Endogenous Preferences, Environmental Law
1993; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 22; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Espanhol
10.1086/468164
ISSN1537-5366
Autores Tópico(s)Economic and Environmental Valuation
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessEndogenous Preferences, Environmental LawCass R. SunsteinCass R. SunsteinPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 22, Number 2Jun., 1993 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/468164 Views: 13Total views on this site Citations: 41Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1993 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Peter Bradley An Institutional Economics Framework to explore Sustainable production and consumption, Sustainable Production and Consumption 2 (Feb 2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.035CASS R. SUNSTEIN Valuing Facebook, Behavioural Public Policy 4, no.33 (Feb 2019): 370–381.https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.34Andrew Stark Value, Externalities, and the Boundaries of the Market, Journal of Social Philosophy 51, no.22 (Apr 2020): 180–204.https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12341Steven McMullen Waste and Efficiency in a Consumer Economy, (Oct 2018): 144–158.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6120-0.ch008Scott L. Stephens, Brandon M. Collins, Eric Biber, Peter Z. Fulé U.S. federal fire and forest policy: emphasizing resilience in dry forests, Ecosphere 7, no.1111 (Nov 2016): e01584.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1584Linus Mattauch, Cameron Hepburn Climate Policy When Preferences Are Endogenous-and Sometimes They Are, Midwest Studies In Philosophy 40, no.11 (Sep 2016): 76–95.https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12048Daniel Monroy BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS Y POLLTICAS PPBLICAS: Algunos problemas y sus soluciones (Behavioral Economics and Public Policies: Some Problems and Their Solutions - In Spanish), SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2722947Daniel Monroy Las Preferencias Dependen Del Punto De Referencia!: Un desaffo al Annlisis Econnmico y coaseanoo del Derecho (Preferences Depend on Reference Points!: A Challenge to Law & Economics And Coasean Theory - In Spanish), SSRN Electronic Journal 27 (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2722945Rachel Croson, Nicolas Treich Behavioral Environmental Economics: Promises and Challenges, Environmental and Resource Economics 58, no.33 (Apr 2014): 335–351.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9783-yAbraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky Reinventing Copyright and Patent, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2399998Edward A. Parson, Eric L. Kravitz Market Instruments for the Sustainability Transition, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38, no.11 (Oct 2013): 415–440.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-061311-111640Nicolas Dendoncker, Hans Keune, Sander Jacobs, Erik Gómez-Baggethun Inclusive Ecosystem Services Valuation, (Jan 2013): 3–12.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-419964-4.00001-9Michael E. Kenneally Intellectual Property Rights and Institutions: A Pluralist Account, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2310986Yannick Ferreira De Sousa, Alistair Munro Truck, barter and exchange versus the endowment effect: Virtual field experiments in an online game environment, Journal of Economic Psychology 33, no.33 (Jun 2012): 482–493.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.12.011Quang Nguyen Does nurture matter: Theory and experimental investigation on the effect of working environment on risk and time preferences, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 43, no.33 (Nov 2011): 245–270.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-011-9130-4NIENKE VAN SCHIE, MIKE DUIJN, JURIAN EDELENBOS CO-VALUATION: EXPLORING METHODS FOR EXPERT AND STAKEHOLDER VALUATION, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 13, no.0404 (Dec 2011): 619–650.https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333211004036Brian Hector MacGillivray, Ruth E. Alcock, Jerry Busby Is Risk-Based Regulation Feasible? The Case of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs), Risk Analysis 31, no.22 (Sep 2010): 266–281.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01500.xINSA THEESFELD, CHRISTIAN SCHLEYER, OLIVIER AZNAR The procedure for institutional compatibility assessment: ex-ante policy assessment from an institutional perspective, Journal of Institutional Economics 6, no.33 (May 2010): 377–399.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137410000056Jack L. Knetsch Values of Gains and Losses: Reference States and Choice of Measure, Environmental and Resource Economics 46, no.22 (Apr 2010): 179–188.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9355-8Nathalie Moureau, Marion Vidal Quand préférences déclarées et révélées s'opposent : le téléspectateur, un cas paradoxal pour l'économiste, Revue Française de Socio-Économie n° 4, no.22 (Nov 2009): 199–218.https://doi.org/10.3917/rfse.004.0199Arild Vatn An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal, Ecological Economics 68, no.8-98-9 (Jun 2009): 2207–2215.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.005Larry Lohmann Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost–benefit, Accounting, Organizations and Society 34, no.3-43-4 (Apr 2009): 499–534.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.03.002Yannick Ferreira De Sousa, Alistair Munro Truck, Barter and Exchange Versus the Endowment Effect: Virtual Field Experiments in an Online Game Environment, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1082797Edmundo Claro Exchange Relationships and the Environment: The Acceptability of Compensation in the Siting of Waste Disposal Facilities, Environmental Values 16, no.22 (May 2007): 187–208.https://doi.org/10.3197/096327107780474519Sang-Hoon Kim Evaluation of negative environmental impacts of electricity generation: Neoclassical and institutional approaches, Energy Policy 35, no.11 (Jan 2007): 413–423.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.12.002Arild Vatn Rationality, institutions and environmental policy, Ecological Economics 55, no.22 (Nov 2005): 203–217.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.001Lauren B. Edelman Rivers of Law and Contested Terrain: A Law and Society Approach to Economic Rationality, Law Society Review 38, no.22 (Jun 2004): 181–198.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.03802003.xIgnacio Palacios-Huerta, Tano J. Santos A theory of markets, institutions, and endogenous preferences, Journal of Public Economics 88, no.3-43-4 (Mar 2004): 601–627.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00162-7P. K. Rao Behavioural Economics, (Jan 2003): 128–140.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597686_7Maria Lee Tort, regulation and environmental liability, Legal Studies 22, no.11 (Jan 2018): 33–52.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2002.tb00578.xSabine U O’Hara, Sigrid Stagl Endogenous preferences and sustainable development, The Journal of Socio-Economics 31, no.55 (Jan 2002): 511–527.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(02)00134-8Kenneth Dau-Schmidt Preference Shaping by the Law, (Jan 2017): 1484–1488.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_284R.E. Goodin Adaptive Preferences: Philosophical Aspects, (Jan 2001): 72–77.https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01070-6Juan Camilo Cardenas, John Stranlund, Cleve Willis Local Environmental Control and Institutional Crowding-Out, World Development 28, no.1010 (Oct 2000): 1719–1733.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00055-3Felix Rauschmayer An Ethically Neutral Decision Aid, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1999).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.163548Peter Newman P, (Jan 1998): 1–198.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_1John G. Cullis, Philip R. Jones Towards a “New” outrageous public choice, The Journal of Socio-Economics 27, no.55 (Jan 1998): 623–640.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(99)80115-2Eric Talley Interdisciplinary Gap Filling: Game Theory and the Law, Law Social Inquiry 22, no.44 (Oct 1997): 1055–1085.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1997.tb01098.xNeil Duxbury Liberalism, Self-interest and Precommitment: Critical Notice: Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy by Stephen Holmes, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 9, no.22 (Jun 2015): 383–395.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900003507Cass R. Sunstein On costs, benefits, and regulatory success: Reply to Crandall, Critical Review 8, no.44 (Sep 1994): 623–633.https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819408443366Douglas A. Kysar, David A. Dana The Missing Market Instrument, (): 117–143.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511988554.009
Referência(s)