Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Skin cancer was not a potent selective force in the evolution of protective pigmentation in early hominins

2014; Royal Society; Volume: 281; Issue: 1789 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1098/rspb.2014.0517

1471-2954

Nina G. Jablonski, George Chaplin,

Dermatology and Skin Diseases

You have accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Jablonski Nina G. and Chaplin George 2014Skin cancer was not a potent selective force in the evolution of protective pigmentation in early homininsProc. R. Soc. B.2812014051720140517http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0517SectionYou have accessComments and invited repliesSkin cancer was not a potent selective force in the evolution of protective pigmentation in early hominins Nina G. Jablonski Nina G. Jablonski [email protected] Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and George Chaplin George Chaplin Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Nina G. Jablonski Nina G. Jablonski [email protected] Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed and George Chaplin George Chaplin Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Published:22 August 2014https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0517Greaves [1] proposed that skin cancer was a potent selective force for the evolution of dark pigmentation in early hominins. Blum [2,3] questioned the role of skin cancer in the evolution of skin pigmentation because it only rarely causes death to individuals of reproductive age. Since Blum's studies, much more data on skin cancer rates has been amassed, and a clearer picture of skin cancer aetiology has emerged. Individuals with lightly pigmented skin, especially those with a tendency to freckle who carry specific polymorphisms of the melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R), are most susceptible to skin cancers of all types [4,5]. Other polymorphisms of pigmentation genes also have been associated with elevated risk of skin cancer in people of European descent [6]. Development of the most common skin cancers, namely, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC), is associated with chronic sun peak exposure and generally develops in the seventh decade of life. Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) is much rarer, is associated with sunburns, particularly in childhood, and can appear as early as the third or fourth decades of life because of the roughly 20 year lag between damaging exposures and the appearance of disease [4]. This still allows for reproduction and the persistence of familial predisposition to CMM [7].Greaves' case for skin cancer as a potent agent for natural selection of dark skin pigmentation presupposes that ancestral hominins had skin that was pale or light, and that people in Africa who are entirely lacking eumelanin in their integument owing to OCA2 albinism are a suitable model for the ancestral state. OCA2 albinism predisposes individuals to extreme ultraviolet ratiation (UVR)-induced damage to DNA and is associated with severe and often fatal skin cancers (mostly SCC) in the middle of their potential reproductive careers in the third and fourth decades of life [8,9]. Excessively high rates of skin cancer develop in individuals with OCA2 albinism when compared with other very light-skinned people with MC1R variants, probably because of the protective non-pigmentary effects of MC1R, specifically the fewer number of p53 clones that develop after UVR exposure [10].Early hominins never had naked pale skin comparable in function to that of individuals with OCA2 albinism. All living cattarhine primates have intact pigmentary systems and can develop facultative pigmentation through tanning or have permanently melanized skin [11,12]. Humans evolved from African apes which had the potential to develop protective eumelanin pigmentation through tanning on exposed skin in response to UVR exposure. The skin (and not just the hair follicles) of great apes bears active melanocytes which produce eumelanin upon exposure to strong sunlight [13]. Increased sun exposure on hairless areas results in gradual darkening of the skin, as melanocytes gain competence with increasing age. Based on comparative evolutionary physiology and the principle of parsimony, this must have been the ancestral condition of the last common ancestor of African apes and humans [11,14]. Skin cancers are not among the skin conditions known to afflict living apes [15].The evolution of functional hairlessness in early hominins was a gradual process, not a sudden one, during which the MC1R locus was under increasing selective constraint [16]. Once permanent dark constitutive pigmentation evolved about 1.2 Ma [16], selection eliminated non-synonymous MC1R variation in order to maintain a high-eumelanin phenotype [17]. During this process, the skin of early hominins was never pale-skinned or incapable of tanning, and was never functionally similar to the condition seen in people with OCA2 albinism. The skin of individuals with albinism