Resolving the Discrepancy in Childhood Bipolar High-Risk Study Findings
2010; American Psychiatric Association; Volume: 167; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10020170
ISSN1535-7228
AutoresAnne Duffy, Paul Grof, Tomáš Hájek, Martin Alda,
Tópico(s)Family Support in Illness
ResumoBack to table of contents Previous article Next article Letter to the EditorFull AccessResolving the Discrepancy in Childhood Bipolar High-Risk Study FindingsAnne Duffy, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Paul Grof, M.D., Ph.D., F.R.C.P.C., Tomas Hajek, M.D., Ph.D., and Martin Alda, M.D., F.R.C.P.C.Anne Duffy, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Paul Grof, M.D., Ph.D., F.R.C.P.C., Tomas Hajek, M.D., Ph.D., and Martin Alda, M.D., F.R.C.P.C.Published Online:1 Jun 2010https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10020170AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail To the Editor: In their article, published in the March 2010 issue of the Journal, Boris Birmaher, M.D., et al. (1) discussed some factors that may explain why their findings in preschool-age children of parents with bipolar disorder appeared to contradict those of other studies. However, there are other reasons for the obvious contradictions, including the different methods of recruitment, assessment, and symptom definition.The Pittsburgh Bipolar Offspring Study (BIOS) ascertained many high-risk families through advertisement, confirmed parental bipolar disorder on cross-sectional assessment, and allowed for psychiatric comorbidity amongst co-parents. This differs from studies in which the parent was diagnosed with bipolar disorder based on structured interviews, combined with all available clinical information, and in which well biological co-parents were required (2, 3). This also differs from studies that recruited parents largely from specialty clinics or patient support groups (4, 5).The variation in recruitment may explain the high rates of comorbid diagnoses in BIOS parents. Furthermore, the unexpectedly high rates of substance use, conduct disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the female probands suggest that the offspring sample may be enriched for genetic susceptibility to these conditions.Second, other studies that used only experienced clinicians to directly assess offspring did not report elevated rates of ADHD in high-risk children (2–6), unlike the BIOS study, in which parents were interviewed about the presence of psychiatric disorders in their children. Furthermore, the finding that the caregivers and teachers were not able to differentiate high-risk offspring from comparison offspring raises questions about the reliability of the diagnostic information.Finally, bipolar disorder criteria for children are not developmentally sensitive, and psychiatric disorders appear to evolve from heterotypic origins (nonspecific to specific). Thus, labeling symptoms in preschoolers as manic may be premature until the symptoms are proven to be related to bipolar disorder. Consistent with the findings, in the Amish study (2), manic-like symptoms appeared only later in development, and this study along with others, (4–7) failed to identify a single case of prepubertal mania. Irritable mood, distractibility, increased activity, poor judgment, and unusual energy in preschoolers may not be symptoms of mania, but rather indicators of risk for a variety of future outcomes and/or a mixture of developmentally appropriate behaviors that ill parents find challenging.In closing, we share the view of Dr. Birmaher et al. that longitudinal observation over the entire risk period will clarify the natural history of bipolar disorder in high-risk children.Halifax, Nova ScotiaToronto, Ont., CanadaHalifax, Nova ScotiaThe authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.References1 Birmaher B , Axelson D , Goldstein B , Monk K , Kalas C , Obreja M , Hickey MB , Iyengar S , Brent D , Shamseddeen W , Diler R , Kupfer D : Psychiatric disorders in preschool offspring of parents with bipolar disorder: the Pittsburgh Bipolar Offspring Study (BIOS). Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167:321–330 Link, Google Scholar2 Shaw JA , Egeland JA , Endicott J , Allen CR , Hostetter AM : A 10-year prospective study of prodromal patterns for bipolar disorder among Amish youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2005; 44:1104–1111 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Duffy A , Alda M , Hajek T , Sherry SB , Grof P : Early stages in the development of bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2010; 121:127–135 Crossref, Google Scholar4 Hillegers MH , Reichart CG , Wals M , Verhulst FC , Ormel J , Nolen WA : Five-year prospective outcome of psychopathology in the adolescent offspring of bipolar parents. Bipolar Disord 2005; 7:344–350 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Akiskal HS , Downs J , Jordan P , Watson S , Daugherty D , Pruitt DB : Affective disorders in referred children and younger siblings of manic-depressives: mode of onset and prospective course. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985; 42:996–1003 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Hammen C , Burge D , Burney E , Adrian C : Longitudinal study of diagnoses in children of women with unipolar and bipolar affective disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990; 47:1112–1117 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Duffy A , Alda M , Hajek T , Grof P : Early course of bipolar disorder in high-risk offspring: prospective study. Br J Psychiatry 2009; 195:457–458 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited ByDo the Trajectories of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia Follow a Universal Staging Model?9 July 2016 | The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 62, No. 2Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, Vol. 194, No. 3 Volume 167Issue 6 June 2010Pages 716-716 Metrics PDF download History Accepted 1 March 2010 Published online 1 June 2010 Published in print 1 June 2010
Referência(s)