Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Human Orc2 localizes to centrosomes, centromeres and heterochromatin during chromosome inheritance

2004; Springer Nature; Volume: 23; Issue: 13 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1038/sj.emboj.7600255

ISSN

1460-2075

Autores

Supriya G. Prasanth, Kannanganattu V. Prasanth, Khalid Siddiqui, David L. Spector, Bruce Stillman,

Tópico(s)

Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Resumo

Article24 June 2004free access Human Orc2 localizes to centrosomes, centromeres and heterochromatin during chromosome inheritance Supriya G Prasanth Supriya G Prasanth Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author Kannanganattu V Prasanth Kannanganattu V Prasanth Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author Khalid Siddiqui Khalid Siddiqui Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author David L Spector David L Spector Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author Bruce Stillman Corresponding Author Bruce Stillman Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author Supriya G Prasanth Supriya G Prasanth Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author Kannanganattu V Prasanth Kannanganattu V Prasanth Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author Khalid Siddiqui Khalid Siddiqui Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author David L Spector David L Spector Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author Bruce Stillman Corresponding Author Bruce Stillman Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author Author Information Supriya G Prasanth1, Kannanganattu V Prasanth1, Khalid Siddiqui1, David L Spector1 and Bruce Stillman 1 1Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA *Corresponding author. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA. Tel.: +1 516 367 8383; Fax: +1 516 367 8879; E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2004)23:2651-2663https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600255 Correction(s) for this article Human Orc2 localizes to centrosomes, centromeres and heterochromatin during chromosome inheritance17 February 2005 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info The initiation of DNA replication in S phase requires the prior assembly of an origin recognition complex (ORC)-dependent pre-replicative complex on chromatin during G1 phase of the cell division cycle. In human cells, the Orc2 subunit localized to the nucleus as expected, but it also localized to centrosomes throughout the entire cell cycle. Furthermore, Orc2 was tightly bound to heterochromatin and heterochromatin protein 1α (HP1α) and HP1β in G1 and early S phase, but during late S, G2 and M phases tight chromatin association was restricted to centromeres. Depletion of Orc2 by siRNA caused multiple phenotypes. A population of cells showed an S-phase defect with little proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) on chromatin, although MCM proteins remained. Orc2 depletion also disrupted HP1 localization, but not histone-H3-lysine-9 methylation at prominent heterochromatic foci. Another subset of Orc2-depleted cells containing replicated DNA arrested with abnormally condensed chromosomes, failed chromosome congression and multiple centrosomes. These results implicate Orc2 protein in chromosome duplication, chromosome structure and centrosome copy number control, suggesting that it coordinates all stages of the chromosome inheritance cycle. Introduction The inheritance of eukaryotic genomes requires that DNA replication, chromosome segregation and cell division are coordinated. The origin recognition complex (ORC) serves as a landing pad for the ordered assembly of Cdc6, Cdt1 and the MCM proteins to form a pre-replication complex (pre-RC) at each origin of DNA replication prior to S phase (Kelly and Brown, 2000; Bell and Dutta, 2002; DePamphilis, 2003; Méndez and Stillman, 2003). First described in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Bell and Stillman, 1992), ORC contains six conserved subunits Orc1–6 and is essential for the initiation of DNA replication in diverse organisms (Bell and Dutta, 2002). In addition to its role in establishing pre-RCs on