Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Comparison of Trimethoprim‐Sulfamethoxazole, Dapsone, and Pentamidine in the Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia

1996; Wiley; Volume: 16; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/j.1875-9114.1996.tb03029.x

1875-9114

Allison C. Warnock, David Rimland,

Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology

To compare the incidence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving one of three prophylactic agents.Retrospective chart review.A university-affiliated Department of Veterans' Affairs medical center HIV clinic.All 200 HIV-infected patients enrolled in the clinic who were prescribed a PCP prophylactic drug during 18 months.Patients were administered oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) DS, oral dapsone, or aerosolized pentamidine in a heirarchic fashion. A subset of 110 patients received only one of the prophylaxis regimens for at least 6 months; they were examined separately for the purpose of statistical analysis.One case of PCP was diagnosed in 1110 patient-months of oral TMP-SMX DS therapy, 6 in 418 patient-months of oral dapsone therapy, and 3 in 164 patient-months of aerosolized pentamidine therapy. In the subset population, the documented incidence of PCP was 0% among 71 TMP-SMX DS-treated patients, 16% among 25 dapsone-treated patients (p < 0.004), and 14% among 14 aerosolized pentamidine-treated patients (p < 0.03). For patients receiving primary prophylaxis, the incidence of PCP was 0% for 58 receiving TMP-SMX, 15% for 20 receiving dapsone (p = 0.015), and 17% for 6 receiving pentamidine (p = 0.094).We believe TMP-SMX DS was more effective than oral dapsone or aerosolized pentamidine in preventing PCP in these HIV-infected patients.