Trans‐locals, critical area studies and geography’s Others, or why ‘development’ should not be geography’s organizing framework: a response to Potter
2002; Wiley; Volume: 34; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/1475-4762.00073
ISSN1475-4762
Autores Tópico(s)Urban Planning and Governance
ResumoAreaVolume 34, Issue 2 p. 210-213 Trans-locals, critical area studies and geography's Others, or why 'development' should not be geography's organizing framework: a response to Potter Adrian Smith, Adrian Smith Department of Geography, University of [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Adrian Smith, Adrian Smith Department of Geography, University of [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 16 December 2002 https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00073Citations: 19AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Citing Literature Volume34, Issue2June 2002Pages 210-213 RelatedInformation
Referência(s)