chromosomes prior to DNA replication, ORC is involved in other chromosome-associated processes. ORC associates with genetic elements called cis-acting silencers that form repressed chromatin at certain loci in S. cerevisiae (Bell et al, 1993; Kelly et al, 1994; Loo et al, 1995) and is associated with heterochromatin in Drosophila (Huang et al, 1998; Loupart et al, 2000; Gerbi and Bielinsky, 2002). In Drosophila and Xenopus, ORC interacts with heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) (Pak et al, 1997). The Orc6 subunit of ORC binds to the outer kinetochore only during mitosis and localizes to the mid-plane of cell division in anaphase where it is required for cytokinesis via interaction with a septin protein (Prasanth et al, 2002; Chesnokov et al, 2003). Although ORC is bound to chromatin at origins of replication throughout the cell cycle in yeast (Diffley et al, 1994; Aparicio et al, 1997; Weinreich et al, 1999), ORC is highly dynamic in mammalian cells (DePamphilis, 2003). In human cells, the largest subunit of ORC (Orc1) dissociated from chromatin during the G1- to S-phase transition and reloaded at the M–G1 transition when new pre-RCs were formed (Kreitz et al, 2001; Méndez et al, 2002; Tatsumi et al, 2003). The Orc2–5 subunits form a stable core and the Orc1 and Orc6 are loosely bound to the complex (Dhar et al, 2001a; Vashee et al, 2001). The dynamics of human Orc2, an integral component of the core of ORC was examined. Orc2 was detected in the nucleus of interphase cells, but surprisingly a subset of Orc2 localized to centrosomes throughout the cell division cycle. In addition, Orc2 bound in a cell cycle-regulated manner to heterochromatin and HP1 proteins, initially localizing to heterochromatic foci, but only on centric heterochromatin during mitosis. Depleting Orc2 from human cells produced two cell cycle-arrested phenotypes. In some cells cell cycle progression was prevented and HP1 localization was disrupted, whereas other cells arrested in an aberrant mitotic-like state with replicated DNA. The latter cells had abnormal chromosome structure and congression as well as abnormal centrosome copy number. We propose that Orc2 participates in multiple aspects of the chromosome inheritance cycle, possibly coordinating DNA replication with chromosome segregation. Results Orc2 localizes to centrosomes The localization of Orc2 throughout the cell division cycle was studied by immunofluorescence (IF) using polyclonal (pAb) and monoclonal (mAb) antibodies, both of which gave similar results. IF in HeLa cells using the anti-Orc2 mAb showed a nuclear, punctate labeling pattern during interphase (Figure 1Aa). A subset of Orc2 localized to a cytoplasmic dot (Figure 1Aa; see arrowhead) reminiscent of centrosome labeling. During metaphase and subsequent stages of mitosis, a fraction of Orc2 decorated the astral poles in addition to a diffuse labeling pattern that mostly excluded chromatin (Figure 1Ab–d). Orc2 redistributed to the daughter nuclei during telophase (Figure 1Ae). Double labeling with an anti-Orc2 pAb and an antibody against the centrosome protein γ-tubulin showed colocalization at centrosomes throughout the cell cycle, in addition to the punctate nuclear localization during interphase (Figure 1B). Peptide-blocking experiments demonstrated that the two Orc2 antibodies recognized different epitopes, confirming the specificity of Orc2 staining (Supplementary Figure S1). Figure 1.Orc2 localizes to the centrosomes. (A) Cell cycle distribution of Orc2. Cells were fixed with 1.0% paraformaldehyde and immunolabeling was carried out as described in Materials and methods. Indirect IF localization (red) of Orc2 proteins in HeLa cells during interphase (a), metaphase (b), early anaphase (c), late anaphase (d) and telophase (e). The arrow in (a) denotes the 'dot' seen as the centrosome association during interphase. Chromatin was stained with 4′, 6-diaminidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; a′–e′) in blue. Scale bar denotes 5 μm (a, a′) and 10 μm (b–e′). (B) Centrosome localization of Orc2. Dual-color indirect IF analysis using anti-Orc2 (red; a–d) together with γ-tubulin (green; a′–d′). Chromatin was stained with DAPI (blue; a‴–d‴). Merges highlight the