRCP(C), Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave, Suite 1609, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Dufour P, Vinatier D, Puech F. The use of intravenous nitroglycerin for cervico-uterine relaxation: a review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1997; 261: 1–7.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Parker JD, Parker JO. Nitrate therapy for stable angina pectoris. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 520–531.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Munzel T, Hink U, Yigit H, et al. Role of superoxide dismutase in in vivo and in vitro nitrate tolerance. Br J Pharmacol. 1999; 127: 1224–1230.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Munzel T, Sayegh H, Freeman BA, et al. Evidence for enhanced vascular superoxide anion production in nitrate tolerance: a novel mechanism underlying tolerance and cross-tolerance. J Clin Invest. 1995; 95: 187–194.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Huie RE, Padmaja S. The reaction of NO with superoxide. Free Radic Res Commun. 1993; 18: 195–199.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Elliott SJ, Lacey DJ, Chilian WM, et al. Peroxynitrite is a contractile agonist of cerebral artery smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: H1585–H1591.MedlineGoogle Scholar7 Skatchkov M, Larina LL, Larin AA, et al. Urinary nitrotyrosine content as a marker of peroxynitrite-induced tolerance to organic nitrates. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 1997; 2: 85–96.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Dikalov S, Fink B, Skatchkov M, et al. Formation of reactive oxygen species in various vascular cells during glyceryltrinitrate metabolism. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 1998; 3: 51–62.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Mihm MJ, Coyle CM, Jing L, et al. Vascular peroxynitrite formation during organic nitrate tolerance. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999; 291: 194–198.MedlineGoogle Scholar10 Bassenge E, Fink N, Skatchkov M, et al. Dietary supplement with vitamin C prevents nitrate tolerance. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 67–71.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11 Dikalov S, Fink B, Skatchkov M, et al. Comparison of glyceryl trinitrate-induced with pentaerythrityl tetranitrate-induced in vivo formation of superoxide radicals: effect of vitamin C. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999; 27: 170–176.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Milone SD, Pace-Asciak CR, Reynaud D, et al. Biochemical, hemodynamic, and vascular evidence concerning the free radical hypothesis of nitrate tolerance. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999; 33: 685–690.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Munzel T, Kurz S, Heitzer T, et al. New insights into mechanisms underlying nitrate tolerance. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 77: 24C–30C.MedlineGoogle Scholar14 Mollnau H, Wendt M, Szocs K, et al. Effects of angiotensin II infusion on the expression and function of NAD(P)H oxidase and components of nitric oxide/CGMP signaling. Circ Res. 2002; 90: E58–E65.LinkGoogle Scholar15 Munzel T, Kurz S, et al. Hydralazine prevents nitroglycerin tolerance by inhibiting activation of a membrane-bound NADH oxidase: a new action for an old drug. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98: 1465–1470.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16 Gogia H, Mehra A, Parikh S, et al. Prevention of tolerance to hemodynamic effects of nitrates with concomitant use of hydralazine in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 1575–1580.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17 Laursen JB, Boesgaard S, Poulsen HE, et al. Nitrate tolerance impairs nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in vivo. Cardiovasc Res. 1996; 31: 814–819.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 Gori T, Mak SS, Kelly S, et al. Evidence supporting abnormalities in nitric oxide synthase function induced by nitroglycerin in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 1096–1101.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19 Buga GM, Griscavage JM, Rogers NE, et al. Negative feedback regulation of endothelial cell function by nitric oxide. Circ Res. 1993; 73: 808–812.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20 Chen LY, Mehta JL. Downregulation of nitric oxide synthase activity in human platelets by nitroglycerin and authentic nitric oxide. J Investig Med. 1997; 45: 69–74.MedlineGoogle Scholar21 Caramori PR, Adelman AG, Azevedo ER, et al. Therapy with nitroglycerin increases coronary vasoconstriction in response to acetylcholine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 1969–1974.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar22 Munzel T, Li H, Mollnau H, et al. Effects of long-term nitroglycerin treatment on endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS III) gene expression, NOS III-mediated superoxide production, and vascular NO bioavailability. Circ Res. 2000; 86: E7–E12.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar23 Vasquez-Vivar J, Kalyanaraman B, Martasek P, et al. Superoxide generation by endothelial nitric oxide synthase: the influence of cofactors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 9220–9225.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar24 Xia Y, Tsai AL, Berka V, et al. Superoxide generation from endothelial nitric-oxide synthase: a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent and tetrahydrobiopterin regulatory process. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 25804–25808.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar25 Laursen JB, Somers M, Kurz S, et al. Endothelial regulation of vasomotion in apoE-deficient mice: implications for interactions between peroxynitrite and tetrahydrobiopterin. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1282–1288.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar26 Gruhn N, Aldershvile J, Boesgaard S. Tetrahydrobiopterin improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in nitroglycerin-tolerant rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001; 416: 245–249.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar27 Verhaar MC, Stroes E, Rabelink TJ. Folates and cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 6–13.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar28 Gori T, Burstein JM, Ahmed S, et al. Folic acid prevents nitroglycerin-induced nitric oxide synthase dysfunction and nitrate tolerance: a human in vivo study. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1119–1123.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar29 Verhaar MC, Wever RM, Kastelein JJ, et al. 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, the active form of folic acid, restores endothelial function in familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 1998; 97: 237–241.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar30 Wilmink HW, Stroes ES, Erkelens WD, et al. Influence of folic acid on postprandial endothelial dysfunction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 185–188.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar31 Loscalzo J. Folate and nitrate-induced endothelial dysfunction: a simple treatment for a complex pathobiology. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1086–1088.LinkGoogle Scholar32 Joshi R, Adhikari S, Patro BS, et al. Free radical scavenging behavior of folic acid: evidence for possible antioxidant activity. Free Radic Biol Med. 2001; 30: 1390–1399.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar33 Hyndman E, Verma S, Rosenfeld RJ, et al. Interaction of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate and tetrahydrobiopterin on endothelial function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 282: H2167–H2172.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar34 Abou-Mohamed G, Kaesemeyer WH, Caldwell RB, et al. Role of l-arginine in the vascular actions and development of tolerance to nitroglycerin. Br J Pharmacol. 2000; 130: 211–218.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar35 Kaesemeyer WH, Ogonowski AA, Jin L, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase is a site of superoxide synthesis in endothelial cells treated with glyceryl trinitrate: effects of NO donors and synthase agonists on endothelial cell uptake of L-Arg and superoxide production. Br J Pharmacol. 2000; 131: 1019–1023.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar36 Ogonowski AA, Kaesemeyer WH, Jin L, et al. Effects of NO donors and synthase agonists on endothelial cell uptake of L-Arg and superoxide production. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000; 278: C136–C143.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar37 McDonald KK, Zharikov S, Block ER, et al. A caveolar complex between the cationic amino acid transporter 1 and endothelial nitric-oxide synthase may explain the "arginine paradox". J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 31213–31216.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar38 Wallner S, Hermetter A, Mayer B, et al. The alpha-amino group of l-arginine mediates its antioxidant effect. Eur J Clin Invest. 2001; 31: 98–102.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar39 Parker JO, Parker JD, Caldwell RW, et al. The effect of supplemental l-arginine on tolerance development during continuous transdermal nitroglycerin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 1199–1203.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar40 Dupuis J, Lalonde G, Lemieux R, et al. Tolerance to intravenous nitroglycerin in patients with congestive heart failure: role of increased intravascular volume, neurohumoral activation and lack of prevention with N-acetylcysteine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 16: 923–931.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar41 Munzel T, Heitzer T, Kurz S, et al. Dissociation of coronary vascular tolerance and neurohormonal adjustments during long-term nitroglycerin therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 297–303.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar42 Parker JD, Parker JO. Effect of therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on hemodynamic and counterregulatory responses during continuous therapy with nitroglycerin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21: 1445–1453.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar43 Parker JD. Counterregulatory responses: sustained-release isosorbide-5-mononitrate versus transdermal nitroglycerin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996; 28: 631–638.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar44 Hebert D, Lam JY. Nitroglycerin rebound associated with vascular, rather than platelet, hypersensitivity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 2311–2316.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar45 Watanabe H, Kakihana M, Ohtsuka S, et al. Efficacy and rebound phenomenon related to intermittent nitroglycerin therapy for the prevention of nitrate tolerance. Jpn Circ J. 1998; 62: 571–575.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar46 Thadani U. Nitrate tolerance, rebound, and their clinical relevance in stable angina pectoris, unstable angina, and heart failure. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1997; 10: 735–742.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar47 Ferratini M. Risk of rebound phenomenon during nitrate withdrawal. Int J Cardiol. 1994; 45: 89–96.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar48 Kubo T, Urabe Y, Suzuki S, et al. Dissociation of vascular tolerance and plasma norepinephrine adjustment during long-term nitrate therapy in human coronary arteries. Intern Med. 1999; 38: 773–779.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar49 Pueyo ME, Arnal JF, Rami J, et al. Angiotensin II stimulates the production of NO and peroxynitrite in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1998; 274: C214–C220.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar50 Rajagopalan S, Kurz S, Munzel T, et al. Angiotensin II-mediated hypertension in the rat increases vascular superoxide production via membrane NADH/NADPH oxidase activation: contribution to alterations of vasomotor tone. J Clin Invest. 1996; 97: 1916–1923.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar51 Kurz S, Hink U, Nickenig G, et al. Evidence for a causal role of the renin-angiotensin system in nitrate tolerance. Circulation. 1999; 99: 3181–3187.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar52 Warnholtz A, Nickenig G, Schulz E, et al. Increased NADH-oxidase-mediated superoxide production in the early stages of atherosclerosis: evidence for involvement of the renin-angiotensin system. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2027–2033.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar53 Griendling KK, Minieri CA, Ollerenshaw JD, et al. Angiotensin II stimulates NADH and NADPH oxidase activity in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1994; 74: 1141–1148.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar54 Harada K, Sugimoto K, Kawaguchi A, et al. Effect of angiotensin II on venodilator response to nitroglycerin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 69: 130–136.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar55 Berkenboom G, Fontaine D, Unger P, et al. Absence of nitrate tolerance after long-term treatment with ramipril: an endothelium-dependent mechanism. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999; 34: 547–553.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar56 Munzel T, Bassenge E. Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with high-dose enalapril retards nitrate tolerance in large epicardial arteries and prevents rebound coronary vasoconstriction in vivo. Circulation. 1996; 93: 2052–2058.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar57 Kahler J, Ewert A, Weckmuller J, et al. Oxidative stress increases endothelin-1 synthesis in human coronary artery smooth muscle cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2001; 38: 49–57.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar58 Kahler J, Mendel S, Weckmuller J, et al. Oxidative stress increases synthesis of big endothelin-1 by activation of the endothelin-1 promoter. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000; 32: 1429–1437.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar59 Imai T, Hirata Y, Emori T, et al. Induction of endothelin-1 gene by angiotensin and vasopressin in endothelial cells. Hypertension. 1992; 19: 753–757.LinkGoogle Scholar60 Ratz JD, Fraser AB, Rees-Milton KJ, et al. Endothelin receptor antagonism does not prevent the development of in vivo glyceryl trinitrate tolerance in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000; 295: 578–585.MedlineGoogle Scholar61 Munzel T, Giaid A, Kurz S, et al. Evidence for a role of endothelin 1 and protein kina
Referência(s)