Editorial Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Hormone Replacement Therapy and Endothelial Function

2001; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 21; Issue: 12 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1161/atvb.21.12.1867

ISSN

1524-4636

Autores

Joseph A. Vita, John F. Keaney,

Tópico(s)

Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Resumo

HomeArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular BiologyVol. 21, No. 12Hormone Replacement Therapy and Endothelial Function Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBHormone Replacement Therapy and Endothelial FunctionThe Exception That Proves the Rule? Joseph A. Vita and John F. KeaneyJr Joseph A. VitaJoseph A. Vita From the Evans Department of Medicine and Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass. and John F. KeaneyJrJohn F. KeaneyJr From the Evans Department of Medicine and Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass. Originally published15 Mar 2018https://doi.org/10.1161/atvb.21.12.1867Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2001;21:1867–1869The endothelium plays a central role in the regulation of vascular homeostasis by releasing paracrine factors that influence vascular tone, thrombosis, and inflammation in the arterial wall.1 A principal endothelial product responsible for homeostasis is nitric oxide (NO), which is synthesized by the endothelial isoform of NO synthase2 in response to a number of stimuli, including increased shear stress that accompanies increased arterial flow.3 Atherosclerosis and its risk factors are characterized by an impairment of endothelial NO-dependent vasodilation,1 and the magnitude of this defect in the coronary circulation predicts cardiovascular disease events, raising the possibility of a pathogenic relationship.4,5See page 1955This notion of a causal relation between endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular events is also supported by intervention data. For example, lipid-lowering therapy, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, smoking cessation, and exercise all reverse endothelial dysfunction and have proven benefitial against cardiovascular disease events.1 This concordance between improved endothelial function and reduced cardiovascular events has prompted speculation that changes in endothelial function are partially responsible for the benefits.6–8 Thus, endothelial dysfunction could potentially be used as a surrogate marker for cardiovascular disease risk in study of risk reduction therapies.3Hormone replacement therapy has received considerable attention as a means for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. This interest was initially based on population-based studies linking a reduced incidence of cardiovascular disease to hormone replacement therapy.9–11 Estrogen has many potential benefits, including favorable influence on serum lipids and thrombotic factors, and there is substantial evidence that chronic estrogen treatment also improves endothelial function in postmenopausal women (Table). Despite these apparent benefits, a relatively large-scale randomized clinical trial of hormone replacement therapy (conjugated equine estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate) for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (HERS) failed to demonstrate a benefit from estrogen.24 Furthermore, in a separate study, neither the combination of estrogen and progesterone nor estrogen alone had any effect on angiographic extent of coronary artery disease.25 As a consequence of these findings, a consensus panel concluded that hormone replacement therapy has no role in either the primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, pending the results of ongoing clinical trials.11 These data highlight an apparent lack of concordance between the effects of estrogen treatment on endothelial function and clinical outcome, fueling speculation against the clinical relevance of endothelial function.26Table 1. Studies of Chronic Hormone Replacement Therapy and Endothelial Function in Postmenopausal WomenFirst AuthorNAge (years)Medical ConditionsRxEndpointEffectN indicates number of women receiving treatment; CVD, cardiovascular disease; FMD, brachial artery flow-mediated dilation; NO2/NO3, total nitrite and nitrate; meds, cardiac medications; HRT, hormone replacement therapy.Lieberman121355±7Healthy women with no CVD or risk factorsOral estrogenFMD+Herrington134PostmenopausalCoronary artery disease and anginaOral or topical estrogenIntracoronary acetylcholine+Rosselli1413>45Healthy womenTopical estrogenPlasma NO2/NO3+Topical estrogen+oral norethisteronePlasma NO2/NO3−McCrohon155558±3Healthy womenEstrogen aloneFMD+Estrogen+progesteroneFMD+Gerhard161760 (48–70)Healthy women with no CVD or risk factorsTopical estrogenFMD+Topical estrogen+vaginal progestinFMD+Sorensen174653±3Healthy