areas of colocalization (yellow; a″–d″). The centrosome association of Orc2 was present during interphase, as single dot during G1 (A, a), as a doublet during S and G2 (B, a–a‴) and during subsequent mitotic stages, prometaphase (b–b‴), metaphase (c–c‴) and anaphase (d–d‴). Scale bar, 5 μm. Download figure Download PowerPoint Cell cycle-dependent binding of Orc2 to heterochromatin Following pre-extraction with detergent to remove the soluble fraction of Orc2, Orc2 in the nucleus localized in two different patterns. Small, punctate spots throughout the nucleus (Figures 2Aa and Ca, b) disappeared as cells progressed through S phase (Figure 2Cc, d). The remaining Orc2 colocalized with the pronounced, HP1α-containing heterochromatic foci that were prominent in human MCF7 breast epithelial cells (Figure 2Aa–a′′). Paraformaldehyde (PF) fixation without detergent pre-extraction also revealed the presence of Orc2 at the heterochromatin foci, although partially masked by the soluble pool (Supplementary Figure S2Aa–a′). The association of Orc2 with heterochromatic foci was also observed in HeLa cells (Supplementary Figure S2Ba–a). Epitope-tagged versions of Orc2, including YFP-Orc2 and T7-Orc2, showed heterochromatin association, corroborating the IF studies (Supplementary Figure S3). Immunoprecipitation of Orc2 showed association with HP1α and HP1β, but not with HP1γ (Figure 2B). Furthermore, Orc2 IF in MCF7 cells revealed cell cycle-dependent binding of Orc2 to the heterochromatin as cells progressed through S phase, as monitored by the pattern of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) labeling after detergent pre-extraction (Figure 2C). Orc2 localized with heterochromatic foci during G1 phase and early S phase (Figure 2Ca–a′′), but localized to fewer punctate spots in mid-S (Figure 2Cb–b′′, c–c′′) and even fewer in late S (Figure 2Cd–d′′; data not shown). The punctate pattern of Orc2 also decreased during S phase (compare Figure 2Ca–d). The late S-phase pattern was shown to be centric heterochromatin by dual-color immunolocalization of Orc2 with the auto-antibody (AnaC) that recognized centromere proteins (Figure 2Da–a′′). Similar centromeric association of Orc2 was also obtained in other human cell lines (MCF10A, IMR90, RKO, 293, HCT and HS68). Heterochromatin association of Orc2 was also observed in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (Figure 2Ea–a′). Orc2 localization at centromeres was confirmed by labeling metaphase chromosome spreads of human and mouse cells (Figure 2F). Figure 2.Heterochromatin association of Orc2. (A) IF following pre-extraction procedure was carried out to study colocalization of Orc2 (a) and HP1α (a′) in MCF7 cell line. Merge (a″) represents the areas of colocalization. The arrow in (a) and (a″) denotes the centrosome association of Orc2. (B) Orc2 immunoprecipitates HP1α and HP1β. Immunoprecipitation (IP; Nielsen et al, 1999) using Orc2 mAb and immunoblot with Orc2 pAb, HP1α, HP1β and HP1γ. Lane 1 represents input, lane 2 is 12CA5 mAb IP (mouse IgG negative control) and lane 3 is Orc2 IP. Note the light chain of IgG in HP1α, HP1β and HP1γ immunoblots ('*' lanes 2 and 3). (C) Differential binding of Orc2 to heterochromatin. Dual-color immunolocalization studies in MCF7 cells of Orc2 (red; a–d) and PCNA (green; a′–d′) did not reveal significant colocalization (merges; a″–d″). (a–a′′) Early S, (b–b″, c–c″) mid-S and (d–d″) late S. (D) Orc2 decorates centromeres. Orc2 (a) and centromere marker AnaC (a′) show significant colocalization (a″) in MCF10A cells. DAPI (a‴) staining shows a typical late G2 cell. (E) Mouse Orc2 localizes to heterochromatin. Immunolocalization using Orc2 mAb in MEFS (a) shows Orc2 in DAPI dense pericentric heterochromatin blobs (a′). (F) Orc2 at centromeres is evolutionarily conserved. Orc2 (green) labeling in metaphase chromosome spreads from IMR-90 (a) and MEFs (b). (a′) and (b′) are higher magnification of individual chromosome from (a) and (b), respectively. Scale bars in (A), (C), (D) and (E) represent 5 μM. Download figure Download PowerPoint Orc2 depletion has two arrest points: a DNA replication defect and an aberrant mitotic arrest RNA interference (RNAi) was used to determine the consequences of