Disciplining social psychology: A case study of boundary relations in the history of the human sciences
2000; Wiley; Volume: 36; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/1520-6696(200023)36
ISSN1520-6696
Autores Tópico(s)Community Health and Development
ResumoJournal of the History of the Behavioral SciencesVolume 36, Issue 4 p. 383-403 Article Disciplining social psychology: A case study of boundary relations in the history of the human sciences James M. M. Good, Corresponding Author James M. M. Good lectures in social psychology, director of the Centre for the History of the Human Sciences [email protected] University of DurhamDepartment of Psychology, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham UK DH1 3LESearch for more papers by this author James M. M. Good, Corresponding Author James M. M. Good lectures in social psychology, director of the Centre for the History of the Human Sciences [email protected] University of DurhamDepartment of Psychology, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham UK DH1 3LESearch for more papers by this author First published: 24 October 2000 https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(200023)36:4 3.0.CO;2-LCitations: 29AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract This paper explores the disciplinary status of social psychology through an analysis of the history of the boundary relations of psychology, sociology, and social psychology. After outlining some research on the nature of scientific disciplines, on the role of rhetoric in the constitution of disciplines, and on "boundary work," I consider the singular importance of social psychology as a discipline for the analysis of boundary relations, examining its units of analysis and its "disciplining." The boundaries of the disciplines of social psychology were seen as fluid, contingent, local, and contestable, reflecting the thematic preoccupations, disciplinary origins, and meta-theoretical commitments of social psychologists, of the parent disciplines, and of those who represent disciplinary practices. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. References Allport, G. W. ( 1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3–56). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley. Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. ( 1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 7–40). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Apfelbaum, E. ( 1986). Prolegomena for a history of social psychology: Some hypotheses concerning its emergence in the 20th century and its raison d'être. In K. S. Larsen (Ed.), Dialectics and ideology in psychology (pp. 3–13). Norwood NJ: Ablex. Backman, C. W. ( 1983). Toward an interdisciplinary social psychology. Advances in experimental social psychology, 16, 219–261. Backman, C. W. ( 1991). Interdisciplinary social psychology: Prospects and problems. In C. W. Stephan, W. G. Stephan, & T. F. Pettigrew (Eds.), The future of social psychology: Defining the relationship between sociology and psychology (pp. 61–70). New York: Springer-Verlag. Barnes, B. ( 1977). Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Becher, T. ( 1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE & Open University Press. Bechtel, W. ( 1986a). The nature of scientific integration. In W. Bechtel (Ed.), Integrating scientific disciplines (pp. 3–52). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. W. Bechtel (Ed.). ( 1986b). Integrating scientific disciplines. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. Bernstein, R. J. ( 1976). The restructuring of social and political theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Blackman, L. M. ( 1994). What is doing history? The use of history to understand the constitution of contempory psychological objects. Theory & Psychology, 4, 485–504. Blumer, H. ( 1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall. Boden, D. ( 1990). The world as it happens: Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of social theory: The new syntheses (pp. 185–213). New York: Columbia University Press. Bonacich, P., & Light, J. ( 1978). Laboratory experimentation in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 145–170. E. F. Borgatta, & M. L. Borgatta (Eds.). ( 1992). Encyclopedia of sociology. New York: Macmillan. Boutilier, R. G., Roed, J. C., & Svendsen, A .C. ( 1980). Crises in the two social psychologies: A critical comparison. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 5–17. Britt, S. H. ( 1937a). Social psychologists or psychological sociologists which? Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 32, 314–318. Britt, S. H. ( 1937b). Social psychologists or psychological sociologists—which? American Sociological Review, 2, 898–902. Britt, S. H. ( 1941/ 1949). Social psychology of modern life. New York: Rinehart & Co. Brown, J. F. ( 1936). Psychology and the social order: An introduction to the dynamic study of social fields. New York: McGraw-Hill. Campbell, D. T. ( 1969). Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds.), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences (pp. 328–348). Chicago: Aldine. Cherry, F. ( 1995). The "stubborn particulars" of social psychology. London: Routledge. Collier, G., Minton, H. L., & Reynolds, G. ( 1991). Currents of thought in American social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.). ( 1995). Sociological perspectives on social psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Cook, K. S., & Pike, K. C. ( 1988). Social psychology: Models of action, reaction and interaction. In E. F. Borgatta & K. S. Cook (Eds.), The future of sociology (pp. 236–254). Newbury Park CA: Sage. Couch, C. J. ( 1987). Researching social processes in the laboratory. Greenwich CT: JAI Press. Coutu, W. ( 1949). Emergent human nature: A symbolic field interpretation. New York: Knopf. Danziger, K. ( 1990). Wilhelm Wundt and the emergence of experimental psychology. In R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie, & J. S. Hodge (Eds.), Companion to the history of modern science (pp. 396–409). London: Routledge. Danziger, K. ( 1993a). Psychological objects, practice, and history. In H. van Rappard, P. J. van Strien, L. P. Mos, & W. J. Baker (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 15–47). New York: Plenum. Danziger, K. ( 1993b). History, practice, and psychological objects: Reply to commentators. In H. van Rappard, P. J. van Strien, L. P. Mos, & W. J. Baker (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 71–84). New York: Plenum. Danziger, K. ( 1994). Does the history of psychology have a future? Theory & Psychology, 4, 467–484. Danziger, K. ( 2000). Making social psychology experimental: A conceptual history, 1920–1970. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, this issue. Dawe, A. ( 1978). Theories of social action. In T. Bottomore & R. Nisbet (Eds.), A history of sociological analysis (pp. 362–417). London: Heinemann. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. ( 1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press. Edwards, D. ( 1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage. Emirbayer, M. ( 1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317. Farr, R. M. ( 1978). On the varieties of social psychology: An essay on the relationships between social psychology and other social sciences. Social Science Information, 17, 503–525. Farr, R. M. ( 1996). The roots of modern social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell. R. M. Farr, & S. Moscovici (Eds.). ( 1984). Social representations. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge University Press/Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme. Fay, B. ( 1996). Contemporary philosophy of social science: A multicultural approach. Oxford: Blackwell. Festinger, L. ( 1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston IL: Row, Peterson. Fine, G. A. ( 1990). Symbolic interactionism in the post-Blumerian age. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of social theory: The new syntheses (pp. 117–157). New York: Columbia University Press. Fine, W. F. ( 1979). Progressive evolutionism and American sociology, 1890–1920. Ann Arbor MI: UMI Research Press. Fiske, S. ( 1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from daguerreotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 877–889. Forman, P. ( 1991). Independence, not transcendence, for the historian of science. Isis, 82, 71–86. Foucault, M. ( 1969). L'archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard. [English translation: The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock, 1972] Foucault, M. ( 1975). Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard. [English translation: Discipline and punish. London: Tavistock, 1977] Fujimura, J. H. ( 1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and "translation." In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 168–211). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fuller, S. ( 1991). Disciplinary boundaries and the rhetoric of the social sciences. Poetics Today, 12, 301–325. Fuller, S. ( 1994). Philosophy, rhetoric and the end of knowledge: The coming of science and technology studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Galison, P. ( 1996). Introduction. In P. Galison & D. J. Stump (Eds.). The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power (pp. 1–33). Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. P. Galison, & D. J. Stump (Eds.). ( 1996). The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. Gardner, H. ( 1985). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books. Garfinkel, H. ( 1996). Ethnomethodology's program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 5–21. Gaziano, E. ( 1996). Ecological metaphors as scientific boundary work: Innovation and authority in interwar sociology and biology. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 874–907. Gecas, V. ( 1989). Rekindling the sociological imagination in social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19, 97–115. Gerth, H., & Mills, C. W. ( 1954). Character and social structure: The psychology of social institutions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Gibson, J. J. ( 1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Giddens, A. ( 1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press. Gieryn, T. F. ( 1983). Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in the professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795. Gieryn, T. F. ( 1995). Boundaries of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J .C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology (pp. 393–443). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Giri, A. K. ( 1998). Transcending disciplinary boundaries: Creative experiments and the critiques of modernity. Critique of Anthropology, 18, 379–404. Good, J. M. M. ( 1981). Sociology and psychology promise unfulfilled? In P. Abrams & P. Lethwaite (Eds.), Development and diversity: British sociology 1950–1980 (pp. 610–632). London: British Sociological Association. Good, J. M. M. ( 1993). Quests for interdisciplinarity: The rhetorical constitution of social psychology. In R. H. Roberts & J. M. M. Good (Eds.), The recovery of rhetoric: Persuasive discourse and disciplinarity in the human sciences (pp. 239–262). Bristol: The Bristol Press. Good, J. M .M., & Still, A. W. ( 1992). The idea of an interdisciplinary social psychology: An historical and rhetorical analysis. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 33, 563–568. Good, J. M. M., & Still, A. W. ( 1997, March). The mutual voice: Writers, readers, and representations of the past. Paper presented at the conference "Who Speaks? The Voice in the Human Sciences," Bristol, England. J. M. M. Good, & I. Velody (Eds.). ( 1998). The politics of postmodernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Graumann, C. F. ( 1986). The individualization of the social and the desocialization of the individual: Floyd H. Allport's contribution to social psychology. In C. F. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of crowd mind and behavior (pp. 97–116). New York: Springer-Verlag. Greenwood, J. D. ( 1991). Relations and representations: An introduction to the philosophy of social psychological science. London: Routledge. Greenwood, J. D. ( 1997). Introduction: The mark of the social. In J. D. Greenwood (Ed.), The mark of the social: Discovery or invention? (pp. 1–16). Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Greenwood, J. D. ( 2000). Individualism and the social in early American social psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, this issue. Haney, C., Banks, C., & Zimbardo, P. ( 1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Criminology and Penology, 1, 69–97. Harré, R. ( 1992). The discursive creation of human psychology. Symbolic Interaction, 15, 515–527. Heider, F. ( 1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Hewitt, J. P. ( 1999). Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology ( 8th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall. H. Himmelweit, & G. Gaskell (Eds.) ( 1990). Societal psychology. Newbury Park CA: Sage. House, J. ( 1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40, 161–177. House, J. S. ( 1981). Social structure and personality. In M. Rosenberg & R. S. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 525–561). New York: Basic Books. House, J. S. ( 1995). Introduction: Social structure and personality: Past, present, and future. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on sociological psychology (pp. 387–395). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Hull, D. L. ( 1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. J. Israel, & H. Tajfel (Eds.). ( 1972). The context of social psychology: A critical assessment. London: Academic Press. Jackson, J. M. ( 1988). Social psychology, past and present: An integrative orientation. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum. S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.). ( 1995). Handbook of science and technology. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Jaspars, J. M. F., & Ackermans, E. ( 1966). The interdisciplinary character of social psychology: An illustration. Sociologia Neerlandica, 4, 62–79. Jenkins, K. ( 1991). Re-thinking history. London: Routledge. K. Jenkins (Ed.). ( 1997). The postmodern history reader. London: Routledge. Jones, E. E. ( 1985). Major developments in social psychology during the past five decades. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology ( 3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 47–108). New York: Random House. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. ( 1965). From acts to dispositions: the attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219–266). New York: Academic Press. Kantor, J. R. ( 1959). Inter-behavioral psychology: A sample of scientific system construction. Granville OH: Principia Press. Karpf, F. B. ( 1952– 1953). American social psychology—1951. American Journal of Sociology, 58, 187–193. Karpf, F. B. ( 1932). American social psychology: Its origins, development, and European background. New York: Macmillan. Katovich, M. A. ( 1984). Symbolic interactionism and experimentation: The laboratory as a provocative stage. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 5, 49–67. Kelley, H. H. ( 1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–241). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Kelvin, P. ( 1979). Review of S. Moscovici, Social influence and social change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 441–454. Klein, J. T. ( 1990a). Across the boundaries. Social Epistemology, 4, 267–280. Klein, J. T. ( 1990b). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Detroit MI: Wayne State University Press. Kohn, M. L. ( 1989). Social structure and personality: A quintessentially sociological approach to social psychology. Social Forces, 68, 26–33. Krausz, M. ( 1991). History and its objects. The Monist, 74, 217–229. Krech, D., Crutchfield, R. S., & Ballachey, E. L. ( 1962). Individual in society: A textbook of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. Kroger, R. O., & Wood, L. A. ( 1992). Whatever happened to language in social psychology? A survey of texts. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 33, 584–594. Lave, J. ( 1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lenoir, T. ( 1997). Instituting science: The cultural production of scientific disciplines. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. Lepenies, W., & Weingart, P. ( 1983). Introduction. In L. Graham, W. Lepenies, & P. Weingart (Eds.), Functions and uses of disciplinary histories (pp. ix–xx). Dordrecht: Reidel. Lewin, K. ( 1951). Field theory in social science: Selected papers. New York: Harper & Row. Lindesmith, A. R., Strauss, A. L., & Denzin, N. K. ( 1999). Social psychology ( 8th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Lovejoy, A .O. ( 1930). The revolt against dualism. LaSalle IL: Open Court. Lowy, I. ( 1992). The strength of loose concepts—boundary concepts, federative strategies and disciplinary growth: The case of immunology. History of Science, 30, 371–396. Lubek, I. ( 2000). Understanding and using the history of social psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, this issue. Lubek, I., & Apfelbaum, E. ( 2000). A critical gaze and wistful glance at Handbook histories of social psychology: Did the successive accounts by Gordon Allport and successors historiographically succeed? Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, this issue. Lundberg, G. ( 1931– 1932). The interests of the members of the American Sociological Society, 1930. American Journal of Sociology, 37, 458–460. S. Lundstedt (Ed.). ( 1968). Higher education in social psychology. Cleveland OH: Case-Western Reserve Press. MacMartin, C., & Winston, A. S. ( 2000). The rhetoric of experimental social psychology, 1930–1960: From caution to enthusiasm. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, this issue. Manicas, P. T. ( 1987). A history and philosophy of the social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell. Margolis, J., Manicas, P. T., Harré, R., & Secord, P. F. ( 1986). Psychology: Designing the discipline. Oxford: Blackwell. Markova, I. ( 2000). The individual and society in psychological theory. Theory and Psychology, 10, 107–116. Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. ( 1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology ( 3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 137–230). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum. Maxwell, N. ( 1980). Science, reason, knowledge, and wisdom: A critique of specialism. Inquiry, 23, 19–81. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. ( 1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215–238. McCall, G. J. ( 1992). Social psychology. New York: Free Press. McDougall, W. ( 1908). Introduction to social psychology. London: Methuen. C. McGarty, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.). ( 1997). The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society. Oxford: Blackwell. McMahon, A. M. ( 1984). The two social psychologies: Post-crises directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 121–140. Meeker, B. F., & Leik, R. K. ( 1995). Experimentation in sociological social psychology. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 630–649). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.). ( 1993). Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. Michaels, J. W., & Green, D. S. ( 1978). Behavioral sociology: Emergent forms and issues. American Sociologist, 13, 23–29. Milgram, S. ( 1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18, 57–76. Mills, C. W. ( 1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press. Moscovici, S. ( 1972). Society and theory in social psychology. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.), The context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 17–68). London: Academic Press. Moscovici, S. ( 1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press. Moscovici, S. ( 1979). Rejoinder. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 441–454. Moscovici, S. ( 1993a). Toward a social psychology of science. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 23, 343–374. Moscovici, S. ( 1993b). The invention of society: Psychological explanations for social phenomena. Cambridge: Polity Press. J. S. Nelson, A. Megill, & D. McCloskey (Eds.). ( 1987). The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Newcomb, T. M. ( 1950). Social psychology. New York: Dryden Press. Newcomb, T. M. ( 1953). An approach to the study of comunicative acts. Psychological Review, 60, 393–404. Newcomb, T. M. ( 1974). Theodore M. Newcomb. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 6, pp. 365–392). New York: Prentice-Hall, 1974. Novick, P. ( 1988). That noble dream: The "objectivity" question and the American historical profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. I. Parker, & R. Spears (Eds.). ( 1996). Psychology and society: Radical theory and practice. London: Pluto Press. Pettigrew, T .F. ( 1991). Is unity possible? A summary. In C. W. Stephan, W. G. Stephan, & T. F. Pettigrew (Eds.), The future of social psychology: Defining the relationship between sociology and psychology (pp. 99–121). New York: Springer-Verlag. Pettigrew, T. F. ( 1997). Personality and social structure: Social psychological considerations. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 417–438). San Diego CA: Academic Press. Pickering, A. ( 1992). From science as knowledge to science as practice. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 1–26). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. ( 1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage. R. H. Roberts, & J. M. M. Good (Eds.). ( 1993). The recovery of rhetoric: Persuasive discourse and disciplinarity in the human sciences. Bristol/Charlottesville: The Bristol Press/University of Virginia Press. M. Rosenberg, & R. H. Turner (Eds.). ( 1981). Social psychology: Sociological perspectives. New York: Basic Books. Ross, E. A. ( 1908). Social psychology: An outline and source book. New York: Macmillan. Rouse, J. ( 1987). Knowledge and power: Toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. Rouse, J. ( 1991). Policing knowledge: Disembodied policy for embodied knowledge. Inquiry, 34, 353–364. Rouse, J. ( 1999). Understanding scientific practices: Cultural studies of science as a philosophical program. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), Science studies reader (pp. 442–456). New York: Routledge. Samelson, F. ( 2000). Whig and anti-Whig histories—and other curiosities of social psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavorial Sciences, this issue. Sarason, S. B. ( 1981). Psychology misdirected. New York: Free Press. Saxton, S. L., & Hall, P. M. ( 1987). Two social psychologies: New grounds for discussion. Studies in symbolic interaction, 8, 43–67. Schorske, C. E. ( 1998). Thinking with history: Explorations in the passage to modernism. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. Schwarz, N. ( 1998). Warmer and more social: Recent developments in cognitive social psychology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 239–264. Sewell, W. H. ( 1989). Some reflections on the golden age of interdisciplinary social psychology. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 1–16. Sherif, M. ( 1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Row. Shumway, D. R., & Messer-Davidow, E. ( 1991). Disciplinarity: An introduction. Poetics Today, 12, 201–225. Smith, R. ( 1997). The Fontana history of the human sciences. London: Fontana. Stainton Rogers, R. ( 1995). Q methodology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 178–192). London: Sage. Stam, H. J., Radke, H. L., & Lubek, I. ( 2000). Strains in experimental social psychology: A textual analysis of the development of experimentation in social psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, this issue. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. ( 1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420. Stephan, C. W., & Stephan, W. G. ( 1990). Two social psychologies: An integrated approach ( 2nd ed.). Homewood IL: Dorsey Press. C. W. Stephan, W. G. Stephan, & T. F. Pettigrew (Eds.). ( 1991). The future of social psychology: Defining the relationship between sociology and psychology. New York: Springer-Verlag. Still, A. W. ( 1991). Mechanism and romanticism: A selective history. In A. W. Still & A. Costall (Eds.), Against cognitivism: Alternative foundations for cognitive psychology (pp. 7–26). Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Still, A. W., & Good, J. M. M. ( 1992). Mutualism in the human sciences: Towards the implementation of a theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22, 105–128. Still, A. W., & Good, J. M. M. ( 1998). The ontology of mutualism. Ecological Psychology, 10, 39–63. Stryker, S. ( 1977). Developments in "two social psychologies": Toward an appreciation of mutual relevance. Sociometry, 40, 145–160. Stryker, S. ( 1987). The vitalization of symbolic interactionism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 83–94. Stryker, S. ( 1991). Consequences of the gap between the "two social psychologies." In C .W. Stephan, W. G. Stephan, & T. F. Pettigrew (Eds.), The future of social psychology: Defining the relationship between sociology and psychology (pp. 83–98). New York: Springer-Verlag. Stryker, S. ( 1997). "In the beginning there is society": Lessons from a sociological social psychology. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 315–327). Oxford: Blackwell. Tajfel, H., & Fraser, C. ( 1978). Introducing social psychology. London: Penguin. Valenti, S. S., & Good, J. M. M. ( 1991). Social affordances and interaction I: Introduction. Ecological Psychology, 3, 77–98. van Strien, P. J. ( 1997). The American "colonization" of European social psychology after World War II. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 33, 349–363. Wallerstein, I. ( 1996). Open the social sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian commission on the restructuring of the social sciences. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. Weigert, A. J., & Gecas, V. ( 1995). Multiplicity and dialogue in social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 25, 141–174. Wertsch, J. V., del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. ( 1995). Sociocultural studies: History, action, and mediation. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 1–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. White, H. ( 1973). Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth century Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Wrong, D. H. ( 1961). The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology. American Sociological Review, 26, 183–193. Zagorin, P. ( 1999). History, the referent, and narrative: Reflections on postmodernism now. History and Theory, 38, 1–24. Citing Literature Volume36, Issue4Special Issue: Re‐engaging the History of Social PsychologyAutumn (Fall) 2000Pages 383-403 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)