women with no CVD or risk factorsOral estrogen+oral norethisteroneFMD−Bush181756±9No CVDEstrogen and estrogen/progesteroneFMD+Arora191153 (43–58)Healthy womenEstrogenSkin microvessel acetylcholine+Koh202857±6LDL cholesterol>130 mg/dLEstrogenFMD+Koh212055±8Healthy womenEstrogen+progesteroneFMD+Wakatsuki221453 (45–65)Healthy womenOral estrogenFMD+31Oral estrogen+oral medroxyprogesteroneFMD−Herrington2329170–80+Elderly womenHRT (76% unopposed oral estrogen)FMD−32Women with no risk factors, CVD, or medsFMD+Hulley24276367±7Coronary artery diseaseOral estrogen+medroxy-progesteroneCardiovascular events−In this issue of Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, Herrington and colleagues23 report the effect of hormone replacement therapy on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in 1662 women participating in the Cardiovascular Health Study, a longitudinal study of cardiovascular risk factors in the elderly. The authors used vascular ultrasound to measure flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery, a response that has been shown to be NO-dependent27 and to correlate with responses in the coronary circulation.28 As with the coronary circulation, endothelial dysfunction in the brachial artery improves with many risk reduction therapies,1,3 and a preliminary study suggests that brachial artery endothelial dysfunction is an independent predictor of short-term cardiovascular disease events in high risk patients.29Overall, Herrington and colleagues23 found no significant difference in endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the 291 women with current or previous hormone replacement therapy (largely unopposed estrogen) compared with the women who had never received replacement therapy. When the subjects' data were stratified according to current versus previous therapy, or to unopposed estrogen versus estrogen-progesterone combination therapy, the results were unchanged. Interestingly, when the patients were stratified according to age, the presence of cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular medication use, and risk factors, there was a benefit of hormone replacement therapy that was restricted to younger, lower-risk women. The authors concluded that the beneficial effects of estrogen might be limited to women without established cardiovascular disease. The strengths of the study include the large, well-characterized patient cohort, the careful and well-validated methodology for assessment of brachial vasodilation, and the rigorous statistical approach.How do these findings relate to the HERS results? The women in the study by Herrington et al23 were substantially older than women in other studies of hormone replacement therapy and endothelial function. In contrast to all previous studies except one that involved only 4 subjects, this study is the only one that included patients with known cardiovascular disease (Table). Thus, the subjects were much more comparable to the HERS patient population, and the results are parallel. When women without cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular disease risks were considered, the results from Herrington and colleagues23 are similar to previous studies of chronic unopposed estrogen and endothelial function. It remains unclear why older women with established cardiovascular disease would have a reduced response to estrogen treatment, but as pointed out by the authors, there currently is evidence for reduced expression of the estrogen receptor in women with advancing age30 and with cardiovascular disease.31 Although the current study showed no effect of progesterone therapy on endothelial function, many of the previous studies suggest that inclusion of medroxyprogesterone reduces or eliminates the benefits of estrogen, and these findings also are concordant with HERS.The study by Herrington and colleagues23 has several limitations. First, it was observational in nature and not a randomized trial. Thus, the hormone combination and duration of treatment varied, and many women were no longer receiving therapy at the time of the ultrasound study. Second, given the overall negative result, the subgroup analysis showing a benefit in younger, healthier subjects must be considered exploratory in nature. Third, the small number of subjects in certain subgroups limits the findings. For example, only 32 women had no cardiovascular disease, risk factors, or cardiovascular medication use, and a relatively small number of patients were receiving estrogen and progesterone in combination. Fourth, the study did not include an examination of nitroglycerin-mediated dilation, so the apparent effect of hormone replacement therapy in low-risk subjects must be interpreted as an effect on vascular function, rather than on endothelial function. Finally, the degree of brachial artery dilation was rather low compared with previous studies. As the