loss of Orc2 in human cells (Elbashir et al, 2001). Transfection of HeLa cells with two independent, duplex, small interfering RNAs (siRNA) caused significant loss of Orc2 by 72 h post siRNA (Figure 3A and Supplementary Figure S4). Orc2 mRNA was eliminated (data not shown). Interestingly, in Orc2 siRNA-treated cells, the level of Orc3 decreased concomitant with the reduction in Orc2 levels (Figure 3A). A similar dependency of Orc2 stability on Orc3 levels was observed following Orc3 siRNA (Supplementary Figure S5); however, the levels of other ORC subunits were unaltered in Orc2-depleted cells (see Orc1 and Orc6 in Figure 4B; Orc4 and Orc5, data not shown). Figure 3.Orc2 depletion has dual execution points. (A) Immunoblot of whole-cell extract from cells transfected with Orc2 siRNA duplex or control luciferase siRNA and harvested at different time points. Cells were transfected at 0, 24 and 48 h at about 20% starting confluence. Efficacy of RNAi was assessed by immunoblotting to detect Orc2. α-Tubulin levels were used as loading controls. Orc3 levels were also modulated and, with the reappearance of Orc2 in the cells at 144 h, the levels of Orc3 also increased. (B) Orc2 depletion at 72 h post siRNA shows morphologically two distinct populations of cells: the flat adherent cells and the rounded mitotic cells. (C) DNA content of control and Orc2 siRNA-treated cells at 48 h was determined by flow cytometry. Note a broader S phase and an increase in G2/M in Orc2 siRNA-treated cells. (D) Two-dimensional FACS to assess BrdU incorporation (10 min pulse) and DNA content by propidium iodide (PI) was assessed by flow cytometry in control and Orc2-depleted cells at 72 h. Note an increase in G2/M and accumulation of cells in S phase without incorporation of BrdU (see arrow) in Orc2-depleted cells. (E) Histogram showing the percentage of cells incorporating BrdU during a 24 h label at different time points after transfection, with Orc2 (gray bars) or luciferase control (white bars) siRNA duplexes. BrdU incorporation was allowed for 24 h to ensure that all cells had a chance to pass through at least one S phase. Download figure Download PowerPoint Figure 4.Orc2 depletion affects S-phase progression. (A) Immunolabeling of cells at 72 h after transfection with control or Orc2 siRNA duplexes (a, b); BrdU incorporation during a 24 h pulse (a′, b′); Nomarski images (a″, b″). Scale bar, 10 μM. (B) Luciferase (control) and Orc2 siRNA duplex-treated cells were subjected to biochemical fractionation (Méndez and Stillman, 2000). The relative abundance of different replication proteins was tested by immunoblotting. S2, soluble cytosolic fraction; S3, soluble nuclear fraction; P3, chromatin-enriched fraction. Antibodies against Orc2, Orc1, Orc3, Orc6, Cdc6, MCM2, MCM3, MCM4, MCM7 and PCNA were used. Cytosolic kinase MEK2 was used as a control. Note that Orc3 and PCNA loading was affected in Orc2-depleted cells. (C) Chromatin association of PCNA was assessed by IF in control (a–a′) and Orc2-depleted cells (b–b′). DNA was stained with DAPI (a′, b′). Scale bar, 10 μM. (D) Chromatin-bound MCM3 was analyzed by a detergent pre-extraction procedure in control (a) and Orc2-depleted cells (b) by dual-color IF for MCM (red; a–b) and PCNA (green; a′–b′). The arrow in (a) denotes an MCM-positive, PCNA-negative G1 cell (Prasanth et al, 2004). Total number of cells positive for MCM2 and MCM3 in Orc2-depleted cells was 77 and 76%, respectively, whereas the same for the control was 62 and 60%. In control cells, the MCM2+/PCNA+ was 24%, MCM2+/PCNA− 38%, MCM2−/PCNA+ 2% and MCM2−/PCNA− 36%. Similar results were obtained for MCM3 in control cells. In contrast, for Orc2 siRNA-treated cells, MCM2+/PCNA+ was 15%, MCM2+/PCNA− 62% and MCM2−/PCNA− 23%. Scale bar, 10 μm. RNAi-treated cells were assessed at 72 h. Download figure Download PowerPoint Following Orc2 depletion, two morphologically distinct populations consisting of flat and round cells were observed (Figure 3B). Flow cytometry showed an increase in cells in S-phase and with a replicated, 4C DNA content compared to the normal DNA content in cells transfected with control siRNA (Figure 3C). Dual-color flow cytometry analyzing bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation