Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Guidelines for procedural pain in the newborn

2009; Wiley; Volume: 98; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01291.x

1651-2227

Paola Lago, Elisabetta Garetti, Daniele Merazzi, Luisa Pieragostini, Gina Ancora, Anna Pirelli, Carlo V. Bellieni,

Neonatal Respiratory Health Research

Despite accumulating evidence that procedural pain experienced by newborn infants may have acute and even long-term detrimental effects on their subsequent behaviour and neurological outcome, pain control and prevention remain controversial issues. Our aim was to develop guidelines based on evidence and clinical practice for preventing and controlling neonatal procedural pain in the light of the evidence-based recommendations contained in the SIGN classification. A panel of expert neonatologists used systematic review, data synthesis and open discussion to reach a consensus on the level of evidence supported by the literature or customs in clinical practice and to describe a global analgesic management, considering pharmacological, non-pharmacological, behavioural and environmental measures for each invasive procedure. There is strong evidence to support some analgesic measures, e.g. sucrose or breast milk for minor invasive procedures, and combinations of drugs for tracheal intubation. Many other pain control measures used during chest tube placement and removal, screening and treatment for ROP, or for postoperative pain, are still based not on evidence, but on good practice or expert opinions.