authors acknowledge, this discrepancy is likely related to the older subject age, the lower arm cuff position, and the use of a 4-minute, rather than 5-minute period of cuff occlusion to induce hyperemia. Despite these limitations, this study represents a relatively large-scale and careful study of the effects of hormone replacement therapy on endothelial function in older, higher risk women.Thus, when a more comparable population is studied, the effects of hormone replacement therapy on endothelial function do seem to parallel the HERS results, supporting the utility of endothelial function as a surrogate endpoint. The available endothelial function studies would predict a beneficial effect of unopposed estrogen for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in healthy women that are closer to menopause. This question will be addressed in ongoing clinical trials, including the Women's Health Initiative. If it turns out that unopposed estrogen has benefit, any clinical recommendations will have to be considered carefully, because of the potential for pro-carcinogenic effects of unopposed estrogen. It remains quite conceivable that these and other adverse effects will outweigh any beneficial effects on the vasculature. Use of newer selective estrogen receptor modulations (SERMs) may be another way to take advantage of the benefits of estrogen without inducing its adverse effects. These agents have already been shown to have beneficial effects on endothelial function,32 and thus would be predicted to have benefit against cardiovascular disease.Drs. Vita and Keaney are supported by NIH grants HL55993, HL60886, HL 52936, and DK55656. Dr. Keaney is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association.FootnotesAddress correspondence to Joseph A. Vita, MD, Section of Cardiology, Boston Medical Center, 88 East Newton St C-818, Boston, MA 02118. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Gokce N, Keaney JFJ, Vita JA. Endotheliopathies: clinical manifestations of endothelial dysfunction.In: Loscalzo J, Shafer AI, eds. Thrombosis and Hemorrhage. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1998:901–924.Google Scholar2 Ignarro LJ, Buga GM, Wood KS, Byrns RE, Chaudhuri G. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor produced and released from artery and vein is nitric oxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987; 84: 9265–9269.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Corretti M, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, Celermajer DS, Charbonneau F, Creager M, Daley WL, Deanfield JE, Drexler H, Gerhard M, Herrington DM, Vallance P, Vita JA, Vogel RA. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol. In press.Google Scholar4 Schächinger V, Britten MB, Zeiher AM. Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator dysfunction on adverse long- term outcome of coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1899–1906.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Suwaidi JA, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR, Lerman A. Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2000; 101: 948–954.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Levine GN, Keaney JFJ, Vita JA. Cholesterol reduction in cardiovascular disease: clinical benefits and possible mechanisms. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332: 512–521.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7 Vita JA, Keaney JF Jr. Exercise: toning up the endothelium? N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 503–505.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Vogel RA, Corretti MC. Estrogens, progestins, and heart disease: can endothelial function divine the benefit? Circulation. 1998; 97: 1223–1226.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Barrett-Connor E, Bush TL. Estrogen and coronary heart disease in women. JAMA. 1991; 265: 1861–1867.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. The protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 1801–1811.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11 Mosca L, Collins P, Herrington DM, Mendelsohn ME, Pasternak RC, Robertson RM, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Smith SC Jr, Taubert KA, Wenger NK. Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001; 104: 499–503.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Uehata A, Walsh BW, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Yeung AC, Creager MA. Estrogen improves endothelium-dependent, flow mediated vasodilation in post menopausal women. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121: 936–941.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Herrington DM, Braden GA, Williams JK, Morgan TM. Endothelial dependent coronary vasomotor responsiveness in postmenopausal women with and without estrogen replacement therapy. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 73: 951–952.