versus DNA content showed that Orc2 depletion prevented cells from progressing through S phase and accumulated cells with a 4C DNA content (Figure 3D). The unusual presence of cells with an S-phase DNA content but not incorporating BrdU (see arrow) suggested that loss of Orc2 could block DNA replication. The loss of BrdU incorporation in a 24-h pulse label paralleled the loss of Orc2 protein (Figure 3E). Since there were two morphologically distinct cell phenotypes in the Orc2-depleted population, they were characterized separately. The flat cells that remained attached to the dish were first characterized. Silencing Orc2 expression affects S-phase progression The flat cells were pulse-labeled with BrdU for 24 h from 72 to 96 h following three rounds of transfection of siRNA and dual immunolabeling of Orc2 and BrdU was examined. Following Orc2 siRNA, the majority of cells lacking Orc2 did not incorporate BrdU (compare control siRNA in Figure 4Aa–a′′ with Orc2 siRNA in Figure 4Ab–b′′). Even the cells that incorporated BrdU showed differential signal intensity as compared to control. The chromatin association of DNA replication proteins in Orc2-depleted cells was determined (Figure 4B). The majority of the Orc2 protein was bound to chromatin in control cells, whereas Orc2 siRNA-treated cells had significantly reduced levels of chromatin-associated Orc2 and Orc3, but not Orc1 or Orc6 (Figure 4B). Surprisingly, no dramatic difference was found in the chromatin association of the pre-RC proteins Cdc6 and MCM (MCM2, MCM3, MCM4 and MCM7), but chromatin loading of PCNA was reduced (Figure 4B). To confirm the observations made by biochemical fractionation, IF following detergent pre-extraction of non-chromatin-bound proteins was performed. Compared to control siRNA, PCNA association with chromatin was severely compromised in Orc2 siRNA-treated cells (12–15% positive (all weak) compared to 31% in control cells; Figure 4C). MCM3 labeling on the chromatin by IF did not show significant variation when compared to the control (Figure 4D), but the pattern of MCM IF (Dimitrova et al, 1999; Prasanth et al, 2004) clearly demonstrated that some cells had entered or were at different stages of S phase (see Supplementary Figure S6A). In addition, MCM-positive cells had duplicated centrosomes that had moved apart, again suggesting that the cells were in S and not only arrested in G1 (Supplementary Figure S6B). The S-phase pattern identification based on the BrdU profile following a 10 min BrdU pulse (O'Keefe et al, 1992) showed 26% cells incorporating BrdU in control cells, of which 60% were in early S, 25% in mid-S and 15% in late S (N=500). In contrast, in Orc2 siRNA-treated cells, only 14–15% of cells incorporated BrdU with low signal intensity and, of these, 75% were in early, 19% in mid-S and only 6% in late S (N=1500). The IF statistics corroborated the BrdU/PI flow cytometry profile, suggesting slow S-phase progression and defective late DNA replication. Disruption of HP1α and HP1β localization in Orc2-depleted cells Since Orc2 was found to bind to heterochromatin, the status of heterochromatin proteins in the attached, flat Orc2-depleted cells was examined. HP1α labeling after detergent pre-extraction in control HeLa cells showed pronounced heterochromatin foci (Figure 5Aa–a′), whereas cells treated with Orc2 siRNA showed a homogenous labeling of HP1α (>60% of the cells; Figure 5Ab–b′). Similar observations were made with HP1β (Figure 5Ba, b). However, the trimethyl lysine 9 modification on histone H3 was comparable in control versus the Orc2 siRNA-treated cells (Figure 5Ba′, b′). Similarly, HPIγ staining was normal in cells lacking Orc2 (Supplementary Figure S7A). HP1α, HP1β and trimethyl K9 at histone H3 levels were comparable in lysates from control and Orc2-depleted cells (Supplementary Figure S7B). Figure 5.Orc2 depletion disrupts heterochromatin organization. (A) Prominent HP1α labeling in heterochromatin foci (a) in luciferase siRNA control cells as compared to loss of these foci in Orc2 siRNA-treated cells (72 h post transfection) (b). DNA was stained with DAPI (a′, b′). (B) Luciferase siRNA-treated cells showing HP1β-positive foci (a) at the sites of trimethyl K9 foci of