Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure: A Valid Clinical Score for Assessing Acute Asthma Severity from Toddlers to Teenagers

2007; Elsevier BV; Volume: 152; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.08.034

1097-6833

Francine M. Ducharme, Dominic Chalut, Laurie H. Plotnick, Cheryl Savdie, Denise Kudirka, Xun Zhang, Linyan Meng, David McGillivray,

Neonatal Respiratory Health Research

Objective To determine the performance characteristics of the Preschool Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) in preschool and school-aged children with acute asthma. Study design In a prospective cohort study, we examined the validity, responsiveness, and reliability of the PRAM in children aged 2 to 17 years with acute asthma. The study involved more than 100 nurses and physicians who recorded the PRAM on triage, after initial bronchodilation, and at disposition. Predictive validity and responsiveness were examined using disposition as outcome. Results The PRAM was recorded in 81% (n = 782) of patients at triage. The PRAM at triage and after initial bronchodilation showed a strong association with admission (r = 0.4 and 0.5, respectively; P < .0001), thus supporting its ability to distinguish across severity levels. The responsiveness coefficient of 0.7 indicated good ability to identify change after bronchodilation. The PRAM showed good internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.71) and inter-rater reliability (r = 0.78) for all patients and across all age groups. Conclusions Good performance characteristics were observed in all age groups, making the PRAM an attractive score for assessing asthma severity and response to treatment. To determine the performance characteristics of the Preschool Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) in preschool and school-aged children with acute asthma. In a prospective cohort study, we examined the validity, responsiveness, and reliability of the PRAM in children aged 2 to 17 years with acute asthma. The study involved more than 100 nurses and physicians who recorded the PRAM on triage, after initial bronchodilation, and at disposition. Predictive validity and responsiveness were examined using disposition as outcome. The PRAM was recorded in 81% (n = 782) of patients at triage. The PRAM at triage and after initial bronchodilation showed a strong association with admission (r = 0.4 and 0.5, respectively; P < .0001), thus supporting its ability to distinguish across severity levels. The responsiveness coefficient of 0.7 indicated good ability to identify change after bronchodilation. The PRAM showed good internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.71) and inter-rater reliability (r = 0.78) for all patients and across all age groups. Good performance characteristics were observed in all age groups, making the PRAM an attractive score for assessing asthma severity and response to treatment.