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 Rosselli M, Imthurn B, Keller PJ, Jackson EK, Dubey RK. Circulating nitric oxide (nitrite/nitrate) levels in postmenopausal women substituted with 17 beta-estradiol and norethisterone acetate: a two-year follow-up study. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 848–853.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15 McCrohon JA, Adams MR, McCredie RJ, Robinson J, Pike A, Abbey M, Keech AC, Celermajer DS. Hormone replacement therapy is associated with improved arterial physiology in healthy post-menopausal women. Clin Endocrinol. 1996; 45: 435–441.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16 Gerhard M, Walsh MW, Tawakol A, Haley EA, Creager SJ. Estradiol therapy combined with progesterone and endothelium-dependent vasodilation in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1998; 98: 1158–1163.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17 Sorenson KE, Dorup I, Hermann AP, Mosekilde L. Combined hormone replacement therapy does not protect women against the age-related decline in endothelium-dependent vasomotor function. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1234–1238.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 Bush DE, Jones CE, Bass KM, Walters GK, Bruza JM, Ouyang P. Estrogen replacement reverses endothelial dysfunction in postmenopausal women. Am J Med. 1998; 104: 552–558.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19 Arora S, Veves A, Caballaro AE, Smakowski P, LoGerfo FW. Estrogen improves endothelial function. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27: 1141–1146.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20 Koh KK, Cardillo C, Bui MN, Hathaway L, Csako G, Waclawiw MA, Panza JA, Cannon RO,III. Vascular effects of estrogen and cholesterol-lowering therapies in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1999; 99: 354–360.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21 Koh KK, Jin DK, Yang SH, Lee SK, Hwang HY, Kang MH, Kim W, Kim DS, Choi IS, Shin EK. Vascular effects of synthetic or natural progestagen combined with conjugated equine estrogen in healthy postmenopausal women. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1961–1966.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar22 Wakatsuki A, Okatani Y, Ikenoue N, Fukaya T. Effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in postmenopausal women receiving estrogen. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1773–1778.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar23 Herrington DM, Espeland MA, Crouse JR III, Robertson J, Riley WA, McBurnie MA, Burke GL. Estrogen replacement and brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation in older women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 1955–1961CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar24 Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B, Vittinghoff E. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women: Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 1998; 280: 605–613.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar25 Herrington DM, Reboussin DM, Brosnihan KB, Sharp PC, Shumaker SA, Snyder TE, Furberg CD, Kowalchuk GJ, Stuckey TD, Rogers WJ, Givens DH, Waters D. Effects of estrogen replacement on the progression of coronary-artery atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 522–529.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar26 Cannon RO. Cardiovascular benefit of cholesterol-lowering therapy: does improved endothelial vasodilator function matter? Circulation. 2000; 102: 820–822.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar27 Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Uehata A, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Yeung AC, Creager MA. Flow-induced vasodilation of the human brachial artery is impaired in patients <40 years of age with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 1210–1214.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar28 Anderson TJ, Uehata A, Gerhard MD, Meredith IT, Knab S, Delagrange D, Leiberman E, Ganz P, Creager MA, Yeung AC, Selwyn AP. Close relation of endothelial function in the human coronary and peripheral circulations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 1235–1241.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar29 Gokce N, Keaney JF Jr, Menzoian JO, Watkins M, Hunter L, Duffy SJ, Vita JA. Impaired brachial artery endothelial function predicts perioperative cardiovascular events in patients undergoing vascular surgery. Circulation. 2001; 104 (suppl II): II-328.Abstract 1582.Google Scholar30 Post WS, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ, Wilhide CC, Heldman AW, Sussman MS, Ouyang P, Milliken EE, Issa JP. Methylation of the estrogen receptor gene is associated with aging and atherosclerosis in the cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 43: 985–991.