histone H3 (a′); in contrast, in the Orc2 siRNA-treated cells, note the loss of HP1β foci (b) but no significant loss of trimethyl K9 foci (b′). Chromatin was stained with DAPI (blue; a″, b″). Scale bar in (A) and (B) represents 5 μM. Download figure Download PowerPoint A population of Orc2-depleted cells arrest in an abnormal mitosis with chromosome segregation, condensation and spindle defects Depletion of Orc2 caused some cells to arrest with a mitotic-like rounded morphology (Figure 3B). α-Tubulin staining of the entire cell population showed that the round cells were in an abnormal prophase or prometaphase with very few cells in anaphase and telophase (Supplementary Figures S8A and S9). The mitotic index was ∼30±2.3% by 96 h as compared to the control constant value of 6.8±1.5% (Figure 6A). The marked increase in prophase+prometaphase cells and the significant reduction in the number of anaphases and telophases in Orc2 siRNA-treated cells suggested that cells did not complete mitosis. Phospho-H3 (serine 10) labeling was normal in these Orc2-depleted, mitotic cells (Supplementary Figure S8B). Figure 6.Orc2 depletion affects chromosome segregation and spindle organization. (A) Time course of mitotic index in control (luciferase siRNA treated, red) versus Orc2 siRNA-treated cells (blue) carried out by counting the α-tubulin-staining cells with mitotic asters. (B) IF with α-tubulin (green) and DAPI (red) was used to study the spindle structure and chromosome alignment in mitotically arrested cells depleted of Orc2 at 72 h post transfection. Chromosome congression failure with unaligned chromosomes (a–a″, b–b″, c–c″, d–d″, e–e″, f–f″), and spindle defects with asymmetric, bipolar (c–c″) and multipolar spindles (d–d″, e–e″, f–f″) were observed. More than 55% of mitotic cells showed lagging chromosomes, as compared to 11% in control. Merges are shown in (a″), (b″), (c″), (d″), (e″) and (f″). Scale bar, 5 μM. Download figure Download PowerPoint The chromosomes in Orc2-depleted cells were not organized by the formed spindles, suggesting a centromere or kinetochore defect (Figure 6Ba–a′′, b–b′′, c–c′′ and Table I). Gross abnormalities in spindle formation were found, with ∼50% of the mitotic cells forming multipolar asters (Figure 6Bd–d′′, e–e′′, f–f′′, Table I, and Supplementary Movie 1) and ∼20% possessing asymmetric, bipolar asters (Figure 6Bc–c′′ and Table I). At 72 h, mitotic cells with multipolar asters contained multiple centrosome-like structures (anti-γ-tubulin labeling; Table I and Supplementary Figure S10A). The centrosomes of HeLa cells arrested in the aberrant mitotic state failed to label with anti-Orc2 antibodies, suggesting that the Orc2 centrosome labeling was specific (Supplementary Figure S10B). Table 1. Tabulation of spindle defects and chromosome condensation and alignment defects following depletion of Orc2 from human cells Like Orc2, CENP-F (mitosin) localizes to both kinetochores and centrosomes (Yang et al, 2003). Thus the localization of CENP-F in siRNA-treated cells was examined. In the Orc2-depleted cells, but not in the control cells, centrosome localization of CENP-F was abolished, but the kinetochore-associated CENP-F increased compared to control siRNA-treated cells, suggesting abnormalities in mitotic regulation (Figure 7). Figure 7.Immunolocalization of CENP-F following Orc2 siRNA. CENP-F in control and Orc2 siRNA-treated cells was determined by IF. Control siRNA showed kinetochore and centrosome staining (a–a′). Cells lacking Orc2 showed increased CENP-F staining at unaligned kinetochores but lacked centrosome staining (b–b′, c–c′). DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 5 μM. Download figure Download PowerPoint The Orc2-depleted mitotic cells lacked HP1α at centric heterochromatin similar to that observed in Orc2-depleted flat cells (Supplementary Figure S11). The structure of the chromosomes in the aberrant mitotic cells was examined by preparing chromosome spreads. Orc2-depleted cells showed abnormally condensed chromosomes, with much thicker and wider sister chromatids as compared to the control (Figure 8Aa, b). These chromosomes were replicated as evidenced by the well-separated sister chromatids. In all, 80% of the metaphase