Artigo Revisado por pares

PE/PE‐ g ‐MAH/Org‐MMT nanocomposites. II. Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics

2004; Wiley; Volume: 91; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/app.13575

ISSN

1097-4628

Autores

Guodong Liang, Junting Xu, Weibing Xu,

Tópico(s)

Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

Resumo

Abstract The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) and polyethylene (PE)/PE‐grafted maleic anhydride (PE‐ g ‐MAH)/organic‐montmorillonite (Org‐MMT) nanocomposite were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at various cooling rates. Avrami analysis modified by Jeziorny, Ozawa analysis, and a method developed by Liu well described the nonisothermal crystallization process of these samples. The difference in the exponent n , m , and a between HDPE and the nanocomposite indicated that nucleation mechanism and dimension of spherulite growth of the nanocomposite were different from that of HDPE to some extent. The values of half‐time ( t 1/2 ), K ( T ), and F ( T ) showed that the crystallization rate increased with the increase of cooling rates for HDPE and composite, but the crystallization rate of composite was faster than that of HDPE at a given cooling rate. Moreover, the method proposed by Kissinger was used to evaluate the activation energy of the mentioned samples. It was 223.7 kJ/mol for composite, which was much smaller than that for HDPE (304.6 kJ/mol). Overall, the results indicated that the addition of Org‐MMT and PE‐ g ‐MAH could accelerate the overall nonisothermal crystallization process of PE. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3054–3059, 2004

Referência(s)