is an inappropriate model for the ancestral hominin condition because its pallor is the result of complete and irreversible loss of pigmentary function. Even if this condition were taken as the model for the skin of early hominins, skin cancer still could have been only a weak selective force. Reproduction in ancestral hominins started earlier in life than in modern humans [18], and most reproductive effort would have been completed before skin cancer could have affected reproductive success. It is thus unlikely that skin cancer could have affected maternal fertility significantly. Its effect on child mortality through a grandmaternal effect would have been slighter, given that the effect of grandmaternal survival on child mortality is approximately five times less than that of maternal survival [19].Factors affecting individuals early in their reproductive career would have had much greater effects on fertility than skin cancer. Considering that skin pigmentation is most highly correlated to autumnal, and not peak, UVR levels, BCC and SCC were unlikely to have been significant selective forces. The most serious skin cancer, CMM, most often is caused by repeated sunburns, which are more common in regions with highly seasonal solar regimes and large changes in the ratio of UVA to UVB throughout the year. Such conditions prevail today in the subtropical and Mediterranean belts, particularly those of the Southern Hemisphere, which experience greater differences between summer and winter UVR levels owing to current orbital parameters [20,21]. CMM risk therefore may have promoted the evolution of tanning ability [22]. Serious sunburns would have been rare, however, before the era of long-distance travel and recreational sun exposure.In the electronic supplementary material accompanying his article, Greaves criticizes other models for the evolution of dark pigmentation for lack of explanatory power. He focuses special attention on the deficiencies of the folate hypothesis, citing presumed differences in sun exposure between male and female hominins and a lack of experimental evidence for folate sensitivity to UVR. There is no evidence to suggest that female hominins and their offspring experienced any less UVR exposure than males. The evolution of hairlessness and permanent dark pigmentation occurred in the early history of the genus Homo, when hominins of both sexes were actively engaged in foraging and hunting in mostly open, sunny environments [23]. In our development of the folate hypothesis, we have gone to lengths to discuss its strengths and evidentiary shortcomings [11,22], and to indicate that effects on folate metabolism were not the only forces acting to promote the evolution of permanent protective eumelanin pigmentation. Evidence for the in vitro photolysis of folate and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) by UVR [24–26] that we cited in our early studies has been supplemented recently by demonstration of in vivo photolysis by UVR in humans [27]. Reduction in the bioavailability of folate and 5-MTHF by UVR would be a significant selective force because it would have almost immediate effects on folate-dependent processes of DNA synthesis and cell division (including early embryogenesis and spermatogenesis) as well as on DNA repair.Skin cancer is a serious health problem for mobile and long-lived modern humans, and is especially so for individuals suffering from OCA2 albinism in Africa. What we question here is the validity of applying the model of OCA2 albinism to human evolution. Loss of skin pigmentation can occur via many genetic pathways, and has evolved many times [28,29]. The deletion mutation at the P locus in individuals with OCA2 albinism arose in sub-Saharan Africa 2000–3000 years ago, and represents one of the most dramatic examples of loss of pigmentation in the human lineage. Our point is that the absence of pigmentation seen in individuals suffering from OCA2 albinism is not comparable to the ancestral state seen in early hominins. The transition from an 'ape-like' polymorphic MC1R condition—in which individuals were capable of heavy tanning on exposed skin but were not permanently pigmented—to a modern human monomorphic MC1R condition with permanent dark pigmentation over a mostly hairless body more than 1 Ma was the key innovation that occurred in the evolution of human skin. Multiple selective pressures were involved, but the most powerful forces were those that affected reproductive success swiftly and with certainty.FootnotesThe accompanying reply can be viewed at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0940.© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.References1Greaves M. 2014Was skin cancer a selective force for black pigmentation in early hominin evolution?Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132955. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2955). Link, ISI, Google Scholar2Blum HF. 1961Does the melanin pigment of human skin have adaptive value?Q. Rev. Biol. 36, 50–63. (doi:10.1086/403275). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar3Blum HF. 1959Carcinogenesis by ultraviolet light, p. 340. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar4de Vries E, et al.2012Known and potential new risk factors for skin cancer in European populations: a multicentre case–control study. Br. J. Dermatol 167((Suppl. 2)), 1–13. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11081.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar5Rees JL. 2004The genetics of sun sensitivity in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75, 739–751. (doi:10.1086/425285). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar6Nan H, Kraft P, Hunter DJ& Han J. 2009Genetic variants in pigmentation genes, pigmentary phenotypes, and risk of skin cancer in Caucasians. Int. J. Cancer 125, 909–917. (doi:10.1002/ijc.24327). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar7Höiom V, et al.2009MC1R variation and melanoma risk in the Swedish population in relation to clinical and pathological parameters. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 22, 196–204. (doi:10.1111/j.1755-148X.2008.00526.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar8Hong E, Zeeb H& Repacholi M. 2006Albinism in Africa as a public health issue. BMC Public Health 6, 212–218. (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-212). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar9Mabula J, et al.2012Skin cancers among albinos at a university teaching hospital in northwestern Tanzania: a retrospective review of 64 cases. BMC Dermatol. 12, 1–5. (doi:10.1186/1471-5945-12-5). Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar10Robinson S, Dixon S, August S, Diffey B, Wakamatsu K, Ito S, Friedmann PS& Healy E. 2010Protection against UVR involves MC1R-mediated non-pigmentary and pigmentary mechanisms in vivo. J. Invest. Dermatol. 130, 1904–1913. (doi:10.1038/jid.2010.48). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar11Jablonski NG& Chaplin G. 2000The evolution of human skin coloration. J. Hum. Evol. 39, 57–106. (doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0403). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar12Jablonski NG. 2004The evolution of human skin and skin color. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 33, 585–623. (doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143955). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar13Montagna W& Yun JS. 1963The skin of primates. XV. The skin of the chimpanzee (Pan satyrus). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 21, 189–203. (doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330210211). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar14Rana BK& Didier PJ. 1999High polymorphism at the human melanocortin 1 receptor locus. Genetics 151, 1547–1557. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar15Bernstein JA& Didier PJ. 2009Nonhuman primate dermatology: a literature review. Vet. Dermatol. 20, 145–156. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00742.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar16Rogers AR, Iltis D& Wooding S. 2004Genetic variation at the MC1R locus and the time since loss of human body hair. Curr. Anthropol. 45, 105–124. (doi:10.1086/381006). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar17Harding RM, et al.2000Evidence for variable selective pressures at MC1R. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 1351–1361. (doi:10.1086/302863). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar18Bogin B& Smith BH.1996Evolution of the human life cycle. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 8, 703–716. (doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(1996)8:6 3.0.Co;2-u). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar19Shanley DP, Sear R, Mace R& Kirkwood TBL. 2007Testing evolutionary theories of menopause. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 2943–2949. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1028). Link, ISI, Google Scholar20Relethford JH. 1997Hemispheric difference in human skin color. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 104, 449–457. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199712)104:4 3.0.CO;2-N). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar21Chaplin G& Jablonski NG. 1998Hemispheric difference in human skin color. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 107, 221–224. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199810)107:2 3.0.CO;2-X). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar22Jablonski NG& Chaplin G. 2010Human skin pigmentation as an adaptation to UV radiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107((Suppl. 2)), 8962–8968. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0914628107). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar23Bobe R& Leakey MG. 2009Ecology of Plio-Pleistocene mammals in the Omo-Turkana basin and the emergence of Homo. The first humans: origin and early evolution of the genus Homo (eds , Grine FE, Fleagle J& Leakey RE), pp. 173–184. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar24Juzeniene A, Thu Tam TT, Iani V& Moan J. 2013The action spectrum for folic acid photodegradation in aqueous solutions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, Biol. 126, 11–16. (doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.05.011). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar25Tam TTT, Juzeniene A, Steindal AH, Iani V& Moan J. 2009Photodegradation of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in the presence of uroporphyrin. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, Biol. 94, 201–204. (doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.12.003). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar26Branda RF& Eaton JW. 1978Skin color and nutrient photolysis: an evolutionary hypothesis. Science 201, 625–626. (doi:10.1126/science.675247). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar27Borradale DC, Isenring E, Hacker E& Kimlin MG. 2014Exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation is associated with a decreased folate status in women of childbearing age. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, Biol. 131, 90–95. (doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.01.002). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar28Manceau M, Domingues VS, Linnen CR, Rosenblum EB& Hoekstra HE. 2010Convergence in pigmentation at multiple levels: mutations, genes and function. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 2439–2450. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0104). Link, ISI, Google Scholar29Norton HL, et al.2007Genetic evidence for the convergent evolution of light skin in Europeans and East Asians. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 710–722. (doi:10.1093/molbev/msl203). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar Previous ArticleNext Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited by Huang X, Wang S, Jin L and He Y (2021) Dissecting dynamics and differences of selective pressures in the evolution of human pigmentation, Biology Open, 10.1242/bio.056523, 10:2, Online publication date: 15-Feb-2021. Jablonski N (2021) The evolution of human skin pigmentation involved the interactions of genetic, environmental, and cultural variables, Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research, 10.1111/pcmr.12976, 34:4, (707-729), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021. (2019) References A Companion to Anthropological Genetics, 10.1002/9781118768853.refs, (343-443) Albuquerque T, Drummond do Val L, Doherty A and de Magalhães J (2018) From humans to hydra: patterns of cancer across the tree of life, Biological Reviews, 10.1111/brv.12415, 93:3, (1715-1734), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018. Jablonski N (2018) Evolution of Human Skin Color and Vitamin D Vitamin D, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809965-0.00003-3, (29-44), . Jablonski N and Chaplin G (2017) The colours of humanity: the evolution of pigmentation in the human lineage, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372:1724, Online publication date: 5-Jul-2017. Jablonski N (2017) The Anthropology of Skin Colors: An Examination of the Evolution of Skin Pigmentation and the Concepts of Race and Skin of Color Dermatoanthropology of Ethnic Skin and Hair, 10.1007/978-3-319-53961-4_1, (1-11), . Elias P and Williams M (2016) Basis for the gain and subsequent dilution of epidermal pigmentation during human evolution: The barrier and metabolic conservation hypotheses revisited, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 10.1002/ajpa.23030, 161:2, (189-207), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016. Skjærvø G, Fossøy F and Røskaft E (2015) Solar activity at birth predicted infant survival and women's fertility in historical Norway, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282:1801, Online publication date: 22-Feb-2015. Norton H, Werren E and Friedlaender J (2015) MC1R diversity in Northern Island Melanesia has not been constrained by strong purifying selection and cannot explain pigmentation phenotype variation in the region, BMC Genetics, 10.1186/s12863-015-0277-x, 16:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015. Jablonski N (2018) Skin color The International Encyclopedia of Biological Anthropology, 10.1002/9781118584538.ieba0456, (1-5) Jones P, Lucock M, Veysey M and Beckett E (2018) The Vitamin D–Folate Hypothesis as an Evolutionary Model for Skin Pigmentation: An Update and Integration of Current Ideas, Nutrients, 10.3390/nu10050554, 10:5, (554) Norton H (2020) The color of normal: How a Eurocentric focus erases pigmentation complexity, American Journal of Human Biology, 10.1002/ajhb.23554 This Issue22 August 2014Volume 281Issue 1789 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0517PubMed:24990674Published by:Royal SocietyOnline ISSN:1471-2954History: Manuscript received03/03/2014Manuscript accepted02/04/2014Published online22/08/2014Published in print22/08/2014 License:© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved. Citations and impact Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad