Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Testing Experimental Results in the Field: Reply to Hettyey and Pearman

2006; Wiley; Volume: 112; Issue: 9 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01252.x

1439-0310

Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Fiorenza De Bernardi,

Ecosystem dynamics and resilience

EthologyVolume 112, Issue 9 p. 932-933 Testing Experimental Results in the Field: Reply to Hettyey and Pearman Gentile F. Ficetola, Gentile F. Ficetola Department of Biology, Universitàdegli Studi di Milano, V. Celoria 26, 20133 Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorFiorenza De Bernardi, Fiorenza De Bernardi Department of Biology, Universitàdegli Studi di Milano, V. Celoria 26, 20133 Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this author Gentile F. Ficetola, Gentile F. Ficetola Department of Biology, Universitàdegli Studi di Milano, V. Celoria 26, 20133 Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorFiorenza De Bernardi, Fiorenza De Bernardi Department of Biology, Universitàdegli Studi di Milano, V. Celoria 26, 20133 Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this author First published: 14 August 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01252.xCitations: 1 E-mail: [email protected] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Literature Cited Bernini, F., Bonini, L., Ferri, V., Gentilli, A., Razzetti, E. & Scali, S. 2004: Atlante degli Anfibi e dei Rettili della Lombardia. Provincia di Cremona, Cremona. Google Scholar Carpenter, S. R. 1996: Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 77, 677—680. 10.2307/2265490 Web of Science®Google Scholar Carpenter, S. R. 1999: Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology: reply. Ecology 80, 1085—1088. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1085:MEHLRF]2.0.CO;2 Web of Science®Google Scholar Drenner, R. W. & Mazumder, A. 1999: Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology: comment. Ecology 80, 1081—1085. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1081:MEHLRF]2.0.CO;2 Web of Science®Google Scholar Ficetola, G. F. & De Bernardi, F. 2005: Interspecific social interactions and breeding success of the frog Rana latastei: a field study. Ethology 111, 764—774. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01089.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Grossenbacher, K. 1997: Rana latastei. In: Atlas of the Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe ( J. P. Gasc, A. Cabela, J. Crnobrnja-Isailovic, D. Dolmen, K. Grossenbacher, P. Haffner, J. Lescure, H. Martens, J. P. Martínez Rica, H. Maurin, M. E. Oliveira, T. S. Sofianidou, M. Veith & A. Zuiderwijk, eds). Societas Europaea Herpetologica & Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, pp. 146—147. Google Scholar Hettyey, A. & Pearman, P. B. 2003: Social environment and reproductive interference affect reproductive success in the frog Rana latastei. Behav. Ecol. 14, 294—300. 10.1093/beheco/14.2.294 Web of Science®Google Scholar Hettyey, A. & Pearman, P. B.in press: Testing experimental results in the field: comment on Ficetola and De Bernardi (2005). Google Scholar Huggett, A. J. 2005: The concept and utility of ’ecological thresholds’ in biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 124, 301—310. 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.037 Web of Science®Google Scholar Huston, M. A. 1999: Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology: synthesis of comments. Ecology 80, 1088—1089. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1088:MEHLRF]2.0.CO;2 Web of Science®Google Scholar Leps, J. 2004: What do the biodiversity experiments tell us about consequences of plant species loss in the real word? Basic Appl. Ecol. 5, 529—534. 10.1016/j.baae.2004.06.003 Web of Science®Google Scholar Miner, B. G., Sultan, S. E., Morgan, S. G., Padilla, D. K. & Relyea, R. A. 2006: Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 685—692. Google Scholar Schmid, B. & Hector, A. 2004: The value of biodiversity experiments. Basic Appl. Ecol. 5, 435—542. 10.1016/j.baae.2004.07.001 Web of Science®Google Scholar Skelly, D. K. & Kiesecker, J. M. 2001: Venue and outcome in ecological experiments: manipulations of larval anurans. Oikos 94, 198—208. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.t01-1-11105.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Steidl, R. J., Hayes, J. P. & Schauber, E. 1997: Statistical power analysis in wildlife research. J. Wildl. Manage. 61, 270—279. 10.2307/3802582 Web of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume112, Issue9September 2006Pages 932-933 ReferencesRelatedInformation