spreads showed the thick, dumpy chromosomes and 10% showed pulverized and fragmented chromosomes. These chromosomes were shorter end-to-end than normal chromosomes. To assess the DNA replication pattern on these dumpy chromosomes, chromosomes were prepared from cells that had been labeled for 24 h with BrdU and the incorporation was analyzed by immunolabeling on the spread, mitotic chromosomes. In the chromosomes from control cells, complete arms of the sister chromatids were labeled, whereas the dumpy chromosomes from Orc2-depleted cells showed sparse incorporation at discrete foci (Figure 8B). This suggests that these chromosomes had completed late S phase during the labeling. Figure 8.Orc2 depletion causes chromosome condensation defects. (A) Metaphase plate preparation in control (a) and in Orc2-depleted (b) cells (72 h). Insets in (a) and (b) are higher magnification of the boxed portion of the image. Scale bar, 10 μM. (B) Cells were labeled with BrdU for 24 h (from 72 to 96 h) and mitotic chromosomes spread as in (A). Control metaphase chromosomes (a–a″) and Orc2-1-depleted cells (b–b″). Red, PI staining (a, b); green, BrdU labeling (a′, b′); merge (a″–b″). Scale bar, 5 μM. (C) Status of a non-SMC subunit of condensin I (h-CAP-G, red) in metaphase chromosomes of control (a) and Orc2 depleted (b). Insets in (a) and (b) are higher magnification of the boxed portion of the image. DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). Download figure Download PowerPoint The failure of chromosomes to condense correctly could be due to an absence of condensin (Ono et al, 2003). The status of condensin in the control and dumpy chromosomes was examined by labeling with an antibody against CAP-G, a non-SMC subunit of condensin I. Overall condensin levels were similar in both types of chromosomes; however, in control cells, condensin decorated the chromosomes as 'beads on a string' along the axis of the two sister chromatids (Figure 8Ca and Supplementary Movie 2), whereas the Orc2-depleted cells showed a spiral conformation of condensin (Figure 8Cb, Supplementary Movie 3 and Supplementary Figure S12). PCNA knockdown results in cells undergoing apoptosis To address whether the mitotic arrest following Orc2 knockdown was a consequence of a defect in DNA replication, depletion of a crucial DNA replication protein PCNA was studied (Supplementary Figure S13). The resulting phenotype was very different since depletion of PCNA caused immediate apoptosis (see Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Figures S13 and S14). Thus inhibition of ongoing DNA replication did not necessarily result in condensed chromosomes and aberrant mitosis. Discussion Orc2 localizes to multiple sites involved in chromosome duplication and segregation The Orc6 subunit associates with kinetochores only during mitosis (Prasanth et al, 2002), raising the possibility that other ORC subunits also localize to centromeres. In addition to the expected localization of Orc2 to small, punctate spots in the interphase nucleus in human cells, the protein also localized to multiple sites involved in chromosome structure and segregation. Orc2 colocalized with large HP1-containing heterochromatic foci in the early half of the cell division cycle but as S phase progressed and cells entered into M phase, Orc2 localization on chromosomes was restricted to centric heterochromatin. A recent report also described Orc2 association with mitotic centromeres in human and mouse cells (Craig et al, 2003). Unexpectedly, Orc2 was also found to be associated with centrosomes throughout the cell division cycle. Depletion of Orc2 from human cells using siRNA resulted in a DNA replication defect. ORC is required for initiation of DNA replication in yeast and vertebrate cells (Kelly and Brown, 2000; Kiely et al, 2000; Dhar et al, 2001b; Gillespie et al, 2001; Shimada et al, 2002; DePamphilis, 2003). Unexpectedly, however, depletion of Orc2 did not reduce MCM chromatin association. In rapidly proliferating cells, however, the pre-RC is formed during a short time window as cells exit mitosis (Carpenter et al, 1996; Romanowski et al, 1996; Dutta and Bell, 1997; Kelly and Brown, 2000; Méndez and Stillman, 2000; Dimitrova et al,

Referência(s)