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar31 Losordo DW, Kearney M, Kim EA, Jekanowski J, Isner JM. Variable expression of the estrogen receptor in normal and atherosclerotic coronary arteries of premenopausal women. Circulation. 1994; 89: 1501–1510.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar32 Saitta A, Altavilla D, Cucinotta D, Morabito N, Frisina N, Corrado F, D'Anna R, Lasco A, Squadrito G, Gaudio A, Cancellieri F, Arcoraci V, Squadrito F. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on effects of raloxifene and hormone replacement therapy on plasma NO concentrations, endothelin-1 levels, and endothelium-dependent vasodilation in postmenopausal women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 1512–1519.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Dillon G, Stanhewicz A, Serviente C, Greaney J and Alexander L (2021) Hydrogen sulfide-dependent microvascular vasodilation is improved following chronic sulfhydryl-donating antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in adults with hypertension, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 10.1152/ajpheart.00404.2021, 321:4, (H728-H734), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2021. Bardhi E, Blockeel C, Cools W, Santos-Ribeiro S, Racca A, Mackens S, De Vos M, Polyzos N, Popovic-Todorovic B, De Brucker M, Muzii L, Panici P, Tournaye H and Drakopoulos P (2020) Is ovarian response associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles?, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.03.010, 41:2, (263-270), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2020. Vautrin E, Marlière S, Bouvaist H, Guerbaai R and Barone-Rochette G (2016) Coronaropathie de la femme : rôle des hormones sexuelles, Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie, 10.1016/j.ancard.2016.10.007, 65:6, (404-410), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016. Sunkara S, La Marca A, Seed P and Khalaf Y (2015) Increased risk of preterm birth and low birthweight with very high number of oocytes following IVF: an analysis of 65 868 singleton live birth outcomes, Human Reproduction, 10.1093/humrep/dev076, 30:6, (1473-1480), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2015. Kling J, Lahr B, Bailey K, Harman S, Miller V and Mulvagh S (2015) Endothelial function in women of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study, Climacteric, 10.3109/13697137.2014.986719, 18:2, (187-197), Online publication date: 4-Mar-2015. Liu Z, Gou Y, Zhang H, Zuo H, Zhang H, Liu Z and Yao D (2014) Estradiol improves cardiovascular function through up-regulation of SOD2 on vascular wall, Redox Biology, 10.1016/j.redox.2014.11.001, 3, (88-99), . Akman L, Duygu H, Akercan F, Ulukus M, Ozerkan F and Akin M (2013) The effects of different hormone treatment on endothelial function in healthy postmenopausal women, Gynecological Endocrinology, 10.3109/09513590.2013.813471, 29:9, (867-872), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013. Palmiero P, Maiello M, Daly D, Ciccone M and Nanda N (2012) Aortic Stiffness Assessed by Global Pulse Wave Velocity in Postmenopausal Women: An Ultrasonographic Study, Echocardiography, 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2012.01786.x, 29:10, (1233-1238), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2012. Arnal J, Lenfant F and Gourdy P (2012) Traitement hormonal de la ménopause, facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire et complications athéromateuses : où en est-on en 2012 ?, Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux - Pratique, 10.1016/S1261-694X(12)70424-8, 2012:212, (9-14), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2012. Bellien J, Joannides R, Richard V and Thuillez C (2011) Modulation of cytochrome-derived epoxyeicosatrienoic acids pathway: A promising pharmacological approach to prevent endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases?, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.03.015, 131:1, (1-17), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011. Rubinow D and Girdler S (2011) Hormones, heart disease, and health: individualized medicine versus throwing the baby out with the bathwater, Depression and Anxiety, 10.1002/da.20833, 28:6, (E1-E15), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011. Rubinow D and Girdler S (2011) Hormones, heart disease, and health: individualized medicine versus throwing the baby out with the bathwater, Depression and Anxiety, 10.1002/da.20810, 28:4, (282-296), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2011. Lenfant F, Trémollières F, Gourdy P and Arnal J (2011) Timing of the vascular actions of estrogens in experimental and human studies: Why protective early, and not when delayed?, Maturitas, 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.11.016, 