Artigo Revisado por pares

A CRITIQUE OF ANALGESIC TESTING METHODS

1948; Wiley; Volume: 51; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1749-6632.1948.tb27249.x

ISSN

1749-6632

Autores

Lloyd C. Miller,

Tópico(s)

Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics

Resumo

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVolume 51, Issue 1 p. 34-50 A CRITIQUE OF ANALGESIC TESTING METHODS LLOYD C. MILLER, LLOYD C. MILLER Sterling-Winthrop Research Institute, Rensselaer, N. Y. The assistance of Mr. Calvin Zippin in the calculations and in drawing the graphs is gratefully acknowledged.Search for more papers by this author LLOYD C. MILLER, LLOYD C. MILLER Sterling-Winthrop Research Institute, Rensselaer, N. Y. The assistance of Mr. Calvin Zippin in the calculations and in drawing the graphs is gratefully acknowledged.Search for more papers by this author First published: November 1948 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1948.tb27249.xCitations: 30 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1 GOETZL, F. R., D. Y. BURRILL, & A. C. Ivy. 1946. A critical analysis of algesimetric methods with suggestions for a useful procedure. Quart. Bull. Northw. Univ. Med. School 17: 280–291. Google Scholar 2 HAFFNER, F. 1929. Experimentelle Prilfung Schmerzstillender Mittel. Deutsch. med. Woch. 55: 731–733. 10.1055/s-0028-1126487 Web of Science®Google Scholar 3 SCHAUMANN, O. 1940. Über eine neue Klasse von Verbindungen mit spasmolytischer und zentral analgetischer Wirksamkeit unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des l-Methyl-4-phenyl-piperidin-4-carbonsäure-äthylesters (Dolantin). Arch. Exp. Path. & Pharmakol. 196: 109–136. 10.1007/BF01861099 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4 WOOLFE, G., & A. D. MACDONALD. 1944. The evaluation of the analgesic action of pethidine hydrochloride (Demerol). J. Pharm. 80: 300–307. CASGoogle Scholar 5 BLISS, C. I., & E. L. SEVRINGHAUS. 1947. A collaborative study of methods assaying analgesic drugs. Fed. Proc. 6: 310–311. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6 KOLL, W., & H. REFFERT. 1938. Eine neue Methode zur Messung analgetischer Wirkungen im Tierversuch—Versuche mit Morphin und einigen Morphinderivaten am Hund. Arch. Exp. Pharm. Pathol. 190: 687–711. 10.1007/BF01862050 CASGoogle Scholar 7 HARDY, J. D., H. G. WOLFF, & H. GOODELL. 1940. Studies on pain threshold: observations on spatial summation of pain. J. Clin. Invest. 19: 649–657. 10.1172/JCI101168 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8 WOLFF, H. G., J. D. HARDY, & H. GOODELL. 1940. Studies on pain. Measurement of the effect of morphine, codeine, and other opiates on the pain threshold and analysis of their relation to the pain experience. J. Clin. Invest. 29: 659–680. 10.1172/JCI101169 Google Scholar 9 HOLLAND, H. L., & E. G. GROSS. 1948. Two new analgesics. Fed. Proc. 7: 227–228. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 SCHUMACHER, G. A., H. GOODELL, J. D. HABDY, & H. G. WOLFF. 1940. Uniformity of the pain threshold in man. Smallcapitals>ience 92: 110–112. Google Scholar 11 DENTON, J. E., O. H. STRAUS, W. E. WADDELL, & H. K. BEECHER. 1948. A comparison of side actions and analgesic effects of morphine, amidone and its isomers in man. Fed. Proc. 7: 215. Web of Science®Google Scholar 12 THORP, R. H. 1946. The assessment of analgesic activity in new synthetic drugs. Brit. J. Pharm. 1: 113–126. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1946.tb00030.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 13 DODDS, E. C., W. LAWSON, S. A. SIMPSON, & P. C. WILLIAMS. 1945. Testing diphenylethylamine compounds for analgesic action. J. Physiol. 104: 47–51. 10.1113/jphysiol.1945.sp004105 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14 WINDER, C. V., C. C. PFEIFFER, & G. L. MAISON. 1946. The nociceptive contraction of the cutaneous muscle of the guinea pig as elicited by radiant heat, with observations on the mode of action of morphine. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. 72: 329–359. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 15 WINDER, C. V. 1947. Distribution of the resting pain-reaction thresholds in guinea-pigs, with a statistical concept of gradation of biological effect. Yale J. Biol. Med. 19: 289–310. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 16 WINDER, C. V. 1947. A preliminary test for analgetic action in guinea pigs. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. 74: 176–192. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 17 WINDER, C. V. 1947. Quantitative evaluation of analgetic action in guinea pigs. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. 74: 219–232. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 18 BONNYCASTLE, D. D., & J. MOLLAND. 1948. An examination of potentiating action of aspirin upon codeine in raising the pain threshold. Fed. Proc. 7: 206. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 19 MATHER, K. 1946. Statistical Analysis in Biology. Interscience Publishers, Inc. New York . Google Scholar 20 WOLFF, H. G. 1945. Cornell Conference on Therapy: Psychologic aspects of treatment of pain. NY. State J. Med. 45: 1003–1009. Web of Science®Google Scholar 21 D'AMOUB, F. E., & D. L. SMITH. 1941. A method for determining loss of pain sensation. J. Pharm. & Exp, Therap. 72: 74–79. Google Scholar 22 ERCOLI, N., & M. N. LEWIS. 1945. Studies on analgesics. I. Thetime-action curves of morphine, codeine, dilaudid and demerol by various methods of administration. II. Analgesic activity of acetyl salicylic acid and aminopyrine. J. Pharm. & Exp. Therap. 84: 301–317. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 23 DAVIES, O. L., J. RAVENTÓS, & A. E. WALPOLE, 1946. A method for the evaluation of analgesic activity using rats. Brit. J. Pharm. 1: 255–264. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1946.tb00045.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 24 FOSTER, R. H. K., & A. CARMAN. 1947. Studies in analgesia: Piperidine derivatives with morphine-like activity. J. Pharm. & Exp. Therap. 91: 195–209. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 25 LEWIS, J. R. Unpublished data. Google Scholar 26 WALD, A., & J. WOLFOWITZ. 1946. Tolerance limits for a normal distribution. Ann. Math. Stat. 17: 208–215. 10.1214/aoms/1177730981 Web of Science®Google Scholar 27 C. EISENHART, M. W. HASTAY, & W. A. WALLIS, Editors. 1947. Techniques of Statistical Analysis. McGraw-Hill. New York . Web of Science®Google Scholar 28 LITCIIFIELD, J. T., & F. WILCOXON. 1948. A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. Fed. Proc. 7: 240. Google Scholar 29 EDDY, N. B. Personal communication. Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume51, Issue1Newer Synthetic AnalgesicsNovember 1948Pages 34-50 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)