68:2, (165-173), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2011. Gelbaya T, Vitthala S, Nardo L and Seif M (2010) Optimizing hormone therapy for future reproductive performance in women with premature ovarian failure, Gynecological Endocrinology, 10.3109/09513590.2010.501875, 27:1, (1-7), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011. Arnal J, Fontaine C, Billon-Galés A, Favre J, Laurell H, Lenfant F and Gourdy P (2010) Estrogen Receptors and Endothelium, Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 30:8, (1506-1512), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2010.Billon-Galés A, Fontaine C, Douin-Echinard V, Delpy L, Berges H, Calippe B, Lenfant F, Laurell H, Guéry J, Gourdy P and Arnal J (2009) Endothelial Estrogen Receptor-α Plays a Crucial Role in the Atheroprotective Action of 17β-Estradiol in Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor–Deficient Mice, Circulation, 120:25, (2567-2576), Online publication date: 22-Dec-2009. Yildiz A, Cakar M, Baskurt M, Okcun B, Guzelsoy D and Coskun U (2007) The effects of atorvastatin therapy on endothelıal function in patients with coronary artery disease, Cardiovascular Ultrasound, 10.1186/1476-7120-5-51, 5:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007. Duck M and Hoffman R (2007) Impaired Endothelial Function in Healthy African-American Adolescents Compared with Caucasians, The Journal of Pediatrics, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.12.034, 150:4, (400-406), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2007. Méthot J, Hamelin B, Arsenault M, Bogaty P, Plante S and Poirier P (2006) The ACE-DD genotype is associated with endothelial dysfunction in postmenopausal women, Menopause, 10.1097/01.gme.0000243576.09065.93, 13:6, (959-966), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2006. Elesber A, Bonetti P and Lerman A (2006) Endothelial function and cerebrovascular disease: Implications for diagnosis and treatment, Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10.1007/s11936-006-0014-x, 8:3, (213-219), Online publication date: 1-May-2006. Kalantaridou S, Naka K, Bechlioulis A, Makrigiannakis A, Michalis L and Chrousos G (2006) Premature ovarian failure, endothelial dysfunction and estrogen–progestogen replacement, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 10.1016/j.tem.2006.02.003, 17:3, (101-109), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2006. Dupuis J, Tardif J, Rouleau J, Ricci J, Arnold M, Lonn E, Roux R, Title L, Amyot R, Bonafede N, Woo A and Cannon C (2005) Intensity of Lipid Lowering With Statins and Brachial Artery Vascular Endothelium Reactivity After Acute Coronary Syndromes (from the BRAVER Trial), The American Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.057, 96:9, (1207-1213), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2005. Wenger N (2004) Menopausal Hormone Therapy Coronary Disease in Women, 10.1007/978-1-59259-645-4_21, (321-348), . Bots M, Evans G, Riley W, Meijer R, McBride K, Paskett E, Helmond F, Grobbee D and for the OPAL Investigators (2003) The Osteoporosis Prevention and Arterial effects of tiboLone (OPAL) study: design and baseline characteristics, Controlled Clinical Trials, 10.1016/S0197-2456(03)00096-5, 24:6, (752-775), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003. Stehouwer C and Schalkwijk C (2003) Endothelial Function and Dysfunction International Textbook of Diabetes Mellitus, 10.1002/0470862092.d1010 Widlansky M, Gokce N, Keaney J and Vita J (2003) The clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00994-X, 42:7, (1149-1160), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2003. KIRWAN L, MERTENS D, KAVANAGH T, THOMAS S and GOODMAN J (2003) Exercise Training in Women with Heart Disease: Influence of Hormone Replacement Therapy, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048670.61339.68, 35:2, (185-192), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2003. Bonetti P, Lerman L and Lerman A (2002) Endothelial Dysfunction, Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 23:2, (168-175), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2003. Bell D, Gochenaur K and Hecht J (2002) O 2 − -mediated impairment of coronary arterial relaxation is prevented by overnight treatment with 1 nM β-estradiol, Journal of Applied Physiology, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00615.2002, 93:6, (1952-1958), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2002. Lebrun C, van der Schouw Y, Bak A, de Jong F, Pols H, Grobbee D, Lamberts S and Bots M (2002) Arterial stiffness in postmenopausal women, Journal of Hypertension, 10.1097/00004872-200211000-00015, 20:11, (2165-2172), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2002. December 2001Vol 21, Issue 12 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/atvb.21.12.1867PMID: 11742856 Originally publishedMarch 15, 2018 PDF download Advertisement

Referência(s)